Predicting drug penetration across the bloodabrain barrier: comparison of micellar liquid chromatography and immobilized artificial membrane liquid chromatography

Several in vitro methods have been tested for their ability to predict drug penetration across the bloodabrain barrier (BBB) into the central nervous system (CNS). In this article, the performance of a variety of micellar liquid chromatographic (MLC) methods and immobilized artificial membrane (IAM)...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry 2013-07, Vol.405 (18), p.6029-6041
Hauptverfasser: De Vrieze, Mike, Lynen, Frederic, Chen, Kai, Szucs, Roman, Sandra, Pat
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Several in vitro methods have been tested for their ability to predict drug penetration across the bloodabrain barrier (BBB) into the central nervous system (CNS). In this article, the performance of a variety of micellar liquid chromatographic (MLC) methods and immobilized artificial membrane (IAM) liquid chromatographic approaches were compared for a set of 45 solutes. MLC measurements were performed on a C18 column with sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), polyoxyethylene (23) lauryl ether (Brij35), or sodium deoxycholate (SDC) as surfactant in the micellar mobile phase. IAM liquid chromatography measurements were performed with Dulbeccoas phosphate-buffered saline (DPBS) and methanol as organic modifier in the mobile phase. The corresponding retention and computed descriptor data for each solute were used for construction of models to predict transport across the bloodabrain barrier (log BB). All data were correlated with experimental log BB values and the relative performance of the models was studied. SDS-based models proved most suitable for prediction of log BB values, followed closely by a simplified IAM method, in which it could be observed that extrapolation of retention data to 0 % modifier in the mobile phase was unnecessary.
ISSN:1618-2642
1618-2650
DOI:10.1007/s00216-013-7015-x