Acid mine drainage treatment using by-products from quicklime manufacturing as neutralization chemicals
•By-products from quicklime manufacturing were investigated for AMD treatment.•All tested by-products removed over 99% of Al, As, Cd, Co, Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni, Zn from AMD.•All tested by-products removed approximately 60% of sulphate from AMD.•The neutralization capacity of the by-products varied.•Results...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Chemosphere (Oxford) 2014-12, Vol.117, p.419-424 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 424 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 419 |
| container_title | Chemosphere (Oxford) |
| container_volume | 117 |
| creator | Tolonen, Emma-Tuulia Sarpola, Arja Hu, Tao Rämö, Jaakko Lassi, Ulla |
| description | •By-products from quicklime manufacturing were investigated for AMD treatment.•All tested by-products removed over 99% of Al, As, Cd, Co, Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni, Zn from AMD.•All tested by-products removed approximately 60% of sulphate from AMD.•The neutralization capacity of the by-products varied.•Results indicate that two of the by-products could be used for AMD treatment.
The aim of this research was to investigate whether by-products from quicklime manufacturing could be used instead of commercial quicklime (CaO) or hydrated lime (Ca(OH)2), which are traditionally used as neutralization chemicals in acid mine drainage treatment. Four by-products were studied and the results were compared with quicklime and hydrated lime. The studied by-products were partly burnt lime stored outdoors, partly burnt lime stored in a silo, kiln dust and a mixture of partly burnt lime stored outdoors and dolomite. Present application options for these by-products are limited and they are largely considered waste. Chemical precipitation experiments were performed with the jar test. All the studied by-products removed over 99% of Al, As, Cd, Co, Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni, Zn and approximately 60% of sulphate from acid mine drainage. However, the neutralization capacity of the by-products and thus the amount of by-product needed as well as the amount of sludge produced varied. The results indicated that two out of the four studied by-products could be used as an alternative to quicklime or hydrated lime for acid mine drainage treatment. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.07.090 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1660054297</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0045653514009692</els_id><sourcerecordid>1629585956</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-e7a47df92b24c8fc7ed60969b9bacd400b341377a4b446473783d9f66dc988f53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0U1v1DAQBuAIgehS-AvIHJC4JIwTf8THagUUqRIXOFuOPdl6SZyt7SCVX49XuwWOe5rL89qjeavqHYWGAhUf9429x3lJh3uM2LRAWQOyAQXPqg3tpappq_rn1QaA8Vrwjl9Vr1LaA5QwVy-rq5ZT1UnFN9XuxnpHZh-QuGh8MDskOaLJM4ZM1uTDjgyP9SEubrU5kTEuM3lYvf05-RnJbMI6GpvXeIQmkYBrjmbyv032SyDHPb01U3pdvRjLwDfneV39-Pzp-_a2vvv25ev25q62THa5RmmYdKNqh5bZfrQSnQAl1KAGYx0DGDpGO1nUwJgoEdl3To1COKv6fuTddfXh9G7Z-GHFlPXsk8VpMgGXNWkqBABnrZIXUM6EFBzgAtoq3nPFRaHqRG1cUoo46kP0s4mPmoI-tqf3-r_29LE9DVKX9kr27fmbdZjR_U0-1VXA-zMwqVx1jCZYn_45BW3b9ay47clhOfUvj1En6zFYdD6izdot_oJ1_gCVvb95</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1629585956</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Acid mine drainage treatment using by-products from quicklime manufacturing as neutralization chemicals</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Tolonen, Emma-Tuulia ; Sarpola, Arja ; Hu, Tao ; Rämö, Jaakko ; Lassi, Ulla</creator><creatorcontrib>Tolonen, Emma-Tuulia ; Sarpola, Arja ; Hu, Tao ; Rämö, Jaakko ; Lassi, Ulla</creatorcontrib><description>•By-products from quicklime manufacturing were investigated for AMD treatment.•All tested by-products removed over 99% of Al, As, Cd, Co, Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni, Zn from AMD.•All tested by-products removed approximately 60% of sulphate from AMD.•The neutralization capacity of the by-products varied.•Results indicate that two of the by-products could be used for AMD treatment.
The aim of this research was to investigate whether by-products from quicklime manufacturing could be used instead of commercial quicklime (CaO) or hydrated lime (Ca(OH)2), which are traditionally used as neutralization chemicals in acid mine drainage treatment. Four by-products were studied and the results were compared with quicklime and hydrated lime. The studied by-products were partly burnt lime stored outdoors, partly burnt lime stored in a silo, kiln dust and a mixture of partly burnt lime stored outdoors and dolomite. Present application options for these by-products are limited and they are largely considered waste. Chemical precipitation experiments were performed with the jar test. All the studied by-products removed over 99% of Al, As, Cd, Co, Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni, Zn and approximately 60% of sulphate from acid mine drainage. However, the neutralization capacity of the by-products and thus the amount of by-product needed as well as the amount of sludge produced varied. The results indicated that two out of the four studied by-products could be used as an alternative to quicklime or hydrated lime for acid mine drainage treatment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0045-6535</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1298</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.07.090</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25193795</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CMSHAF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Acid mine drainage ; Acid mine drainage (AMD) ; Aluminum ; Applied sciences ; By-products ; Byproducts ; Cadmium ; Calcium Compounds - chemistry ; Chemical Precipitation ; Exact sciences and technology ; Industrial wastewaters ; Lime ; Microscopy, Electron, Scanning ; Mining ; Neutralization ; Nickel ; Outdoor ; Oxides - chemistry ; Pollution ; Quicklime ; Sulfates ; Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods ; Wastewater treatment ; Wastewaters ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - chemistry ; Water treatment and pollution ; X-Ray Diffraction</subject><ispartof>Chemosphere (Oxford), 2014-12, Vol.117, p.419-424</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-e7a47df92b24c8fc7ed60969b9bacd400b341377a4b446473783d9f66dc988f53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-e7a47df92b24c8fc7ed60969b9bacd400b341377a4b446473783d9f66dc988f53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.07.090$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=29022384$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25193795$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tolonen, Emma-Tuulia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarpola, Arja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Tao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rämö, Jaakko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lassi, Ulla</creatorcontrib><title>Acid mine drainage treatment using by-products from quicklime manufacturing as neutralization chemicals</title><title>Chemosphere (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Chemosphere</addtitle><description>•By-products from quicklime manufacturing were investigated for AMD treatment.•All tested by-products removed over 99% of Al, As, Cd, Co, Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni, Zn from AMD.•All tested by-products removed approximately 60% of sulphate from AMD.•The neutralization capacity of the by-products varied.•Results indicate that two of the by-products could be used for AMD treatment.
The aim of this research was to investigate whether by-products from quicklime manufacturing could be used instead of commercial quicklime (CaO) or hydrated lime (Ca(OH)2), which are traditionally used as neutralization chemicals in acid mine drainage treatment. Four by-products were studied and the results were compared with quicklime and hydrated lime. The studied by-products were partly burnt lime stored outdoors, partly burnt lime stored in a silo, kiln dust and a mixture of partly burnt lime stored outdoors and dolomite. Present application options for these by-products are limited and they are largely considered waste. Chemical precipitation experiments were performed with the jar test. All the studied by-products removed over 99% of Al, As, Cd, Co, Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni, Zn and approximately 60% of sulphate from acid mine drainage. However, the neutralization capacity of the by-products and thus the amount of by-product needed as well as the amount of sludge produced varied. The results indicated that two out of the four studied by-products could be used as an alternative to quicklime or hydrated lime for acid mine drainage treatment.</description><subject>Acid mine drainage</subject><subject>Acid mine drainage (AMD)</subject><subject>Aluminum</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>By-products</subject><subject>Byproducts</subject><subject>Cadmium</subject><subject>Calcium Compounds - chemistry</subject><subject>Chemical Precipitation</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Industrial wastewaters</subject><subject>Lime</subject><subject>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</subject><subject>Mining</subject><subject>Neutralization</subject><subject>Nickel</subject><subject>Outdoor</subject><subject>Oxides - chemistry</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Quicklime</subject><subject>Sulfates</subject><subject>Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment</subject><subject>Wastewaters</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - chemistry</subject><subject>Water treatment and pollution</subject><subject>X-Ray Diffraction</subject><issn>0045-6535</issn><issn>1879-1298</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0U1v1DAQBuAIgehS-AvIHJC4JIwTf8THagUUqRIXOFuOPdl6SZyt7SCVX49XuwWOe5rL89qjeavqHYWGAhUf9429x3lJh3uM2LRAWQOyAQXPqg3tpappq_rn1QaA8Vrwjl9Vr1LaA5QwVy-rq5ZT1UnFN9XuxnpHZh-QuGh8MDskOaLJM4ZM1uTDjgyP9SEubrU5kTEuM3lYvf05-RnJbMI6GpvXeIQmkYBrjmbyv032SyDHPb01U3pdvRjLwDfneV39-Pzp-_a2vvv25ev25q62THa5RmmYdKNqh5bZfrQSnQAl1KAGYx0DGDpGO1nUwJgoEdl3To1COKv6fuTddfXh9G7Z-GHFlPXsk8VpMgGXNWkqBABnrZIXUM6EFBzgAtoq3nPFRaHqRG1cUoo46kP0s4mPmoI-tqf3-r_29LE9DVKX9kr27fmbdZjR_U0-1VXA-zMwqVx1jCZYn_45BW3b9ay47clhOfUvj1En6zFYdD6izdot_oJ1_gCVvb95</recordid><startdate>20141201</startdate><enddate>20141201</enddate><creator>Tolonen, Emma-Tuulia</creator><creator>Sarpola, Arja</creator><creator>Hu, Tao</creator><creator>Rämö, Jaakko</creator><creator>Lassi, Ulla</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141201</creationdate><title>Acid mine drainage treatment using by-products from quicklime manufacturing as neutralization chemicals</title><author>Tolonen, Emma-Tuulia ; Sarpola, Arja ; Hu, Tao ; Rämö, Jaakko ; Lassi, Ulla</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-e7a47df92b24c8fc7ed60969b9bacd400b341377a4b446473783d9f66dc988f53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Acid mine drainage</topic><topic>Acid mine drainage (AMD)</topic><topic>Aluminum</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>By-products</topic><topic>Byproducts</topic><topic>Cadmium</topic><topic>Calcium Compounds - chemistry</topic><topic>Chemical Precipitation</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Industrial wastewaters</topic><topic>Lime</topic><topic>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</topic><topic>Mining</topic><topic>Neutralization</topic><topic>Nickel</topic><topic>Outdoor</topic><topic>Oxides - chemistry</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Quicklime</topic><topic>Sulfates</topic><topic>Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment</topic><topic>Wastewaters</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - chemistry</topic><topic>Water treatment and pollution</topic><topic>X-Ray Diffraction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tolonen, Emma-Tuulia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarpola, Arja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Tao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rämö, Jaakko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lassi, Ulla</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Chemosphere (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tolonen, Emma-Tuulia</au><au>Sarpola, Arja</au><au>Hu, Tao</au><au>Rämö, Jaakko</au><au>Lassi, Ulla</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Acid mine drainage treatment using by-products from quicklime manufacturing as neutralization chemicals</atitle><jtitle>Chemosphere (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Chemosphere</addtitle><date>2014-12-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>117</volume><spage>419</spage><epage>424</epage><pages>419-424</pages><issn>0045-6535</issn><eissn>1879-1298</eissn><coden>CMSHAF</coden><abstract>•By-products from quicklime manufacturing were investigated for AMD treatment.•All tested by-products removed over 99% of Al, As, Cd, Co, Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni, Zn from AMD.•All tested by-products removed approximately 60% of sulphate from AMD.•The neutralization capacity of the by-products varied.•Results indicate that two of the by-products could be used for AMD treatment.
The aim of this research was to investigate whether by-products from quicklime manufacturing could be used instead of commercial quicklime (CaO) or hydrated lime (Ca(OH)2), which are traditionally used as neutralization chemicals in acid mine drainage treatment. Four by-products were studied and the results were compared with quicklime and hydrated lime. The studied by-products were partly burnt lime stored outdoors, partly burnt lime stored in a silo, kiln dust and a mixture of partly burnt lime stored outdoors and dolomite. Present application options for these by-products are limited and they are largely considered waste. Chemical precipitation experiments were performed with the jar test. All the studied by-products removed over 99% of Al, As, Cd, Co, Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni, Zn and approximately 60% of sulphate from acid mine drainage. However, the neutralization capacity of the by-products and thus the amount of by-product needed as well as the amount of sludge produced varied. The results indicated that two out of the four studied by-products could be used as an alternative to quicklime or hydrated lime for acid mine drainage treatment.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>25193795</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.07.090</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0045-6535 |
| ispartof | Chemosphere (Oxford), 2014-12, Vol.117, p.419-424 |
| issn | 0045-6535 1879-1298 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1660054297 |
| source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
| subjects | Acid mine drainage Acid mine drainage (AMD) Aluminum Applied sciences By-products Byproducts Cadmium Calcium Compounds - chemistry Chemical Precipitation Exact sciences and technology Industrial wastewaters Lime Microscopy, Electron, Scanning Mining Neutralization Nickel Outdoor Oxides - chemistry Pollution Quicklime Sulfates Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods Wastewater treatment Wastewaters Water Pollutants, Chemical - chemistry Water treatment and pollution X-Ray Diffraction |
| title | Acid mine drainage treatment using by-products from quicklime manufacturing as neutralization chemicals |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T16%3A03%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Acid%20mine%20drainage%20treatment%20using%20by-products%20from%20quicklime%20manufacturing%20as%20neutralization%20chemicals&rft.jtitle=Chemosphere%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Tolonen,%20Emma-Tuulia&rft.date=2014-12-01&rft.volume=117&rft.spage=419&rft.epage=424&rft.pages=419-424&rft.issn=0045-6535&rft.eissn=1879-1298&rft.coden=CMSHAF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.07.090&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1629585956%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1629585956&rft_id=info:pmid/25193795&rft_els_id=S0045653514009692&rfr_iscdi=true |