On the primary emission of formic acid from light duty gasoline vehicles and ocean-going vessels

We present determinations of fuel-based emission factors for formic acid (EFHCOOH) from light duty gasoline vehicles (LDGVs) and in-use ocean-going vessels. Emission ratios, from which the emission factors were derived, were determined from LDGVs through measurement of HCOOH and carbon dioxide (CO2)...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Atmospheric environment (1994) 2014-12, Vol.98, p.426-433
Hauptverfasser: Crisp, Timia A., Brady, James M., Cappa, Christopher D., Collier, Sonya, Forestieri, Sara D., Kleeman, Michael J., Kuwayama, Toshihiro, Lerner, Brian M., Williams, Eric J., Zhang, Qi, Bertram, Timothy H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 433
container_issue
container_start_page 426
container_title Atmospheric environment (1994)
container_volume 98
creator Crisp, Timia A.
Brady, James M.
Cappa, Christopher D.
Collier, Sonya
Forestieri, Sara D.
Kleeman, Michael J.
Kuwayama, Toshihiro
Lerner, Brian M.
Williams, Eric J.
Zhang, Qi
Bertram, Timothy H.
description We present determinations of fuel-based emission factors for formic acid (EFHCOOH) from light duty gasoline vehicles (LDGVs) and in-use ocean-going vessels. Emission ratios, from which the emission factors were derived, were determined from LDGVs through measurement of HCOOH and carbon dioxide (CO2) in the exhaust of a fleet of eight LDGVs driven under the California Unified Cycle at the California Air Resources Board's Haagen-Smit Laboratory. Emission ratios from in-use ocean-going vessels were determined through direct measurement of HCOOH and CO2 in ship plumes intercepted by the R/V Atlantis during the 2010 California Research at the Nexus of Air Quality and Climate Change (CalNex) campaign within 24 nautical miles of the California coast. The eight car fleet average EFHCOOH was 0.94 ± 0.32 (1σ) and 0.57 ± 0.18 mg (kg fuel)−1 for the cold start and hot running phases of the drive cycle, respectively. This difference suggests that catalytic converter performance and the air/fuel equivalence ratio are important metrics contributing to EFHCOOH. EFHCOOH was determined to be 1.94 ± 1.06 mg (kg fuel)−1 for a single diesel vehicle driven under highway driving conditions, higher on average than any individual LDGV tested. In comparison, HCOOH primary emissions from in-use ocean-going vessels were substantially larger, averaging 20.89 ± 8.50 mg (kg fuel)−1. On a global scale, HCOOH primary emissions from fossil fuel combustion are likely to be insignificant relative to secondary production mechanisms, however primary emissions may contribute more significantly on a finer, regional scale in urban locations. •HCOOH emission factors were measured for mobile vehicles and ocean-going vessels.•HCOOH emission factors were higher during the cold start phase of a typical drive cycle.•On a global scale HCOOH primary emissions are small compared with secondary sources.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.08.070
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1660067439</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1352231014006815</els_id><sourcerecordid>1660067439</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-961a4836dc4a1d9bce71f222c941823a0723b35e35bc3a8dc550b2748dcb410f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1r3DAQhk1oIWmavxB0KfRiZ_RhS761hH4EArm0Z1WWx7tabCnVeBfy76tlt702p3lhnvl8q-qWQ8OBd3e7xq1LIoyHRgBXDZgGNFxUV9xoWQuj1JuiZStqITlcVu-IdgAgda-vql9Pka1bZM85LC6_MFwCUUiRpYlNKS_BM-fDyKacFjaHzXZl4359YRtHaQ4R2QG3wc9IzMWRJY8u1psU4qYkiHCm99Xbyc2EN-d4Xf38-uXH_ff68enbw_3nx9orxde677hTRnajV46P_eBR80kI4XvFjZAOtJCDbFG2g5fOjL5tYRBaFTUoDpO8rj6e-j7n9HuPtNpyicd5dhHTnizvOoBOK9m_AlUaBEjgr0NB9eaIdifU50SUcbLnn1oO9miU3dm_RtmjURaMLUaVwg_nGY68m6fsog_0r1oY05XdTeE-nbjyVTwEzJZ8wOhxDBn9ascU_jfqD8ywrDk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1647004981</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>On the primary emission of formic acid from light duty gasoline vehicles and ocean-going vessels</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Crisp, Timia A. ; Brady, James M. ; Cappa, Christopher D. ; Collier, Sonya ; Forestieri, Sara D. ; Kleeman, Michael J. ; Kuwayama, Toshihiro ; Lerner, Brian M. ; Williams, Eric J. ; Zhang, Qi ; Bertram, Timothy H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Crisp, Timia A. ; Brady, James M. ; Cappa, Christopher D. ; Collier, Sonya ; Forestieri, Sara D. ; Kleeman, Michael J. ; Kuwayama, Toshihiro ; Lerner, Brian M. ; Williams, Eric J. ; Zhang, Qi ; Bertram, Timothy H.</creatorcontrib><description>We present determinations of fuel-based emission factors for formic acid (EFHCOOH) from light duty gasoline vehicles (LDGVs) and in-use ocean-going vessels. Emission ratios, from which the emission factors were derived, were determined from LDGVs through measurement of HCOOH and carbon dioxide (CO2) in the exhaust of a fleet of eight LDGVs driven under the California Unified Cycle at the California Air Resources Board's Haagen-Smit Laboratory. Emission ratios from in-use ocean-going vessels were determined through direct measurement of HCOOH and CO2 in ship plumes intercepted by the R/V Atlantis during the 2010 California Research at the Nexus of Air Quality and Climate Change (CalNex) campaign within 24 nautical miles of the California coast. The eight car fleet average EFHCOOH was 0.94 ± 0.32 (1σ) and 0.57 ± 0.18 mg (kg fuel)−1 for the cold start and hot running phases of the drive cycle, respectively. This difference suggests that catalytic converter performance and the air/fuel equivalence ratio are important metrics contributing to EFHCOOH. EFHCOOH was determined to be 1.94 ± 1.06 mg (kg fuel)−1 for a single diesel vehicle driven under highway driving conditions, higher on average than any individual LDGV tested. In comparison, HCOOH primary emissions from in-use ocean-going vessels were substantially larger, averaging 20.89 ± 8.50 mg (kg fuel)−1. On a global scale, HCOOH primary emissions from fossil fuel combustion are likely to be insignificant relative to secondary production mechanisms, however primary emissions may contribute more significantly on a finer, regional scale in urban locations. •HCOOH emission factors were measured for mobile vehicles and ocean-going vessels.•HCOOH emission factors were higher during the cold start phase of a typical drive cycle.•On a global scale HCOOH primary emissions are small compared with secondary sources.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1352-2310</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2844</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.08.070</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Atmospheric chemistry ; Atmospheric pollution ; Automobiles ; Automotive engineering ; Carbon dioxide ; Combustion ; Emission ; Emission factors ; Exact sciences and technology ; Formic acid ; Fuels ; Gasoline ; Marine ; Pollution ; Pollution sources. Measurement results ; Primary emissions ; Transports ; Vessels</subject><ispartof>Atmospheric environment (1994), 2014-12, Vol.98, p.426-433</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-961a4836dc4a1d9bce71f222c941823a0723b35e35bc3a8dc550b2748dcb410f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-961a4836dc4a1d9bce71f222c941823a0723b35e35bc3a8dc550b2748dcb410f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3528-3368</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1352231014006815$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28866608$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Crisp, Timia A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brady, James M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cappa, Christopher D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collier, Sonya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forestieri, Sara D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kleeman, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuwayama, Toshihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lerner, Brian M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Eric J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Qi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bertram, Timothy H.</creatorcontrib><title>On the primary emission of formic acid from light duty gasoline vehicles and ocean-going vessels</title><title>Atmospheric environment (1994)</title><description>We present determinations of fuel-based emission factors for formic acid (EFHCOOH) from light duty gasoline vehicles (LDGVs) and in-use ocean-going vessels. Emission ratios, from which the emission factors were derived, were determined from LDGVs through measurement of HCOOH and carbon dioxide (CO2) in the exhaust of a fleet of eight LDGVs driven under the California Unified Cycle at the California Air Resources Board's Haagen-Smit Laboratory. Emission ratios from in-use ocean-going vessels were determined through direct measurement of HCOOH and CO2 in ship plumes intercepted by the R/V Atlantis during the 2010 California Research at the Nexus of Air Quality and Climate Change (CalNex) campaign within 24 nautical miles of the California coast. The eight car fleet average EFHCOOH was 0.94 ± 0.32 (1σ) and 0.57 ± 0.18 mg (kg fuel)−1 for the cold start and hot running phases of the drive cycle, respectively. This difference suggests that catalytic converter performance and the air/fuel equivalence ratio are important metrics contributing to EFHCOOH. EFHCOOH was determined to be 1.94 ± 1.06 mg (kg fuel)−1 for a single diesel vehicle driven under highway driving conditions, higher on average than any individual LDGV tested. In comparison, HCOOH primary emissions from in-use ocean-going vessels were substantially larger, averaging 20.89 ± 8.50 mg (kg fuel)−1. On a global scale, HCOOH primary emissions from fossil fuel combustion are likely to be insignificant relative to secondary production mechanisms, however primary emissions may contribute more significantly on a finer, regional scale in urban locations. •HCOOH emission factors were measured for mobile vehicles and ocean-going vessels.•HCOOH emission factors were higher during the cold start phase of a typical drive cycle.•On a global scale HCOOH primary emissions are small compared with secondary sources.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Atmospheric chemistry</subject><subject>Atmospheric pollution</subject><subject>Automobiles</subject><subject>Automotive engineering</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Combustion</subject><subject>Emission</subject><subject>Emission factors</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Formic acid</subject><subject>Fuels</subject><subject>Gasoline</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Pollution sources. Measurement results</subject><subject>Primary emissions</subject><subject>Transports</subject><subject>Vessels</subject><issn>1352-2310</issn><issn>1873-2844</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkU1r3DAQhk1oIWmavxB0KfRiZ_RhS761hH4EArm0Z1WWx7tabCnVeBfy76tlt702p3lhnvl8q-qWQ8OBd3e7xq1LIoyHRgBXDZgGNFxUV9xoWQuj1JuiZStqITlcVu-IdgAgda-vql9Pka1bZM85LC6_MFwCUUiRpYlNKS_BM-fDyKacFjaHzXZl4359YRtHaQ4R2QG3wc9IzMWRJY8u1psU4qYkiHCm99Xbyc2EN-d4Xf38-uXH_ff68enbw_3nx9orxde677hTRnajV46P_eBR80kI4XvFjZAOtJCDbFG2g5fOjL5tYRBaFTUoDpO8rj6e-j7n9HuPtNpyicd5dhHTnizvOoBOK9m_AlUaBEjgr0NB9eaIdifU50SUcbLnn1oO9miU3dm_RtmjURaMLUaVwg_nGY68m6fsog_0r1oY05XdTeE-nbjyVTwEzJZ8wOhxDBn9ascU_jfqD8ywrDk</recordid><startdate>20141201</startdate><enddate>20141201</enddate><creator>Crisp, Timia A.</creator><creator>Brady, James M.</creator><creator>Cappa, Christopher D.</creator><creator>Collier, Sonya</creator><creator>Forestieri, Sara D.</creator><creator>Kleeman, Michael J.</creator><creator>Kuwayama, Toshihiro</creator><creator>Lerner, Brian M.</creator><creator>Williams, Eric J.</creator><creator>Zhang, Qi</creator><creator>Bertram, Timothy H.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3528-3368</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20141201</creationdate><title>On the primary emission of formic acid from light duty gasoline vehicles and ocean-going vessels</title><author>Crisp, Timia A. ; Brady, James M. ; Cappa, Christopher D. ; Collier, Sonya ; Forestieri, Sara D. ; Kleeman, Michael J. ; Kuwayama, Toshihiro ; Lerner, Brian M. ; Williams, Eric J. ; Zhang, Qi ; Bertram, Timothy H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-961a4836dc4a1d9bce71f222c941823a0723b35e35bc3a8dc550b2748dcb410f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Atmospheric chemistry</topic><topic>Atmospheric pollution</topic><topic>Automobiles</topic><topic>Automotive engineering</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Combustion</topic><topic>Emission</topic><topic>Emission factors</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Formic acid</topic><topic>Fuels</topic><topic>Gasoline</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Pollution sources. Measurement results</topic><topic>Primary emissions</topic><topic>Transports</topic><topic>Vessels</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Crisp, Timia A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brady, James M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cappa, Christopher D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collier, Sonya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forestieri, Sara D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kleeman, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuwayama, Toshihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lerner, Brian M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Eric J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Qi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bertram, Timothy H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Atmospheric environment (1994)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Crisp, Timia A.</au><au>Brady, James M.</au><au>Cappa, Christopher D.</au><au>Collier, Sonya</au><au>Forestieri, Sara D.</au><au>Kleeman, Michael J.</au><au>Kuwayama, Toshihiro</au><au>Lerner, Brian M.</au><au>Williams, Eric J.</au><au>Zhang, Qi</au><au>Bertram, Timothy H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>On the primary emission of formic acid from light duty gasoline vehicles and ocean-going vessels</atitle><jtitle>Atmospheric environment (1994)</jtitle><date>2014-12-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>98</volume><spage>426</spage><epage>433</epage><pages>426-433</pages><issn>1352-2310</issn><eissn>1873-2844</eissn><abstract>We present determinations of fuel-based emission factors for formic acid (EFHCOOH) from light duty gasoline vehicles (LDGVs) and in-use ocean-going vessels. Emission ratios, from which the emission factors were derived, were determined from LDGVs through measurement of HCOOH and carbon dioxide (CO2) in the exhaust of a fleet of eight LDGVs driven under the California Unified Cycle at the California Air Resources Board's Haagen-Smit Laboratory. Emission ratios from in-use ocean-going vessels were determined through direct measurement of HCOOH and CO2 in ship plumes intercepted by the R/V Atlantis during the 2010 California Research at the Nexus of Air Quality and Climate Change (CalNex) campaign within 24 nautical miles of the California coast. The eight car fleet average EFHCOOH was 0.94 ± 0.32 (1σ) and 0.57 ± 0.18 mg (kg fuel)−1 for the cold start and hot running phases of the drive cycle, respectively. This difference suggests that catalytic converter performance and the air/fuel equivalence ratio are important metrics contributing to EFHCOOH. EFHCOOH was determined to be 1.94 ± 1.06 mg (kg fuel)−1 for a single diesel vehicle driven under highway driving conditions, higher on average than any individual LDGV tested. In comparison, HCOOH primary emissions from in-use ocean-going vessels were substantially larger, averaging 20.89 ± 8.50 mg (kg fuel)−1. On a global scale, HCOOH primary emissions from fossil fuel combustion are likely to be insignificant relative to secondary production mechanisms, however primary emissions may contribute more significantly on a finer, regional scale in urban locations. •HCOOH emission factors were measured for mobile vehicles and ocean-going vessels.•HCOOH emission factors were higher during the cold start phase of a typical drive cycle.•On a global scale HCOOH primary emissions are small compared with secondary sources.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.08.070</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3528-3368</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1352-2310
ispartof Atmospheric environment (1994), 2014-12, Vol.98, p.426-433
issn 1352-2310
1873-2844
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1660067439
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Applied sciences
Atmospheric chemistry
Atmospheric pollution
Automobiles
Automotive engineering
Carbon dioxide
Combustion
Emission
Emission factors
Exact sciences and technology
Formic acid
Fuels
Gasoline
Marine
Pollution
Pollution sources. Measurement results
Primary emissions
Transports
Vessels
title On the primary emission of formic acid from light duty gasoline vehicles and ocean-going vessels
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T18%3A40%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=On%20the%20primary%20emission%20of%20formic%20acid%20from%20light%20duty%20gasoline%20vehicles%20and%20ocean-going%20vessels&rft.jtitle=Atmospheric%20environment%20(1994)&rft.au=Crisp,%20Timia%20A.&rft.date=2014-12-01&rft.volume=98&rft.spage=426&rft.epage=433&rft.pages=426-433&rft.issn=1352-2310&rft.eissn=1873-2844&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.08.070&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1660067439%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1647004981&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1352231014006815&rfr_iscdi=true