Grain Boundary Segregation of Interstitial and Substitutional Impurity Atoms in Alpha-Iron
The macroscopic behavior of polycrystalline materials is influenced by the local variation of properties caused by the presence of impurities and defects. The effect of these impurities at the atomic scale can either embrittle or strengthen grain boundaries (GBs) within. Thus, it is imperative to un...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | JOM (1989) 2014-01, Vol.66 (1), p.129-138 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 138 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 129 |
container_title | JOM (1989) |
container_volume | 66 |
creator | Rajagopalan, M. Tschopp, M. A. Solanki, K. N. |
description | The macroscopic behavior of polycrystalline materials is influenced by the local variation of properties caused by the presence of impurities and defects. The effect of these impurities at the atomic scale can either embrittle or strengthen grain boundaries (GBs) within. Thus, it is imperative to understand the energetics associated with segregation to design materials with desirable properties. In this study, molecular statics simulations were employed to analyze the energetics associated with the segregation of various elements (helium, hydrogen, carbon, phosphorous, and vanadium) to four 〈100〉 (Σ5 and Σ13 GBs) and six 〈110〉 (Σ3, Σ9, and Σ11 GBs) symmetric tilt grain boundaries in
α
-Fe. This knowledge is important for designing stable interfaces in harsh environments. Simulation results show that the local atomic arrangements within the GB region and the resulting structural units have a significant influence on the magnitude of binding energies of the impurity (interstitial and substitutional) atoms. These data also suggest that the site-to-site variation of energies within a boundary is substantial. Comparing the binding energies of all 10 boundaries shows that the Σ3(112) boundary possesses a much smaller binding energy for all interstitial and substitutional impurity atoms among the boundaries examined in this study. Additionally, based on the Rice–Wang model, our total energy calculations show that V has a significant beneficial effect on the Fe grain boundary cohesion, while P has a detrimental effect on grain boundary cohesion, much weaker than H and He. This is significant for applications where extreme environmental damage generates lattice defects and grain boundaries act as sinks for both interstitial and substitutional impurity atoms. This methodology provides us with a tool to effectively identify the local as well as the global segregation behavior that can influence the GB cohesion. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11837-013-0807-9 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1660039586</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1660039586</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-9a8fc3a7241bca84b5ce4a408249b6b8ff67aa37c78e4b1a00a3883ca46aea643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kLFOwzAURS0EEqXwAWyWWFgMdu3EzlgqKJEqMRQWFusldUqqxA62M_D3OCoDQmJ6fta5V3oHoWtG7xil8j4wprgklHFCFZWkOEEzlglOmMrYaXpTIYlQXJ2jixAONGVEwWbofe2htfjBjXYH_gtvzd6bPcTWWewaXNpofIhtbKHDYHd4O1bTOk5A-ir7YfRt_MLL6PqAU9OyGz6AlN7ZS3TWQBfM1c-co7enx9fVM9m8rMvVckNqwbJIClBNzUEuBKtqUKLKaiNAULUQRZVXqmlyCcBlLZURFQNKgSvFaxA5GMgFn6PbY-_g3edoQtR9G2rTdWCNG4NmeU4pLzKVJ_TmD3pwo0-HJCrpSCYzXiSKHanauxC8afTg2z7Z0YzqybY-2tbJtp5s6ymzOGZCYu3e-F_N_4a-AQzLgmw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1491100539</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Grain Boundary Segregation of Interstitial and Substitutional Impurity Atoms in Alpha-Iron</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Rajagopalan, M. ; Tschopp, M. A. ; Solanki, K. N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rajagopalan, M. ; Tschopp, M. A. ; Solanki, K. N.</creatorcontrib><description>The macroscopic behavior of polycrystalline materials is influenced by the local variation of properties caused by the presence of impurities and defects. The effect of these impurities at the atomic scale can either embrittle or strengthen grain boundaries (GBs) within. Thus, it is imperative to understand the energetics associated with segregation to design materials with desirable properties. In this study, molecular statics simulations were employed to analyze the energetics associated with the segregation of various elements (helium, hydrogen, carbon, phosphorous, and vanadium) to four 〈100〉 (Σ5 and Σ13 GBs) and six 〈110〉 (Σ3, Σ9, and Σ11 GBs) symmetric tilt grain boundaries in
α
-Fe. This knowledge is important for designing stable interfaces in harsh environments. Simulation results show that the local atomic arrangements within the GB region and the resulting structural units have a significant influence on the magnitude of binding energies of the impurity (interstitial and substitutional) atoms. These data also suggest that the site-to-site variation of energies within a boundary is substantial. Comparing the binding energies of all 10 boundaries shows that the Σ3(112) boundary possesses a much smaller binding energy for all interstitial and substitutional impurity atoms among the boundaries examined in this study. Additionally, based on the Rice–Wang model, our total energy calculations show that V has a significant beneficial effect on the Fe grain boundary cohesion, while P has a detrimental effect on grain boundary cohesion, much weaker than H and He. This is significant for applications where extreme environmental damage generates lattice defects and grain boundaries act as sinks for both interstitial and substitutional impurity atoms. This methodology provides us with a tool to effectively identify the local as well as the global segregation behavior that can influence the GB cohesion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1047-4838</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1543-1851</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11837-013-0807-9</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JOMMER</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer US</publisher><subject>Alpha iron ; Atoms & subatomic particles ; Carbon ; Chemistry/Food Science ; Crystal defects ; Earth Sciences ; Energy ; Engineering ; Environment ; Flux ; Grain boundaries ; Interstitials ; Microscopy ; Physical properties ; Physics ; Point defects ; Polycrystals ; Segregations ; Simulation ; Studies ; Substitutional impurities ; Vacancies</subject><ispartof>JOM (1989), 2014-01, Vol.66 (1), p.129-138</ispartof><rights>The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 2013</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Science & Business Media Jan 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-9a8fc3a7241bca84b5ce4a408249b6b8ff67aa37c78e4b1a00a3883ca46aea643</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-9a8fc3a7241bca84b5ce4a408249b6b8ff67aa37c78e4b1a00a3883ca46aea643</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11837-013-0807-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11837-013-0807-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51298</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rajagopalan, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tschopp, M. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solanki, K. N.</creatorcontrib><title>Grain Boundary Segregation of Interstitial and Substitutional Impurity Atoms in Alpha-Iron</title><title>JOM (1989)</title><addtitle>JOM</addtitle><description>The macroscopic behavior of polycrystalline materials is influenced by the local variation of properties caused by the presence of impurities and defects. The effect of these impurities at the atomic scale can either embrittle or strengthen grain boundaries (GBs) within. Thus, it is imperative to understand the energetics associated with segregation to design materials with desirable properties. In this study, molecular statics simulations were employed to analyze the energetics associated with the segregation of various elements (helium, hydrogen, carbon, phosphorous, and vanadium) to four 〈100〉 (Σ5 and Σ13 GBs) and six 〈110〉 (Σ3, Σ9, and Σ11 GBs) symmetric tilt grain boundaries in
α
-Fe. This knowledge is important for designing stable interfaces in harsh environments. Simulation results show that the local atomic arrangements within the GB region and the resulting structural units have a significant influence on the magnitude of binding energies of the impurity (interstitial and substitutional) atoms. These data also suggest that the site-to-site variation of energies within a boundary is substantial. Comparing the binding energies of all 10 boundaries shows that the Σ3(112) boundary possesses a much smaller binding energy for all interstitial and substitutional impurity atoms among the boundaries examined in this study. Additionally, based on the Rice–Wang model, our total energy calculations show that V has a significant beneficial effect on the Fe grain boundary cohesion, while P has a detrimental effect on grain boundary cohesion, much weaker than H and He. This is significant for applications where extreme environmental damage generates lattice defects and grain boundaries act as sinks for both interstitial and substitutional impurity atoms. This methodology provides us with a tool to effectively identify the local as well as the global segregation behavior that can influence the GB cohesion.</description><subject>Alpha iron</subject><subject>Atoms & subatomic particles</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Chemistry/Food Science</subject><subject>Crystal defects</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Flux</subject><subject>Grain boundaries</subject><subject>Interstitials</subject><subject>Microscopy</subject><subject>Physical properties</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Point defects</subject><subject>Polycrystals</subject><subject>Segregations</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Substitutional impurities</subject><subject>Vacancies</subject><issn>1047-4838</issn><issn>1543-1851</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kLFOwzAURS0EEqXwAWyWWFgMdu3EzlgqKJEqMRQWFusldUqqxA62M_D3OCoDQmJ6fta5V3oHoWtG7xil8j4wprgklHFCFZWkOEEzlglOmMrYaXpTIYlQXJ2jixAONGVEwWbofe2htfjBjXYH_gtvzd6bPcTWWewaXNpofIhtbKHDYHd4O1bTOk5A-ir7YfRt_MLL6PqAU9OyGz6AlN7ZS3TWQBfM1c-co7enx9fVM9m8rMvVckNqwbJIClBNzUEuBKtqUKLKaiNAULUQRZVXqmlyCcBlLZURFQNKgSvFaxA5GMgFn6PbY-_g3edoQtR9G2rTdWCNG4NmeU4pLzKVJ_TmD3pwo0-HJCrpSCYzXiSKHanauxC8afTg2z7Z0YzqybY-2tbJtp5s6ymzOGZCYu3e-F_N_4a-AQzLgmw</recordid><startdate>20140101</startdate><enddate>20140101</enddate><creator>Rajagopalan, M.</creator><creator>Tschopp, M. A.</creator><creator>Solanki, K. N.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>883</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0F</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7SE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140101</creationdate><title>Grain Boundary Segregation of Interstitial and Substitutional Impurity Atoms in Alpha-Iron</title><author>Rajagopalan, M. ; Tschopp, M. A. ; Solanki, K. N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-9a8fc3a7241bca84b5ce4a408249b6b8ff67aa37c78e4b1a00a3883ca46aea643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Alpha iron</topic><topic>Atoms & subatomic particles</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Chemistry/Food Science</topic><topic>Crystal defects</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Flux</topic><topic>Grain boundaries</topic><topic>Interstitials</topic><topic>Microscopy</topic><topic>Physical properties</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Point defects</topic><topic>Polycrystals</topic><topic>Segregations</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Substitutional impurities</topic><topic>Vacancies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rajagopalan, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tschopp, M. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solanki, K. N.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade & Industry (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade & Industry</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><jtitle>JOM (1989)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rajagopalan, M.</au><au>Tschopp, M. A.</au><au>Solanki, K. N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Grain Boundary Segregation of Interstitial and Substitutional Impurity Atoms in Alpha-Iron</atitle><jtitle>JOM (1989)</jtitle><stitle>JOM</stitle><date>2014-01-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>129</spage><epage>138</epage><pages>129-138</pages><issn>1047-4838</issn><eissn>1543-1851</eissn><coden>JOMMER</coden><abstract>The macroscopic behavior of polycrystalline materials is influenced by the local variation of properties caused by the presence of impurities and defects. The effect of these impurities at the atomic scale can either embrittle or strengthen grain boundaries (GBs) within. Thus, it is imperative to understand the energetics associated with segregation to design materials with desirable properties. In this study, molecular statics simulations were employed to analyze the energetics associated with the segregation of various elements (helium, hydrogen, carbon, phosphorous, and vanadium) to four 〈100〉 (Σ5 and Σ13 GBs) and six 〈110〉 (Σ3, Σ9, and Σ11 GBs) symmetric tilt grain boundaries in
α
-Fe. This knowledge is important for designing stable interfaces in harsh environments. Simulation results show that the local atomic arrangements within the GB region and the resulting structural units have a significant influence on the magnitude of binding energies of the impurity (interstitial and substitutional) atoms. These data also suggest that the site-to-site variation of energies within a boundary is substantial. Comparing the binding energies of all 10 boundaries shows that the Σ3(112) boundary possesses a much smaller binding energy for all interstitial and substitutional impurity atoms among the boundaries examined in this study. Additionally, based on the Rice–Wang model, our total energy calculations show that V has a significant beneficial effect on the Fe grain boundary cohesion, while P has a detrimental effect on grain boundary cohesion, much weaker than H and He. This is significant for applications where extreme environmental damage generates lattice defects and grain boundaries act as sinks for both interstitial and substitutional impurity atoms. This methodology provides us with a tool to effectively identify the local as well as the global segregation behavior that can influence the GB cohesion.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s11837-013-0807-9</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1047-4838 |
ispartof | JOM (1989), 2014-01, Vol.66 (1), p.129-138 |
issn | 1047-4838 1543-1851 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1660039586 |
source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Alpha iron Atoms & subatomic particles Carbon Chemistry/Food Science Crystal defects Earth Sciences Energy Engineering Environment Flux Grain boundaries Interstitials Microscopy Physical properties Physics Point defects Polycrystals Segregations Simulation Studies Substitutional impurities Vacancies |
title | Grain Boundary Segregation of Interstitial and Substitutional Impurity Atoms in Alpha-Iron |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T11%3A36%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Grain%20Boundary%20Segregation%20of%20Interstitial%20and%20Substitutional%20Impurity%20Atoms%20in%20Alpha-Iron&rft.jtitle=JOM%20(1989)&rft.au=Rajagopalan,%20M.&rft.date=2014-01-01&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=129&rft.epage=138&rft.pages=129-138&rft.issn=1047-4838&rft.eissn=1543-1851&rft.coden=JOMMER&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11837-013-0807-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1660039586%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1491100539&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |