Influence of number of flowers and number of previous and simultaneous foragers on bumblebees’ local foraging decisions
The number of both flowers and co-foragers may affect bumblebees’ local foraging decisions and the effort they devote to each flower during foraging. We studied bumblebees’ local foraging decisions by using an experimental set-up in which bumblebees ( Bombus terrestris ) foraged for a single species...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Acta ethologica 2015-02, Vol.18 (1), p.37-46 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 46 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 37 |
container_title | Acta ethologica |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Lázaro, Amparo Piazzon, Martín |
description | The number of both flowers and co-foragers may affect bumblebees’ local foraging decisions and the effort they devote to each flower during foraging. We studied bumblebees’ local foraging decisions by using an experimental set-up in which bumblebees (
Bombus terrestris
) foraged for a single species (
Salvia farinacea
) in patches containing
S. farinacea
and
Tagetes bonanza
in varying densities (25, 50 and 75 %
Salvia
). We did not restrict the number of co-foragers, which allowed us also to assess the influence of simultaneous and previous foragers on foraging decisions. Bumblebees could adjust the effort per inflorescence and flower to the number of available inflorescences and flowers in the patch. They increased between-patch and between-plant movements as the number of previous foragers increased, and this effect was stronger in the patches with more
Salvia
, probably due to the synergic effects of number of flowers and number of previous foragers. Simultaneous foragers, on the contrary, favoured within-plant movements. The probability of leaving a patch was positively related to inflorescence exploitation time and to the number of previous foragers. The movements between patches followed
Salvia
abundance and were modified by the experience gained in the observation period. This experiment shed light on the influence of foragers’ abundances on local foraging behaviour, and the interactions and synergies between flower abundance and foragers’ abundances at a local scale, which are still much unknown. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10211-014-0180-x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1660428774</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1660428774</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-544229ea78497d86636870fa0e9f760d50f665c6bf892daf442dff2f34e265bd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctKxDAUhoMoOF4ewF3BjZtq0ua6lMHLgOBG1yFtT6SSScZkqjM7X8PX80lMqYtBcBFO-M_3Hw7nR-iM4EuCsbhKBFeElJjQ_CQuN3toRmgtSsUo30czLEVdKkHVITpK6RVjwiShM7RdeOsG8C0UwRZ-WDYQx5914QNiKozvdtRVhPc-DJOc-uXg1sbDKNgQzctoCL5oMu-gAUjfn1-FC61xU7_3L0UHbZ_64NMJOrDGJTj9rcfo-fbmaX5fPjzeLebXD2VbU7UuGaVVpcAISZXoJOc1lwJbg0FZwXHHsOWctbyxUlWdsRnvrK1sTaHirOnqY3QxzV3F8DZAWutln1pwbtpcE84xraQQNKPnf9DXMESft8sUo0xiJVmmyES1MaQUwepV7JcmbjXBegxDT2HoHIYew9Cb7KkmT8qsz4famfyv6QfiAI9P</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1654580985</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of number of flowers and number of previous and simultaneous foragers on bumblebees’ local foraging decisions</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Lázaro, Amparo ; Piazzon, Martín</creator><creatorcontrib>Lázaro, Amparo ; Piazzon, Martín</creatorcontrib><description>The number of both flowers and co-foragers may affect bumblebees’ local foraging decisions and the effort they devote to each flower during foraging. We studied bumblebees’ local foraging decisions by using an experimental set-up in which bumblebees (
Bombus terrestris
) foraged for a single species (
Salvia farinacea
) in patches containing
S. farinacea
and
Tagetes bonanza
in varying densities (25, 50 and 75 %
Salvia
). We did not restrict the number of co-foragers, which allowed us also to assess the influence of simultaneous and previous foragers on foraging decisions. Bumblebees could adjust the effort per inflorescence and flower to the number of available inflorescences and flowers in the patch. They increased between-patch and between-plant movements as the number of previous foragers increased, and this effect was stronger in the patches with more
Salvia
, probably due to the synergic effects of number of flowers and number of previous foragers. Simultaneous foragers, on the contrary, favoured within-plant movements. The probability of leaving a patch was positively related to inflorescence exploitation time and to the number of previous foragers. The movements between patches followed
Salvia
abundance and were modified by the experience gained in the observation period. This experiment shed light on the influence of foragers’ abundances on local foraging behaviour, and the interactions and synergies between flower abundance and foragers’ abundances at a local scale, which are still much unknown.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0873-9749</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1437-9546</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10211-014-0180-x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Animal populations ; Bees ; Behavioral Sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Bombus terrestris ; Evolutionary Biology ; Flowers ; Flowers & plants ; Forage ; Foraging behavior ; Life Sciences ; Original Paper ; Population density ; Salvia ; Salvia farinacea ; Tagetes ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Acta ethologica, 2015-02, Vol.18 (1), p.37-46</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg and ISPA 2014</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg and ISPA 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-544229ea78497d86636870fa0e9f760d50f665c6bf892daf442dff2f34e265bd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-544229ea78497d86636870fa0e9f760d50f665c6bf892daf442dff2f34e265bd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10211-014-0180-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10211-014-0180-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lázaro, Amparo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piazzon, Martín</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of number of flowers and number of previous and simultaneous foragers on bumblebees’ local foraging decisions</title><title>Acta ethologica</title><addtitle>acta ethol</addtitle><description>The number of both flowers and co-foragers may affect bumblebees’ local foraging decisions and the effort they devote to each flower during foraging. We studied bumblebees’ local foraging decisions by using an experimental set-up in which bumblebees (
Bombus terrestris
) foraged for a single species (
Salvia farinacea
) in patches containing
S. farinacea
and
Tagetes bonanza
in varying densities (25, 50 and 75 %
Salvia
). We did not restrict the number of co-foragers, which allowed us also to assess the influence of simultaneous and previous foragers on foraging decisions. Bumblebees could adjust the effort per inflorescence and flower to the number of available inflorescences and flowers in the patch. They increased between-patch and between-plant movements as the number of previous foragers increased, and this effect was stronger in the patches with more
Salvia
, probably due to the synergic effects of number of flowers and number of previous foragers. Simultaneous foragers, on the contrary, favoured within-plant movements. The probability of leaving a patch was positively related to inflorescence exploitation time and to the number of previous foragers. The movements between patches followed
Salvia
abundance and were modified by the experience gained in the observation period. This experiment shed light on the influence of foragers’ abundances on local foraging behaviour, and the interactions and synergies between flower abundance and foragers’ abundances at a local scale, which are still much unknown.</description><subject>Animal populations</subject><subject>Bees</subject><subject>Behavioral Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Bombus terrestris</subject><subject>Evolutionary Biology</subject><subject>Flowers</subject><subject>Flowers & plants</subject><subject>Forage</subject><subject>Foraging behavior</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Population density</subject><subject>Salvia</subject><subject>Salvia farinacea</subject><subject>Tagetes</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0873-9749</issn><issn>1437-9546</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kctKxDAUhoMoOF4ewF3BjZtq0ua6lMHLgOBG1yFtT6SSScZkqjM7X8PX80lMqYtBcBFO-M_3Hw7nR-iM4EuCsbhKBFeElJjQ_CQuN3toRmgtSsUo30czLEVdKkHVITpK6RVjwiShM7RdeOsG8C0UwRZ-WDYQx5914QNiKozvdtRVhPc-DJOc-uXg1sbDKNgQzctoCL5oMu-gAUjfn1-FC61xU7_3L0UHbZ_64NMJOrDGJTj9rcfo-fbmaX5fPjzeLebXD2VbU7UuGaVVpcAISZXoJOc1lwJbg0FZwXHHsOWctbyxUlWdsRnvrK1sTaHirOnqY3QxzV3F8DZAWutln1pwbtpcE84xraQQNKPnf9DXMESft8sUo0xiJVmmyES1MaQUwepV7JcmbjXBegxDT2HoHIYew9Cb7KkmT8qsz4famfyv6QfiAI9P</recordid><startdate>20150201</startdate><enddate>20150201</enddate><creator>Lázaro, Amparo</creator><creator>Piazzon, Martín</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150201</creationdate><title>Influence of number of flowers and number of previous and simultaneous foragers on bumblebees’ local foraging decisions</title><author>Lázaro, Amparo ; Piazzon, Martín</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-544229ea78497d86636870fa0e9f760d50f665c6bf892daf442dff2f34e265bd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Animal populations</topic><topic>Bees</topic><topic>Behavioral Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Bombus terrestris</topic><topic>Evolutionary Biology</topic><topic>Flowers</topic><topic>Flowers & plants</topic><topic>Forage</topic><topic>Foraging behavior</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Population density</topic><topic>Salvia</topic><topic>Salvia farinacea</topic><topic>Tagetes</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lázaro, Amparo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piazzon, Martín</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Acta ethologica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lázaro, Amparo</au><au>Piazzon, Martín</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of number of flowers and number of previous and simultaneous foragers on bumblebees’ local foraging decisions</atitle><jtitle>Acta ethologica</jtitle><stitle>acta ethol</stitle><date>2015-02-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>37</spage><epage>46</epage><pages>37-46</pages><issn>0873-9749</issn><eissn>1437-9546</eissn><abstract>The number of both flowers and co-foragers may affect bumblebees’ local foraging decisions and the effort they devote to each flower during foraging. We studied bumblebees’ local foraging decisions by using an experimental set-up in which bumblebees (
Bombus terrestris
) foraged for a single species (
Salvia farinacea
) in patches containing
S. farinacea
and
Tagetes bonanza
in varying densities (25, 50 and 75 %
Salvia
). We did not restrict the number of co-foragers, which allowed us also to assess the influence of simultaneous and previous foragers on foraging decisions. Bumblebees could adjust the effort per inflorescence and flower to the number of available inflorescences and flowers in the patch. They increased between-patch and between-plant movements as the number of previous foragers increased, and this effect was stronger in the patches with more
Salvia
, probably due to the synergic effects of number of flowers and number of previous foragers. Simultaneous foragers, on the contrary, favoured within-plant movements. The probability of leaving a patch was positively related to inflorescence exploitation time and to the number of previous foragers. The movements between patches followed
Salvia
abundance and were modified by the experience gained in the observation period. This experiment shed light on the influence of foragers’ abundances on local foraging behaviour, and the interactions and synergies between flower abundance and foragers’ abundances at a local scale, which are still much unknown.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s10211-014-0180-x</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0873-9749 |
ispartof | Acta ethologica, 2015-02, Vol.18 (1), p.37-46 |
issn | 0873-9749 1437-9546 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1660428774 |
source | SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Animal populations Bees Behavioral Sciences Biomedical and Life Sciences Bombus terrestris Evolutionary Biology Flowers Flowers & plants Forage Foraging behavior Life Sciences Original Paper Population density Salvia Salvia farinacea Tagetes Zoology |
title | Influence of number of flowers and number of previous and simultaneous foragers on bumblebees’ local foraging decisions |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T05%3A00%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20number%20of%20flowers%20and%20number%20of%20previous%20and%20simultaneous%20foragers%20on%20bumblebees%E2%80%99%20local%20foraging%20decisions&rft.jtitle=Acta%20ethologica&rft.au=L%C3%A1zaro,%20Amparo&rft.date=2015-02-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=37&rft.epage=46&rft.pages=37-46&rft.issn=0873-9749&rft.eissn=1437-9546&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10211-014-0180-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1660428774%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1654580985&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |