A new economic instrument for financing accelerated landfill aftercare
•The long timescales and uncertain funding of landfill aftercare is a problem.•The impact of discount rates and investment period on funding aftercare are explored.•A proposal is made for an economic instrument that could shorten landfill aftercare.•A landfill tax or aftercare provision rebate may p...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Waste management (Elmsford) 2014-07, Vol.34 (7), p.1191-1198 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1198 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 1191 |
container_title | Waste management (Elmsford) |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Beaven, R.P. Knox, K. Gronow, J.R. Hjelmar, O. Greedy, D. Scharff, H. |
description | •The long timescales and uncertain funding of landfill aftercare is a problem.•The impact of discount rates and investment period on funding aftercare are explored.•A proposal is made for an economic instrument that could shorten landfill aftercare.•A landfill tax or aftercare provision rebate may promote landfill stabilization.•A rebate would be paid for leachate treated and commercially unviable carbon removed.
The key aspects of landfill operation that remain unresolved are the extended timescale and uncertain funding of the post-closure period. This paper reviews the topic and proposes an economic instrument to resolve the unsustainable nature of the current situation. Unsustainability arises from the sluggish degradation of organic material and also the slow flushing of potential pollutants that is exacerbated by low-permeability capping. A landfill tax or aftercare provision rebate is proposed as an economic instrument to encourage operators to actively advance the stabilization of landfilled waste. The rebate could be accommodated within existing regulatory and tax regimes and would be paid for: (i) every tonne of nitrogen (or other agreed leachate marker) whose removal is advanced via the accelerated production and extraction of leachate; (ii) every tonne of non-commercially viable carbon removed via landfill gas collection and treatment. The rebates would be set at a level that would make it financially attractive to operators and would encourage measures such as leachate recirculation, in situ aeration, and enhanced flushing. Illustrative calculations suggest that a maximum rebate of up to ∼€50/tonne MSW would provide an adequate incentive. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.wasman.2014.03.024 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1660038181</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0956053X14001330</els_id><sourcerecordid>1534796511</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-9cf4b0e1518c6586463ff2a28bc06a33d72b5f939079055f03c4babb02bbd9da3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1rFTEUhoMo9lr9ByKzEdzMePI5yUYoxapQ6KYFdyHJnEguM5mazLX47zvDvepOXZ3Nc855eR9CXlPoKFD1ft89uDq53DGgogPeARNPyI7q3rRMSPWU7MBI1YLkX8_Ii1r3sIKawnNyxkSvNJP9jlxdNBkfGgxznqcUmpTrUg4T5qWJc2liyi6HlL81LgQcsbgFh2Z0eYhpHBsXFyzBFXxJnkU3Vnx1mufk7urj7eXn9vrm05fLi-s2SBBLa0IUHpBKqoOSWgnFY2SOaR9AOc6HnnkZDTfQG5AyAg_CO--BeT-YwfFz8u54977M3w9YFzulugZbE-F8qJYqBcA11fQ_UNabnq09_BuVXPRGSbpdFUc0lLnWgtHelzS58tNSsJsXu7dHL3bzYoHb1cu69ub04eAnHH4v_RKxAm9PgKvBjbFstdc_nJasV2aL-uHI4dryj4TF1pAwBxxSwbDYYU5_T_II7UesUA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1534796511</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A new economic instrument for financing accelerated landfill aftercare</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Beaven, R.P. ; Knox, K. ; Gronow, J.R. ; Hjelmar, O. ; Greedy, D. ; Scharff, H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Beaven, R.P. ; Knox, K. ; Gronow, J.R. ; Hjelmar, O. ; Greedy, D. ; Scharff, H.</creatorcontrib><description>•The long timescales and uncertain funding of landfill aftercare is a problem.•The impact of discount rates and investment period on funding aftercare are explored.•A proposal is made for an economic instrument that could shorten landfill aftercare.•A landfill tax or aftercare provision rebate may promote landfill stabilization.•A rebate would be paid for leachate treated and commercially unviable carbon removed.
The key aspects of landfill operation that remain unresolved are the extended timescale and uncertain funding of the post-closure period. This paper reviews the topic and proposes an economic instrument to resolve the unsustainable nature of the current situation. Unsustainability arises from the sluggish degradation of organic material and also the slow flushing of potential pollutants that is exacerbated by low-permeability capping. A landfill tax or aftercare provision rebate is proposed as an economic instrument to encourage operators to actively advance the stabilization of landfilled waste. The rebate could be accommodated within existing regulatory and tax regimes and would be paid for: (i) every tonne of nitrogen (or other agreed leachate marker) whose removal is advanced via the accelerated production and extraction of leachate; (ii) every tonne of non-commercially viable carbon removed via landfill gas collection and treatment. The rebates would be set at a level that would make it financially attractive to operators and would encourage measures such as leachate recirculation, in situ aeration, and enhanced flushing. Illustrative calculations suggest that a maximum rebate of up to ∼€50/tonne MSW would provide an adequate incentive.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0956-053X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2456</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2014.03.024</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24768257</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Aftercare ; Applied sciences ; Carbon ; Carbon - chemistry ; Economic instruments ; Economics ; Environmental Pollution - prevention & control ; Exact sciences and technology ; Extraction ; Financial provisions ; Flushing ; General treatment and storage processes ; In situ leaching ; Landfill ; Landfills ; Models, Theoretical ; Nitrogen - chemistry ; Operators ; Other wastes and particular components of wastes ; Pollution ; Refuse Disposal - economics ; Sustainability ; Time Factors ; Urban and domestic wastes ; Waste Disposal Facilities - economics ; Waste management ; Wastes</subject><ispartof>Waste management (Elmsford), 2014-07, Vol.34 (7), p.1191-1198</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-9cf4b0e1518c6586463ff2a28bc06a33d72b5f939079055f03c4babb02bbd9da3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-9cf4b0e1518c6586463ff2a28bc06a33d72b5f939079055f03c4babb02bbd9da3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956053X14001330$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=28527692$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24768257$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Beaven, R.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knox, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gronow, J.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hjelmar, O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greedy, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scharff, H.</creatorcontrib><title>A new economic instrument for financing accelerated landfill aftercare</title><title>Waste management (Elmsford)</title><addtitle>Waste Manag</addtitle><description>•The long timescales and uncertain funding of landfill aftercare is a problem.•The impact of discount rates and investment period on funding aftercare are explored.•A proposal is made for an economic instrument that could shorten landfill aftercare.•A landfill tax or aftercare provision rebate may promote landfill stabilization.•A rebate would be paid for leachate treated and commercially unviable carbon removed.
The key aspects of landfill operation that remain unresolved are the extended timescale and uncertain funding of the post-closure period. This paper reviews the topic and proposes an economic instrument to resolve the unsustainable nature of the current situation. Unsustainability arises from the sluggish degradation of organic material and also the slow flushing of potential pollutants that is exacerbated by low-permeability capping. A landfill tax or aftercare provision rebate is proposed as an economic instrument to encourage operators to actively advance the stabilization of landfilled waste. The rebate could be accommodated within existing regulatory and tax regimes and would be paid for: (i) every tonne of nitrogen (or other agreed leachate marker) whose removal is advanced via the accelerated production and extraction of leachate; (ii) every tonne of non-commercially viable carbon removed via landfill gas collection and treatment. The rebates would be set at a level that would make it financially attractive to operators and would encourage measures such as leachate recirculation, in situ aeration, and enhanced flushing. Illustrative calculations suggest that a maximum rebate of up to ∼€50/tonne MSW would provide an adequate incentive.</description><subject>Aftercare</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Carbon - chemistry</subject><subject>Economic instruments</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Environmental Pollution - prevention & control</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Extraction</subject><subject>Financial provisions</subject><subject>Flushing</subject><subject>General treatment and storage processes</subject><subject>In situ leaching</subject><subject>Landfill</subject><subject>Landfills</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Nitrogen - chemistry</subject><subject>Operators</subject><subject>Other wastes and particular components of wastes</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Refuse Disposal - economics</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Urban and domestic wastes</subject><subject>Waste Disposal Facilities - economics</subject><subject>Waste management</subject><subject>Wastes</subject><issn>0956-053X</issn><issn>1879-2456</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1rFTEUhoMo9lr9ByKzEdzMePI5yUYoxapQ6KYFdyHJnEguM5mazLX47zvDvepOXZ3Nc855eR9CXlPoKFD1ft89uDq53DGgogPeARNPyI7q3rRMSPWU7MBI1YLkX8_Ii1r3sIKawnNyxkSvNJP9jlxdNBkfGgxznqcUmpTrUg4T5qWJc2liyi6HlL81LgQcsbgFh2Z0eYhpHBsXFyzBFXxJnkU3Vnx1mufk7urj7eXn9vrm05fLi-s2SBBLa0IUHpBKqoOSWgnFY2SOaR9AOc6HnnkZDTfQG5AyAg_CO--BeT-YwfFz8u54977M3w9YFzulugZbE-F8qJYqBcA11fQ_UNabnq09_BuVXPRGSbpdFUc0lLnWgtHelzS58tNSsJsXu7dHL3bzYoHb1cu69ub04eAnHH4v_RKxAm9PgKvBjbFstdc_nJasV2aL-uHI4dryj4TF1pAwBxxSwbDYYU5_T_II7UesUA</recordid><startdate>20140701</startdate><enddate>20140701</enddate><creator>Beaven, R.P.</creator><creator>Knox, K.</creator><creator>Gronow, J.R.</creator><creator>Hjelmar, O.</creator><creator>Greedy, D.</creator><creator>Scharff, H.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140701</creationdate><title>A new economic instrument for financing accelerated landfill aftercare</title><author>Beaven, R.P. ; Knox, K. ; Gronow, J.R. ; Hjelmar, O. ; Greedy, D. ; Scharff, H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-9cf4b0e1518c6586463ff2a28bc06a33d72b5f939079055f03c4babb02bbd9da3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Aftercare</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Carbon - chemistry</topic><topic>Economic instruments</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Environmental Pollution - prevention & control</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Extraction</topic><topic>Financial provisions</topic><topic>Flushing</topic><topic>General treatment and storage processes</topic><topic>In situ leaching</topic><topic>Landfill</topic><topic>Landfills</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Nitrogen - chemistry</topic><topic>Operators</topic><topic>Other wastes and particular components of wastes</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Refuse Disposal - economics</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Urban and domestic wastes</topic><topic>Waste Disposal Facilities - economics</topic><topic>Waste management</topic><topic>Wastes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Beaven, R.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knox, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gronow, J.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hjelmar, O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greedy, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scharff, H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Waste management (Elmsford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Beaven, R.P.</au><au>Knox, K.</au><au>Gronow, J.R.</au><au>Hjelmar, O.</au><au>Greedy, D.</au><au>Scharff, H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A new economic instrument for financing accelerated landfill aftercare</atitle><jtitle>Waste management (Elmsford)</jtitle><addtitle>Waste Manag</addtitle><date>2014-07-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1191</spage><epage>1198</epage><pages>1191-1198</pages><issn>0956-053X</issn><eissn>1879-2456</eissn><abstract>•The long timescales and uncertain funding of landfill aftercare is a problem.•The impact of discount rates and investment period on funding aftercare are explored.•A proposal is made for an economic instrument that could shorten landfill aftercare.•A landfill tax or aftercare provision rebate may promote landfill stabilization.•A rebate would be paid for leachate treated and commercially unviable carbon removed.
The key aspects of landfill operation that remain unresolved are the extended timescale and uncertain funding of the post-closure period. This paper reviews the topic and proposes an economic instrument to resolve the unsustainable nature of the current situation. Unsustainability arises from the sluggish degradation of organic material and also the slow flushing of potential pollutants that is exacerbated by low-permeability capping. A landfill tax or aftercare provision rebate is proposed as an economic instrument to encourage operators to actively advance the stabilization of landfilled waste. The rebate could be accommodated within existing regulatory and tax regimes and would be paid for: (i) every tonne of nitrogen (or other agreed leachate marker) whose removal is advanced via the accelerated production and extraction of leachate; (ii) every tonne of non-commercially viable carbon removed via landfill gas collection and treatment. The rebates would be set at a level that would make it financially attractive to operators and would encourage measures such as leachate recirculation, in situ aeration, and enhanced flushing. Illustrative calculations suggest that a maximum rebate of up to ∼€50/tonne MSW would provide an adequate incentive.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>24768257</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.wasman.2014.03.024</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0956-053X |
ispartof | Waste management (Elmsford), 2014-07, Vol.34 (7), p.1191-1198 |
issn | 0956-053X 1879-2456 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1660038181 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Aftercare Applied sciences Carbon Carbon - chemistry Economic instruments Economics Environmental Pollution - prevention & control Exact sciences and technology Extraction Financial provisions Flushing General treatment and storage processes In situ leaching Landfill Landfills Models, Theoretical Nitrogen - chemistry Operators Other wastes and particular components of wastes Pollution Refuse Disposal - economics Sustainability Time Factors Urban and domestic wastes Waste Disposal Facilities - economics Waste management Wastes |
title | A new economic instrument for financing accelerated landfill aftercare |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T03%3A31%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20new%20economic%20instrument%20for%20financing%20accelerated%20landfill%20aftercare&rft.jtitle=Waste%20management%20(Elmsford)&rft.au=Beaven,%20R.P.&rft.date=2014-07-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1191&rft.epage=1198&rft.pages=1191-1198&rft.issn=0956-053X&rft.eissn=1879-2456&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.03.024&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1534796511%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1534796511&rft_id=info:pmid/24768257&rft_els_id=S0956053X14001330&rfr_iscdi=true |