Comparison of the acceptability and benefits of two mindfulness-based interventions in women with breast or gynecologic cancer: a pilot study
Purpose The aim of this study was to compare the relative benefits and acceptability of two different group-based mindfulness psychotherapy interventions among women with breast and gynecologic cancer. Methods Data from 42 women who completed an 8-week mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) prog...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Supportive care in cancer 2015-04, Vol.23 (4), p.1063-1071 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1071 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 1063 |
| container_title | Supportive care in cancer |
| container_volume | 23 |
| creator | Stafford, Lesley Thomas, Naomi Foley, Elizabeth Judd, Fiona Gibson, Penny Komiti, Angela Couper, Jeremy Kiropoulos, Litza |
| description | Purpose
The aim of this study was to compare the relative benefits and acceptability of two different group-based mindfulness psychotherapy interventions among women with breast and gynecologic cancer.
Methods
Data from 42 women who completed an 8-week mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) program comprising 22 contact hours were compared to data from 24 women who completed a 6-week mindfulness meditation program (MMP) comprising 9 contact hours. Distress, quality of life (QOL), and mindfulness were evaluated pre- (T1) and post-intervention (T2). ANCOVA was used to analyse the relationship between intervention type and T1 score on outcome variable change scores. Participants’ perceptions of benefit and acceptability were assessed.
Results
The participants did not differ on clinical or demographic variables other than MBCT participants were more likely than MMP participants to have a past history of anxiety or depression (
p
= .01). Scores on distress, QOL, and mindfulness improved from T1 to T2 with medium to large effect sizes for the MMP (
p
= .002,
d
= .07;
p
= .001,
d
= .08;
p
= .005,
d
= .06, respectively) and MBCT (
p
|
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00520-014-2442-6 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1660414891</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A423836010</galeid><sourcerecordid>A423836010</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-b2942fe5c9101e954b98715c8e1847f99d88a05124e97c075e15db4836b7f0883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1ks-OFCEQxjtG446rD-DFkHjx0mtBQwPeNhP_JZt40TOh6epZNt0wAu1mHsJ3lnHWjRoNCaTg9xVF8TXNcwoXFEC-zgCCQQuUt4xz1vYPmg3lXdfKrtMPmw1oTlveCXHWPMn5BoBKKdjj5owJpihjctN838Zlb5PPMZA4kXKNxDqH-2IHP_tyIDaMZMCAky_5J3EbyeLDOK1zwJzbwWYciQ8F0zcMxceQa0Ru44J19uWaDAltLiQmsjsEdHGOO--Is8FhekMs2fs5FpLLOh6eNo8mO2d8dreeN1_evf28_dBefXr_cXt51ToBurQD05xNKJymQFELPmglqXAKqeJy0npUyoKgjKOWDqRAKsaBq64f5ARKdefNq1PefYpfV8zFLD47nGcbMK7Z0L4HTrnStKIv_0Jv4ppCra5SQmkGXe32PbWzMxofpliSdcek5pKzrt4MFCp18Q-qjhEX7-KxyXX_DwE9CVyKOSeczD75xaaDoWCOFjAnC5hqAXO0gOmr5sVdweuw4Hiv-PXnFWAnINejsMP024v-m_UHNMm69g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1658920373</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of the acceptability and benefits of two mindfulness-based interventions in women with breast or gynecologic cancer: a pilot study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Stafford, Lesley ; Thomas, Naomi ; Foley, Elizabeth ; Judd, Fiona ; Gibson, Penny ; Komiti, Angela ; Couper, Jeremy ; Kiropoulos, Litza</creator><creatorcontrib>Stafford, Lesley ; Thomas, Naomi ; Foley, Elizabeth ; Judd, Fiona ; Gibson, Penny ; Komiti, Angela ; Couper, Jeremy ; Kiropoulos, Litza</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
The aim of this study was to compare the relative benefits and acceptability of two different group-based mindfulness psychotherapy interventions among women with breast and gynecologic cancer.
Methods
Data from 42 women who completed an 8-week mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) program comprising 22 contact hours were compared to data from 24 women who completed a 6-week mindfulness meditation program (MMP) comprising 9 contact hours. Distress, quality of life (QOL), and mindfulness were evaluated pre- (T1) and post-intervention (T2). ANCOVA was used to analyse the relationship between intervention type and T1 score on outcome variable change scores. Participants’ perceptions of benefit and acceptability were assessed.
Results
The participants did not differ on clinical or demographic variables other than MBCT participants were more likely than MMP participants to have a past history of anxiety or depression (
p
= .01). Scores on distress, QOL, and mindfulness improved from T1 to T2 with medium to large effect sizes for the MMP (
p
= .002,
d
= .07;
p
= .001,
d
= .08;
p
= .005,
d
= .06, respectively) and MBCT (
p
< .001,
d
= .06;
p
= .008,
d
= .04;
p
< .001,
d
= .09, respectively) interventions. ANCOVA showed no main effect for intervention type on outcome change scores and no interaction between intervention type and respective T1 score. Distress and mindfulness scores at T1 had a main effect on respective change scores (
p
= .02, η
p
2
= .87;
p
= .01, η
p
2
= .80, respectively). Both programs were perceived as beneficial and acceptable with no differences between the intervention types.
Conclusions
Within the limits of a small, non-randomized study, these findings provide preliminary support for the utility of a brief mindfulness intervention for improving distress and QOL in a heterogeneous group of women with cancer. Abbreviated interventions are less resource intensive and may be attractive to very unwell patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0941-4355</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-7339</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00520-014-2442-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25281227</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Analysis ; Anxiety Disorders - etiology ; Anxiety Disorders - therapy ; Breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms - complications ; Breast Neoplasms - psychology ; Breast Neoplasms - therapy ; Cancer ; Cancer research ; Cognitive therapy ; Depressive Disorder - etiology ; Depressive Disorder - therapy ; Emotional disorders ; Female ; Genital Neoplasms, Female - complications ; Genital Neoplasms, Female - psychology ; Humans ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Meditation ; Middle Aged ; Mind-Body Therapies - methods ; Mindfulness - methods ; Nursing ; Nursing Research ; Oncology ; Original Article ; Pain Medicine ; Patient Acceptance of Health Care - psychology ; Pilot Projects ; Quality of Life ; Rehabilitation Medicine ; Treatment Outcome ; Women</subject><ispartof>Supportive care in cancer, 2015-04, Vol.23 (4), p.1063-1071</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 Springer</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-b2942fe5c9101e954b98715c8e1847f99d88a05124e97c075e15db4836b7f0883</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-b2942fe5c9101e954b98715c8e1847f99d88a05124e97c075e15db4836b7f0883</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00520-014-2442-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00520-014-2442-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25281227$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stafford, Lesley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Naomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foley, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Judd, Fiona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibson, Penny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Komiti, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Couper, Jeremy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiropoulos, Litza</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of the acceptability and benefits of two mindfulness-based interventions in women with breast or gynecologic cancer: a pilot study</title><title>Supportive care in cancer</title><addtitle>Support Care Cancer</addtitle><addtitle>Support Care Cancer</addtitle><description>Purpose
The aim of this study was to compare the relative benefits and acceptability of two different group-based mindfulness psychotherapy interventions among women with breast and gynecologic cancer.
Methods
Data from 42 women who completed an 8-week mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) program comprising 22 contact hours were compared to data from 24 women who completed a 6-week mindfulness meditation program (MMP) comprising 9 contact hours. Distress, quality of life (QOL), and mindfulness were evaluated pre- (T1) and post-intervention (T2). ANCOVA was used to analyse the relationship between intervention type and T1 score on outcome variable change scores. Participants’ perceptions of benefit and acceptability were assessed.
Results
The participants did not differ on clinical or demographic variables other than MBCT participants were more likely than MMP participants to have a past history of anxiety or depression (
p
= .01). Scores on distress, QOL, and mindfulness improved from T1 to T2 with medium to large effect sizes for the MMP (
p
= .002,
d
= .07;
p
= .001,
d
= .08;
p
= .005,
d
= .06, respectively) and MBCT (
p
< .001,
d
= .06;
p
= .008,
d
= .04;
p
< .001,
d
= .09, respectively) interventions. ANCOVA showed no main effect for intervention type on outcome change scores and no interaction between intervention type and respective T1 score. Distress and mindfulness scores at T1 had a main effect on respective change scores (
p
= .02, η
p
2
= .87;
p
= .01, η
p
2
= .80, respectively). Both programs were perceived as beneficial and acceptable with no differences between the intervention types.
Conclusions
Within the limits of a small, non-randomized study, these findings provide preliminary support for the utility of a brief mindfulness intervention for improving distress and QOL in a heterogeneous group of women with cancer. Abbreviated interventions are less resource intensive and may be attractive to very unwell patients.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Anxiety Disorders - etiology</subject><subject>Anxiety Disorders - therapy</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - complications</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - psychology</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer research</subject><subject>Cognitive therapy</subject><subject>Depressive Disorder - etiology</subject><subject>Depressive Disorder - therapy</subject><subject>Emotional disorders</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Genital Neoplasms, Female - complications</subject><subject>Genital Neoplasms, Female - psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Meditation</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mind-Body Therapies - methods</subject><subject>Mindfulness - methods</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing Research</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pain Medicine</subject><subject>Patient Acceptance of Health Care - psychology</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Rehabilitation Medicine</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>0941-4355</issn><issn>1433-7339</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1ks-OFCEQxjtG446rD-DFkHjx0mtBQwPeNhP_JZt40TOh6epZNt0wAu1mHsJ3lnHWjRoNCaTg9xVF8TXNcwoXFEC-zgCCQQuUt4xz1vYPmg3lXdfKrtMPmw1oTlveCXHWPMn5BoBKKdjj5owJpihjctN838Zlb5PPMZA4kXKNxDqH-2IHP_tyIDaMZMCAky_5J3EbyeLDOK1zwJzbwWYciQ8F0zcMxceQa0Ru44J19uWaDAltLiQmsjsEdHGOO--Is8FhekMs2fs5FpLLOh6eNo8mO2d8dreeN1_evf28_dBefXr_cXt51ToBurQD05xNKJymQFELPmglqXAKqeJy0npUyoKgjKOWDqRAKsaBq64f5ARKdefNq1PefYpfV8zFLD47nGcbMK7Z0L4HTrnStKIv_0Jv4ppCra5SQmkGXe32PbWzMxofpliSdcek5pKzrt4MFCp18Q-qjhEX7-KxyXX_DwE9CVyKOSeczD75xaaDoWCOFjAnC5hqAXO0gOmr5sVdweuw4Hiv-PXnFWAnINejsMP024v-m_UHNMm69g</recordid><startdate>20150401</startdate><enddate>20150401</enddate><creator>Stafford, Lesley</creator><creator>Thomas, Naomi</creator><creator>Foley, Elizabeth</creator><creator>Judd, Fiona</creator><creator>Gibson, Penny</creator><creator>Komiti, Angela</creator><creator>Couper, Jeremy</creator><creator>Kiropoulos, Litza</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150401</creationdate><title>Comparison of the acceptability and benefits of two mindfulness-based interventions in women with breast or gynecologic cancer: a pilot study</title><author>Stafford, Lesley ; Thomas, Naomi ; Foley, Elizabeth ; Judd, Fiona ; Gibson, Penny ; Komiti, Angela ; Couper, Jeremy ; Kiropoulos, Litza</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-b2942fe5c9101e954b98715c8e1847f99d88a05124e97c075e15db4836b7f0883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Anxiety Disorders - etiology</topic><topic>Anxiety Disorders - therapy</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - complications</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - psychology</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer research</topic><topic>Cognitive therapy</topic><topic>Depressive Disorder - etiology</topic><topic>Depressive Disorder - therapy</topic><topic>Emotional disorders</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Genital Neoplasms, Female - complications</topic><topic>Genital Neoplasms, Female - psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Meditation</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mind-Body Therapies - methods</topic><topic>Mindfulness - methods</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing Research</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pain Medicine</topic><topic>Patient Acceptance of Health Care - psychology</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Rehabilitation Medicine</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stafford, Lesley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Naomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foley, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Judd, Fiona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibson, Penny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Komiti, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Couper, Jeremy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiropoulos, Litza</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Supportive care in cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stafford, Lesley</au><au>Thomas, Naomi</au><au>Foley, Elizabeth</au><au>Judd, Fiona</au><au>Gibson, Penny</au><au>Komiti, Angela</au><au>Couper, Jeremy</au><au>Kiropoulos, Litza</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of the acceptability and benefits of two mindfulness-based interventions in women with breast or gynecologic cancer: a pilot study</atitle><jtitle>Supportive care in cancer</jtitle><stitle>Support Care Cancer</stitle><addtitle>Support Care Cancer</addtitle><date>2015-04-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1063</spage><epage>1071</epage><pages>1063-1071</pages><issn>0941-4355</issn><eissn>1433-7339</eissn><abstract>Purpose
The aim of this study was to compare the relative benefits and acceptability of two different group-based mindfulness psychotherapy interventions among women with breast and gynecologic cancer.
Methods
Data from 42 women who completed an 8-week mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) program comprising 22 contact hours were compared to data from 24 women who completed a 6-week mindfulness meditation program (MMP) comprising 9 contact hours. Distress, quality of life (QOL), and mindfulness were evaluated pre- (T1) and post-intervention (T2). ANCOVA was used to analyse the relationship between intervention type and T1 score on outcome variable change scores. Participants’ perceptions of benefit and acceptability were assessed.
Results
The participants did not differ on clinical or demographic variables other than MBCT participants were more likely than MMP participants to have a past history of anxiety or depression (
p
= .01). Scores on distress, QOL, and mindfulness improved from T1 to T2 with medium to large effect sizes for the MMP (
p
= .002,
d
= .07;
p
= .001,
d
= .08;
p
= .005,
d
= .06, respectively) and MBCT (
p
< .001,
d
= .06;
p
= .008,
d
= .04;
p
< .001,
d
= .09, respectively) interventions. ANCOVA showed no main effect for intervention type on outcome change scores and no interaction between intervention type and respective T1 score. Distress and mindfulness scores at T1 had a main effect on respective change scores (
p
= .02, η
p
2
= .87;
p
= .01, η
p
2
= .80, respectively). Both programs were perceived as beneficial and acceptable with no differences between the intervention types.
Conclusions
Within the limits of a small, non-randomized study, these findings provide preliminary support for the utility of a brief mindfulness intervention for improving distress and QOL in a heterogeneous group of women with cancer. Abbreviated interventions are less resource intensive and may be attractive to very unwell patients.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>25281227</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00520-014-2442-6</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0941-4355 |
| ispartof | Supportive care in cancer, 2015-04, Vol.23 (4), p.1063-1071 |
| issn | 0941-4355 1433-7339 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1660414891 |
| source | MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals |
| subjects | Adult Aged Analysis Anxiety Disorders - etiology Anxiety Disorders - therapy Breast cancer Breast Neoplasms - complications Breast Neoplasms - psychology Breast Neoplasms - therapy Cancer Cancer research Cognitive therapy Depressive Disorder - etiology Depressive Disorder - therapy Emotional disorders Female Genital Neoplasms, Female - complications Genital Neoplasms, Female - psychology Humans Medicine Medicine & Public Health Meditation Middle Aged Mind-Body Therapies - methods Mindfulness - methods Nursing Nursing Research Oncology Original Article Pain Medicine Patient Acceptance of Health Care - psychology Pilot Projects Quality of Life Rehabilitation Medicine Treatment Outcome Women |
| title | Comparison of the acceptability and benefits of two mindfulness-based interventions in women with breast or gynecologic cancer: a pilot study |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T20%3A07%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20the%20acceptability%20and%20benefits%20of%20two%20mindfulness-based%20interventions%20in%20women%20with%20breast%20or%20gynecologic%20cancer:%20a%20pilot%20study&rft.jtitle=Supportive%20care%20in%20cancer&rft.au=Stafford,%20Lesley&rft.date=2015-04-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1063&rft.epage=1071&rft.pages=1063-1071&rft.issn=0941-4355&rft.eissn=1433-7339&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00520-014-2442-6&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA423836010%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1658920373&rft_id=info:pmid/25281227&rft_galeid=A423836010&rfr_iscdi=true |