Applicability of estimating glomerular filtration rate equations in pediatric patients: comparison with a measured glomerular filtration rate by iohexol clearance

Estimating glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) has become popular in clinical medicine as an alternative to measured GFR (mGFR), but there are few studies comparing them in clinical practice. We determined mGFR by iohexol clearance in 81 consecutive children in routine practice and calculated eGFR fro...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine 2015-03, Vol.165 (3), p.437-445
Hauptverfasser: Deng, Fang, Finer, Gal, Haymond, Shannon, Brooks, Ellen, Langman, Craig B
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 445
container_issue 3
container_start_page 437
container_title Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine
container_volume 165
creator Deng, Fang
Finer, Gal
Haymond, Shannon
Brooks, Ellen
Langman, Craig B
description Estimating glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) has become popular in clinical medicine as an alternative to measured GFR (mGFR), but there are few studies comparing them in clinical practice. We determined mGFR by iohexol clearance in 81 consecutive children in routine practice and calculated eGFR from 14 standard equations using serum creatinine, cystatin C, and urea nitrogen that were collected at the time of the mGFR procedure. Nonparametric Wilcoxon test, Spearman correlation, Bland-Altman analysis, bias (median difference), and accuracy (P15 , P30 ) were used to compare mGFR with eGFR. For the entire study group, the mGFR was 77.9 ± 38.8 mL/min/1.73 m2 . Eight of the 14 estimating equations demonstrated values without a significant difference from the mGFR value and demonstrated a lower bias in Bland-Altman analysis. Three of these 8 equations based on a combination of creatinine and cystatin C (Schwartz et al. New equations to estimate GFR in children with CKD. J Am Soc Nephrol 2009;20:629–37; Schwartz et al. Improved equations estimating GFR in children with chronic kidney disease using an immunonephelometric determination of cystatin C. Kidney Int 2012;82:445–53; Chehade et al. New combined serum creatinine and cystatin C quadratic formula for GFR assessment in children. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2014;9:54–63) had the highest accuracy with approximately 60% of P15 and 80% of P30 . In 10 patients with a single kidney, 7 with kidney transplant, and 11 additional children with short stature, values of the 3 equations had low bias and no significant difference when compared with mGFR. In conclusion, the 3 equations that used cystatin C, creatinine, and growth parameters performed in a superior manner over univariate equations based on either creatinine or cystatin C and also had good applicability in specific pediatric patients with single kidneys, those with a kidney transplant, and short stature. Thus, we suggest that eGFR calculations in pediatric clinical practice use only a multivariate equation.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.trsl.2014.10.004
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1660417499</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1931524414003478</els_id><sourcerecordid>1660417499</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-c435e73dd64e51183aaccdacbf0973df67f857e3dafb0968a4c5a7343ff46e9d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uk1vFSEUnRgbW6t_wIVh6eY9YYD5MMakafxKmrhQ14SBS8uTGabAVN_f6S_1jq920UU3XDg55yScc6vqFaNbRlnzdrctKYdtTZlAYEupeFKdsK7tNqxj9Cnee842shbiuHqe8w4JTU_Fs-q4lkLImnYn1e3ZPAdv9OCDL3sSHYFc_KiLny7JZYgjpCXoRJwPJSEaJ4IDCFwv_16Z-InMYL0uyRsyIwhTye-IieOsk88o-O3LFdFkBJ2XBPYx22FPfLyCPzEQE0AnPRl4UR05HTK8vJun1c9PH3-cf9lcfPv89fzsYmOElAVPLqHl1jYCJGMd19oYq83gaI-wa1rXyRa41W6gfdNpYaRuueDOiQZ6y0-rNwffOcXrBWNQo88GQtATxCUr1jRUsFb0PVLrA9WkmHMCp-aEoaW9YlSt3aidWrtRazcrhtGj6PWd_zKMYO8l_8tAwvsDAfCXNx6SygbTNJhuAlOUjf5x_w8P5Cb4CbsNv2APeReXNGF-iqlcK6q-r9uxLgcTlHLRdvwvQ1e7Cw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1660417499</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Applicability of estimating glomerular filtration rate equations in pediatric patients: comparison with a measured glomerular filtration rate by iohexol clearance</title><source>ScienceDirect</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Deng, Fang ; Finer, Gal ; Haymond, Shannon ; Brooks, Ellen ; Langman, Craig B</creator><creatorcontrib>Deng, Fang ; Finer, Gal ; Haymond, Shannon ; Brooks, Ellen ; Langman, Craig B</creatorcontrib><description>Estimating glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) has become popular in clinical medicine as an alternative to measured GFR (mGFR), but there are few studies comparing them in clinical practice. We determined mGFR by iohexol clearance in 81 consecutive children in routine practice and calculated eGFR from 14 standard equations using serum creatinine, cystatin C, and urea nitrogen that were collected at the time of the mGFR procedure. Nonparametric Wilcoxon test, Spearman correlation, Bland-Altman analysis, bias (median difference), and accuracy (P15 , P30 ) were used to compare mGFR with eGFR. For the entire study group, the mGFR was 77.9 ± 38.8 mL/min/1.73 m2 . Eight of the 14 estimating equations demonstrated values without a significant difference from the mGFR value and demonstrated a lower bias in Bland-Altman analysis. Three of these 8 equations based on a combination of creatinine and cystatin C (Schwartz et al. New equations to estimate GFR in children with CKD. J Am Soc Nephrol 2009;20:629–37; Schwartz et al. Improved equations estimating GFR in children with chronic kidney disease using an immunonephelometric determination of cystatin C. Kidney Int 2012;82:445–53; Chehade et al. New combined serum creatinine and cystatin C quadratic formula for GFR assessment in children. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2014;9:54–63) had the highest accuracy with approximately 60% of P15 and 80% of P30 . In 10 patients with a single kidney, 7 with kidney transplant, and 11 additional children with short stature, values of the 3 equations had low bias and no significant difference when compared with mGFR. In conclusion, the 3 equations that used cystatin C, creatinine, and growth parameters performed in a superior manner over univariate equations based on either creatinine or cystatin C and also had good applicability in specific pediatric patients with single kidneys, those with a kidney transplant, and short stature. Thus, we suggest that eGFR calculations in pediatric clinical practice use only a multivariate equation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1931-5244</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-1810</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.trsl.2014.10.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25445208</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Body Height ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Demography ; Glomerular Filtration Rate ; Humans ; Infant ; Internal Medicine ; Iohexol - pharmacokinetics ; Kidney - abnormalities ; Kidney - physiopathology ; Kidney Transplantation ; Multivariate Analysis ; Regression Analysis ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine, 2015-03, Vol.165 (3), p.437-445</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2015 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-c435e73dd64e51183aaccdacbf0973df67f857e3dafb0968a4c5a7343ff46e9d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-c435e73dd64e51183aaccdacbf0973df67f857e3dafb0968a4c5a7343ff46e9d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trsl.2014.10.004$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3541,27915,27916,45986</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25445208$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Deng, Fang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Finer, Gal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haymond, Shannon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brooks, Ellen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langman, Craig B</creatorcontrib><title>Applicability of estimating glomerular filtration rate equations in pediatric patients: comparison with a measured glomerular filtration rate by iohexol clearance</title><title>Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine</title><addtitle>Transl Res</addtitle><description>Estimating glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) has become popular in clinical medicine as an alternative to measured GFR (mGFR), but there are few studies comparing them in clinical practice. We determined mGFR by iohexol clearance in 81 consecutive children in routine practice and calculated eGFR from 14 standard equations using serum creatinine, cystatin C, and urea nitrogen that were collected at the time of the mGFR procedure. Nonparametric Wilcoxon test, Spearman correlation, Bland-Altman analysis, bias (median difference), and accuracy (P15 , P30 ) were used to compare mGFR with eGFR. For the entire study group, the mGFR was 77.9 ± 38.8 mL/min/1.73 m2 . Eight of the 14 estimating equations demonstrated values without a significant difference from the mGFR value and demonstrated a lower bias in Bland-Altman analysis. Three of these 8 equations based on a combination of creatinine and cystatin C (Schwartz et al. New equations to estimate GFR in children with CKD. J Am Soc Nephrol 2009;20:629–37; Schwartz et al. Improved equations estimating GFR in children with chronic kidney disease using an immunonephelometric determination of cystatin C. Kidney Int 2012;82:445–53; Chehade et al. New combined serum creatinine and cystatin C quadratic formula for GFR assessment in children. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2014;9:54–63) had the highest accuracy with approximately 60% of P15 and 80% of P30 . In 10 patients with a single kidney, 7 with kidney transplant, and 11 additional children with short stature, values of the 3 equations had low bias and no significant difference when compared with mGFR. In conclusion, the 3 equations that used cystatin C, creatinine, and growth parameters performed in a superior manner over univariate equations based on either creatinine or cystatin C and also had good applicability in specific pediatric patients with single kidneys, those with a kidney transplant, and short stature. Thus, we suggest that eGFR calculations in pediatric clinical practice use only a multivariate equation.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Body Height</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Glomerular Filtration Rate</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Iohexol - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Kidney - abnormalities</subject><subject>Kidney - physiopathology</subject><subject>Kidney Transplantation</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1931-5244</issn><issn>1878-1810</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Uk1vFSEUnRgbW6t_wIVh6eY9YYD5MMakafxKmrhQ14SBS8uTGabAVN_f6S_1jq920UU3XDg55yScc6vqFaNbRlnzdrctKYdtTZlAYEupeFKdsK7tNqxj9Cnee842shbiuHqe8w4JTU_Fs-q4lkLImnYn1e3ZPAdv9OCDL3sSHYFc_KiLny7JZYgjpCXoRJwPJSEaJ4IDCFwv_16Z-InMYL0uyRsyIwhTye-IieOsk88o-O3LFdFkBJ2XBPYx22FPfLyCPzEQE0AnPRl4UR05HTK8vJun1c9PH3-cf9lcfPv89fzsYmOElAVPLqHl1jYCJGMd19oYq83gaI-wa1rXyRa41W6gfdNpYaRuueDOiQZ6y0-rNwffOcXrBWNQo88GQtATxCUr1jRUsFb0PVLrA9WkmHMCp-aEoaW9YlSt3aidWrtRazcrhtGj6PWd_zKMYO8l_8tAwvsDAfCXNx6SygbTNJhuAlOUjf5x_w8P5Cb4CbsNv2APeReXNGF-iqlcK6q-r9uxLgcTlHLRdvwvQ1e7Cw</recordid><startdate>20150301</startdate><enddate>20150301</enddate><creator>Deng, Fang</creator><creator>Finer, Gal</creator><creator>Haymond, Shannon</creator><creator>Brooks, Ellen</creator><creator>Langman, Craig B</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150301</creationdate><title>Applicability of estimating glomerular filtration rate equations in pediatric patients: comparison with a measured glomerular filtration rate by iohexol clearance</title><author>Deng, Fang ; Finer, Gal ; Haymond, Shannon ; Brooks, Ellen ; Langman, Craig B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-c435e73dd64e51183aaccdacbf0973df67f857e3dafb0968a4c5a7343ff46e9d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Body Height</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Glomerular Filtration Rate</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Iohexol - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Kidney - abnormalities</topic><topic>Kidney - physiopathology</topic><topic>Kidney Transplantation</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Deng, Fang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Finer, Gal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haymond, Shannon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brooks, Ellen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langman, Craig B</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Deng, Fang</au><au>Finer, Gal</au><au>Haymond, Shannon</au><au>Brooks, Ellen</au><au>Langman, Craig B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Applicability of estimating glomerular filtration rate equations in pediatric patients: comparison with a measured glomerular filtration rate by iohexol clearance</atitle><jtitle>Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Transl Res</addtitle><date>2015-03-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>165</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>437</spage><epage>445</epage><pages>437-445</pages><issn>1931-5244</issn><eissn>1878-1810</eissn><abstract>Estimating glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) has become popular in clinical medicine as an alternative to measured GFR (mGFR), but there are few studies comparing them in clinical practice. We determined mGFR by iohexol clearance in 81 consecutive children in routine practice and calculated eGFR from 14 standard equations using serum creatinine, cystatin C, and urea nitrogen that were collected at the time of the mGFR procedure. Nonparametric Wilcoxon test, Spearman correlation, Bland-Altman analysis, bias (median difference), and accuracy (P15 , P30 ) were used to compare mGFR with eGFR. For the entire study group, the mGFR was 77.9 ± 38.8 mL/min/1.73 m2 . Eight of the 14 estimating equations demonstrated values without a significant difference from the mGFR value and demonstrated a lower bias in Bland-Altman analysis. Three of these 8 equations based on a combination of creatinine and cystatin C (Schwartz et al. New equations to estimate GFR in children with CKD. J Am Soc Nephrol 2009;20:629–37; Schwartz et al. Improved equations estimating GFR in children with chronic kidney disease using an immunonephelometric determination of cystatin C. Kidney Int 2012;82:445–53; Chehade et al. New combined serum creatinine and cystatin C quadratic formula for GFR assessment in children. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2014;9:54–63) had the highest accuracy with approximately 60% of P15 and 80% of P30 . In 10 patients with a single kidney, 7 with kidney transplant, and 11 additional children with short stature, values of the 3 equations had low bias and no significant difference when compared with mGFR. In conclusion, the 3 equations that used cystatin C, creatinine, and growth parameters performed in a superior manner over univariate equations based on either creatinine or cystatin C and also had good applicability in specific pediatric patients with single kidneys, those with a kidney transplant, and short stature. Thus, we suggest that eGFR calculations in pediatric clinical practice use only a multivariate equation.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>25445208</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.trsl.2014.10.004</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1931-5244
ispartof Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine, 2015-03, Vol.165 (3), p.437-445
issn 1931-5244
1878-1810
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1660417499
source ScienceDirect; MEDLINE
subjects Adolescent
Body Height
Child
Child, Preschool
Demography
Glomerular Filtration Rate
Humans
Infant
Internal Medicine
Iohexol - pharmacokinetics
Kidney - abnormalities
Kidney - physiopathology
Kidney Transplantation
Multivariate Analysis
Regression Analysis
Young Adult
title Applicability of estimating glomerular filtration rate equations in pediatric patients: comparison with a measured glomerular filtration rate by iohexol clearance
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T20%3A27%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Applicability%20of%20estimating%20glomerular%20filtration%20rate%20equations%20in%20pediatric%20patients:%20comparison%20with%20a%20measured%20glomerular%20filtration%20rate%20by%20iohexol%20clearance&rft.jtitle=Translational%20research%20:%20the%20journal%20of%20laboratory%20and%20clinical%20medicine&rft.au=Deng,%20Fang&rft.date=2015-03-01&rft.volume=165&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=437&rft.epage=445&rft.pages=437-445&rft.issn=1931-5244&rft.eissn=1878-1810&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.trsl.2014.10.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1660417499%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1660417499&rft_id=info:pmid/25445208&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1931524414003478&rfr_iscdi=true