Human health risk implications of multiple sources of faecal indicator bacteria in a recreational waterbody

We simulate the influence of multiple sources of enterococci (ENT) as faecal indicator bacteria (FIB) in recreational water bodies on potential human health risk by considering waters impacted by human and animal sources, human and non-pathogenic sources, and animal and non-pathogenic sources. We il...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Water research (Oxford) 2014-12, Vol.66, p.254-264
Hauptverfasser: Soller, Jeffrey A., Schoen, Mary E., Varghese, Arun, Ichida, Audrey M., Boehm, Alexandria B., Eftim, Sorina, Ashbolt, Nicholas J., Ravenscroft, John E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 264
container_issue
container_start_page 254
container_title Water research (Oxford)
container_volume 66
creator Soller, Jeffrey A.
Schoen, Mary E.
Varghese, Arun
Ichida, Audrey M.
Boehm, Alexandria B.
Eftim, Sorina
Ashbolt, Nicholas J.
Ravenscroft, John E.
description We simulate the influence of multiple sources of enterococci (ENT) as faecal indicator bacteria (FIB) in recreational water bodies on potential human health risk by considering waters impacted by human and animal sources, human and non-pathogenic sources, and animal and non-pathogenic sources. We illustrate that risks vary with the proportion of culturable ENT in water bodies derived from these sources and estimate corresponding ENT densities that yield the same level of health protection that the recreational water quality criteria in the United States seeks (benchmark risk). The benchmark risk is based on epidemiological studies conducted in water bodies predominantly impacted by human faecal sources. The key result is that the risks from mixed sources are driven predominantly by the proportion of the contamination source with the greatest ability to cause human infection (potency), not necessarily the greatest source(s) of FIB. Predicted risks from exposures to mixtures comprised of approximately 30% ENT from human sources were up to 50% lower than the risks expected from purely human sources when contamination is recent and ENT levels are at the current water quality criteria levels (35 CFU 100 mL-1). For human/non-pathogenic, human/gull, human/pig, and human/chicken faecal mixtures with relatively low human contribution, the predicted culturable enterococci densities that correspond to the benchmark risk are substantially greater than the current water quality criteria values. These findings are important because they highlight the potential applicability of site specific water quality criteria for waters that are predominantly un-impacted by human sources. [Display omitted] •Human health risks are influenced by the nature and magnitude of the faecal contamination sources.•Alternative recreational water quality standards can be justified for some non-human sources.•Risks for mixtures with moderate or higher human source proportions are not substantially reduced.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.watres.2014.08.026
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1660071589</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0043135414005934</els_id><sourcerecordid>1660071589</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-2fc4d081bc81a11077ddafe0cdabee6f179756592a6ee6c4dc0ddc7b74e1d5c73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU2LFDEQhoMo7rj6D0RyEbx0W0mn83ERZFFXWPCi55BOqtnM9seYdLvsvze9M-pN5pSkeOqtIg8hrxnUDJh8v6_v3ZIw1xyYqEHXwOUTsmNamYoLoZ-SHYBoKta04oK8yHkPAJw35jm54C0vN2525O56Hd1Eb9ENyy1NMd_ROB6G6N0S5ynTuafjOizxMCDN85o8PtZ6h94NNE5hI-dEO-cXTNGVEnU0oU_4mFCgsiambg4PL8mz3g0ZX53OS_Lj86fvV9fVzbcvX68-3lReGLZUvPcigGad18wxBkqF4HoEH1yHKHumjGpla7iT5VlYDyF41SmBLLReNZfk3TH3kOafK-bFjjF7HAY34bxmy6QEUKzV5gxUKIBWan4u2spzUrkxrVB8SxVH1Kc554S9PaQ4uvRgGdjNs93bo2e7ebagbfFc2t6cJqzdiOFv0x-xBXh7AlwupvrkJh_zP05rA7zZ_urDkcMi5FfEZLOPOHkMsUhcbJjj_zf5DaEXyTc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1629954722</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Human health risk implications of multiple sources of faecal indicator bacteria in a recreational waterbody</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Soller, Jeffrey A. ; Schoen, Mary E. ; Varghese, Arun ; Ichida, Audrey M. ; Boehm, Alexandria B. ; Eftim, Sorina ; Ashbolt, Nicholas J. ; Ravenscroft, John E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Soller, Jeffrey A. ; Schoen, Mary E. ; Varghese, Arun ; Ichida, Audrey M. ; Boehm, Alexandria B. ; Eftim, Sorina ; Ashbolt, Nicholas J. ; Ravenscroft, John E.</creatorcontrib><description>We simulate the influence of multiple sources of enterococci (ENT) as faecal indicator bacteria (FIB) in recreational water bodies on potential human health risk by considering waters impacted by human and animal sources, human and non-pathogenic sources, and animal and non-pathogenic sources. We illustrate that risks vary with the proportion of culturable ENT in water bodies derived from these sources and estimate corresponding ENT densities that yield the same level of health protection that the recreational water quality criteria in the United States seeks (benchmark risk). The benchmark risk is based on epidemiological studies conducted in water bodies predominantly impacted by human faecal sources. The key result is that the risks from mixed sources are driven predominantly by the proportion of the contamination source with the greatest ability to cause human infection (potency), not necessarily the greatest source(s) of FIB. Predicted risks from exposures to mixtures comprised of approximately 30% ENT from human sources were up to 50% lower than the risks expected from purely human sources when contamination is recent and ENT levels are at the current water quality criteria levels (35 CFU 100 mL-1). For human/non-pathogenic, human/gull, human/pig, and human/chicken faecal mixtures with relatively low human contribution, the predicted culturable enterococci densities that correspond to the benchmark risk are substantially greater than the current water quality criteria values. These findings are important because they highlight the potential applicability of site specific water quality criteria for waters that are predominantly un-impacted by human sources. [Display omitted] •Human health risks are influenced by the nature and magnitude of the faecal contamination sources.•Alternative recreational water quality standards can be justified for some non-human sources.•Risks for mixtures with moderate or higher human source proportions are not substantially reduced.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1354</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2448</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2014.08.026</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25222329</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WATRAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Air. Soil. Water. Waste. Feeding ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Applied sciences ; Bacteria ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biological and physicochemical phenomena ; Criteria ; Density ; Enterococcus ; Environment. Living conditions ; Environmental Monitoring ; Escherichia coli O157 ; Exact sciences and technology ; Faecal contamination ; Feces - microbiology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Gastrointestinal Diseases - microbiology ; Health ; Human ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Microbial ecology ; Microbial source apportionment ; Natural water pollution ; Pollution ; Pollution sources ; Probability ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Quantitative microbial risk assessment ; Recreational water ; Risk ; Risk Assessment ; Swine ; United States ; Various environments (extraatmospheric space, air, water) ; Water Microbiology ; Water Pollutants - analysis ; Water Pollution ; Water Quality ; Water Supply ; Water treatment and pollution</subject><ispartof>Water research (Oxford), 2014-12, Vol.66, p.254-264</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-2fc4d081bc81a11077ddafe0cdabee6f179756592a6ee6c4dc0ddc7b74e1d5c73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-2fc4d081bc81a11077ddafe0cdabee6f179756592a6ee6c4dc0ddc7b74e1d5c73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2014.08.026$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3538,27906,27907,45977</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28890237$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25222329$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Soller, Jeffrey A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schoen, Mary E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varghese, Arun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ichida, Audrey M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boehm, Alexandria B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eftim, Sorina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashbolt, Nicholas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ravenscroft, John E.</creatorcontrib><title>Human health risk implications of multiple sources of faecal indicator bacteria in a recreational waterbody</title><title>Water research (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Water Res</addtitle><description>We simulate the influence of multiple sources of enterococci (ENT) as faecal indicator bacteria (FIB) in recreational water bodies on potential human health risk by considering waters impacted by human and animal sources, human and non-pathogenic sources, and animal and non-pathogenic sources. We illustrate that risks vary with the proportion of culturable ENT in water bodies derived from these sources and estimate corresponding ENT densities that yield the same level of health protection that the recreational water quality criteria in the United States seeks (benchmark risk). The benchmark risk is based on epidemiological studies conducted in water bodies predominantly impacted by human faecal sources. The key result is that the risks from mixed sources are driven predominantly by the proportion of the contamination source with the greatest ability to cause human infection (potency), not necessarily the greatest source(s) of FIB. Predicted risks from exposures to mixtures comprised of approximately 30% ENT from human sources were up to 50% lower than the risks expected from purely human sources when contamination is recent and ENT levels are at the current water quality criteria levels (35 CFU 100 mL-1). For human/non-pathogenic, human/gull, human/pig, and human/chicken faecal mixtures with relatively low human contribution, the predicted culturable enterococci densities that correspond to the benchmark risk are substantially greater than the current water quality criteria values. These findings are important because they highlight the potential applicability of site specific water quality criteria for waters that are predominantly un-impacted by human sources. [Display omitted] •Human health risks are influenced by the nature and magnitude of the faecal contamination sources.•Alternative recreational water quality standards can be justified for some non-human sources.•Risks for mixtures with moderate or higher human source proportions are not substantially reduced.</description><subject>Air. Soil. Water. Waste. Feeding</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biological and physicochemical phenomena</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Enterococcus</subject><subject>Environment. Living conditions</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring</subject><subject>Escherichia coli O157</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Faecal contamination</subject><subject>Feces - microbiology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal Diseases - microbiology</subject><subject>Health</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Microbial ecology</subject><subject>Microbial source apportionment</subject><subject>Natural water pollution</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Pollution sources</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Quantitative microbial risk assessment</subject><subject>Recreational water</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Various environments (extraatmospheric space, air, water)</subject><subject>Water Microbiology</subject><subject>Water Pollutants - analysis</subject><subject>Water Pollution</subject><subject>Water Quality</subject><subject>Water Supply</subject><subject>Water treatment and pollution</subject><issn>0043-1354</issn><issn>1879-2448</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU2LFDEQhoMo7rj6D0RyEbx0W0mn83ERZFFXWPCi55BOqtnM9seYdLvsvze9M-pN5pSkeOqtIg8hrxnUDJh8v6_v3ZIw1xyYqEHXwOUTsmNamYoLoZ-SHYBoKta04oK8yHkPAJw35jm54C0vN2525O56Hd1Eb9ENyy1NMd_ROB6G6N0S5ynTuafjOizxMCDN85o8PtZ6h94NNE5hI-dEO-cXTNGVEnU0oU_4mFCgsiambg4PL8mz3g0ZX53OS_Lj86fvV9fVzbcvX68-3lReGLZUvPcigGad18wxBkqF4HoEH1yHKHumjGpla7iT5VlYDyF41SmBLLReNZfk3TH3kOafK-bFjjF7HAY34bxmy6QEUKzV5gxUKIBWan4u2spzUrkxrVB8SxVH1Kc554S9PaQ4uvRgGdjNs93bo2e7ebagbfFc2t6cJqzdiOFv0x-xBXh7AlwupvrkJh_zP05rA7zZ_urDkcMi5FfEZLOPOHkMsUhcbJjj_zf5DaEXyTc</recordid><startdate>20141201</startdate><enddate>20141201</enddate><creator>Soller, Jeffrey A.</creator><creator>Schoen, Mary E.</creator><creator>Varghese, Arun</creator><creator>Ichida, Audrey M.</creator><creator>Boehm, Alexandria B.</creator><creator>Eftim, Sorina</creator><creator>Ashbolt, Nicholas J.</creator><creator>Ravenscroft, John E.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141201</creationdate><title>Human health risk implications of multiple sources of faecal indicator bacteria in a recreational waterbody</title><author>Soller, Jeffrey A. ; Schoen, Mary E. ; Varghese, Arun ; Ichida, Audrey M. ; Boehm, Alexandria B. ; Eftim, Sorina ; Ashbolt, Nicholas J. ; Ravenscroft, John E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-2fc4d081bc81a11077ddafe0cdabee6f179756592a6ee6c4dc0ddc7b74e1d5c73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Air. Soil. Water. Waste. Feeding</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biological and physicochemical phenomena</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Enterococcus</topic><topic>Environment. Living conditions</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring</topic><topic>Escherichia coli O157</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Faecal contamination</topic><topic>Feces - microbiology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal Diseases - microbiology</topic><topic>Health</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Microbial ecology</topic><topic>Microbial source apportionment</topic><topic>Natural water pollution</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Pollution sources</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Quantitative microbial risk assessment</topic><topic>Recreational water</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Various environments (extraatmospheric space, air, water)</topic><topic>Water Microbiology</topic><topic>Water Pollutants - analysis</topic><topic>Water Pollution</topic><topic>Water Quality</topic><topic>Water Supply</topic><topic>Water treatment and pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Soller, Jeffrey A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schoen, Mary E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varghese, Arun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ichida, Audrey M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boehm, Alexandria B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eftim, Sorina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashbolt, Nicholas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ravenscroft, John E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water research (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Soller, Jeffrey A.</au><au>Schoen, Mary E.</au><au>Varghese, Arun</au><au>Ichida, Audrey M.</au><au>Boehm, Alexandria B.</au><au>Eftim, Sorina</au><au>Ashbolt, Nicholas J.</au><au>Ravenscroft, John E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Human health risk implications of multiple sources of faecal indicator bacteria in a recreational waterbody</atitle><jtitle>Water research (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Water Res</addtitle><date>2014-12-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>66</volume><spage>254</spage><epage>264</epage><pages>254-264</pages><issn>0043-1354</issn><eissn>1879-2448</eissn><coden>WATRAG</coden><abstract>We simulate the influence of multiple sources of enterococci (ENT) as faecal indicator bacteria (FIB) in recreational water bodies on potential human health risk by considering waters impacted by human and animal sources, human and non-pathogenic sources, and animal and non-pathogenic sources. We illustrate that risks vary with the proportion of culturable ENT in water bodies derived from these sources and estimate corresponding ENT densities that yield the same level of health protection that the recreational water quality criteria in the United States seeks (benchmark risk). The benchmark risk is based on epidemiological studies conducted in water bodies predominantly impacted by human faecal sources. The key result is that the risks from mixed sources are driven predominantly by the proportion of the contamination source with the greatest ability to cause human infection (potency), not necessarily the greatest source(s) of FIB. Predicted risks from exposures to mixtures comprised of approximately 30% ENT from human sources were up to 50% lower than the risks expected from purely human sources when contamination is recent and ENT levels are at the current water quality criteria levels (35 CFU 100 mL-1). For human/non-pathogenic, human/gull, human/pig, and human/chicken faecal mixtures with relatively low human contribution, the predicted culturable enterococci densities that correspond to the benchmark risk are substantially greater than the current water quality criteria values. These findings are important because they highlight the potential applicability of site specific water quality criteria for waters that are predominantly un-impacted by human sources. [Display omitted] •Human health risks are influenced by the nature and magnitude of the faecal contamination sources.•Alternative recreational water quality standards can be justified for some non-human sources.•Risks for mixtures with moderate or higher human source proportions are not substantially reduced.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>25222329</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.watres.2014.08.026</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0043-1354
ispartof Water research (Oxford), 2014-12, Vol.66, p.254-264
issn 0043-1354
1879-2448
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1660071589
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Air. Soil. Water. Waste. Feeding
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Animals
Applied sciences
Bacteria
Biological and medical sciences
Biological and physicochemical phenomena
Criteria
Density
Enterococcus
Environment. Living conditions
Environmental Monitoring
Escherichia coli O157
Exact sciences and technology
Faecal contamination
Feces - microbiology
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Gastrointestinal Diseases - microbiology
Health
Human
Humans
Medical sciences
Microbial ecology
Microbial source apportionment
Natural water pollution
Pollution
Pollution sources
Probability
Public health. Hygiene
Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine
Quantitative microbial risk assessment
Recreational water
Risk
Risk Assessment
Swine
United States
Various environments (extraatmospheric space, air, water)
Water Microbiology
Water Pollutants - analysis
Water Pollution
Water Quality
Water Supply
Water treatment and pollution
title Human health risk implications of multiple sources of faecal indicator bacteria in a recreational waterbody
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T11%3A28%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Human%20health%20risk%20implications%20of%20multiple%20sources%20of%20faecal%20indicator%20bacteria%20in%20a%20recreational%20waterbody&rft.jtitle=Water%20research%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Soller,%20Jeffrey%20A.&rft.date=2014-12-01&rft.volume=66&rft.spage=254&rft.epage=264&rft.pages=254-264&rft.issn=0043-1354&rft.eissn=1879-2448&rft.coden=WATRAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.watres.2014.08.026&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1660071589%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1629954722&rft_id=info:pmid/25222329&rft_els_id=S0043135414005934&rfr_iscdi=true