Bovine cysticercosis in slaughtered cattle as an indicator of Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) and epidemiological risk factors

This study focused on estimating the economic losses resulting from cysticercosis at beef cattle farms that supply an export slaughterhouse located in the state of São Paulo, Brazil, and to identify the epidemiological risks factors involved in the disease to ascertain if these farms adopt Good Agri...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Preventive veterinary medicine 2015-03, Vol.118 (4), p.504-508
Hauptverfasser: Rossi, Gabriel Augusto Marques, Hoppe, Estevam Guilherme Lux, Mathias, Luis Antonio, Martins, Ana Maria Centola Vidal, Mussi, Leila Aparecida, Prata, Luiz Francisco
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 508
container_issue 4
container_start_page 504
container_title Preventive veterinary medicine
container_volume 118
creator Rossi, Gabriel Augusto Marques
Hoppe, Estevam Guilherme Lux
Mathias, Luis Antonio
Martins, Ana Maria Centola Vidal
Mussi, Leila Aparecida
Prata, Luiz Francisco
description This study focused on estimating the economic losses resulting from cysticercosis at beef cattle farms that supply an export slaughterhouse located in the state of São Paulo, Brazil, and to identify the epidemiological risks factors involved in the disease to ascertain if these farms adopt Good Agricultural Practices (GAP). To this, we used data recorded in 2012 by Brazil's Federal Inspection Service (SIF) on the daily occurrence of the disease, according to the farm from which the animals originated. In addition, the associated risk factors were determined based on a case–control study at 48 farms. Cysticercosis was detected in 2.26% (95% CI 2.2–2.33) of the 190,903 bovines supplied by 556 farms in the following four states: 2.92% (95% CI 2.83–3.03) in São Paulo, 1.81% (95% CI 1.71–1.93) in Minas Gerais, 0.71% (95% CI 0.6–0.82) in Goiás and 1.11% (95% CI 0.79–1.57) in Mato Grosso do Sul, with significant differences in the epidemiological indices of these states. Cysticercosis was detected at 58.45% (95% CI 54.36–62.55) of the farms of this study, representing estimated economic losses of US$312,194.52 for the farmers. Lower prevalence of this disease were found at the farms qualified for exports to the European Union, indicating a statistically significant difference from those not qualified to export to Europe. The access of cattle to non-controlled water sources, as well as sport fishing activities near the farms, was identified as risk factors. Cysticercosis causes considerable losses in Brazil's beef supply chain, with lower prevalence appearing only at farms qualified to export to the European Union. As for the access of cattle to non-controlled water sources, this is an indication that GAP are not implemented by some farms, demonstrating the violation of international agreements by the industry and the farms.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2015.01.004
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1660417562</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0167587715000057</els_id><sourcerecordid>1660417562</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-571383d7c7099f137213fbf6cd487ce5fba86058c95fb904f5239406f88bfe953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1vEzEQhi0EoqHwF8DHctjFXq8_9hgqCEiV6AHOlmOPg4OzDrY3Um_8dByl5cpprJnnnZEfhN5R0lNCxYd9f8xwgnoA1w-E8p7QnpDxGVpRJVlHJRXP0aqRsuNKyiv0qpQ9IUQIxV-iq4ELRkfCVujPx3QKM2D7UGqwkG0qoeAw4xLNsvtZIYPD1tQaAZuCzdxmLrRGyjh5vEnJ4fUuB7vEumQT8X029ryp4JvN-v59SzgMx-DgEFJMuxaNOIfyC_vGpVxeoxfexAJvHus1-vH50_fbL93dt83X2_VdZ8eR1o5LyhRz0koyTZ4yOVDmt15YNyppgfutUYJwZaf2nMjo-cCmkQiv1NbDxNk1urnsPeb0e4FS9SEUCzGaGdJSNBWCjFRyMTRUXlCbUykZvD7mcDD5QVOiz_r1Xv_Tr8_6NaG66W_Jt49Hlu159pR78t2A9QWA9tVTgKyLDTBbcCGDrdql8N8jfwENqpwo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1660417562</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bovine cysticercosis in slaughtered cattle as an indicator of Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) and epidemiological risk factors</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Rossi, Gabriel Augusto Marques ; Hoppe, Estevam Guilherme Lux ; Mathias, Luis Antonio ; Martins, Ana Maria Centola Vidal ; Mussi, Leila Aparecida ; Prata, Luiz Francisco</creator><creatorcontrib>Rossi, Gabriel Augusto Marques ; Hoppe, Estevam Guilherme Lux ; Mathias, Luis Antonio ; Martins, Ana Maria Centola Vidal ; Mussi, Leila Aparecida ; Prata, Luiz Francisco</creatorcontrib><description>This study focused on estimating the economic losses resulting from cysticercosis at beef cattle farms that supply an export slaughterhouse located in the state of São Paulo, Brazil, and to identify the epidemiological risks factors involved in the disease to ascertain if these farms adopt Good Agricultural Practices (GAP). To this, we used data recorded in 2012 by Brazil's Federal Inspection Service (SIF) on the daily occurrence of the disease, according to the farm from which the animals originated. In addition, the associated risk factors were determined based on a case–control study at 48 farms. Cysticercosis was detected in 2.26% (95% CI 2.2–2.33) of the 190,903 bovines supplied by 556 farms in the following four states: 2.92% (95% CI 2.83–3.03) in São Paulo, 1.81% (95% CI 1.71–1.93) in Minas Gerais, 0.71% (95% CI 0.6–0.82) in Goiás and 1.11% (95% CI 0.79–1.57) in Mato Grosso do Sul, with significant differences in the epidemiological indices of these states. Cysticercosis was detected at 58.45% (95% CI 54.36–62.55) of the farms of this study, representing estimated economic losses of US$312,194.52 for the farmers. Lower prevalence of this disease were found at the farms qualified for exports to the European Union, indicating a statistically significant difference from those not qualified to export to Europe. The access of cattle to non-controlled water sources, as well as sport fishing activities near the farms, was identified as risk factors. Cysticercosis causes considerable losses in Brazil's beef supply chain, with lower prevalence appearing only at farms qualified to export to the European Union. As for the access of cattle to non-controlled water sources, this is an indication that GAP are not implemented by some farms, demonstrating the violation of international agreements by the industry and the farms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-5877</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-1716</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2015.01.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25631403</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Abattoirs ; Animal Husbandry - economics ; Animal Husbandry - methods ; Animal Husbandry - standards ; Animals ; Beef sanitary inspection ; Brazil - epidemiology ; Case-Control Studies ; Cattle ; Cattle Diseases - economics ; Cattle Diseases - epidemiology ; Cattle Diseases - parasitology ; Commerce ; Cysticercosis - economics ; Cysticercosis - epidemiology ; Cysticercosis - veterinary ; Epidemiology ; Food Microbiology ; Logistic Models ; Meat ; Risk Factors ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Taenia saginata ; Zoonosis</subject><ispartof>Preventive veterinary medicine, 2015-03, Vol.118 (4), p.504-508</ispartof><rights>2015 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-571383d7c7099f137213fbf6cd487ce5fba86058c95fb904f5239406f88bfe953</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-571383d7c7099f137213fbf6cd487ce5fba86058c95fb904f5239406f88bfe953</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3958-7227</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2015.01.004$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25631403$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rossi, Gabriel Augusto Marques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoppe, Estevam Guilherme Lux</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mathias, Luis Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martins, Ana Maria Centola Vidal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mussi, Leila Aparecida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prata, Luiz Francisco</creatorcontrib><title>Bovine cysticercosis in slaughtered cattle as an indicator of Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) and epidemiological risk factors</title><title>Preventive veterinary medicine</title><addtitle>Prev Vet Med</addtitle><description>This study focused on estimating the economic losses resulting from cysticercosis at beef cattle farms that supply an export slaughterhouse located in the state of São Paulo, Brazil, and to identify the epidemiological risks factors involved in the disease to ascertain if these farms adopt Good Agricultural Practices (GAP). To this, we used data recorded in 2012 by Brazil's Federal Inspection Service (SIF) on the daily occurrence of the disease, according to the farm from which the animals originated. In addition, the associated risk factors were determined based on a case–control study at 48 farms. Cysticercosis was detected in 2.26% (95% CI 2.2–2.33) of the 190,903 bovines supplied by 556 farms in the following four states: 2.92% (95% CI 2.83–3.03) in São Paulo, 1.81% (95% CI 1.71–1.93) in Minas Gerais, 0.71% (95% CI 0.6–0.82) in Goiás and 1.11% (95% CI 0.79–1.57) in Mato Grosso do Sul, with significant differences in the epidemiological indices of these states. Cysticercosis was detected at 58.45% (95% CI 54.36–62.55) of the farms of this study, representing estimated economic losses of US$312,194.52 for the farmers. Lower prevalence of this disease were found at the farms qualified for exports to the European Union, indicating a statistically significant difference from those not qualified to export to Europe. The access of cattle to non-controlled water sources, as well as sport fishing activities near the farms, was identified as risk factors. Cysticercosis causes considerable losses in Brazil's beef supply chain, with lower prevalence appearing only at farms qualified to export to the European Union. As for the access of cattle to non-controlled water sources, this is an indication that GAP are not implemented by some farms, demonstrating the violation of international agreements by the industry and the farms.</description><subject>Abattoirs</subject><subject>Animal Husbandry - economics</subject><subject>Animal Husbandry - methods</subject><subject>Animal Husbandry - standards</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Beef sanitary inspection</subject><subject>Brazil - epidemiology</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Cattle Diseases - economics</subject><subject>Cattle Diseases - epidemiology</subject><subject>Cattle Diseases - parasitology</subject><subject>Commerce</subject><subject>Cysticercosis - economics</subject><subject>Cysticercosis - epidemiology</subject><subject>Cysticercosis - veterinary</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Food Microbiology</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Meat</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Taenia saginata</subject><subject>Zoonosis</subject><issn>0167-5877</issn><issn>1873-1716</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1vEzEQhi0EoqHwF8DHctjFXq8_9hgqCEiV6AHOlmOPg4OzDrY3Um_8dByl5cpprJnnnZEfhN5R0lNCxYd9f8xwgnoA1w-E8p7QnpDxGVpRJVlHJRXP0aqRsuNKyiv0qpQ9IUQIxV-iq4ELRkfCVujPx3QKM2D7UGqwkG0qoeAw4xLNsvtZIYPD1tQaAZuCzdxmLrRGyjh5vEnJ4fUuB7vEumQT8X029ryp4JvN-v59SzgMx-DgEFJMuxaNOIfyC_vGpVxeoxfexAJvHus1-vH50_fbL93dt83X2_VdZ8eR1o5LyhRz0koyTZ4yOVDmt15YNyppgfutUYJwZaf2nMjo-cCmkQiv1NbDxNk1urnsPeb0e4FS9SEUCzGaGdJSNBWCjFRyMTRUXlCbUykZvD7mcDD5QVOiz_r1Xv_Tr8_6NaG66W_Jt49Hlu159pR78t2A9QWA9tVTgKyLDTBbcCGDrdql8N8jfwENqpwo</recordid><startdate>20150301</startdate><enddate>20150301</enddate><creator>Rossi, Gabriel Augusto Marques</creator><creator>Hoppe, Estevam Guilherme Lux</creator><creator>Mathias, Luis Antonio</creator><creator>Martins, Ana Maria Centola Vidal</creator><creator>Mussi, Leila Aparecida</creator><creator>Prata, Luiz Francisco</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3958-7227</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20150301</creationdate><title>Bovine cysticercosis in slaughtered cattle as an indicator of Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) and epidemiological risk factors</title><author>Rossi, Gabriel Augusto Marques ; Hoppe, Estevam Guilherme Lux ; Mathias, Luis Antonio ; Martins, Ana Maria Centola Vidal ; Mussi, Leila Aparecida ; Prata, Luiz Francisco</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-571383d7c7099f137213fbf6cd487ce5fba86058c95fb904f5239406f88bfe953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Abattoirs</topic><topic>Animal Husbandry - economics</topic><topic>Animal Husbandry - methods</topic><topic>Animal Husbandry - standards</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Beef sanitary inspection</topic><topic>Brazil - epidemiology</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Cattle Diseases - economics</topic><topic>Cattle Diseases - epidemiology</topic><topic>Cattle Diseases - parasitology</topic><topic>Commerce</topic><topic>Cysticercosis - economics</topic><topic>Cysticercosis - epidemiology</topic><topic>Cysticercosis - veterinary</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Food Microbiology</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Meat</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Taenia saginata</topic><topic>Zoonosis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rossi, Gabriel Augusto Marques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoppe, Estevam Guilherme Lux</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mathias, Luis Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martins, Ana Maria Centola Vidal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mussi, Leila Aparecida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prata, Luiz Francisco</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Preventive veterinary medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rossi, Gabriel Augusto Marques</au><au>Hoppe, Estevam Guilherme Lux</au><au>Mathias, Luis Antonio</au><au>Martins, Ana Maria Centola Vidal</au><au>Mussi, Leila Aparecida</au><au>Prata, Luiz Francisco</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bovine cysticercosis in slaughtered cattle as an indicator of Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) and epidemiological risk factors</atitle><jtitle>Preventive veterinary medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Prev Vet Med</addtitle><date>2015-03-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>118</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>504</spage><epage>508</epage><pages>504-508</pages><issn>0167-5877</issn><eissn>1873-1716</eissn><abstract>This study focused on estimating the economic losses resulting from cysticercosis at beef cattle farms that supply an export slaughterhouse located in the state of São Paulo, Brazil, and to identify the epidemiological risks factors involved in the disease to ascertain if these farms adopt Good Agricultural Practices (GAP). To this, we used data recorded in 2012 by Brazil's Federal Inspection Service (SIF) on the daily occurrence of the disease, according to the farm from which the animals originated. In addition, the associated risk factors were determined based on a case–control study at 48 farms. Cysticercosis was detected in 2.26% (95% CI 2.2–2.33) of the 190,903 bovines supplied by 556 farms in the following four states: 2.92% (95% CI 2.83–3.03) in São Paulo, 1.81% (95% CI 1.71–1.93) in Minas Gerais, 0.71% (95% CI 0.6–0.82) in Goiás and 1.11% (95% CI 0.79–1.57) in Mato Grosso do Sul, with significant differences in the epidemiological indices of these states. Cysticercosis was detected at 58.45% (95% CI 54.36–62.55) of the farms of this study, representing estimated economic losses of US$312,194.52 for the farmers. Lower prevalence of this disease were found at the farms qualified for exports to the European Union, indicating a statistically significant difference from those not qualified to export to Europe. The access of cattle to non-controlled water sources, as well as sport fishing activities near the farms, was identified as risk factors. Cysticercosis causes considerable losses in Brazil's beef supply chain, with lower prevalence appearing only at farms qualified to export to the European Union. As for the access of cattle to non-controlled water sources, this is an indication that GAP are not implemented by some farms, demonstrating the violation of international agreements by the industry and the farms.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>25631403</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.prevetmed.2015.01.004</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3958-7227</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-5877
ispartof Preventive veterinary medicine, 2015-03, Vol.118 (4), p.504-508
issn 0167-5877
1873-1716
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1660417562
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Abattoirs
Animal Husbandry - economics
Animal Husbandry - methods
Animal Husbandry - standards
Animals
Beef sanitary inspection
Brazil - epidemiology
Case-Control Studies
Cattle
Cattle Diseases - economics
Cattle Diseases - epidemiology
Cattle Diseases - parasitology
Commerce
Cysticercosis - economics
Cysticercosis - epidemiology
Cysticercosis - veterinary
Epidemiology
Food Microbiology
Logistic Models
Meat
Risk Factors
Surveys and Questionnaires
Taenia saginata
Zoonosis
title Bovine cysticercosis in slaughtered cattle as an indicator of Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) and epidemiological risk factors
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T15%3A09%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bovine%20cysticercosis%20in%20slaughtered%20cattle%20as%20an%20indicator%20of%20Good%20Agricultural%20Practices%20(GAP)%20and%20epidemiological%20risk%20factors&rft.jtitle=Preventive%20veterinary%20medicine&rft.au=Rossi,%20Gabriel%20Augusto%20Marques&rft.date=2015-03-01&rft.volume=118&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=504&rft.epage=508&rft.pages=504-508&rft.issn=0167-5877&rft.eissn=1873-1716&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2015.01.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1660417562%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1660417562&rft_id=info:pmid/25631403&rft_els_id=S0167587715000057&rfr_iscdi=true