Hydraulic performance of a permeable reactive barrier at Casey Station, Antarctica

•A permeable reactive barrier to intercept and degrade fuel installed in Antarctica.•Permeable reactive barrier permeability assessed through use of tracer tests.•Particle disintegration and fine wash through promoted barrier freezing. A permeable bio-reactive barrier (PRB) was installed at Casey St...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Chemosphere (Oxford) 2014-12, Vol.117, p.223-231
Hauptverfasser: Mumford, K.A., Rayner, J.L., Snape, I., Stevens, G.W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 231
container_issue
container_start_page 223
container_title Chemosphere (Oxford)
container_volume 117
creator Mumford, K.A.
Rayner, J.L.
Snape, I.
Stevens, G.W.
description •A permeable reactive barrier to intercept and degrade fuel installed in Antarctica.•Permeable reactive barrier permeability assessed through use of tracer tests.•Particle disintegration and fine wash through promoted barrier freezing. A permeable bio-reactive barrier (PRB) was installed at Casey Station, Antarctica in 2005/06 to intercept, capture and degrade petroleum hydrocarbons from a decade old fuel spill. A funnel and gate configuration was selected and implemented. The reactive gate was split into five separate cells to enable the testing of five different treatment combinations. Although different treatment materials were used in each cell, each treatment combination contained the following reactive zones: a zone for the controlled release of nutrients to enhance degradation, a zone for hydrocarbon capture and enhanced degradation, and a zone to capture excess nutrients. The materials selected for each of these zones had other requirements, these included; not having any adverse impact on the environment, being permeable enough to capture the entire catchment flow, and having sufficient residence time to fully capture migrating hydrocarbons. Over a five year period the performance of the PRB was extensively monitored and evaluated for nutrient concentration, fuel retention and permeability. At the end of the five year test period the material located within the reactive gate was excavated, total petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations present on the material determined and particle size analysis conducted. This work found that although maintaining media reactivity is obviously important, the most critical aspect of PRB performance is preserving the permeability of the barrier itself, in this case by maintaining appropriate particle size distribution. This is particularly important when PRBs are installed in regions that are subject to freeze thaw processes that may result in particle disintegration over time.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.06.091
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1660070939</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0045653514008480</els_id><sourcerecordid>1629584941</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-39ff1b3f73ac14071b88a38676adf57183f1ee89d118aeb8f9a31f4b7fdb155c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0cuK2zAUgGFRWjqZaV-huItCF2NXx7JuyyG0ncJAoZe1OJaPGAU7TiVnIG9fhaSXZVYC8R1J6GfsLfAGOKgPm8Y_0jTn3SMlaloOXcNVwy08Yysw2tbQWvOcrTjvZK2kkFfsOucN52VY2pfsqpVcGwXdin27PwwJ92P01Y5SmNOEW0_VHCo8bkyE_UhVIvRLfKKqx5QipQqXao2ZDtX3BZc4b2-ru-2CqSCPr9iLgGOm1-f1hv389PHH-r5--Pr5y_ruofadFkstbAjQi6AFeui4ht4YFEZphUOQGowIQGTsAGCQehMsCghdr8PQg5Re3LD3p3N3af61p7y4KWZP44hbmvfZgVKca26FvYDKTmlhWriAtlaaznZHak_UpznnRMHtUpwwHRxwdwzlNu6_UO4YynHlSqgy--Z8zb6faPg7-adMAe_OALPHMaTSJeZ_zvK2FdIUtz45Kl_9VNq47COVhkNM5Bc3zPGC5_wG6-u2pQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1629584941</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hydraulic performance of a permeable reactive barrier at Casey Station, Antarctica</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Mumford, K.A. ; Rayner, J.L. ; Snape, I. ; Stevens, G.W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mumford, K.A. ; Rayner, J.L. ; Snape, I. ; Stevens, G.W.</creatorcontrib><description>•A permeable reactive barrier to intercept and degrade fuel installed in Antarctica.•Permeable reactive barrier permeability assessed through use of tracer tests.•Particle disintegration and fine wash through promoted barrier freezing. A permeable bio-reactive barrier (PRB) was installed at Casey Station, Antarctica in 2005/06 to intercept, capture and degrade petroleum hydrocarbons from a decade old fuel spill. A funnel and gate configuration was selected and implemented. The reactive gate was split into five separate cells to enable the testing of five different treatment combinations. Although different treatment materials were used in each cell, each treatment combination contained the following reactive zones: a zone for the controlled release of nutrients to enhance degradation, a zone for hydrocarbon capture and enhanced degradation, and a zone to capture excess nutrients. The materials selected for each of these zones had other requirements, these included; not having any adverse impact on the environment, being permeable enough to capture the entire catchment flow, and having sufficient residence time to fully capture migrating hydrocarbons. Over a five year period the performance of the PRB was extensively monitored and evaluated for nutrient concentration, fuel retention and permeability. At the end of the five year test period the material located within the reactive gate was excavated, total petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations present on the material determined and particle size analysis conducted. This work found that although maintaining media reactivity is obviously important, the most critical aspect of PRB performance is preserving the permeability of the barrier itself, in this case by maintaining appropriate particle size distribution. This is particularly important when PRBs are installed in regions that are subject to freeze thaw processes that may result in particle disintegration over time.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0045-6535</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1298</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.06.091</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25078614</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CMSHAF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Antarctic Regions ; Antarctica ; Applied sciences ; Barriers ; Crude oil ; Degradation ; Environmental Monitoring ; Environmental Restoration and Remediation - methods ; Exact sciences and technology ; Freeze thaw processes ; Gates ; Hydraulics ; Hydrocarbons ; Hydrology ; Materials selection ; Natural water pollution ; Nutrients ; Permeability ; Permeable reactive barrier ; Petroleum Pollution - prevention &amp; control ; Pollution ; Remediation ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis ; Water Pollution, Chemical - prevention &amp; control ; Water treatment and pollution</subject><ispartof>Chemosphere (Oxford), 2014-12, Vol.117, p.223-231</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-39ff1b3f73ac14071b88a38676adf57183f1ee89d118aeb8f9a31f4b7fdb155c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-39ff1b3f73ac14071b88a38676adf57183f1ee89d118aeb8f9a31f4b7fdb155c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.06.091$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=29022358$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25078614$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mumford, K.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rayner, J.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snape, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevens, G.W.</creatorcontrib><title>Hydraulic performance of a permeable reactive barrier at Casey Station, Antarctica</title><title>Chemosphere (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Chemosphere</addtitle><description>•A permeable reactive barrier to intercept and degrade fuel installed in Antarctica.•Permeable reactive barrier permeability assessed through use of tracer tests.•Particle disintegration and fine wash through promoted barrier freezing. A permeable bio-reactive barrier (PRB) was installed at Casey Station, Antarctica in 2005/06 to intercept, capture and degrade petroleum hydrocarbons from a decade old fuel spill. A funnel and gate configuration was selected and implemented. The reactive gate was split into five separate cells to enable the testing of five different treatment combinations. Although different treatment materials were used in each cell, each treatment combination contained the following reactive zones: a zone for the controlled release of nutrients to enhance degradation, a zone for hydrocarbon capture and enhanced degradation, and a zone to capture excess nutrients. The materials selected for each of these zones had other requirements, these included; not having any adverse impact on the environment, being permeable enough to capture the entire catchment flow, and having sufficient residence time to fully capture migrating hydrocarbons. Over a five year period the performance of the PRB was extensively monitored and evaluated for nutrient concentration, fuel retention and permeability. At the end of the five year test period the material located within the reactive gate was excavated, total petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations present on the material determined and particle size analysis conducted. This work found that although maintaining media reactivity is obviously important, the most critical aspect of PRB performance is preserving the permeability of the barrier itself, in this case by maintaining appropriate particle size distribution. This is particularly important when PRBs are installed in regions that are subject to freeze thaw processes that may result in particle disintegration over time.</description><subject>Antarctic Regions</subject><subject>Antarctica</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Barriers</subject><subject>Crude oil</subject><subject>Degradation</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring</subject><subject>Environmental Restoration and Remediation - methods</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Freeze thaw processes</subject><subject>Gates</subject><subject>Hydraulics</subject><subject>Hydrocarbons</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Materials selection</subject><subject>Natural water pollution</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Permeability</subject><subject>Permeable reactive barrier</subject><subject>Petroleum Pollution - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Remediation</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</subject><subject>Water Pollution, Chemical - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Water treatment and pollution</subject><issn>0045-6535</issn><issn>1879-1298</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0cuK2zAUgGFRWjqZaV-huItCF2NXx7JuyyG0ncJAoZe1OJaPGAU7TiVnIG9fhaSXZVYC8R1J6GfsLfAGOKgPm8Y_0jTn3SMlaloOXcNVwy08Yysw2tbQWvOcrTjvZK2kkFfsOucN52VY2pfsqpVcGwXdin27PwwJ92P01Y5SmNOEW0_VHCo8bkyE_UhVIvRLfKKqx5QipQqXao2ZDtX3BZc4b2-ru-2CqSCPr9iLgGOm1-f1hv389PHH-r5--Pr5y_ruofadFkstbAjQi6AFeui4ht4YFEZphUOQGowIQGTsAGCQehMsCghdr8PQg5Re3LD3p3N3af61p7y4KWZP44hbmvfZgVKca26FvYDKTmlhWriAtlaaznZHak_UpznnRMHtUpwwHRxwdwzlNu6_UO4YynHlSqgy--Z8zb6faPg7-adMAe_OALPHMaTSJeZ_zvK2FdIUtz45Kl_9VNq47COVhkNM5Bc3zPGC5_wG6-u2pQ</recordid><startdate>20141201</startdate><enddate>20141201</enddate><creator>Mumford, K.A.</creator><creator>Rayner, J.L.</creator><creator>Snape, I.</creator><creator>Stevens, G.W.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141201</creationdate><title>Hydraulic performance of a permeable reactive barrier at Casey Station, Antarctica</title><author>Mumford, K.A. ; Rayner, J.L. ; Snape, I. ; Stevens, G.W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-39ff1b3f73ac14071b88a38676adf57183f1ee89d118aeb8f9a31f4b7fdb155c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Antarctic Regions</topic><topic>Antarctica</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Barriers</topic><topic>Crude oil</topic><topic>Degradation</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring</topic><topic>Environmental Restoration and Remediation - methods</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Freeze thaw processes</topic><topic>Gates</topic><topic>Hydraulics</topic><topic>Hydrocarbons</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Materials selection</topic><topic>Natural water pollution</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Permeability</topic><topic>Permeable reactive barrier</topic><topic>Petroleum Pollution - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Remediation</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</topic><topic>Water Pollution, Chemical - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Water treatment and pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mumford, K.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rayner, J.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snape, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevens, G.W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Chemosphere (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mumford, K.A.</au><au>Rayner, J.L.</au><au>Snape, I.</au><au>Stevens, G.W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hydraulic performance of a permeable reactive barrier at Casey Station, Antarctica</atitle><jtitle>Chemosphere (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Chemosphere</addtitle><date>2014-12-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>117</volume><spage>223</spage><epage>231</epage><pages>223-231</pages><issn>0045-6535</issn><eissn>1879-1298</eissn><coden>CMSHAF</coden><abstract>•A permeable reactive barrier to intercept and degrade fuel installed in Antarctica.•Permeable reactive barrier permeability assessed through use of tracer tests.•Particle disintegration and fine wash through promoted barrier freezing. A permeable bio-reactive barrier (PRB) was installed at Casey Station, Antarctica in 2005/06 to intercept, capture and degrade petroleum hydrocarbons from a decade old fuel spill. A funnel and gate configuration was selected and implemented. The reactive gate was split into five separate cells to enable the testing of five different treatment combinations. Although different treatment materials were used in each cell, each treatment combination contained the following reactive zones: a zone for the controlled release of nutrients to enhance degradation, a zone for hydrocarbon capture and enhanced degradation, and a zone to capture excess nutrients. The materials selected for each of these zones had other requirements, these included; not having any adverse impact on the environment, being permeable enough to capture the entire catchment flow, and having sufficient residence time to fully capture migrating hydrocarbons. Over a five year period the performance of the PRB was extensively monitored and evaluated for nutrient concentration, fuel retention and permeability. At the end of the five year test period the material located within the reactive gate was excavated, total petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations present on the material determined and particle size analysis conducted. This work found that although maintaining media reactivity is obviously important, the most critical aspect of PRB performance is preserving the permeability of the barrier itself, in this case by maintaining appropriate particle size distribution. This is particularly important when PRBs are installed in regions that are subject to freeze thaw processes that may result in particle disintegration over time.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>25078614</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.06.091</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0045-6535
ispartof Chemosphere (Oxford), 2014-12, Vol.117, p.223-231
issn 0045-6535
1879-1298
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1660070939
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Antarctic Regions
Antarctica
Applied sciences
Barriers
Crude oil
Degradation
Environmental Monitoring
Environmental Restoration and Remediation - methods
Exact sciences and technology
Freeze thaw processes
Gates
Hydraulics
Hydrocarbons
Hydrology
Materials selection
Natural water pollution
Nutrients
Permeability
Permeable reactive barrier
Petroleum Pollution - prevention & control
Pollution
Remediation
Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis
Water Pollution, Chemical - prevention & control
Water treatment and pollution
title Hydraulic performance of a permeable reactive barrier at Casey Station, Antarctica
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T17%3A55%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hydraulic%20performance%20of%20a%20permeable%20reactive%20barrier%20at%20Casey%20Station,%20Antarctica&rft.jtitle=Chemosphere%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Mumford,%20K.A.&rft.date=2014-12-01&rft.volume=117&rft.spage=223&rft.epage=231&rft.pages=223-231&rft.issn=0045-6535&rft.eissn=1879-1298&rft.coden=CMSHAF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.06.091&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1629584941%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1629584941&rft_id=info:pmid/25078614&rft_els_id=S0045653514008480&rfr_iscdi=true