Delivery of therapeutic protein for prevention of neurodegenerative changes: Comparison of different CSF-delivery methods
Injection of lysosomal enzyme into cisternal or ventricular cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) has been carried out in 11 lysosomal storage disorder models, with each study demonstrating reductions in primary substrate and secondary neuropathological changes, and several reports of improved neurological func...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Experimental neurology 2015-01, Vol.263, p.79-90 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 90 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 79 |
container_title | Experimental neurology |
container_volume | 263 |
creator | Marshall, Neil R. Hassiotis, Sofia King, Barbara Rozaklis, Tina Trim, Paul J. Duplock, Stephen K. Winner, Leanne K. Beard, Helen Snel, Marten F. Jolly, Robert D. Hopwood, John J. Hemsley, Kim M. |
description | Injection of lysosomal enzyme into cisternal or ventricular cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) has been carried out in 11 lysosomal storage disorder models, with each study demonstrating reductions in primary substrate and secondary neuropathological changes, and several reports of improved neurological function. Whilst acute studies in mucopolysaccharidosis (MPS) type II mice revealed that intrathecally-delivered enzyme (into thoraco-lumbar CSF) accesses the brain, the impact of longer-term treatment of affected subjects via this route is unknown. This approach is presently being utilized to treat children with MPS types I, II and III. Our aim was to determine the efficacy of repeated intrathecal injection of recombinant human sulfamidase (rhSGSH) on pathological changes in the MPS IIIA dog brain. The outcomes were compared with those in dogs treated via intra-cisternal or ventricular routes. Control dogs received buffer or no treatment. Significant reductions in primary/secondary substrate levels in brain were observed in dogs treated via all routes, although the extent of the reduction differed regionally. Treatment via all CSF access points resulted in large reductions in microgliosis in superficial cerebral cortex, but only ventricular injection enabled amelioration in deep cerebral cortex. Formation of glutamic acid decarboxylase-positive axonal spheroids in deep cerebellar nuclei was prevented by treatment delivered via any route. Anti-rhSGSH antibodies in the sera of some dogs did not reduce therapeutic efficacy. Our data indicates the capacity of intra-spinal CSF-injected rhSGSH to circulate within CSF-filled spaces, penetrate into brain and mediate a significant reduction in substrate accumulation and secondary pathology in the MPS IIIA dog brain.
•Treatment via all intra-CSF injection routes initiated a reduction in substrate levels.•Axonal spheroid formation was prevented by treatment delivered via any route.•Microgliosis in deep cerebral cortex was reduced only by ventricular injection.•Anti-rhSGSH antibodies in the sera of some dogs did not reduce therapeutic efficacy.•All intra-CSF injection routes appear viable for treating MPS IIIA-based pathology. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.expneurol.2014.09.008 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1660395552</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S001448861400291X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1635002727</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-3cecd30058a39cd1a1caf23c30cc194aa6e9c87b62be9281cdafa483d45d2ef83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1u1DAUhS1E1U5LXwGyZJNw_ZMfs6sGWpAqdQGsLY993fEoiYOdjDpvj4dpu4WVr-Tv3CP7I-QDhYoCbT7tKnyaRlxi6CsGVFQgK4DuDVlRkFAyweEtWUG-KUXXNRfkMqUdAEjB2nNywWomGsZhRQ5fsPd7jIciuGLeYtQTLrM3xRTDjH4sXIh5xj2Osw_jkfpba_ERx0zPOVyYrR4fMX0u1mGYdPTpBFrvHMYcLNY_bkv7UjTgvA02vSNnTvcJr5_PK_Lr9uvP9bfy_uHu-_rmvjQCxFxyg8ZygLrTXBpLNTXaMW44GEOl0LpBabp207ANStZRY7XTouNW1Jah6_gV-Xjam1_0e8E0q8Eng32vRwxLUrRpgMu6rtl_oLwGYC1rM9qeUBNDShGdmqIfdDwoCuqoSO3UqyJ1VKRAqqwoJ98_lyybAe1r7sVJBm5OAOZf2XuMKhmPo0HrI5pZ2eD_WfIH09qqNQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1635002727</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Delivery of therapeutic protein for prevention of neurodegenerative changes: Comparison of different CSF-delivery methods</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Marshall, Neil R. ; Hassiotis, Sofia ; King, Barbara ; Rozaklis, Tina ; Trim, Paul J. ; Duplock, Stephen K. ; Winner, Leanne K. ; Beard, Helen ; Snel, Marten F. ; Jolly, Robert D. ; Hopwood, John J. ; Hemsley, Kim M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Marshall, Neil R. ; Hassiotis, Sofia ; King, Barbara ; Rozaklis, Tina ; Trim, Paul J. ; Duplock, Stephen K. ; Winner, Leanne K. ; Beard, Helen ; Snel, Marten F. ; Jolly, Robert D. ; Hopwood, John J. ; Hemsley, Kim M.</creatorcontrib><description>Injection of lysosomal enzyme into cisternal or ventricular cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) has been carried out in 11 lysosomal storage disorder models, with each study demonstrating reductions in primary substrate and secondary neuropathological changes, and several reports of improved neurological function. Whilst acute studies in mucopolysaccharidosis (MPS) type II mice revealed that intrathecally-delivered enzyme (into thoraco-lumbar CSF) accesses the brain, the impact of longer-term treatment of affected subjects via this route is unknown. This approach is presently being utilized to treat children with MPS types I, II and III. Our aim was to determine the efficacy of repeated intrathecal injection of recombinant human sulfamidase (rhSGSH) on pathological changes in the MPS IIIA dog brain. The outcomes were compared with those in dogs treated via intra-cisternal or ventricular routes. Control dogs received buffer or no treatment. Significant reductions in primary/secondary substrate levels in brain were observed in dogs treated via all routes, although the extent of the reduction differed regionally. Treatment via all CSF access points resulted in large reductions in microgliosis in superficial cerebral cortex, but only ventricular injection enabled amelioration in deep cerebral cortex. Formation of glutamic acid decarboxylase-positive axonal spheroids in deep cerebellar nuclei was prevented by treatment delivered via any route. Anti-rhSGSH antibodies in the sera of some dogs did not reduce therapeutic efficacy. Our data indicates the capacity of intra-spinal CSF-injected rhSGSH to circulate within CSF-filled spaces, penetrate into brain and mediate a significant reduction in substrate accumulation and secondary pathology in the MPS IIIA dog brain.
•Treatment via all intra-CSF injection routes initiated a reduction in substrate levels.•Axonal spheroid formation was prevented by treatment delivered via any route.•Microgliosis in deep cerebral cortex was reduced only by ventricular injection.•Anti-rhSGSH antibodies in the sera of some dogs did not reduce therapeutic efficacy.•All intra-CSF injection routes appear viable for treating MPS IIIA-based pathology.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-4886</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1090-2430</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2014.09.008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25246230</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Canine ; Cerebrospinal fluid ; Chromatography, Liquid ; Disease Models, Animal ; Dogs ; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay ; Heparitin Sulfate - analysis ; Humans ; Hydrolases - administration & dosage ; Immunohistochemistry ; Injections, Spinal ; Lysosomal storage disorder ; Mass Spectrometry ; Mucopolysaccharidoses - pathology ; Neurodegenerative disease ; Recombinant protein ; Recombinant Proteins - administration & dosage ; Ricinus communis ; Treatment</subject><ispartof>Experimental neurology, 2015-01, Vol.263, p.79-90</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-3cecd30058a39cd1a1caf23c30cc194aa6e9c87b62be9281cdafa483d45d2ef83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-3cecd30058a39cd1a1caf23c30cc194aa6e9c87b62be9281cdafa483d45d2ef83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001448861400291X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25246230$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marshall, Neil R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hassiotis, Sofia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rozaklis, Tina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trim, Paul J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duplock, Stephen K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winner, Leanne K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beard, Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snel, Marten F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jolly, Robert D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hopwood, John J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hemsley, Kim M.</creatorcontrib><title>Delivery of therapeutic protein for prevention of neurodegenerative changes: Comparison of different CSF-delivery methods</title><title>Experimental neurology</title><addtitle>Exp Neurol</addtitle><description>Injection of lysosomal enzyme into cisternal or ventricular cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) has been carried out in 11 lysosomal storage disorder models, with each study demonstrating reductions in primary substrate and secondary neuropathological changes, and several reports of improved neurological function. Whilst acute studies in mucopolysaccharidosis (MPS) type II mice revealed that intrathecally-delivered enzyme (into thoraco-lumbar CSF) accesses the brain, the impact of longer-term treatment of affected subjects via this route is unknown. This approach is presently being utilized to treat children with MPS types I, II and III. Our aim was to determine the efficacy of repeated intrathecal injection of recombinant human sulfamidase (rhSGSH) on pathological changes in the MPS IIIA dog brain. The outcomes were compared with those in dogs treated via intra-cisternal or ventricular routes. Control dogs received buffer or no treatment. Significant reductions in primary/secondary substrate levels in brain were observed in dogs treated via all routes, although the extent of the reduction differed regionally. Treatment via all CSF access points resulted in large reductions in microgliosis in superficial cerebral cortex, but only ventricular injection enabled amelioration in deep cerebral cortex. Formation of glutamic acid decarboxylase-positive axonal spheroids in deep cerebellar nuclei was prevented by treatment delivered via any route. Anti-rhSGSH antibodies in the sera of some dogs did not reduce therapeutic efficacy. Our data indicates the capacity of intra-spinal CSF-injected rhSGSH to circulate within CSF-filled spaces, penetrate into brain and mediate a significant reduction in substrate accumulation and secondary pathology in the MPS IIIA dog brain.
•Treatment via all intra-CSF injection routes initiated a reduction in substrate levels.•Axonal spheroid formation was prevented by treatment delivered via any route.•Microgliosis in deep cerebral cortex was reduced only by ventricular injection.•Anti-rhSGSH antibodies in the sera of some dogs did not reduce therapeutic efficacy.•All intra-CSF injection routes appear viable for treating MPS IIIA-based pathology.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Canine</subject><subject>Cerebrospinal fluid</subject><subject>Chromatography, Liquid</subject><subject>Disease Models, Animal</subject><subject>Dogs</subject><subject>Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay</subject><subject>Heparitin Sulfate - analysis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hydrolases - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Immunohistochemistry</subject><subject>Injections, Spinal</subject><subject>Lysosomal storage disorder</subject><subject>Mass Spectrometry</subject><subject>Mucopolysaccharidoses - pathology</subject><subject>Neurodegenerative disease</subject><subject>Recombinant protein</subject><subject>Recombinant Proteins - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Ricinus communis</subject><subject>Treatment</subject><issn>0014-4886</issn><issn>1090-2430</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1u1DAUhS1E1U5LXwGyZJNw_ZMfs6sGWpAqdQGsLY993fEoiYOdjDpvj4dpu4WVr-Tv3CP7I-QDhYoCbT7tKnyaRlxi6CsGVFQgK4DuDVlRkFAyweEtWUG-KUXXNRfkMqUdAEjB2nNywWomGsZhRQ5fsPd7jIciuGLeYtQTLrM3xRTDjH4sXIh5xj2Osw_jkfpba_ERx0zPOVyYrR4fMX0u1mGYdPTpBFrvHMYcLNY_bkv7UjTgvA02vSNnTvcJr5_PK_Lr9uvP9bfy_uHu-_rmvjQCxFxyg8ZygLrTXBpLNTXaMW44GEOl0LpBabp207ANStZRY7XTouNW1Jah6_gV-Xjam1_0e8E0q8Eng32vRwxLUrRpgMu6rtl_oLwGYC1rM9qeUBNDShGdmqIfdDwoCuqoSO3UqyJ1VKRAqqwoJ98_lyybAe1r7sVJBm5OAOZf2XuMKhmPo0HrI5pZ2eD_WfIH09qqNQ</recordid><startdate>201501</startdate><enddate>201501</enddate><creator>Marshall, Neil R.</creator><creator>Hassiotis, Sofia</creator><creator>King, Barbara</creator><creator>Rozaklis, Tina</creator><creator>Trim, Paul J.</creator><creator>Duplock, Stephen K.</creator><creator>Winner, Leanne K.</creator><creator>Beard, Helen</creator><creator>Snel, Marten F.</creator><creator>Jolly, Robert D.</creator><creator>Hopwood, John J.</creator><creator>Hemsley, Kim M.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201501</creationdate><title>Delivery of therapeutic protein for prevention of neurodegenerative changes: Comparison of different CSF-delivery methods</title><author>Marshall, Neil R. ; Hassiotis, Sofia ; King, Barbara ; Rozaklis, Tina ; Trim, Paul J. ; Duplock, Stephen K. ; Winner, Leanne K. ; Beard, Helen ; Snel, Marten F. ; Jolly, Robert D. ; Hopwood, John J. ; Hemsley, Kim M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-3cecd30058a39cd1a1caf23c30cc194aa6e9c87b62be9281cdafa483d45d2ef83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Canine</topic><topic>Cerebrospinal fluid</topic><topic>Chromatography, Liquid</topic><topic>Disease Models, Animal</topic><topic>Dogs</topic><topic>Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay</topic><topic>Heparitin Sulfate - analysis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hydrolases - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Immunohistochemistry</topic><topic>Injections, Spinal</topic><topic>Lysosomal storage disorder</topic><topic>Mass Spectrometry</topic><topic>Mucopolysaccharidoses - pathology</topic><topic>Neurodegenerative disease</topic><topic>Recombinant protein</topic><topic>Recombinant Proteins - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Ricinus communis</topic><topic>Treatment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marshall, Neil R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hassiotis, Sofia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rozaklis, Tina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trim, Paul J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duplock, Stephen K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winner, Leanne K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beard, Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snel, Marten F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jolly, Robert D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hopwood, John J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hemsley, Kim M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Experimental neurology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marshall, Neil R.</au><au>Hassiotis, Sofia</au><au>King, Barbara</au><au>Rozaklis, Tina</au><au>Trim, Paul J.</au><au>Duplock, Stephen K.</au><au>Winner, Leanne K.</au><au>Beard, Helen</au><au>Snel, Marten F.</au><au>Jolly, Robert D.</au><au>Hopwood, John J.</au><au>Hemsley, Kim M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Delivery of therapeutic protein for prevention of neurodegenerative changes: Comparison of different CSF-delivery methods</atitle><jtitle>Experimental neurology</jtitle><addtitle>Exp Neurol</addtitle><date>2015-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>263</volume><spage>79</spage><epage>90</epage><pages>79-90</pages><issn>0014-4886</issn><eissn>1090-2430</eissn><abstract>Injection of lysosomal enzyme into cisternal or ventricular cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) has been carried out in 11 lysosomal storage disorder models, with each study demonstrating reductions in primary substrate and secondary neuropathological changes, and several reports of improved neurological function. Whilst acute studies in mucopolysaccharidosis (MPS) type II mice revealed that intrathecally-delivered enzyme (into thoraco-lumbar CSF) accesses the brain, the impact of longer-term treatment of affected subjects via this route is unknown. This approach is presently being utilized to treat children with MPS types I, II and III. Our aim was to determine the efficacy of repeated intrathecal injection of recombinant human sulfamidase (rhSGSH) on pathological changes in the MPS IIIA dog brain. The outcomes were compared with those in dogs treated via intra-cisternal or ventricular routes. Control dogs received buffer or no treatment. Significant reductions in primary/secondary substrate levels in brain were observed in dogs treated via all routes, although the extent of the reduction differed regionally. Treatment via all CSF access points resulted in large reductions in microgliosis in superficial cerebral cortex, but only ventricular injection enabled amelioration in deep cerebral cortex. Formation of glutamic acid decarboxylase-positive axonal spheroids in deep cerebellar nuclei was prevented by treatment delivered via any route. Anti-rhSGSH antibodies in the sera of some dogs did not reduce therapeutic efficacy. Our data indicates the capacity of intra-spinal CSF-injected rhSGSH to circulate within CSF-filled spaces, penetrate into brain and mediate a significant reduction in substrate accumulation and secondary pathology in the MPS IIIA dog brain.
•Treatment via all intra-CSF injection routes initiated a reduction in substrate levels.•Axonal spheroid formation was prevented by treatment delivered via any route.•Microgliosis in deep cerebral cortex was reduced only by ventricular injection.•Anti-rhSGSH antibodies in the sera of some dogs did not reduce therapeutic efficacy.•All intra-CSF injection routes appear viable for treating MPS IIIA-based pathology.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>25246230</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.expneurol.2014.09.008</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0014-4886 |
ispartof | Experimental neurology, 2015-01, Vol.263, p.79-90 |
issn | 0014-4886 1090-2430 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1660395552 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Animals Canine Cerebrospinal fluid Chromatography, Liquid Disease Models, Animal Dogs Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay Heparitin Sulfate - analysis Humans Hydrolases - administration & dosage Immunohistochemistry Injections, Spinal Lysosomal storage disorder Mass Spectrometry Mucopolysaccharidoses - pathology Neurodegenerative disease Recombinant protein Recombinant Proteins - administration & dosage Ricinus communis Treatment |
title | Delivery of therapeutic protein for prevention of neurodegenerative changes: Comparison of different CSF-delivery methods |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T18%3A44%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Delivery%20of%20therapeutic%20protein%20for%20prevention%20of%20neurodegenerative%20changes:%20Comparison%20of%20different%20CSF-delivery%20methods&rft.jtitle=Experimental%20neurology&rft.au=Marshall,%20Neil%20R.&rft.date=2015-01&rft.volume=263&rft.spage=79&rft.epage=90&rft.pages=79-90&rft.issn=0014-4886&rft.eissn=1090-2430&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.expneurol.2014.09.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1635002727%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1635002727&rft_id=info:pmid/25246230&rft_els_id=S001448861400291X&rfr_iscdi=true |