A biochemical approach for identifying plastics exposure in live wildlife
Summary Plastic pollution is a long‐standing ubiquitous issue. Global use of plastics is continuing to rise, and there is increasing interest in understanding the prevalence and risk associated with exposure of wildlife to plastics, particularly in the marine environment. In order To facilitate an a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Methods in ecology and evolution 2015-01, Vol.6 (1), p.92-98 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 98 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 92 |
container_title | Methods in ecology and evolution |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Hardesty, Britta D. Holdsworth, Daniel Revill, Andrew T. Wilcox, Chris Davey, Matthew |
description | Summary
Plastic pollution is a long‐standing ubiquitous issue. Global use of plastics is continuing to rise, and there is increasing interest in understanding the prevalence and risk associated with exposure of wildlife to plastics, particularly in the marine environment.
In order To facilitate an assessment of ingestion of plastics in seabird populations, we developed a minimally invasive tool that allows for detection of exposure to plastics.
Using a simple swabbing technique in which the waxy preen oil is expressed from the uropygial gland of birds, we successfully tested for the presence of three common plasticizers: dimethyl, dibutyl and diethylhexyl phthalate [dimethyl phthalate, dibutyl phthalate and bis(2‐ethylhexyl)‐phthalate, respectively]. These plasticizers are prevalent in the manufacturing of plastic end‐user items which often end up in the marine environment.
Using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry and protocols to reduce background contamination, we were confidently able to detect targeted plasticizers at low levels.
The method described has broad applicability for detecting plastics exposure in wildlife at individual, population and species levels. Furthermore, the approach can be readily modified as needed to survey for plastics exposure in taxa other than seabirds.
Applying the simple, minimally invasive approach we describe here is particularly appealing for detecting plastics exposure at population and species levels, it shows promise for quantification and it has no observed detrimental impacts to wildlife. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/2041-210X.12277 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1660402644</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1660402644</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4157-d78f609965dc8100b791aa7d3ad225bdb79e7a19d03e2f8f215b7029049f1c393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMoWGrPXgNevGybZLPJ7rGUqoWKFwVvIZsPm5LurklX7b83dUXEi3OZD553mHkBuMRoilPMCKI4Ixg9TzEhnJ-A0c_k9Fd9DiYxblGKvKwQoSOwmsPatWpjdk5JD2XXhVaqDbRtgE6bZu_swTUvsPMy7p2K0Hx0beyDga6B3r0Z-O689s6aC3BmpY9m8p3H4Olm-bi4y9YPt6vFfJ0pigueaV5ahqqKFVqVGKGaV1hKrnOpCSlqnXrDJa40yg2xpSW4qDkiFaKVxSqv8jG4HvamS197E_di56Iy3svGtH0UmDFEEWGUJvTqD7pt-9Ck6xJFeYkYwyxRs4FSoY0xGCu64HYyHARG4uiuOPonjv6JL3eTgg2K9Ls5_IeL--UyH4SfU3h6og</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1647806616</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A biochemical approach for identifying plastics exposure in live wildlife</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Hardesty, Britta D. ; Holdsworth, Daniel ; Revill, Andrew T. ; Wilcox, Chris ; Davey, Matthew</creator><contributor>Davey, Matthew</contributor><creatorcontrib>Hardesty, Britta D. ; Holdsworth, Daniel ; Revill, Andrew T. ; Wilcox, Chris ; Davey, Matthew ; Davey, Matthew</creatorcontrib><description>Summary
Plastic pollution is a long‐standing ubiquitous issue. Global use of plastics is continuing to rise, and there is increasing interest in understanding the prevalence and risk associated with exposure of wildlife to plastics, particularly in the marine environment.
In order To facilitate an assessment of ingestion of plastics in seabird populations, we developed a minimally invasive tool that allows for detection of exposure to plastics.
Using a simple swabbing technique in which the waxy preen oil is expressed from the uropygial gland of birds, we successfully tested for the presence of three common plasticizers: dimethyl, dibutyl and diethylhexyl phthalate [dimethyl phthalate, dibutyl phthalate and bis(2‐ethylhexyl)‐phthalate, respectively]. These plasticizers are prevalent in the manufacturing of plastic end‐user items which often end up in the marine environment.
Using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry and protocols to reduce background contamination, we were confidently able to detect targeted plasticizers at low levels.
The method described has broad applicability for detecting plastics exposure in wildlife at individual, population and species levels. Furthermore, the approach can be readily modified as needed to survey for plastics exposure in taxa other than seabirds.
Applying the simple, minimally invasive approach we describe here is particularly appealing for detecting plastics exposure at population and species levels, it shows promise for quantification and it has no observed detrimental impacts to wildlife.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2041-210X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2041-210X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.12277</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>bis‐phthalate ; dibutyl phthalate ; dimethyl phthalate ; Marine ; Plastics ; seabird ; uropygial gland ; Wildlife</subject><ispartof>Methods in ecology and evolution, 2015-01, Vol.6 (1), p.92-98</ispartof><rights>2014 The Authors. Methods in Ecology and Evolution © 2014 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 British Ecological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4157-d78f609965dc8100b791aa7d3ad225bdb79e7a19d03e2f8f215b7029049f1c393</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4157-d78f609965dc8100b791aa7d3ad225bdb79e7a19d03e2f8f215b7029049f1c393</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F2041-210X.12277$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F2041-210X.12277$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27929,27930,45579,45580</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Davey, Matthew</contributor><creatorcontrib>Hardesty, Britta D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holdsworth, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Revill, Andrew T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilcox, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davey, Matthew</creatorcontrib><title>A biochemical approach for identifying plastics exposure in live wildlife</title><title>Methods in ecology and evolution</title><description>Summary
Plastic pollution is a long‐standing ubiquitous issue. Global use of plastics is continuing to rise, and there is increasing interest in understanding the prevalence and risk associated with exposure of wildlife to plastics, particularly in the marine environment.
In order To facilitate an assessment of ingestion of plastics in seabird populations, we developed a minimally invasive tool that allows for detection of exposure to plastics.
Using a simple swabbing technique in which the waxy preen oil is expressed from the uropygial gland of birds, we successfully tested for the presence of three common plasticizers: dimethyl, dibutyl and diethylhexyl phthalate [dimethyl phthalate, dibutyl phthalate and bis(2‐ethylhexyl)‐phthalate, respectively]. These plasticizers are prevalent in the manufacturing of plastic end‐user items which often end up in the marine environment.
Using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry and protocols to reduce background contamination, we were confidently able to detect targeted plasticizers at low levels.
The method described has broad applicability for detecting plastics exposure in wildlife at individual, population and species levels. Furthermore, the approach can be readily modified as needed to survey for plastics exposure in taxa other than seabirds.
Applying the simple, minimally invasive approach we describe here is particularly appealing for detecting plastics exposure at population and species levels, it shows promise for quantification and it has no observed detrimental impacts to wildlife.</description><subject>bis‐phthalate</subject><subject>dibutyl phthalate</subject><subject>dimethyl phthalate</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Plastics</subject><subject>seabird</subject><subject>uropygial gland</subject><subject>Wildlife</subject><issn>2041-210X</issn><issn>2041-210X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMoWGrPXgNevGybZLPJ7rGUqoWKFwVvIZsPm5LurklX7b83dUXEi3OZD553mHkBuMRoilPMCKI4Ixg9TzEhnJ-A0c_k9Fd9DiYxblGKvKwQoSOwmsPatWpjdk5JD2XXhVaqDbRtgE6bZu_swTUvsPMy7p2K0Hx0beyDga6B3r0Z-O689s6aC3BmpY9m8p3H4Olm-bi4y9YPt6vFfJ0pigueaV5ahqqKFVqVGKGaV1hKrnOpCSlqnXrDJa40yg2xpSW4qDkiFaKVxSqv8jG4HvamS197E_di56Iy3svGtH0UmDFEEWGUJvTqD7pt-9Ck6xJFeYkYwyxRs4FSoY0xGCu64HYyHARG4uiuOPonjv6JL3eTgg2K9Ls5_IeL--UyH4SfU3h6og</recordid><startdate>201501</startdate><enddate>201501</enddate><creator>Hardesty, Britta D.</creator><creator>Holdsworth, Daniel</creator><creator>Revill, Andrew T.</creator><creator>Wilcox, Chris</creator><creator>Davey, Matthew</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201501</creationdate><title>A biochemical approach for identifying plastics exposure in live wildlife</title><author>Hardesty, Britta D. ; Holdsworth, Daniel ; Revill, Andrew T. ; Wilcox, Chris ; Davey, Matthew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4157-d78f609965dc8100b791aa7d3ad225bdb79e7a19d03e2f8f215b7029049f1c393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>bis‐phthalate</topic><topic>dibutyl phthalate</topic><topic>dimethyl phthalate</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Plastics</topic><topic>seabird</topic><topic>uropygial gland</topic><topic>Wildlife</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hardesty, Britta D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holdsworth, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Revill, Andrew T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilcox, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davey, Matthew</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Methods in ecology and evolution</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hardesty, Britta D.</au><au>Holdsworth, Daniel</au><au>Revill, Andrew T.</au><au>Wilcox, Chris</au><au>Davey, Matthew</au><au>Davey, Matthew</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A biochemical approach for identifying plastics exposure in live wildlife</atitle><jtitle>Methods in ecology and evolution</jtitle><date>2015-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>92</spage><epage>98</epage><pages>92-98</pages><issn>2041-210X</issn><eissn>2041-210X</eissn><abstract>Summary
Plastic pollution is a long‐standing ubiquitous issue. Global use of plastics is continuing to rise, and there is increasing interest in understanding the prevalence and risk associated with exposure of wildlife to plastics, particularly in the marine environment.
In order To facilitate an assessment of ingestion of plastics in seabird populations, we developed a minimally invasive tool that allows for detection of exposure to plastics.
Using a simple swabbing technique in which the waxy preen oil is expressed from the uropygial gland of birds, we successfully tested for the presence of three common plasticizers: dimethyl, dibutyl and diethylhexyl phthalate [dimethyl phthalate, dibutyl phthalate and bis(2‐ethylhexyl)‐phthalate, respectively]. These plasticizers are prevalent in the manufacturing of plastic end‐user items which often end up in the marine environment.
Using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry and protocols to reduce background contamination, we were confidently able to detect targeted plasticizers at low levels.
The method described has broad applicability for detecting plastics exposure in wildlife at individual, population and species levels. Furthermore, the approach can be readily modified as needed to survey for plastics exposure in taxa other than seabirds.
Applying the simple, minimally invasive approach we describe here is particularly appealing for detecting plastics exposure at population and species levels, it shows promise for quantification and it has no observed detrimental impacts to wildlife.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/2041-210X.12277</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2041-210X |
ispartof | Methods in ecology and evolution, 2015-01, Vol.6 (1), p.92-98 |
issn | 2041-210X 2041-210X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1660402644 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | bis‐phthalate dibutyl phthalate dimethyl phthalate Marine Plastics seabird uropygial gland Wildlife |
title | A biochemical approach for identifying plastics exposure in live wildlife |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T04%3A15%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20biochemical%20approach%20for%20identifying%20plastics%20exposure%20in%20live%20wildlife&rft.jtitle=Methods%20in%20ecology%20and%20evolution&rft.au=Hardesty,%20Britta%20D.&rft.date=2015-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=92&rft.epage=98&rft.pages=92-98&rft.issn=2041-210X&rft.eissn=2041-210X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/2041-210X.12277&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1660402644%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1647806616&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |