Human health risk implications of multiple sources of faecal indicator bacteria in a recreational waterbody
We simulate the influence of multiple sources of enterococci (ENT) as faecal indicator bacteria (FIB) in recreational water bodies on potential human health risk by considering waters impacted by human and animal sources, human and non-pathogenic sources, and animal and non-pathogenic sources. We il...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Water research (Oxford) 2014-12, Vol.66, p.254-264 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 264 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 254 |
container_title | Water research (Oxford) |
container_volume | 66 |
creator | Soller, Jeffrey A. Schoen, Mary E. Varghese, Arun Ichida, Audrey M. Boehm, Alexandria B. Eftim, Sorina Ashbolt, Nicholas J. Ravenscroft, John E. |
description | We simulate the influence of multiple sources of enterococci (ENT) as faecal indicator bacteria (FIB) in recreational water bodies on potential human health risk by considering waters impacted by human and animal sources, human and non-pathogenic sources, and animal and non-pathogenic sources. We illustrate that risks vary with the proportion of culturable ENT in water bodies derived from these sources and estimate corresponding ENT densities that yield the same level of health protection that the recreational water quality criteria in the United States seeks (benchmark risk). The benchmark risk is based on epidemiological studies conducted in water bodies predominantly impacted by human faecal sources. The key result is that the risks from mixed sources are driven predominantly by the proportion of the contamination source with the greatest ability to cause human infection (potency), not necessarily the greatest source(s) of FIB. Predicted risks from exposures to mixtures comprised of approximately 30% ENT from human sources were up to 50% lower than the risks expected from purely human sources when contamination is recent and ENT levels are at the current water quality criteria levels (35 CFU 100 mL-1). For human/non-pathogenic, human/gull, human/pig, and human/chicken faecal mixtures with relatively low human contribution, the predicted culturable enterococci densities that correspond to the benchmark risk are substantially greater than the current water quality criteria values. These findings are important because they highlight the potential applicability of site specific water quality criteria for waters that are predominantly un-impacted by human sources.
[Display omitted]
•Human health risks are influenced by the nature and magnitude of the faecal contamination sources.•Alternative recreational water quality standards can be justified for some non-human sources.•Risks for mixtures with moderate or higher human source proportions are not substantially reduced. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.watres.2014.08.026 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1660071589</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0043135414005934</els_id><sourcerecordid>1660071589</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-2fc4d081bc81a11077ddafe0cdabee6f179756592a6ee6c4dc0ddc7b74e1d5c73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU2LFDEQhoMo7rj6D0RyEbx0W0mn83ERZFFXWPCi55BOqtnM9seYdLvsvze9M-pN5pSkeOqtIg8hrxnUDJh8v6_v3ZIw1xyYqEHXwOUTsmNamYoLoZ-SHYBoKta04oK8yHkPAJw35jm54C0vN2525O56Hd1Eb9ENyy1NMd_ROB6G6N0S5ynTuafjOizxMCDN85o8PtZ6h94NNE5hI-dEO-cXTNGVEnU0oU_4mFCgsiambg4PL8mz3g0ZX53OS_Lj86fvV9fVzbcvX68-3lReGLZUvPcigGad18wxBkqF4HoEH1yHKHumjGpla7iT5VlYDyF41SmBLLReNZfk3TH3kOafK-bFjjF7HAY34bxmy6QEUKzV5gxUKIBWan4u2spzUrkxrVB8SxVH1Kc554S9PaQ4uvRgGdjNs93bo2e7ebagbfFc2t6cJqzdiOFv0x-xBXh7AlwupvrkJh_zP05rA7zZ_urDkcMi5FfEZLOPOHkMsUhcbJjj_zf5DaEXyTc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1629954722</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Human health risk implications of multiple sources of faecal indicator bacteria in a recreational waterbody</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Soller, Jeffrey A. ; Schoen, Mary E. ; Varghese, Arun ; Ichida, Audrey M. ; Boehm, Alexandria B. ; Eftim, Sorina ; Ashbolt, Nicholas J. ; Ravenscroft, John E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Soller, Jeffrey A. ; Schoen, Mary E. ; Varghese, Arun ; Ichida, Audrey M. ; Boehm, Alexandria B. ; Eftim, Sorina ; Ashbolt, Nicholas J. ; Ravenscroft, John E.</creatorcontrib><description>We simulate the influence of multiple sources of enterococci (ENT) as faecal indicator bacteria (FIB) in recreational water bodies on potential human health risk by considering waters impacted by human and animal sources, human and non-pathogenic sources, and animal and non-pathogenic sources. We illustrate that risks vary with the proportion of culturable ENT in water bodies derived from these sources and estimate corresponding ENT densities that yield the same level of health protection that the recreational water quality criteria in the United States seeks (benchmark risk). The benchmark risk is based on epidemiological studies conducted in water bodies predominantly impacted by human faecal sources. The key result is that the risks from mixed sources are driven predominantly by the proportion of the contamination source with the greatest ability to cause human infection (potency), not necessarily the greatest source(s) of FIB. Predicted risks from exposures to mixtures comprised of approximately 30% ENT from human sources were up to 50% lower than the risks expected from purely human sources when contamination is recent and ENT levels are at the current water quality criteria levels (35 CFU 100 mL-1). For human/non-pathogenic, human/gull, human/pig, and human/chicken faecal mixtures with relatively low human contribution, the predicted culturable enterococci densities that correspond to the benchmark risk are substantially greater than the current water quality criteria values. These findings are important because they highlight the potential applicability of site specific water quality criteria for waters that are predominantly un-impacted by human sources.
[Display omitted]
•Human health risks are influenced by the nature and magnitude of the faecal contamination sources.•Alternative recreational water quality standards can be justified for some non-human sources.•Risks for mixtures with moderate or higher human source proportions are not substantially reduced.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1354</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2448</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2014.08.026</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25222329</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WATRAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Air. Soil. Water. Waste. Feeding ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Applied sciences ; Bacteria ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biological and physicochemical phenomena ; Criteria ; Density ; Enterococcus ; Environment. Living conditions ; Environmental Monitoring ; Escherichia coli O157 ; Exact sciences and technology ; Faecal contamination ; Feces - microbiology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Gastrointestinal Diseases - microbiology ; Health ; Human ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Microbial ecology ; Microbial source apportionment ; Natural water pollution ; Pollution ; Pollution sources ; Probability ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Quantitative microbial risk assessment ; Recreational water ; Risk ; Risk Assessment ; Swine ; United States ; Various environments (extraatmospheric space, air, water) ; Water Microbiology ; Water Pollutants - analysis ; Water Pollution ; Water Quality ; Water Supply ; Water treatment and pollution</subject><ispartof>Water research (Oxford), 2014-12, Vol.66, p.254-264</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-2fc4d081bc81a11077ddafe0cdabee6f179756592a6ee6c4dc0ddc7b74e1d5c73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-2fc4d081bc81a11077ddafe0cdabee6f179756592a6ee6c4dc0ddc7b74e1d5c73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2014.08.026$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3538,27906,27907,45977</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=28890237$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25222329$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Soller, Jeffrey A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schoen, Mary E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varghese, Arun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ichida, Audrey M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boehm, Alexandria B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eftim, Sorina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashbolt, Nicholas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ravenscroft, John E.</creatorcontrib><title>Human health risk implications of multiple sources of faecal indicator bacteria in a recreational waterbody</title><title>Water research (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Water Res</addtitle><description>We simulate the influence of multiple sources of enterococci (ENT) as faecal indicator bacteria (FIB) in recreational water bodies on potential human health risk by considering waters impacted by human and animal sources, human and non-pathogenic sources, and animal and non-pathogenic sources. We illustrate that risks vary with the proportion of culturable ENT in water bodies derived from these sources and estimate corresponding ENT densities that yield the same level of health protection that the recreational water quality criteria in the United States seeks (benchmark risk). The benchmark risk is based on epidemiological studies conducted in water bodies predominantly impacted by human faecal sources. The key result is that the risks from mixed sources are driven predominantly by the proportion of the contamination source with the greatest ability to cause human infection (potency), not necessarily the greatest source(s) of FIB. Predicted risks from exposures to mixtures comprised of approximately 30% ENT from human sources were up to 50% lower than the risks expected from purely human sources when contamination is recent and ENT levels are at the current water quality criteria levels (35 CFU 100 mL-1). For human/non-pathogenic, human/gull, human/pig, and human/chicken faecal mixtures with relatively low human contribution, the predicted culturable enterococci densities that correspond to the benchmark risk are substantially greater than the current water quality criteria values. These findings are important because they highlight the potential applicability of site specific water quality criteria for waters that are predominantly un-impacted by human sources.
[Display omitted]
•Human health risks are influenced by the nature and magnitude of the faecal contamination sources.•Alternative recreational water quality standards can be justified for some non-human sources.•Risks for mixtures with moderate or higher human source proportions are not substantially reduced.</description><subject>Air. Soil. Water. Waste. Feeding</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biological and physicochemical phenomena</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Enterococcus</subject><subject>Environment. Living conditions</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring</subject><subject>Escherichia coli O157</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Faecal contamination</subject><subject>Feces - microbiology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal Diseases - microbiology</subject><subject>Health</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Microbial ecology</subject><subject>Microbial source apportionment</subject><subject>Natural water pollution</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Pollution sources</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Quantitative microbial risk assessment</subject><subject>Recreational water</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Various environments (extraatmospheric space, air, water)</subject><subject>Water Microbiology</subject><subject>Water Pollutants - analysis</subject><subject>Water Pollution</subject><subject>Water Quality</subject><subject>Water Supply</subject><subject>Water treatment and pollution</subject><issn>0043-1354</issn><issn>1879-2448</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU2LFDEQhoMo7rj6D0RyEbx0W0mn83ERZFFXWPCi55BOqtnM9seYdLvsvze9M-pN5pSkeOqtIg8hrxnUDJh8v6_v3ZIw1xyYqEHXwOUTsmNamYoLoZ-SHYBoKta04oK8yHkPAJw35jm54C0vN2525O56Hd1Eb9ENyy1NMd_ROB6G6N0S5ynTuafjOizxMCDN85o8PtZ6h94NNE5hI-dEO-cXTNGVEnU0oU_4mFCgsiambg4PL8mz3g0ZX53OS_Lj86fvV9fVzbcvX68-3lReGLZUvPcigGad18wxBkqF4HoEH1yHKHumjGpla7iT5VlYDyF41SmBLLReNZfk3TH3kOafK-bFjjF7HAY34bxmy6QEUKzV5gxUKIBWan4u2spzUrkxrVB8SxVH1Kc554S9PaQ4uvRgGdjNs93bo2e7ebagbfFc2t6cJqzdiOFv0x-xBXh7AlwupvrkJh_zP05rA7zZ_urDkcMi5FfEZLOPOHkMsUhcbJjj_zf5DaEXyTc</recordid><startdate>20141201</startdate><enddate>20141201</enddate><creator>Soller, Jeffrey A.</creator><creator>Schoen, Mary E.</creator><creator>Varghese, Arun</creator><creator>Ichida, Audrey M.</creator><creator>Boehm, Alexandria B.</creator><creator>Eftim, Sorina</creator><creator>Ashbolt, Nicholas J.</creator><creator>Ravenscroft, John E.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141201</creationdate><title>Human health risk implications of multiple sources of faecal indicator bacteria in a recreational waterbody</title><author>Soller, Jeffrey A. ; Schoen, Mary E. ; Varghese, Arun ; Ichida, Audrey M. ; Boehm, Alexandria B. ; Eftim, Sorina ; Ashbolt, Nicholas J. ; Ravenscroft, John E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-2fc4d081bc81a11077ddafe0cdabee6f179756592a6ee6c4dc0ddc7b74e1d5c73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Air. Soil. Water. Waste. Feeding</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biological and physicochemical phenomena</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Enterococcus</topic><topic>Environment. Living conditions</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring</topic><topic>Escherichia coli O157</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Faecal contamination</topic><topic>Feces - microbiology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal Diseases - microbiology</topic><topic>Health</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Microbial ecology</topic><topic>Microbial source apportionment</topic><topic>Natural water pollution</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Pollution sources</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Quantitative microbial risk assessment</topic><topic>Recreational water</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Various environments (extraatmospheric space, air, water)</topic><topic>Water Microbiology</topic><topic>Water Pollutants - analysis</topic><topic>Water Pollution</topic><topic>Water Quality</topic><topic>Water Supply</topic><topic>Water treatment and pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Soller, Jeffrey A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schoen, Mary E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varghese, Arun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ichida, Audrey M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boehm, Alexandria B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eftim, Sorina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashbolt, Nicholas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ravenscroft, John E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water research (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Soller, Jeffrey A.</au><au>Schoen, Mary E.</au><au>Varghese, Arun</au><au>Ichida, Audrey M.</au><au>Boehm, Alexandria B.</au><au>Eftim, Sorina</au><au>Ashbolt, Nicholas J.</au><au>Ravenscroft, John E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Human health risk implications of multiple sources of faecal indicator bacteria in a recreational waterbody</atitle><jtitle>Water research (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Water Res</addtitle><date>2014-12-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>66</volume><spage>254</spage><epage>264</epage><pages>254-264</pages><issn>0043-1354</issn><eissn>1879-2448</eissn><coden>WATRAG</coden><abstract>We simulate the influence of multiple sources of enterococci (ENT) as faecal indicator bacteria (FIB) in recreational water bodies on potential human health risk by considering waters impacted by human and animal sources, human and non-pathogenic sources, and animal and non-pathogenic sources. We illustrate that risks vary with the proportion of culturable ENT in water bodies derived from these sources and estimate corresponding ENT densities that yield the same level of health protection that the recreational water quality criteria in the United States seeks (benchmark risk). The benchmark risk is based on epidemiological studies conducted in water bodies predominantly impacted by human faecal sources. The key result is that the risks from mixed sources are driven predominantly by the proportion of the contamination source with the greatest ability to cause human infection (potency), not necessarily the greatest source(s) of FIB. Predicted risks from exposures to mixtures comprised of approximately 30% ENT from human sources were up to 50% lower than the risks expected from purely human sources when contamination is recent and ENT levels are at the current water quality criteria levels (35 CFU 100 mL-1). For human/non-pathogenic, human/gull, human/pig, and human/chicken faecal mixtures with relatively low human contribution, the predicted culturable enterococci densities that correspond to the benchmark risk are substantially greater than the current water quality criteria values. These findings are important because they highlight the potential applicability of site specific water quality criteria for waters that are predominantly un-impacted by human sources.
[Display omitted]
•Human health risks are influenced by the nature and magnitude of the faecal contamination sources.•Alternative recreational water quality standards can be justified for some non-human sources.•Risks for mixtures with moderate or higher human source proportions are not substantially reduced.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>25222329</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.watres.2014.08.026</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0043-1354 |
ispartof | Water research (Oxford), 2014-12, Vol.66, p.254-264 |
issn | 0043-1354 1879-2448 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1660071589 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Air. Soil. Water. Waste. Feeding Animal, plant and microbial ecology Animals Applied sciences Bacteria Biological and medical sciences Biological and physicochemical phenomena Criteria Density Enterococcus Environment. Living conditions Environmental Monitoring Escherichia coli O157 Exact sciences and technology Faecal contamination Feces - microbiology Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Gastrointestinal Diseases - microbiology Health Human Humans Medical sciences Microbial ecology Microbial source apportionment Natural water pollution Pollution Pollution sources Probability Public health. Hygiene Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine Quantitative microbial risk assessment Recreational water Risk Risk Assessment Swine United States Various environments (extraatmospheric space, air, water) Water Microbiology Water Pollutants - analysis Water Pollution Water Quality Water Supply Water treatment and pollution |
title | Human health risk implications of multiple sources of faecal indicator bacteria in a recreational waterbody |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T11%3A28%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Human%20health%20risk%20implications%20of%20multiple%20sources%20of%20faecal%20indicator%20bacteria%20in%20a%20recreational%20waterbody&rft.jtitle=Water%20research%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Soller,%20Jeffrey%20A.&rft.date=2014-12-01&rft.volume=66&rft.spage=254&rft.epage=264&rft.pages=254-264&rft.issn=0043-1354&rft.eissn=1879-2448&rft.coden=WATRAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.watres.2014.08.026&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1660071589%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1629954722&rft_id=info:pmid/25222329&rft_els_id=S0043135414005934&rfr_iscdi=true |