Preferences for European agrarian landscapes: A meta-analysis of case studies
•We compare landscape preferences across a diverse set of European case studies.•We find generic preferences for livestock, mosaic land and historic buildings.•Preferences for landscape attributes are related to population density and income. Stated preference studies are increasingly employed to es...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Landscape and urban planning 2014-12, Vol.132, p.89-101 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 101 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 89 |
container_title | Landscape and urban planning |
container_volume | 132 |
creator | van Zanten, Boris T. Verburg, Peter H. Koetse, Mark J. van Beukering, Pieter J.H. |
description | •We compare landscape preferences across a diverse set of European case studies.•We find generic preferences for livestock, mosaic land and historic buildings.•Preferences for landscape attributes are related to population density and income.
Stated preference studies are increasingly employed to estimate the value of attributes of European agrarian landscapes and changes therein. Despite the vast amount of case studies, preferences for landscape attributes are context specific, which inhibits cross-case comparison and up-scaling. In this study, we address this problem by applying a meta-analysis of stated preference studies that focus on attributes of European agrarian landscapes (n=345). The main objective of this study is to identify generic preferences for particular types of landscape attributes across case studies. In addition, landscape context variables that explain preference heterogeneity between different cases that address similar landscape attributes are identified. We find that landscape attributes that describe mosaic land cover, historic buildings or the presence of livestock generally receive the highest stated preferences across cases. Furthermore, we find relations between preferences for particular attributes and context variables – such as population density and GDP per capita – using a meta-regression analysis. The results of the present study provide the first cross-disciplinary and cross-case evidence on relations between preferences for landscape attributes and socio-economic and landscape context conditions. The study is a first step toward up-scaling of landscape preferences and the development social landscape indicators that reflect the perceived value of landscapes at regional and pan-regional scales, which is increasingly important as landscape policies are progressively implemented at European level. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.08.012 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1660061592</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0169204614001984</els_id><sourcerecordid>1660061592</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-a32dc1329495c49fabafb8f51ef68dfd0688a0fd1c3c864490a46776b8fd92b03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1P3DAQhq2qSN0C_yE9IPWSMHYcx-GGVtAigeBQztasPyqvsknwJJX493W0CHFkLjOHZ-YdPYz94FBx4OpyX_U4uCXtptwrAVxWoCvg4gvbcN2KUoESX9kms10pQKpv7DvRHgB4o_iGPTwlH3zyg_VUhDEVN0saJ49DgX8TppiHNYAsTp6uiuvi4GcsccD-lSIVYygski9oXlz0dMZOAvbkz9_6KXu-vfmz_V3eP_66217fl1bydi6xFs7yWnSya6zsAu4w7HRouA9Ku-BAaY0QHLe11UrKDlCqtlWZcZ3YQX3Kfh7vTml8WTzN5hDJ-j6_6seFDFcKQPGmE59AZQvQSFFntDuiNo1E2YuZUjxgejUczGrb7M0H22a1bUCbbDvvXrzFYHbVh4SDjfR-QOhcXK7c9sj5rOdf9MmQjat9F5O3s3Fj_ETaf3A9m2k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1647005423</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Preferences for European agrarian landscapes: A meta-analysis of case studies</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>van Zanten, Boris T. ; Verburg, Peter H. ; Koetse, Mark J. ; van Beukering, Pieter J.H.</creator><creatorcontrib>van Zanten, Boris T. ; Verburg, Peter H. ; Koetse, Mark J. ; van Beukering, Pieter J.H.</creatorcontrib><description>•We compare landscape preferences across a diverse set of European case studies.•We find generic preferences for livestock, mosaic land and historic buildings.•Preferences for landscape attributes are related to population density and income.
Stated preference studies are increasingly employed to estimate the value of attributes of European agrarian landscapes and changes therein. Despite the vast amount of case studies, preferences for landscape attributes are context specific, which inhibits cross-case comparison and up-scaling. In this study, we address this problem by applying a meta-analysis of stated preference studies that focus on attributes of European agrarian landscapes (n=345). The main objective of this study is to identify generic preferences for particular types of landscape attributes across case studies. In addition, landscape context variables that explain preference heterogeneity between different cases that address similar landscape attributes are identified. We find that landscape attributes that describe mosaic land cover, historic buildings or the presence of livestock generally receive the highest stated preferences across cases. Furthermore, we find relations between preferences for particular attributes and context variables – such as population density and GDP per capita – using a meta-regression analysis. The results of the present study provide the first cross-disciplinary and cross-case evidence on relations between preferences for landscape attributes and socio-economic and landscape context conditions. The study is a first step toward up-scaling of landscape preferences and the development social landscape indicators that reflect the perceived value of landscapes at regional and pan-regional scales, which is increasingly important as landscape policies are progressively implemented at European level.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0169-2046</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6062</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.08.012</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LUPLEZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife ; Cultural ecosystem services ; Estimates ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Heterogeneity ; Historical buildings ; Indicators ; Land cover ; Landscape features ; Landscape preferences ; Landscape valuation ; Landscape values ; Landscapes ; Meta-analysis ; Population density ; Urban planning</subject><ispartof>Landscape and urban planning, 2014-12, Vol.132, p.89-101</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-a32dc1329495c49fabafb8f51ef68dfd0688a0fd1c3c864490a46776b8fd92b03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-a32dc1329495c49fabafb8f51ef68dfd0688a0fd1c3c864490a46776b8fd92b03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.08.012$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3549,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=28888142$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>van Zanten, Boris T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verburg, Peter H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koetse, Mark J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Beukering, Pieter J.H.</creatorcontrib><title>Preferences for European agrarian landscapes: A meta-analysis of case studies</title><title>Landscape and urban planning</title><description>•We compare landscape preferences across a diverse set of European case studies.•We find generic preferences for livestock, mosaic land and historic buildings.•Preferences for landscape attributes are related to population density and income.
Stated preference studies are increasingly employed to estimate the value of attributes of European agrarian landscapes and changes therein. Despite the vast amount of case studies, preferences for landscape attributes are context specific, which inhibits cross-case comparison and up-scaling. In this study, we address this problem by applying a meta-analysis of stated preference studies that focus on attributes of European agrarian landscapes (n=345). The main objective of this study is to identify generic preferences for particular types of landscape attributes across case studies. In addition, landscape context variables that explain preference heterogeneity between different cases that address similar landscape attributes are identified. We find that landscape attributes that describe mosaic land cover, historic buildings or the presence of livestock generally receive the highest stated preferences across cases. Furthermore, we find relations between preferences for particular attributes and context variables – such as population density and GDP per capita – using a meta-regression analysis. The results of the present study provide the first cross-disciplinary and cross-case evidence on relations between preferences for landscape attributes and socio-economic and landscape context conditions. The study is a first step toward up-scaling of landscape preferences and the development social landscape indicators that reflect the perceived value of landscapes at regional and pan-regional scales, which is increasingly important as landscape policies are progressively implemented at European level.</description><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</subject><subject>Cultural ecosystem services</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Historical buildings</subject><subject>Indicators</subject><subject>Land cover</subject><subject>Landscape features</subject><subject>Landscape preferences</subject><subject>Landscape valuation</subject><subject>Landscape values</subject><subject>Landscapes</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Population density</subject><subject>Urban planning</subject><issn>0169-2046</issn><issn>1872-6062</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE1P3DAQhq2qSN0C_yE9IPWSMHYcx-GGVtAigeBQztasPyqvsknwJJX493W0CHFkLjOHZ-YdPYz94FBx4OpyX_U4uCXtptwrAVxWoCvg4gvbcN2KUoESX9kms10pQKpv7DvRHgB4o_iGPTwlH3zyg_VUhDEVN0saJ49DgX8TppiHNYAsTp6uiuvi4GcsccD-lSIVYygski9oXlz0dMZOAvbkz9_6KXu-vfmz_V3eP_66217fl1bydi6xFs7yWnSya6zsAu4w7HRouA9Ku-BAaY0QHLe11UrKDlCqtlWZcZ3YQX3Kfh7vTml8WTzN5hDJ-j6_6seFDFcKQPGmE59AZQvQSFFntDuiNo1E2YuZUjxgejUczGrb7M0H22a1bUCbbDvvXrzFYHbVh4SDjfR-QOhcXK7c9sj5rOdf9MmQjat9F5O3s3Fj_ETaf3A9m2k</recordid><startdate>20141201</startdate><enddate>20141201</enddate><creator>van Zanten, Boris T.</creator><creator>Verburg, Peter H.</creator><creator>Koetse, Mark J.</creator><creator>van Beukering, Pieter J.H.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141201</creationdate><title>Preferences for European agrarian landscapes: A meta-analysis of case studies</title><author>van Zanten, Boris T. ; Verburg, Peter H. ; Koetse, Mark J. ; van Beukering, Pieter J.H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-a32dc1329495c49fabafb8f51ef68dfd0688a0fd1c3c864490a46776b8fd92b03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</topic><topic>Cultural ecosystem services</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Historical buildings</topic><topic>Indicators</topic><topic>Land cover</topic><topic>Landscape features</topic><topic>Landscape preferences</topic><topic>Landscape valuation</topic><topic>Landscape values</topic><topic>Landscapes</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Population density</topic><topic>Urban planning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>van Zanten, Boris T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verburg, Peter H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koetse, Mark J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Beukering, Pieter J.H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Landscape and urban planning</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>van Zanten, Boris T.</au><au>Verburg, Peter H.</au><au>Koetse, Mark J.</au><au>van Beukering, Pieter J.H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Preferences for European agrarian landscapes: A meta-analysis of case studies</atitle><jtitle>Landscape and urban planning</jtitle><date>2014-12-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>132</volume><spage>89</spage><epage>101</epage><pages>89-101</pages><issn>0169-2046</issn><eissn>1872-6062</eissn><coden>LUPLEZ</coden><abstract>•We compare landscape preferences across a diverse set of European case studies.•We find generic preferences for livestock, mosaic land and historic buildings.•Preferences for landscape attributes are related to population density and income.
Stated preference studies are increasingly employed to estimate the value of attributes of European agrarian landscapes and changes therein. Despite the vast amount of case studies, preferences for landscape attributes are context specific, which inhibits cross-case comparison and up-scaling. In this study, we address this problem by applying a meta-analysis of stated preference studies that focus on attributes of European agrarian landscapes (n=345). The main objective of this study is to identify generic preferences for particular types of landscape attributes across case studies. In addition, landscape context variables that explain preference heterogeneity between different cases that address similar landscape attributes are identified. We find that landscape attributes that describe mosaic land cover, historic buildings or the presence of livestock generally receive the highest stated preferences across cases. Furthermore, we find relations between preferences for particular attributes and context variables – such as population density and GDP per capita – using a meta-regression analysis. The results of the present study provide the first cross-disciplinary and cross-case evidence on relations between preferences for landscape attributes and socio-economic and landscape context conditions. The study is a first step toward up-scaling of landscape preferences and the development social landscape indicators that reflect the perceived value of landscapes at regional and pan-regional scales, which is increasingly important as landscape policies are progressively implemented at European level.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.08.012</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0169-2046 |
ispartof | Landscape and urban planning, 2014-12, Vol.132, p.89-101 |
issn | 0169-2046 1872-6062 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1660061592 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Animal, plant and microbial ecology Applied ecology Biological and medical sciences Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife Cultural ecosystem services Estimates Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General aspects Heterogeneity Historical buildings Indicators Land cover Landscape features Landscape preferences Landscape valuation Landscape values Landscapes Meta-analysis Population density Urban planning |
title | Preferences for European agrarian landscapes: A meta-analysis of case studies |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T07%3A07%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Preferences%20for%20European%20agrarian%20landscapes:%20A%20meta-analysis%20of%20case%20studies&rft.jtitle=Landscape%20and%20urban%20planning&rft.au=van%20Zanten,%20Boris%20T.&rft.date=2014-12-01&rft.volume=132&rft.spage=89&rft.epage=101&rft.pages=89-101&rft.issn=0169-2046&rft.eissn=1872-6062&rft.coden=LUPLEZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.08.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1660061592%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1647005423&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0169204614001984&rfr_iscdi=true |