Braess' paradox in a generalised traffic network

Summary Braess' paradox illustrates situations when adding a new link to a transport network might lead to an equilibrium state in which travel times of users will increase. The classical network configuration introduced by Braess in 1968 to demonstrate the paradox is of fundamental significanc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of advanced transportation 2015-01, Vol.49 (1), p.114-138
Hauptverfasser: Zverovich, Vadim, Avineri, Erel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 138
container_issue 1
container_start_page 114
container_title Journal of advanced transportation
container_volume 49
creator Zverovich, Vadim
Avineri, Erel
description Summary Braess' paradox illustrates situations when adding a new link to a transport network might lead to an equilibrium state in which travel times of users will increase. The classical network configuration introduced by Braess in 1968 to demonstrate the paradox is of fundamental significance because Valiant and Roughgarden showed in 2006 that ‘the “global” behaviour of an equilibrium flow in a large random network is similar to that in Braess' original four‐node example’. Braess' paradox has been studied mainly in the context of the classical problem introduced by Braess and his colleagues, assuming a certain type of symmetry in networks. Specifically, two pairs of links in those networks are assumed to have the same volume‐delay functions. The occurrence of Braess' paradox for this specific case of network symmetry was investigated by Pas and Principio in 1997. Such a symmetry is not common in real‐life networks because the parameters of volume‐delay functions are associated with roads physical and functional characteristics, which typically differ from one link to another. This research provides an extension of previous studies on Braess' paradox by considering arbitrary volume‐delay functions, that is, symmetry properties are not assumed for any of the network's links and the occurrence of Braess' paradox is studied for a general configuration. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/atr.1269
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1660062527</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1660062527</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4269-ba5ec5fc9f754b52d8d4e975b38c2b827fc412a74cf43a95045ac1247347b35e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10M1KAzEUBeAgCtYq-AgDLnQzNf9plrVoFYqCVAtuQiZzI9NOZ2oype3bO6WiKLi6m49zLgehc4J7BGN6bZvQI1TqA9ShmNOUES0OUQcTrVKpqD5GJzHOMGZaaN5B-CZYiPEyWdpg83qTFFVik3eoINiyiJAnTbDeFy6poFnXYX6KjrwtI5x93S56ubudDO_T8dPoYTgYp4637WlmBTjhnfZK8EzQvJ9z0EpkrO9o1qfKO06oVdx5zqwWmAvrCOWKcZUxAayLrva5y1B_rCA2ZlFEB2VpK6hX0RApMZZUUNXSiz90Vq9C1X7XKs6UJILgn0AX6hgDeLMMxcKGrSHY7KYz7XRmN11L0z1dFyVs_3VmMHn-7YvYwObb2zA3UjElzPRxZEb6daq1fjOcfQLHAXw0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1643761510</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Braess' paradox in a generalised traffic network</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Zverovich, Vadim ; Avineri, Erel</creator><creatorcontrib>Zverovich, Vadim ; Avineri, Erel</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Braess' paradox illustrates situations when adding a new link to a transport network might lead to an equilibrium state in which travel times of users will increase. The classical network configuration introduced by Braess in 1968 to demonstrate the paradox is of fundamental significance because Valiant and Roughgarden showed in 2006 that ‘the “global” behaviour of an equilibrium flow in a large random network is similar to that in Braess' original four‐node example’. Braess' paradox has been studied mainly in the context of the classical problem introduced by Braess and his colleagues, assuming a certain type of symmetry in networks. Specifically, two pairs of links in those networks are assumed to have the same volume‐delay functions. The occurrence of Braess' paradox for this specific case of network symmetry was investigated by Pas and Principio in 1997. Such a symmetry is not common in real‐life networks because the parameters of volume‐delay functions are associated with roads physical and functional characteristics, which typically differ from one link to another. This research provides an extension of previous studies on Braess' paradox by considering arbitrary volume‐delay functions, that is, symmetry properties are not assumed for any of the network's links and the occurrence of Braess' paradox is studied for a general configuration. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0197-6729</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2042-3195</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/atr.1269</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JATRDC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Braess' paradox ; equilibrium flow ; Links ; Networks ; Paradoxes ; Roads ; Symmetry ; Traffic engineering ; traffic network ; Transportation ; Transportation networks</subject><ispartof>Journal of advanced transportation, 2015-01, Vol.49 (1), p.114-138</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2014 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4269-ba5ec5fc9f754b52d8d4e975b38c2b827fc412a74cf43a95045ac1247347b35e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4269-ba5ec5fc9f754b52d8d4e975b38c2b827fc412a74cf43a95045ac1247347b35e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fatr.1269$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fatr.1269$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zverovich, Vadim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Avineri, Erel</creatorcontrib><title>Braess' paradox in a generalised traffic network</title><title>Journal of advanced transportation</title><addtitle>J. Adv. Transp</addtitle><description>Summary Braess' paradox illustrates situations when adding a new link to a transport network might lead to an equilibrium state in which travel times of users will increase. The classical network configuration introduced by Braess in 1968 to demonstrate the paradox is of fundamental significance because Valiant and Roughgarden showed in 2006 that ‘the “global” behaviour of an equilibrium flow in a large random network is similar to that in Braess' original four‐node example’. Braess' paradox has been studied mainly in the context of the classical problem introduced by Braess and his colleagues, assuming a certain type of symmetry in networks. Specifically, two pairs of links in those networks are assumed to have the same volume‐delay functions. The occurrence of Braess' paradox for this specific case of network symmetry was investigated by Pas and Principio in 1997. Such a symmetry is not common in real‐life networks because the parameters of volume‐delay functions are associated with roads physical and functional characteristics, which typically differ from one link to another. This research provides an extension of previous studies on Braess' paradox by considering arbitrary volume‐delay functions, that is, symmetry properties are not assumed for any of the network's links and the occurrence of Braess' paradox is studied for a general configuration. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Braess' paradox</subject><subject>equilibrium flow</subject><subject>Links</subject><subject>Networks</subject><subject>Paradoxes</subject><subject>Roads</subject><subject>Symmetry</subject><subject>Traffic engineering</subject><subject>traffic network</subject><subject>Transportation</subject><subject>Transportation networks</subject><issn>0197-6729</issn><issn>2042-3195</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10M1KAzEUBeAgCtYq-AgDLnQzNf9plrVoFYqCVAtuQiZzI9NOZ2oype3bO6WiKLi6m49zLgehc4J7BGN6bZvQI1TqA9ShmNOUES0OUQcTrVKpqD5GJzHOMGZaaN5B-CZYiPEyWdpg83qTFFVik3eoINiyiJAnTbDeFy6poFnXYX6KjrwtI5x93S56ubudDO_T8dPoYTgYp4637WlmBTjhnfZK8EzQvJ9z0EpkrO9o1qfKO06oVdx5zqwWmAvrCOWKcZUxAayLrva5y1B_rCA2ZlFEB2VpK6hX0RApMZZUUNXSiz90Vq9C1X7XKs6UJILgn0AX6hgDeLMMxcKGrSHY7KYz7XRmN11L0z1dFyVs_3VmMHn-7YvYwObb2zA3UjElzPRxZEb6daq1fjOcfQLHAXw0</recordid><startdate>201501</startdate><enddate>201501</enddate><creator>Zverovich, Vadim</creator><creator>Avineri, Erel</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201501</creationdate><title>Braess' paradox in a generalised traffic network</title><author>Zverovich, Vadim ; Avineri, Erel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4269-ba5ec5fc9f754b52d8d4e975b38c2b827fc412a74cf43a95045ac1247347b35e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Braess' paradox</topic><topic>equilibrium flow</topic><topic>Links</topic><topic>Networks</topic><topic>Paradoxes</topic><topic>Roads</topic><topic>Symmetry</topic><topic>Traffic engineering</topic><topic>traffic network</topic><topic>Transportation</topic><topic>Transportation networks</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zverovich, Vadim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Avineri, Erel</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of advanced transportation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zverovich, Vadim</au><au>Avineri, Erel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Braess' paradox in a generalised traffic network</atitle><jtitle>Journal of advanced transportation</jtitle><addtitle>J. Adv. Transp</addtitle><date>2015-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>114</spage><epage>138</epage><pages>114-138</pages><issn>0197-6729</issn><eissn>2042-3195</eissn><coden>JATRDC</coden><abstract>Summary Braess' paradox illustrates situations when adding a new link to a transport network might lead to an equilibrium state in which travel times of users will increase. The classical network configuration introduced by Braess in 1968 to demonstrate the paradox is of fundamental significance because Valiant and Roughgarden showed in 2006 that ‘the “global” behaviour of an equilibrium flow in a large random network is similar to that in Braess' original four‐node example’. Braess' paradox has been studied mainly in the context of the classical problem introduced by Braess and his colleagues, assuming a certain type of symmetry in networks. Specifically, two pairs of links in those networks are assumed to have the same volume‐delay functions. The occurrence of Braess' paradox for this specific case of network symmetry was investigated by Pas and Principio in 1997. Such a symmetry is not common in real‐life networks because the parameters of volume‐delay functions are associated with roads physical and functional characteristics, which typically differ from one link to another. This research provides an extension of previous studies on Braess' paradox by considering arbitrary volume‐delay functions, that is, symmetry properties are not assumed for any of the network's links and the occurrence of Braess' paradox is studied for a general configuration. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/atr.1269</doi><tpages>25</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0197-6729
ispartof Journal of advanced transportation, 2015-01, Vol.49 (1), p.114-138
issn 0197-6729
2042-3195
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1660062527
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Braess' paradox
equilibrium flow
Links
Networks
Paradoxes
Roads
Symmetry
Traffic engineering
traffic network
Transportation
Transportation networks
title Braess' paradox in a generalised traffic network
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T04%3A46%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Braess'%20paradox%20in%20a%20generalised%20traffic%20network&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20advanced%20transportation&rft.au=Zverovich,%20Vadim&rft.date=2015-01&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=114&rft.epage=138&rft.pages=114-138&rft.issn=0197-6729&rft.eissn=2042-3195&rft.coden=JATRDC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/atr.1269&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1660062527%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1643761510&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true