Systematic optimization of an SPE with HPLC-FLD method for fluoroquinolone detection in wastewater

•WCX is better suited than HLB for solid-phase extraction of fluoroquinolones.•Real wastewater matrix had minimal impact on recovery and fluorescence response.•HPLC-FLD method fully resolves 11 fluoroquinolones.•SPE with HPLC-FLD method demonstrates sensitivity equivalent to LC–MS/MS.•FQs detected i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of hazardous materials 2015-01, Vol.282, p.96-105
Hauptverfasser: He, Ke, Blaney, Lee
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 105
container_issue
container_start_page 96
container_title Journal of hazardous materials
container_volume 282
creator He, Ke
Blaney, Lee
description •WCX is better suited than HLB for solid-phase extraction of fluoroquinolones.•Real wastewater matrix had minimal impact on recovery and fluorescence response.•HPLC-FLD method fully resolves 11 fluoroquinolones.•SPE with HPLC-FLD method demonstrates sensitivity equivalent to LC–MS/MS.•FQs detected in raw wastewater, wastewater effluent, and surface water. This paper describes a selective and ultra-sensitive analytical method for simultaneous determination of 11 fluoroquinolone (FQ) antibiotics in environmental and wastewater samples. The method employs offline solid-phase extraction (SPE) and reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection (HPLC-FLD). A weak cation exchange SPE protocol was developed with a novel loading volume optimization algorithm and a methanol cleanup step to remove background organic matter. Various parameters were optimized to recover FQs from water/wastewater and analyte recovery was generally greater than 80%. Chromatographic separation of the 11 FQs was achieved on a 150mm pentafluorophenyl column using a gradient elution scheme with methanol, acetonitrile, and 20mM phosphate buffer (pH=2.4). Excitation and emission wavelengths were individually optimized for each FQ using fluorescence spectroscopy; the excitation and emission wavelengths were 276–296nm and 444–506nm, respectively. Instrumental quantitation limits were 20–100pg of mass injected. Of the 11 FQs investigated, seven (i.e., ciprofloxacin, difloxacin, enrofloxacin, fleroxacin, norfloxacin, moxifloxacin, and ofloxacin) were detected during a four-month sampling campaign of wastewater and wastewater-impacted surface water. Concentrations of FQs in raw wastewater, wastewater effluent, and wastewater-impacted surface water were 5–1292, 2–504, and 4–187ng/L, respectively.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.08.027
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1660042346</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0304389414006839</els_id><sourcerecordid>1647022662</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c501t-73cb57aa02a37f6c496ae2c1c6767de617f655511b1b92b4d514de613f5fc1a83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU9vEzEQxS1ERUPhI4B85LJb__fmhFBoaaVIVGo5W17vrOJodx1sh6j99PU2gSs9zWj03pvR_BD6RElNCVWX23q7sU-jzTUjVNSkqQnTb9CCNppXnHP1Fi0IJ6LizVKco_cpbQkhVEvxDp0zyUpPlwvU3j-mDCXGOxx22Y_-qfRhwqHHdsL3d1f44PMG39ytV9X1-jseIW9Ch_sQcT_sQwy_934KQ5gAd5DBvZj9hA-25B5shvgBnfV2SPDxVC_Qr-urh9VNtf7543b1bV05SWiuNHet1NYSZrnulRNLZYE56pRWugNFy1BKSWlL2yVrRSepmMe8l72jtuEX6MsxdzcfBSmb0ScHw2AnCPtkqFKECMaFeoVUaMKYUuwVUi6YFlLOB8ij1MWQUoTe7KIfbXw0lJgZmtmaEzQzQzOkMQVa8X0-rdi3I3T_XH8pFcHXowDK-_54iCY5D5ODzsfycdMF_58Vz7znqkI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1634274558</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Systematic optimization of an SPE with HPLC-FLD method for fluoroquinolone detection in wastewater</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>He, Ke ; Blaney, Lee</creator><creatorcontrib>He, Ke ; Blaney, Lee</creatorcontrib><description>•WCX is better suited than HLB for solid-phase extraction of fluoroquinolones.•Real wastewater matrix had minimal impact on recovery and fluorescence response.•HPLC-FLD method fully resolves 11 fluoroquinolones.•SPE with HPLC-FLD method demonstrates sensitivity equivalent to LC–MS/MS.•FQs detected in raw wastewater, wastewater effluent, and surface water. This paper describes a selective and ultra-sensitive analytical method for simultaneous determination of 11 fluoroquinolone (FQ) antibiotics in environmental and wastewater samples. The method employs offline solid-phase extraction (SPE) and reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection (HPLC-FLD). A weak cation exchange SPE protocol was developed with a novel loading volume optimization algorithm and a methanol cleanup step to remove background organic matter. Various parameters were optimized to recover FQs from water/wastewater and analyte recovery was generally greater than 80%. Chromatographic separation of the 11 FQs was achieved on a 150mm pentafluorophenyl column using a gradient elution scheme with methanol, acetonitrile, and 20mM phosphate buffer (pH=2.4). Excitation and emission wavelengths were individually optimized for each FQ using fluorescence spectroscopy; the excitation and emission wavelengths were 276–296nm and 444–506nm, respectively. Instrumental quantitation limits were 20–100pg of mass injected. Of the 11 FQs investigated, seven (i.e., ciprofloxacin, difloxacin, enrofloxacin, fleroxacin, norfloxacin, moxifloxacin, and ofloxacin) were detected during a four-month sampling campaign of wastewater and wastewater-impacted surface water. Concentrations of FQs in raw wastewater, wastewater effluent, and wastewater-impacted surface water were 5–1292, 2–504, and 4–187ng/L, respectively.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0304-3894</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-3336</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.08.027</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25200119</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - analysis ; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid - methods ; Emission spectroscopy ; Environmental Monitoring ; Excitation ; Fluorescence ; Fluorescence detection ; Fluoroquinolones ; Fluoroquinolones - analysis ; HPLC ; Maryland ; Methyl alcohol ; Optimization ; PPCPs ; Rivers - chemistry ; Solid Phase Extraction ; SPE ; Surface water ; Waste water ; Waste Water - analysis ; Wastewater ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis ; Wavelengths</subject><ispartof>Journal of hazardous materials, 2015-01, Vol.282, p.96-105</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c501t-73cb57aa02a37f6c496ae2c1c6767de617f655511b1b92b4d514de613f5fc1a83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c501t-73cb57aa02a37f6c496ae2c1c6767de617f655511b1b92b4d514de613f5fc1a83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304389414006839$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25200119$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>He, Ke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blaney, Lee</creatorcontrib><title>Systematic optimization of an SPE with HPLC-FLD method for fluoroquinolone detection in wastewater</title><title>Journal of hazardous materials</title><addtitle>J Hazard Mater</addtitle><description>•WCX is better suited than HLB for solid-phase extraction of fluoroquinolones.•Real wastewater matrix had minimal impact on recovery and fluorescence response.•HPLC-FLD method fully resolves 11 fluoroquinolones.•SPE with HPLC-FLD method demonstrates sensitivity equivalent to LC–MS/MS.•FQs detected in raw wastewater, wastewater effluent, and surface water. This paper describes a selective and ultra-sensitive analytical method for simultaneous determination of 11 fluoroquinolone (FQ) antibiotics in environmental and wastewater samples. The method employs offline solid-phase extraction (SPE) and reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection (HPLC-FLD). A weak cation exchange SPE protocol was developed with a novel loading volume optimization algorithm and a methanol cleanup step to remove background organic matter. Various parameters were optimized to recover FQs from water/wastewater and analyte recovery was generally greater than 80%. Chromatographic separation of the 11 FQs was achieved on a 150mm pentafluorophenyl column using a gradient elution scheme with methanol, acetonitrile, and 20mM phosphate buffer (pH=2.4). Excitation and emission wavelengths were individually optimized for each FQ using fluorescence spectroscopy; the excitation and emission wavelengths were 276–296nm and 444–506nm, respectively. Instrumental quantitation limits were 20–100pg of mass injected. Of the 11 FQs investigated, seven (i.e., ciprofloxacin, difloxacin, enrofloxacin, fleroxacin, norfloxacin, moxifloxacin, and ofloxacin) were detected during a four-month sampling campaign of wastewater and wastewater-impacted surface water. Concentrations of FQs in raw wastewater, wastewater effluent, and wastewater-impacted surface water were 5–1292, 2–504, and 4–187ng/L, respectively.</description><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - analysis</subject><subject>Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid - methods</subject><subject>Emission spectroscopy</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring</subject><subject>Excitation</subject><subject>Fluorescence</subject><subject>Fluorescence detection</subject><subject>Fluoroquinolones</subject><subject>Fluoroquinolones - analysis</subject><subject>HPLC</subject><subject>Maryland</subject><subject>Methyl alcohol</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>PPCPs</subject><subject>Rivers - chemistry</subject><subject>Solid Phase Extraction</subject><subject>SPE</subject><subject>Surface water</subject><subject>Waste water</subject><subject>Waste Water - analysis</subject><subject>Wastewater</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</subject><subject>Wavelengths</subject><issn>0304-3894</issn><issn>1873-3336</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU9vEzEQxS1ERUPhI4B85LJb__fmhFBoaaVIVGo5W17vrOJodx1sh6j99PU2gSs9zWj03pvR_BD6RElNCVWX23q7sU-jzTUjVNSkqQnTb9CCNppXnHP1Fi0IJ6LizVKco_cpbQkhVEvxDp0zyUpPlwvU3j-mDCXGOxx22Y_-qfRhwqHHdsL3d1f44PMG39ytV9X1-jseIW9Ch_sQcT_sQwy_934KQ5gAd5DBvZj9hA-25B5shvgBnfV2SPDxVC_Qr-urh9VNtf7543b1bV05SWiuNHet1NYSZrnulRNLZYE56pRWugNFy1BKSWlL2yVrRSepmMe8l72jtuEX6MsxdzcfBSmb0ScHw2AnCPtkqFKECMaFeoVUaMKYUuwVUi6YFlLOB8ij1MWQUoTe7KIfbXw0lJgZmtmaEzQzQzOkMQVa8X0-rdi3I3T_XH8pFcHXowDK-_54iCY5D5ODzsfycdMF_58Vz7znqkI</recordid><startdate>20150123</startdate><enddate>20150123</enddate><creator>He, Ke</creator><creator>Blaney, Lee</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150123</creationdate><title>Systematic optimization of an SPE with HPLC-FLD method for fluoroquinolone detection in wastewater</title><author>He, Ke ; Blaney, Lee</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c501t-73cb57aa02a37f6c496ae2c1c6767de617f655511b1b92b4d514de613f5fc1a83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - analysis</topic><topic>Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid - methods</topic><topic>Emission spectroscopy</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring</topic><topic>Excitation</topic><topic>Fluorescence</topic><topic>Fluorescence detection</topic><topic>Fluoroquinolones</topic><topic>Fluoroquinolones - analysis</topic><topic>HPLC</topic><topic>Maryland</topic><topic>Methyl alcohol</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>PPCPs</topic><topic>Rivers - chemistry</topic><topic>Solid Phase Extraction</topic><topic>SPE</topic><topic>Surface water</topic><topic>Waste water</topic><topic>Waste Water - analysis</topic><topic>Wastewater</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</topic><topic>Wavelengths</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>He, Ke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blaney, Lee</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of hazardous materials</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>He, Ke</au><au>Blaney, Lee</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Systematic optimization of an SPE with HPLC-FLD method for fluoroquinolone detection in wastewater</atitle><jtitle>Journal of hazardous materials</jtitle><addtitle>J Hazard Mater</addtitle><date>2015-01-23</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>282</volume><spage>96</spage><epage>105</epage><pages>96-105</pages><issn>0304-3894</issn><eissn>1873-3336</eissn><abstract>•WCX is better suited than HLB for solid-phase extraction of fluoroquinolones.•Real wastewater matrix had minimal impact on recovery and fluorescence response.•HPLC-FLD method fully resolves 11 fluoroquinolones.•SPE with HPLC-FLD method demonstrates sensitivity equivalent to LC–MS/MS.•FQs detected in raw wastewater, wastewater effluent, and surface water. This paper describes a selective and ultra-sensitive analytical method for simultaneous determination of 11 fluoroquinolone (FQ) antibiotics in environmental and wastewater samples. The method employs offline solid-phase extraction (SPE) and reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection (HPLC-FLD). A weak cation exchange SPE protocol was developed with a novel loading volume optimization algorithm and a methanol cleanup step to remove background organic matter. Various parameters were optimized to recover FQs from water/wastewater and analyte recovery was generally greater than 80%. Chromatographic separation of the 11 FQs was achieved on a 150mm pentafluorophenyl column using a gradient elution scheme with methanol, acetonitrile, and 20mM phosphate buffer (pH=2.4). Excitation and emission wavelengths were individually optimized for each FQ using fluorescence spectroscopy; the excitation and emission wavelengths were 276–296nm and 444–506nm, respectively. Instrumental quantitation limits were 20–100pg of mass injected. Of the 11 FQs investigated, seven (i.e., ciprofloxacin, difloxacin, enrofloxacin, fleroxacin, norfloxacin, moxifloxacin, and ofloxacin) were detected during a four-month sampling campaign of wastewater and wastewater-impacted surface water. Concentrations of FQs in raw wastewater, wastewater effluent, and wastewater-impacted surface water were 5–1292, 2–504, and 4–187ng/L, respectively.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>25200119</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.08.027</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0304-3894
ispartof Journal of hazardous materials, 2015-01, Vol.282, p.96-105
issn 0304-3894
1873-3336
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1660042346
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Anti-Bacterial Agents - analysis
Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid - methods
Emission spectroscopy
Environmental Monitoring
Excitation
Fluorescence
Fluorescence detection
Fluoroquinolones
Fluoroquinolones - analysis
HPLC
Maryland
Methyl alcohol
Optimization
PPCPs
Rivers - chemistry
Solid Phase Extraction
SPE
Surface water
Waste water
Waste Water - analysis
Wastewater
Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis
Wavelengths
title Systematic optimization of an SPE with HPLC-FLD method for fluoroquinolone detection in wastewater
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T03%3A07%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Systematic%20optimization%20of%20an%20SPE%20with%20HPLC-FLD%20method%20for%20fluoroquinolone%20detection%20in%20wastewater&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20hazardous%20materials&rft.au=He,%20Ke&rft.date=2015-01-23&rft.volume=282&rft.spage=96&rft.epage=105&rft.pages=96-105&rft.issn=0304-3894&rft.eissn=1873-3336&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.08.027&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1647022662%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1634274558&rft_id=info:pmid/25200119&rft_els_id=S0304389414006839&rfr_iscdi=true