Goal-oriented gaze strategies afforded by object interaction
•We conducted an eyetracking experiment comparing a perceptual and two action tasks.•Scanpaths and attention maps show significant differences on task-relevant points.•ROI-based metrics show how the eyes land in between the finger grasping points.•Salient features correlate with affordances and coul...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Vision research (Oxford) 2015-01, Vol.106, p.47-57 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 57 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 47 |
container_title | Vision research (Oxford) |
container_volume | 106 |
creator | Belardinelli, Anna Herbort, Oliver Butz, Martin V. |
description | •We conducted an eyetracking experiment comparing a perceptual and two action tasks.•Scanpaths and attention maps show significant differences on task-relevant points.•ROI-based metrics show how the eyes land in between the finger grasping points.•Salient features correlate with affordances and could be exploited by the visual system.
Task influence has long been known to play a major role in the way our eyes scan a scene. Yet most studies focus either on visual search or on sequences of active tasks in complex real world scenarios. Few studies have contrasted the distribution of eye fixations during viewing and grasping objects. Here we address how attention is deployed when different actions are planned on objects, in contrast to when the same objects are categorized. In this respect, we are particularly interested in the role every fixation plays in the unfolding dynamics of action control. We conducted an eye-tracking experiment in which participants were shown images of real-world objects. Subjects were either to assign the displayed objects to one of two classes (categorization task), to mimic lifting (lifting task), or to mimic opening the object (opening task). Results suggest that even on simplified, two dimensional displays the eyes reveal the participant’s intentions in an anticipatory fashion. For the active tasks, already the second saccade after stimulus onset was directed towards the central region between the two locations where the thumb and the rest of the fingers would be placed. An analysis of saliency at fixation locations showed that fixations in active tasks have higher correspondence with salient features than fixations in the passive task. We suggest that attention flexibly coordinates visual selection for information retrieval and motor planning, working as a gateway between three components, linking the task (action), the object (target), and the effector (hand) in an effective way. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.visres.2014.11.003 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1660387200</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0042698914002818</els_id><sourcerecordid>1640331128</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-1857c8a969f2e2c51cbde65eee2297c4514fe4608c6680d1723947d32bfe95663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMFKAzEQhoMotlbfQGSPXnbNZJNsFkSQolUoeNFzyGZnS0rb1GRbqE9vSqtHPc1hvn_-4SPkGmgBFOTdvNi6GDAWjAIvAApKyxMyBFWpXEguT8mQUs5yWat6QC5inFNKK8HqczJgggtgHIbkfuLNIvfB4arHNpuZL8xiH0yPM4cxM13nQ5sWzS7zzRxtn7kEBmN751eX5Kwzi4hXxzkiH89P7-OXfPo2eR0_TnMraNXnoERllall3TFkVoBtWpQCERmrK5te4R1ySZWVUtEWKlbWvGpL1nRYCynLEbk93F0H_7nB2OulixYXC7NCv4kapKSlqlgy8D_KaVkCMJVQfkBt8DGZ7PQ6uKUJOw1U7xXruT4o1nvFGkCnghS7OTZsmiW2v6Efpwl4OACYlGwdBh1t0muxdSEJ1K13fzd8AxzojXo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1640331128</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Goal-oriented gaze strategies afforded by object interaction</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Belardinelli, Anna ; Herbort, Oliver ; Butz, Martin V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Belardinelli, Anna ; Herbort, Oliver ; Butz, Martin V.</creatorcontrib><description>•We conducted an eyetracking experiment comparing a perceptual and two action tasks.•Scanpaths and attention maps show significant differences on task-relevant points.•ROI-based metrics show how the eyes land in between the finger grasping points.•Salient features correlate with affordances and could be exploited by the visual system.
Task influence has long been known to play a major role in the way our eyes scan a scene. Yet most studies focus either on visual search or on sequences of active tasks in complex real world scenarios. Few studies have contrasted the distribution of eye fixations during viewing and grasping objects. Here we address how attention is deployed when different actions are planned on objects, in contrast to when the same objects are categorized. In this respect, we are particularly interested in the role every fixation plays in the unfolding dynamics of action control. We conducted an eye-tracking experiment in which participants were shown images of real-world objects. Subjects were either to assign the displayed objects to one of two classes (categorization task), to mimic lifting (lifting task), or to mimic opening the object (opening task). Results suggest that even on simplified, two dimensional displays the eyes reveal the participant’s intentions in an anticipatory fashion. For the active tasks, already the second saccade after stimulus onset was directed towards the central region between the two locations where the thumb and the rest of the fingers would be placed. An analysis of saliency at fixation locations showed that fixations in active tasks have higher correspondence with salient features than fixations in the passive task. We suggest that attention flexibly coordinates visual selection for information retrieval and motor planning, working as a gateway between three components, linking the task (action), the object (target), and the effector (hand) in an effective way.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0042-6989</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-5646</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.11.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25451241</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Analysis of Variance ; Attention - physiology ; Eye Movements - physiology ; Eye-hand coordination ; Eye-tracking ; Female ; Fixation distribution ; Fixation, Ocular - physiology ; Hand - physiology ; Humans ; Male ; Movement - physiology ; Movement preparation ; Object interaction ; Psychomotor Performance - physiology ; Reaction Time - physiology ; Task-driven perception ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Vision research (Oxford), 2015-01, Vol.106, p.47-57</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-1857c8a969f2e2c51cbde65eee2297c4514fe4608c6680d1723947d32bfe95663</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-1857c8a969f2e2c51cbde65eee2297c4514fe4608c6680d1723947d32bfe95663</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0042698914002818$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25451241$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Belardinelli, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herbort, Oliver</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butz, Martin V.</creatorcontrib><title>Goal-oriented gaze strategies afforded by object interaction</title><title>Vision research (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Vision Res</addtitle><description>•We conducted an eyetracking experiment comparing a perceptual and two action tasks.•Scanpaths and attention maps show significant differences on task-relevant points.•ROI-based metrics show how the eyes land in between the finger grasping points.•Salient features correlate with affordances and could be exploited by the visual system.
Task influence has long been known to play a major role in the way our eyes scan a scene. Yet most studies focus either on visual search or on sequences of active tasks in complex real world scenarios. Few studies have contrasted the distribution of eye fixations during viewing and grasping objects. Here we address how attention is deployed when different actions are planned on objects, in contrast to when the same objects are categorized. In this respect, we are particularly interested in the role every fixation plays in the unfolding dynamics of action control. We conducted an eye-tracking experiment in which participants were shown images of real-world objects. Subjects were either to assign the displayed objects to one of two classes (categorization task), to mimic lifting (lifting task), or to mimic opening the object (opening task). Results suggest that even on simplified, two dimensional displays the eyes reveal the participant’s intentions in an anticipatory fashion. For the active tasks, already the second saccade after stimulus onset was directed towards the central region between the two locations where the thumb and the rest of the fingers would be placed. An analysis of saliency at fixation locations showed that fixations in active tasks have higher correspondence with salient features than fixations in the passive task. We suggest that attention flexibly coordinates visual selection for information retrieval and motor planning, working as a gateway between three components, linking the task (action), the object (target), and the effector (hand) in an effective way.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Attention - physiology</subject><subject>Eye Movements - physiology</subject><subject>Eye-hand coordination</subject><subject>Eye-tracking</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fixation distribution</subject><subject>Fixation, Ocular - physiology</subject><subject>Hand - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Movement - physiology</subject><subject>Movement preparation</subject><subject>Object interaction</subject><subject>Psychomotor Performance - physiology</subject><subject>Reaction Time - physiology</subject><subject>Task-driven perception</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0042-6989</issn><issn>1878-5646</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMFKAzEQhoMotlbfQGSPXnbNZJNsFkSQolUoeNFzyGZnS0rb1GRbqE9vSqtHPc1hvn_-4SPkGmgBFOTdvNi6GDAWjAIvAApKyxMyBFWpXEguT8mQUs5yWat6QC5inFNKK8HqczJgggtgHIbkfuLNIvfB4arHNpuZL8xiH0yPM4cxM13nQ5sWzS7zzRxtn7kEBmN751eX5Kwzi4hXxzkiH89P7-OXfPo2eR0_TnMraNXnoERllall3TFkVoBtWpQCERmrK5te4R1ySZWVUtEWKlbWvGpL1nRYCynLEbk93F0H_7nB2OulixYXC7NCv4kapKSlqlgy8D_KaVkCMJVQfkBt8DGZ7PQ6uKUJOw1U7xXruT4o1nvFGkCnghS7OTZsmiW2v6Efpwl4OACYlGwdBh1t0muxdSEJ1K13fzd8AxzojXo</recordid><startdate>201501</startdate><enddate>201501</enddate><creator>Belardinelli, Anna</creator><creator>Herbort, Oliver</creator><creator>Butz, Martin V.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201501</creationdate><title>Goal-oriented gaze strategies afforded by object interaction</title><author>Belardinelli, Anna ; Herbort, Oliver ; Butz, Martin V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-1857c8a969f2e2c51cbde65eee2297c4514fe4608c6680d1723947d32bfe95663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Attention - physiology</topic><topic>Eye Movements - physiology</topic><topic>Eye-hand coordination</topic><topic>Eye-tracking</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fixation distribution</topic><topic>Fixation, Ocular - physiology</topic><topic>Hand - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Movement - physiology</topic><topic>Movement preparation</topic><topic>Object interaction</topic><topic>Psychomotor Performance - physiology</topic><topic>Reaction Time - physiology</topic><topic>Task-driven perception</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Belardinelli, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herbort, Oliver</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butz, Martin V.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Vision research (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Belardinelli, Anna</au><au>Herbort, Oliver</au><au>Butz, Martin V.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Goal-oriented gaze strategies afforded by object interaction</atitle><jtitle>Vision research (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Vision Res</addtitle><date>2015-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>106</volume><spage>47</spage><epage>57</epage><pages>47-57</pages><issn>0042-6989</issn><eissn>1878-5646</eissn><abstract>•We conducted an eyetracking experiment comparing a perceptual and two action tasks.•Scanpaths and attention maps show significant differences on task-relevant points.•ROI-based metrics show how the eyes land in between the finger grasping points.•Salient features correlate with affordances and could be exploited by the visual system.
Task influence has long been known to play a major role in the way our eyes scan a scene. Yet most studies focus either on visual search or on sequences of active tasks in complex real world scenarios. Few studies have contrasted the distribution of eye fixations during viewing and grasping objects. Here we address how attention is deployed when different actions are planned on objects, in contrast to when the same objects are categorized. In this respect, we are particularly interested in the role every fixation plays in the unfolding dynamics of action control. We conducted an eye-tracking experiment in which participants were shown images of real-world objects. Subjects were either to assign the displayed objects to one of two classes (categorization task), to mimic lifting (lifting task), or to mimic opening the object (opening task). Results suggest that even on simplified, two dimensional displays the eyes reveal the participant’s intentions in an anticipatory fashion. For the active tasks, already the second saccade after stimulus onset was directed towards the central region between the two locations where the thumb and the rest of the fingers would be placed. An analysis of saliency at fixation locations showed that fixations in active tasks have higher correspondence with salient features than fixations in the passive task. We suggest that attention flexibly coordinates visual selection for information retrieval and motor planning, working as a gateway between three components, linking the task (action), the object (target), and the effector (hand) in an effective way.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>25451241</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.visres.2014.11.003</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0042-6989 |
ispartof | Vision research (Oxford), 2015-01, Vol.106, p.47-57 |
issn | 0042-6989 1878-5646 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1660387200 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Adult Analysis of Variance Attention - physiology Eye Movements - physiology Eye-hand coordination Eye-tracking Female Fixation distribution Fixation, Ocular - physiology Hand - physiology Humans Male Movement - physiology Movement preparation Object interaction Psychomotor Performance - physiology Reaction Time - physiology Task-driven perception Young Adult |
title | Goal-oriented gaze strategies afforded by object interaction |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T04%3A04%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Goal-oriented%20gaze%20strategies%20afforded%20by%20object%20interaction&rft.jtitle=Vision%20research%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Belardinelli,%20Anna&rft.date=2015-01&rft.volume=106&rft.spage=47&rft.epage=57&rft.pages=47-57&rft.issn=0042-6989&rft.eissn=1878-5646&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.visres.2014.11.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1640331128%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1640331128&rft_id=info:pmid/25451241&rft_els_id=S0042698914002818&rfr_iscdi=true |