Modeling urban growth by the use of a multiobjective optimization approach: Environmental and economic issues for the Yangtze watershed, China
Urban growth is an unavoidable process caused by economic development and population growth. Traditional urban growth models represent the future urban growth pattern by repeating the historical urban growth regulations, which can lead to a lot of environmental problems. The Yangtze watershed is the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental science and pollution research international 2014-11, Vol.21 (22), p.13027-13042 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 13042 |
---|---|
container_issue | 22 |
container_start_page | 13027 |
container_title | Environmental science and pollution research international |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Zhang, Wenting Wang, Haijun Han, Fengxiang Gao, Juan Nguyen, Thuminh Chen, Yarong Huang, Bo Zhan, F. Benjamin Zhou, Lequn Hong, Song |
description | Urban growth is an unavoidable process caused by economic development and population growth. Traditional urban growth models represent the future urban growth pattern by repeating the historical urban growth regulations, which can lead to a lot of environmental problems. The Yangtze watershed is the largest and the most prosperous economic area in China, and it has been suffering from rapid urban growth from the 1970s. With the built-up area increasing from 23,238 to 31,054 km² during the period from 1980 to 2005, the watershed has suffered from serious nonpoint source (NPS) pollution problems, which have been mainly caused by the rapid urban growth. To protect the environment and at the same time maintain the economic development, a multiobjective optimization (MOP) is proposed to tradeoff the multiple objectives during the urban growth process of the Yangtze watershed. In particular, the four objectives of minimization of NPS pollution, maximization of GDP value, minimization of the spatial incompatibility between the land uses, and minimization of the cost of land-use change are considered by the MOP approach. Conventionally, a genetic algorithm (GA) is employed to search the Pareto solution set. In our MOP approach, a two-dimensional GA, rather than the traditional one-dimensional GA, is employed to assist with the search for the spatial optimization solution, where the land-use cells in the two-dimensional space act as genes in the GA. Furthermore, to confirm the superiority of the MOP approach over the traditional prediction approaches, a widely used urban growth prediction model, cellular automata (CA), is also carried out to allow a comparison with the Pareto solution of MOP. The results indicate that the MOP approach can make a tradeoff between the multiple objectives and can achieve an optimal urban growth pattern for Yangtze watershed, while the CA prediction model just represents the historical urban growth pattern as the future growth pattern. Moreover, according to the spatial clustering index, the urban growth pattern predicted through MOP is more reasonable. In summary, the proposed model provides a set of Pareto urban growth solutions, which compromise environmental and economic issues for the Yangtze watershed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11356-014-3007-4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1660069257</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4054932981</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-d3f25b1c8812a0fd49338359a7bf0684b71d8165e01f709220d13db6f82329753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1u1TAQhS0EopfCA7ABS2xYEBj_xTE7dFV-pCIW0AUry0nsXF8l9sVOWrUPwTPjSwpCLBAra2a-czyjg9BjAi8JgHyVCWGiroDwipW64nfQhtSlklypu2gDivOKMM5P0IOc9wAUFJX30Qktc14sNuj7x9jb0YcBL6k1AQ8pXs073F7jeWfxki2ODhs8LePsY7u33ewvS-8w-8nfmNIL2BwOKZpu9xqfhUufYphsmM2ITeix7WKIk--wz3mxGbuYfhp_NWGYbyy-MrNNeWf7F3i788E8RPecGbN9dPueoou3Z1-276vzT-8-bN-cV50ANlc9c1S0pGsaQg24nivGGiaUka2DuuGtJH1DamGBOFluptAT1re1ayijSgp2ip6vvmX1b2WxWU8-d3YcTbBxyZrUNUCtqJD_gVKpGkHgiD77C93HJYVyiCayaYSSIFShyEp1KeacrNOH5CeTrjUBfcxVr7nqkqs-5qp50Ty5dV7ayfa_Fb-CLABdgVxGYbDpj6__4fp0FTkTtRmSz_riMwUiAArVUM5-ABzEtp0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1788597059</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Modeling urban growth by the use of a multiobjective optimization approach: Environmental and economic issues for the Yangtze watershed, China</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Zhang, Wenting ; Wang, Haijun ; Han, Fengxiang ; Gao, Juan ; Nguyen, Thuminh ; Chen, Yarong ; Huang, Bo ; Zhan, F. Benjamin ; Zhou, Lequn ; Hong, Song</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Wenting ; Wang, Haijun ; Han, Fengxiang ; Gao, Juan ; Nguyen, Thuminh ; Chen, Yarong ; Huang, Bo ; Zhan, F. Benjamin ; Zhou, Lequn ; Hong, Song</creatorcontrib><description>Urban growth is an unavoidable process caused by economic development and population growth. Traditional urban growth models represent the future urban growth pattern by repeating the historical urban growth regulations, which can lead to a lot of environmental problems. The Yangtze watershed is the largest and the most prosperous economic area in China, and it has been suffering from rapid urban growth from the 1970s. With the built-up area increasing from 23,238 to 31,054 km² during the period from 1980 to 2005, the watershed has suffered from serious nonpoint source (NPS) pollution problems, which have been mainly caused by the rapid urban growth. To protect the environment and at the same time maintain the economic development, a multiobjective optimization (MOP) is proposed to tradeoff the multiple objectives during the urban growth process of the Yangtze watershed. In particular, the four objectives of minimization of NPS pollution, maximization of GDP value, minimization of the spatial incompatibility between the land uses, and minimization of the cost of land-use change are considered by the MOP approach. Conventionally, a genetic algorithm (GA) is employed to search the Pareto solution set. In our MOP approach, a two-dimensional GA, rather than the traditional one-dimensional GA, is employed to assist with the search for the spatial optimization solution, where the land-use cells in the two-dimensional space act as genes in the GA. Furthermore, to confirm the superiority of the MOP approach over the traditional prediction approaches, a widely used urban growth prediction model, cellular automata (CA), is also carried out to allow a comparison with the Pareto solution of MOP. The results indicate that the MOP approach can make a tradeoff between the multiple objectives and can achieve an optimal urban growth pattern for Yangtze watershed, while the CA prediction model just represents the historical urban growth pattern as the future growth pattern. Moreover, according to the spatial clustering index, the urban growth pattern predicted through MOP is more reasonable. In summary, the proposed model provides a set of Pareto urban growth solutions, which compromise environmental and economic issues for the Yangtze watershed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0944-1344</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1614-7499</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11356-014-3007-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24994100</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Algorithms ; Aquatic Pollution ; Artificial Intelligence ; Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution ; China ; Computer Simulation ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Economic development ; Economics ; Ecotoxicology ; Environment ; Environmental Chemistry ; Environmental Health ; Environmental impact ; genes ; Genetic algorithms ; Growth models ; Growth patterns ; Humans ; Land use ; land use change ; Linear programming ; Mathematical models ; Minimization ; Nonpoint source pollution ; Objectives ; Optimization ; Pareto optimum ; Pollution ; Population growth ; prediction ; Prediction models ; Research Article ; Rivers ; Urban areas ; Urban development ; Urban sprawl ; Urbanization ; Waste Water Technology ; Water conservation ; Water Management ; Water Movements ; Water Pollution - economics ; Water Pollution Control ; Water quality ; Watershed management ; Watersheds</subject><ispartof>Environmental science and pollution research international, 2014-11, Vol.21 (22), p.13027-13042</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-d3f25b1c8812a0fd49338359a7bf0684b71d8165e01f709220d13db6f82329753</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-d3f25b1c8812a0fd49338359a7bf0684b71d8165e01f709220d13db6f82329753</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11356-014-3007-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11356-014-3007-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24994100$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Wenting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Haijun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Fengxiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Thuminh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Yarong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhan, F. Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Lequn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Song</creatorcontrib><title>Modeling urban growth by the use of a multiobjective optimization approach: Environmental and economic issues for the Yangtze watershed, China</title><title>Environmental science and pollution research international</title><addtitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res</addtitle><addtitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res Int</addtitle><description>Urban growth is an unavoidable process caused by economic development and population growth. Traditional urban growth models represent the future urban growth pattern by repeating the historical urban growth regulations, which can lead to a lot of environmental problems. The Yangtze watershed is the largest and the most prosperous economic area in China, and it has been suffering from rapid urban growth from the 1970s. With the built-up area increasing from 23,238 to 31,054 km² during the period from 1980 to 2005, the watershed has suffered from serious nonpoint source (NPS) pollution problems, which have been mainly caused by the rapid urban growth. To protect the environment and at the same time maintain the economic development, a multiobjective optimization (MOP) is proposed to tradeoff the multiple objectives during the urban growth process of the Yangtze watershed. In particular, the four objectives of minimization of NPS pollution, maximization of GDP value, minimization of the spatial incompatibility between the land uses, and minimization of the cost of land-use change are considered by the MOP approach. Conventionally, a genetic algorithm (GA) is employed to search the Pareto solution set. In our MOP approach, a two-dimensional GA, rather than the traditional one-dimensional GA, is employed to assist with the search for the spatial optimization solution, where the land-use cells in the two-dimensional space act as genes in the GA. Furthermore, to confirm the superiority of the MOP approach over the traditional prediction approaches, a widely used urban growth prediction model, cellular automata (CA), is also carried out to allow a comparison with the Pareto solution of MOP. The results indicate that the MOP approach can make a tradeoff between the multiple objectives and can achieve an optimal urban growth pattern for Yangtze watershed, while the CA prediction model just represents the historical urban growth pattern as the future growth pattern. Moreover, according to the spatial clustering index, the urban growth pattern predicted through MOP is more reasonable. In summary, the proposed model provides a set of Pareto urban growth solutions, which compromise environmental and economic issues for the Yangtze watershed.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Aquatic Pollution</subject><subject>Artificial Intelligence</subject><subject>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Chemistry</subject><subject>Environmental Health</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>genes</subject><subject>Genetic algorithms</subject><subject>Growth models</subject><subject>Growth patterns</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>land use change</subject><subject>Linear programming</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Minimization</subject><subject>Nonpoint source pollution</subject><subject>Objectives</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Pareto optimum</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Population growth</subject><subject>prediction</subject><subject>Prediction models</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><subject>Urban development</subject><subject>Urban sprawl</subject><subject>Urbanization</subject><subject>Waste Water Technology</subject><subject>Water conservation</subject><subject>Water Management</subject><subject>Water Movements</subject><subject>Water Pollution - economics</subject><subject>Water Pollution Control</subject><subject>Water quality</subject><subject>Watershed management</subject><subject>Watersheds</subject><issn>0944-1344</issn><issn>1614-7499</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1u1TAQhS0EopfCA7ABS2xYEBj_xTE7dFV-pCIW0AUry0nsXF8l9sVOWrUPwTPjSwpCLBAra2a-czyjg9BjAi8JgHyVCWGiroDwipW64nfQhtSlklypu2gDivOKMM5P0IOc9wAUFJX30Qktc14sNuj7x9jb0YcBL6k1AQ8pXs073F7jeWfxki2ODhs8LePsY7u33ewvS-8w-8nfmNIL2BwOKZpu9xqfhUufYphsmM2ITeix7WKIk--wz3mxGbuYfhp_NWGYbyy-MrNNeWf7F3i788E8RPecGbN9dPueoou3Z1-276vzT-8-bN-cV50ANlc9c1S0pGsaQg24nivGGiaUka2DuuGtJH1DamGBOFluptAT1re1ayijSgp2ip6vvmX1b2WxWU8-d3YcTbBxyZrUNUCtqJD_gVKpGkHgiD77C93HJYVyiCayaYSSIFShyEp1KeacrNOH5CeTrjUBfcxVr7nqkqs-5qp50Ty5dV7ayfa_Fb-CLABdgVxGYbDpj6__4fp0FTkTtRmSz_riMwUiAArVUM5-ABzEtp0</recordid><startdate>20141101</startdate><enddate>20141101</enddate><creator>Zhang, Wenting</creator><creator>Wang, Haijun</creator><creator>Han, Fengxiang</creator><creator>Gao, Juan</creator><creator>Nguyen, Thuminh</creator><creator>Chen, Yarong</creator><creator>Huang, Bo</creator><creator>Zhan, F. Benjamin</creator><creator>Zhou, Lequn</creator><creator>Hong, Song</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141101</creationdate><title>Modeling urban growth by the use of a multiobjective optimization approach: Environmental and economic issues for the Yangtze watershed, China</title><author>Zhang, Wenting ; Wang, Haijun ; Han, Fengxiang ; Gao, Juan ; Nguyen, Thuminh ; Chen, Yarong ; Huang, Bo ; Zhan, F. Benjamin ; Zhou, Lequn ; Hong, Song</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-d3f25b1c8812a0fd49338359a7bf0684b71d8165e01f709220d13db6f82329753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Aquatic Pollution</topic><topic>Artificial Intelligence</topic><topic>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Chemistry</topic><topic>Environmental Health</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>genes</topic><topic>Genetic algorithms</topic><topic>Growth models</topic><topic>Growth patterns</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>land use change</topic><topic>Linear programming</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Minimization</topic><topic>Nonpoint source pollution</topic><topic>Objectives</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Pareto optimum</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Population growth</topic><topic>prediction</topic><topic>Prediction models</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><topic>Urban development</topic><topic>Urban sprawl</topic><topic>Urbanization</topic><topic>Waste Water Technology</topic><topic>Water conservation</topic><topic>Water Management</topic><topic>Water Movements</topic><topic>Water Pollution - economics</topic><topic>Water Pollution Control</topic><topic>Water quality</topic><topic>Watershed management</topic><topic>Watersheds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Wenting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Haijun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Fengxiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Thuminh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Yarong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhan, F. Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Lequn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Song</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Environmental science and pollution research international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhang, Wenting</au><au>Wang, Haijun</au><au>Han, Fengxiang</au><au>Gao, Juan</au><au>Nguyen, Thuminh</au><au>Chen, Yarong</au><au>Huang, Bo</au><au>Zhan, F. Benjamin</au><au>Zhou, Lequn</au><au>Hong, Song</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Modeling urban growth by the use of a multiobjective optimization approach: Environmental and economic issues for the Yangtze watershed, China</atitle><jtitle>Environmental science and pollution research international</jtitle><stitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res</stitle><addtitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res Int</addtitle><date>2014-11-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>22</issue><spage>13027</spage><epage>13042</epage><pages>13027-13042</pages><issn>0944-1344</issn><eissn>1614-7499</eissn><abstract>Urban growth is an unavoidable process caused by economic development and population growth. Traditional urban growth models represent the future urban growth pattern by repeating the historical urban growth regulations, which can lead to a lot of environmental problems. The Yangtze watershed is the largest and the most prosperous economic area in China, and it has been suffering from rapid urban growth from the 1970s. With the built-up area increasing from 23,238 to 31,054 km² during the period from 1980 to 2005, the watershed has suffered from serious nonpoint source (NPS) pollution problems, which have been mainly caused by the rapid urban growth. To protect the environment and at the same time maintain the economic development, a multiobjective optimization (MOP) is proposed to tradeoff the multiple objectives during the urban growth process of the Yangtze watershed. In particular, the four objectives of minimization of NPS pollution, maximization of GDP value, minimization of the spatial incompatibility between the land uses, and minimization of the cost of land-use change are considered by the MOP approach. Conventionally, a genetic algorithm (GA) is employed to search the Pareto solution set. In our MOP approach, a two-dimensional GA, rather than the traditional one-dimensional GA, is employed to assist with the search for the spatial optimization solution, where the land-use cells in the two-dimensional space act as genes in the GA. Furthermore, to confirm the superiority of the MOP approach over the traditional prediction approaches, a widely used urban growth prediction model, cellular automata (CA), is also carried out to allow a comparison with the Pareto solution of MOP. The results indicate that the MOP approach can make a tradeoff between the multiple objectives and can achieve an optimal urban growth pattern for Yangtze watershed, while the CA prediction model just represents the historical urban growth pattern as the future growth pattern. Moreover, according to the spatial clustering index, the urban growth pattern predicted through MOP is more reasonable. In summary, the proposed model provides a set of Pareto urban growth solutions, which compromise environmental and economic issues for the Yangtze watershed.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>24994100</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11356-014-3007-4</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0944-1344 |
ispartof | Environmental science and pollution research international, 2014-11, Vol.21 (22), p.13027-13042 |
issn | 0944-1344 1614-7499 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1660069257 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Agriculture Algorithms Aquatic Pollution Artificial Intelligence Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution China Computer Simulation Earth and Environmental Science Economic development Economics Ecotoxicology Environment Environmental Chemistry Environmental Health Environmental impact genes Genetic algorithms Growth models Growth patterns Humans Land use land use change Linear programming Mathematical models Minimization Nonpoint source pollution Objectives Optimization Pareto optimum Pollution Population growth prediction Prediction models Research Article Rivers Urban areas Urban development Urban sprawl Urbanization Waste Water Technology Water conservation Water Management Water Movements Water Pollution - economics Water Pollution Control Water quality Watershed management Watersheds |
title | Modeling urban growth by the use of a multiobjective optimization approach: Environmental and economic issues for the Yangtze watershed, China |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T17%3A58%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Modeling%20urban%20growth%20by%20the%20use%20of%20a%20multiobjective%20optimization%20approach:%20Environmental%20and%20economic%20issues%20for%20the%20Yangtze%20watershed,%20China&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20science%20and%20pollution%20research%20international&rft.au=Zhang,%20Wenting&rft.date=2014-11-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=22&rft.spage=13027&rft.epage=13042&rft.pages=13027-13042&rft.issn=0944-1344&rft.eissn=1614-7499&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11356-014-3007-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4054932981%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1788597059&rft_id=info:pmid/24994100&rfr_iscdi=true |