Movement patterns and spawning sites of muskellunge Esox masquinongy in the Antrim chain of lakes, Michigan
The purpose of this study was to identify spawning habitat, determine home ranges, and examine movement patterns for a naturally reproducing population of Great Lakes muskellunge in the lower Antrim County chain of lakes, Michigan. Muskellunge spawning sites were identified by tracking of implanted...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental biology of fishes 2015-03, Vol.98 (3), p.833-844 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 844 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 833 |
container_title | Environmental biology of fishes |
container_volume | 98 |
creator | Diana, James S. Hanchin, Patrick Popoff, Nicholas |
description | The purpose of this study was to identify spawning habitat, determine home ranges, and examine movement patterns for a naturally reproducing population of Great Lakes muskellunge in the lower Antrim County chain of lakes, Michigan. Muskellunge spawning sites were identified by tracking of implanted muskellunge using a directional hydrophone and by nighttime spotlight surveys. All spawning fish tagged in Torch or Clam Lake spawned in Clam Lake, while most spawning fish tagged in Elk or Skegemog Lake spawned in the Torch River; one appeared to spawn in Lake Skegemog. Of the 32 potential spawning sites, 28 (87.5 %) contained submerged aquatic vegetation as the dominant habitat type, while the remaining 4 sites were divided equally between woody debris (6.25 %) and bare substrate. All but one implanted muskellunge returned from spawning sites to the same lake in which they were captured and implanted. Of the 24 tagged muskellunge, four were harvested via angling or spearing within 1 year after tagging, and two additional fish were assumed harvested when contact was lost. Implanted muskellunge tended to remain in the lakes during the winter, then move into spawning areas in spring, eventually returning to open lake sites where they resided over summer. Muskellunge movement behavior diverged after spawning each year, with 11 tagged fish (61.1 %) remaining in Skegemog or Clam Lake for the summer, and seven individuals traveling to Elk or Torch Lake. Muskellunge home ranges averaged 612 ha and ranged from 17 to 5,287 ha. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10641-014-0319-7 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_sprin</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1660408843</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1660408843</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p189t-47f106a02b9f481894a5f196ec6f179e79a74bf13a85532f84c0277431b36a043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwAewssWGBYRw7cbysqvKQqNjAOnKDk7pNnDTj8Ph7XJUFYjXS6Nx5HEIuOdxyAHWHHDLJGXDJQHDN1BGZ8FQJlnIhjskEhMoZ16BPyRniBgC0kmpCtsvuw7bWB9qbEOzgkRr_TrE3n975mqILFmlX0XbErW2a0deWLrD7oq3B3eh85-tv6jwNa0tnPgyupeXaxEbMNGZr8YYuXbl2tfHn5KQyDdqL3zolb_eL1_kje355eJrPnlnPcx2YVFV8xkCy0pXMY0uatOI6s2VWcaWt0kbJVcWFydNUJFUuS0iUkoKvRIxJMSXXh7n90O1Gi6FoHZbxeONtN2LBswwk5LkUEb36h266cfDxukhJncZ9CUQqOVDYD1GKHf5QUOz9Fwf_RfRf7P0XSvwAO3R32A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1649517920</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Movement patterns and spawning sites of muskellunge Esox masquinongy in the Antrim chain of lakes, Michigan</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Diana, James S. ; Hanchin, Patrick ; Popoff, Nicholas</creator><creatorcontrib>Diana, James S. ; Hanchin, Patrick ; Popoff, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study was to identify spawning habitat, determine home ranges, and examine movement patterns for a naturally reproducing population of Great Lakes muskellunge in the lower Antrim County chain of lakes, Michigan. Muskellunge spawning sites were identified by tracking of implanted muskellunge using a directional hydrophone and by nighttime spotlight surveys. All spawning fish tagged in Torch or Clam Lake spawned in Clam Lake, while most spawning fish tagged in Elk or Skegemog Lake spawned in the Torch River; one appeared to spawn in Lake Skegemog. Of the 32 potential spawning sites, 28 (87.5 %) contained submerged aquatic vegetation as the dominant habitat type, while the remaining 4 sites were divided equally between woody debris (6.25 %) and bare substrate. All but one implanted muskellunge returned from spawning sites to the same lake in which they were captured and implanted. Of the 24 tagged muskellunge, four were harvested via angling or spearing within 1 year after tagging, and two additional fish were assumed harvested when contact was lost. Implanted muskellunge tended to remain in the lakes during the winter, then move into spawning areas in spring, eventually returning to open lake sites where they resided over summer. Muskellunge movement behavior diverged after spawning each year, with 11 tagged fish (61.1 %) remaining in Skegemog or Clam Lake for the summer, and seven individuals traveling to Elk or Torch Lake. Muskellunge home ranges averaged 612 ha and ranged from 17 to 5,287 ha.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-1909</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-5133</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10641-014-0319-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Animal reproduction ; Animal Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography ; Aquatic plants ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Environment ; Esox masquinongy ; Fish ; Fish harvest ; Freshwater ; Freshwater & Marine Ecology ; Habitats ; Hydrophones ; Lakes ; Life Sciences ; Nature Conservation ; Spawning ; Spawning behavior ; Summer ; Tagging ; Telemetry ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Environmental biology of fishes, 2015-03, Vol.98 (3), p.833-844</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-p189t-47f106a02b9f481894a5f196ec6f179e79a74bf13a85532f84c0277431b36a043</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10641-014-0319-7$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10641-014-0319-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Diana, James S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanchin, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Popoff, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><title>Movement patterns and spawning sites of muskellunge Esox masquinongy in the Antrim chain of lakes, Michigan</title><title>Environmental biology of fishes</title><addtitle>Environ Biol Fish</addtitle><description>The purpose of this study was to identify spawning habitat, determine home ranges, and examine movement patterns for a naturally reproducing population of Great Lakes muskellunge in the lower Antrim County chain of lakes, Michigan. Muskellunge spawning sites were identified by tracking of implanted muskellunge using a directional hydrophone and by nighttime spotlight surveys. All spawning fish tagged in Torch or Clam Lake spawned in Clam Lake, while most spawning fish tagged in Elk or Skegemog Lake spawned in the Torch River; one appeared to spawn in Lake Skegemog. Of the 32 potential spawning sites, 28 (87.5 %) contained submerged aquatic vegetation as the dominant habitat type, while the remaining 4 sites were divided equally between woody debris (6.25 %) and bare substrate. All but one implanted muskellunge returned from spawning sites to the same lake in which they were captured and implanted. Of the 24 tagged muskellunge, four were harvested via angling or spearing within 1 year after tagging, and two additional fish were assumed harvested when contact was lost. Implanted muskellunge tended to remain in the lakes during the winter, then move into spawning areas in spring, eventually returning to open lake sites where they resided over summer. Muskellunge movement behavior diverged after spawning each year, with 11 tagged fish (61.1 %) remaining in Skegemog or Clam Lake for the summer, and seven individuals traveling to Elk or Torch Lake. Muskellunge home ranges averaged 612 ha and ranged from 17 to 5,287 ha.</description><subject>Animal reproduction</subject><subject>Animal Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography</subject><subject>Aquatic plants</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Esox masquinongy</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Fish harvest</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Freshwater & Marine Ecology</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Hydrophones</subject><subject>Lakes</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Nature Conservation</subject><subject>Spawning</subject><subject>Spawning behavior</subject><subject>Summer</subject><subject>Tagging</subject><subject>Telemetry</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0378-1909</issn><issn>1573-5133</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwAewssWGBYRw7cbysqvKQqNjAOnKDk7pNnDTj8Ph7XJUFYjXS6Nx5HEIuOdxyAHWHHDLJGXDJQHDN1BGZ8FQJlnIhjskEhMoZ16BPyRniBgC0kmpCtsvuw7bWB9qbEOzgkRr_TrE3n975mqILFmlX0XbErW2a0deWLrD7oq3B3eh85-tv6jwNa0tnPgyupeXaxEbMNGZr8YYuXbl2tfHn5KQyDdqL3zolb_eL1_kje355eJrPnlnPcx2YVFV8xkCy0pXMY0uatOI6s2VWcaWt0kbJVcWFydNUJFUuS0iUkoKvRIxJMSXXh7n90O1Gi6FoHZbxeONtN2LBswwk5LkUEb36h266cfDxukhJncZ9CUQqOVDYD1GKHf5QUOz9Fwf_RfRf7P0XSvwAO3R32A</recordid><startdate>20150301</startdate><enddate>20150301</enddate><creator>Diana, James S.</creator><creator>Hanchin, Patrick</creator><creator>Popoff, Nicholas</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150301</creationdate><title>Movement patterns and spawning sites of muskellunge Esox masquinongy in the Antrim chain of lakes, Michigan</title><author>Diana, James S. ; Hanchin, Patrick ; Popoff, Nicholas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p189t-47f106a02b9f481894a5f196ec6f179e79a74bf13a85532f84c0277431b36a043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Animal reproduction</topic><topic>Animal Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography</topic><topic>Aquatic plants</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Esox masquinongy</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Fish harvest</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Freshwater & Marine Ecology</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Hydrophones</topic><topic>Lakes</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Nature Conservation</topic><topic>Spawning</topic><topic>Spawning behavior</topic><topic>Summer</topic><topic>Tagging</topic><topic>Telemetry</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Diana, James S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanchin, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Popoff, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental biology of fishes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Diana, James S.</au><au>Hanchin, Patrick</au><au>Popoff, Nicholas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Movement patterns and spawning sites of muskellunge Esox masquinongy in the Antrim chain of lakes, Michigan</atitle><jtitle>Environmental biology of fishes</jtitle><stitle>Environ Biol Fish</stitle><date>2015-03-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>98</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>833</spage><epage>844</epage><pages>833-844</pages><issn>0378-1909</issn><eissn>1573-5133</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this study was to identify spawning habitat, determine home ranges, and examine movement patterns for a naturally reproducing population of Great Lakes muskellunge in the lower Antrim County chain of lakes, Michigan. Muskellunge spawning sites were identified by tracking of implanted muskellunge using a directional hydrophone and by nighttime spotlight surveys. All spawning fish tagged in Torch or Clam Lake spawned in Clam Lake, while most spawning fish tagged in Elk or Skegemog Lake spawned in the Torch River; one appeared to spawn in Lake Skegemog. Of the 32 potential spawning sites, 28 (87.5 %) contained submerged aquatic vegetation as the dominant habitat type, while the remaining 4 sites were divided equally between woody debris (6.25 %) and bare substrate. All but one implanted muskellunge returned from spawning sites to the same lake in which they were captured and implanted. Of the 24 tagged muskellunge, four were harvested via angling or spearing within 1 year after tagging, and two additional fish were assumed harvested when contact was lost. Implanted muskellunge tended to remain in the lakes during the winter, then move into spawning areas in spring, eventually returning to open lake sites where they resided over summer. Muskellunge movement behavior diverged after spawning each year, with 11 tagged fish (61.1 %) remaining in Skegemog or Clam Lake for the summer, and seven individuals traveling to Elk or Torch Lake. Muskellunge home ranges averaged 612 ha and ranged from 17 to 5,287 ha.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10641-014-0319-7</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0378-1909 |
ispartof | Environmental biology of fishes, 2015-03, Vol.98 (3), p.833-844 |
issn | 0378-1909 1573-5133 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1660408843 |
source | SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Animal reproduction Animal Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography Aquatic plants Biomedical and Life Sciences Environment Esox masquinongy Fish Fish harvest Freshwater Freshwater & Marine Ecology Habitats Hydrophones Lakes Life Sciences Nature Conservation Spawning Spawning behavior Summer Tagging Telemetry Zoology |
title | Movement patterns and spawning sites of muskellunge Esox masquinongy in the Antrim chain of lakes, Michigan |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T12%3A40%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_sprin&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Movement%20patterns%20and%20spawning%20sites%20of%20muskellunge%20Esox%20masquinongy%20in%20the%20Antrim%20chain%20of%20lakes,%20Michigan&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20biology%20of%20fishes&rft.au=Diana,%20James%20S.&rft.date=2015-03-01&rft.volume=98&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=833&rft.epage=844&rft.pages=833-844&rft.issn=0378-1909&rft.eissn=1573-5133&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10641-014-0319-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_sprin%3E1660408843%3C/proquest_sprin%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1649517920&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |