A new economic instrument for financing accelerated landfill aftercare

•The long timescales and uncertain funding of landfill aftercare is a problem.•The impact of discount rates and investment period on funding aftercare are explored.•A proposal is made for an economic instrument that could shorten landfill aftercare.•A landfill tax or aftercare provision rebate may p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Waste management (Elmsford) 2014-07, Vol.34 (7), p.1191-1198
Hauptverfasser: Beaven, R.P., Knox, K., Gronow, J.R., Hjelmar, O., Greedy, D., Scharff, H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1198
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1191
container_title Waste management (Elmsford)
container_volume 34
creator Beaven, R.P.
Knox, K.
Gronow, J.R.
Hjelmar, O.
Greedy, D.
Scharff, H.
description •The long timescales and uncertain funding of landfill aftercare is a problem.•The impact of discount rates and investment period on funding aftercare are explored.•A proposal is made for an economic instrument that could shorten landfill aftercare.•A landfill tax or aftercare provision rebate may promote landfill stabilization.•A rebate would be paid for leachate treated and commercially unviable carbon removed. The key aspects of landfill operation that remain unresolved are the extended timescale and uncertain funding of the post-closure period. This paper reviews the topic and proposes an economic instrument to resolve the unsustainable nature of the current situation. Unsustainability arises from the sluggish degradation of organic material and also the slow flushing of potential pollutants that is exacerbated by low-permeability capping. A landfill tax or aftercare provision rebate is proposed as an economic instrument to encourage operators to actively advance the stabilization of landfilled waste. The rebate could be accommodated within existing regulatory and tax regimes and would be paid for: (i) every tonne of nitrogen (or other agreed leachate marker) whose removal is advanced via the accelerated production and extraction of leachate; (ii) every tonne of non-commercially viable carbon removed via landfill gas collection and treatment. The rebates would be set at a level that would make it financially attractive to operators and would encourage measures such as leachate recirculation, in situ aeration, and enhanced flushing. Illustrative calculations suggest that a maximum rebate of up to ∼€50/tonne MSW would provide an adequate incentive.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.wasman.2014.03.024
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1660038181</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0956053X14001330</els_id><sourcerecordid>1534796511</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-9cf4b0e1518c6586463ff2a28bc06a33d72b5f939079055f03c4babb02bbd9da3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1rFTEUhoMo9lr9ByKzEdzMePI5yUYoxapQ6KYFdyHJnEguM5mazLX47zvDvepOXZ3Nc855eR9CXlPoKFD1ft89uDq53DGgogPeARNPyI7q3rRMSPWU7MBI1YLkX8_Ii1r3sIKawnNyxkSvNJP9jlxdNBkfGgxznqcUmpTrUg4T5qWJc2liyi6HlL81LgQcsbgFh2Z0eYhpHBsXFyzBFXxJnkU3Vnx1mufk7urj7eXn9vrm05fLi-s2SBBLa0IUHpBKqoOSWgnFY2SOaR9AOc6HnnkZDTfQG5AyAg_CO--BeT-YwfFz8u54977M3w9YFzulugZbE-F8qJYqBcA11fQ_UNabnq09_BuVXPRGSbpdFUc0lLnWgtHelzS58tNSsJsXu7dHL3bzYoHb1cu69ub04eAnHH4v_RKxAm9PgKvBjbFstdc_nJasV2aL-uHI4dryj4TF1pAwBxxSwbDYYU5_T_II7UesUA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1534796511</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A new economic instrument for financing accelerated landfill aftercare</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Beaven, R.P. ; Knox, K. ; Gronow, J.R. ; Hjelmar, O. ; Greedy, D. ; Scharff, H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Beaven, R.P. ; Knox, K. ; Gronow, J.R. ; Hjelmar, O. ; Greedy, D. ; Scharff, H.</creatorcontrib><description>•The long timescales and uncertain funding of landfill aftercare is a problem.•The impact of discount rates and investment period on funding aftercare are explored.•A proposal is made for an economic instrument that could shorten landfill aftercare.•A landfill tax or aftercare provision rebate may promote landfill stabilization.•A rebate would be paid for leachate treated and commercially unviable carbon removed. The key aspects of landfill operation that remain unresolved are the extended timescale and uncertain funding of the post-closure period. This paper reviews the topic and proposes an economic instrument to resolve the unsustainable nature of the current situation. Unsustainability arises from the sluggish degradation of organic material and also the slow flushing of potential pollutants that is exacerbated by low-permeability capping. A landfill tax or aftercare provision rebate is proposed as an economic instrument to encourage operators to actively advance the stabilization of landfilled waste. The rebate could be accommodated within existing regulatory and tax regimes and would be paid for: (i) every tonne of nitrogen (or other agreed leachate marker) whose removal is advanced via the accelerated production and extraction of leachate; (ii) every tonne of non-commercially viable carbon removed via landfill gas collection and treatment. The rebates would be set at a level that would make it financially attractive to operators and would encourage measures such as leachate recirculation, in situ aeration, and enhanced flushing. Illustrative calculations suggest that a maximum rebate of up to ∼€50/tonne MSW would provide an adequate incentive.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0956-053X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2456</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2014.03.024</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24768257</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Aftercare ; Applied sciences ; Carbon ; Carbon - chemistry ; Economic instruments ; Economics ; Environmental Pollution - prevention &amp; control ; Exact sciences and technology ; Extraction ; Financial provisions ; Flushing ; General treatment and storage processes ; In situ leaching ; Landfill ; Landfills ; Models, Theoretical ; Nitrogen - chemistry ; Operators ; Other wastes and particular components of wastes ; Pollution ; Refuse Disposal - economics ; Sustainability ; Time Factors ; Urban and domestic wastes ; Waste Disposal Facilities - economics ; Waste management ; Wastes</subject><ispartof>Waste management (Elmsford), 2014-07, Vol.34 (7), p.1191-1198</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-9cf4b0e1518c6586463ff2a28bc06a33d72b5f939079055f03c4babb02bbd9da3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-9cf4b0e1518c6586463ff2a28bc06a33d72b5f939079055f03c4babb02bbd9da3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956053X14001330$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28527692$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24768257$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Beaven, R.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knox, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gronow, J.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hjelmar, O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greedy, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scharff, H.</creatorcontrib><title>A new economic instrument for financing accelerated landfill aftercare</title><title>Waste management (Elmsford)</title><addtitle>Waste Manag</addtitle><description>•The long timescales and uncertain funding of landfill aftercare is a problem.•The impact of discount rates and investment period on funding aftercare are explored.•A proposal is made for an economic instrument that could shorten landfill aftercare.•A landfill tax or aftercare provision rebate may promote landfill stabilization.•A rebate would be paid for leachate treated and commercially unviable carbon removed. The key aspects of landfill operation that remain unresolved are the extended timescale and uncertain funding of the post-closure period. This paper reviews the topic and proposes an economic instrument to resolve the unsustainable nature of the current situation. Unsustainability arises from the sluggish degradation of organic material and also the slow flushing of potential pollutants that is exacerbated by low-permeability capping. A landfill tax or aftercare provision rebate is proposed as an economic instrument to encourage operators to actively advance the stabilization of landfilled waste. The rebate could be accommodated within existing regulatory and tax regimes and would be paid for: (i) every tonne of nitrogen (or other agreed leachate marker) whose removal is advanced via the accelerated production and extraction of leachate; (ii) every tonne of non-commercially viable carbon removed via landfill gas collection and treatment. The rebates would be set at a level that would make it financially attractive to operators and would encourage measures such as leachate recirculation, in situ aeration, and enhanced flushing. Illustrative calculations suggest that a maximum rebate of up to ∼€50/tonne MSW would provide an adequate incentive.</description><subject>Aftercare</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Carbon - chemistry</subject><subject>Economic instruments</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Environmental Pollution - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Extraction</subject><subject>Financial provisions</subject><subject>Flushing</subject><subject>General treatment and storage processes</subject><subject>In situ leaching</subject><subject>Landfill</subject><subject>Landfills</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Nitrogen - chemistry</subject><subject>Operators</subject><subject>Other wastes and particular components of wastes</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Refuse Disposal - economics</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Urban and domestic wastes</subject><subject>Waste Disposal Facilities - economics</subject><subject>Waste management</subject><subject>Wastes</subject><issn>0956-053X</issn><issn>1879-2456</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1rFTEUhoMo9lr9ByKzEdzMePI5yUYoxapQ6KYFdyHJnEguM5mazLX47zvDvepOXZ3Nc855eR9CXlPoKFD1ft89uDq53DGgogPeARNPyI7q3rRMSPWU7MBI1YLkX8_Ii1r3sIKawnNyxkSvNJP9jlxdNBkfGgxznqcUmpTrUg4T5qWJc2liyi6HlL81LgQcsbgFh2Z0eYhpHBsXFyzBFXxJnkU3Vnx1mufk7urj7eXn9vrm05fLi-s2SBBLa0IUHpBKqoOSWgnFY2SOaR9AOc6HnnkZDTfQG5AyAg_CO--BeT-YwfFz8u54977M3w9YFzulugZbE-F8qJYqBcA11fQ_UNabnq09_BuVXPRGSbpdFUc0lLnWgtHelzS58tNSsJsXu7dHL3bzYoHb1cu69ub04eAnHH4v_RKxAm9PgKvBjbFstdc_nJasV2aL-uHI4dryj4TF1pAwBxxSwbDYYU5_T_II7UesUA</recordid><startdate>20140701</startdate><enddate>20140701</enddate><creator>Beaven, R.P.</creator><creator>Knox, K.</creator><creator>Gronow, J.R.</creator><creator>Hjelmar, O.</creator><creator>Greedy, D.</creator><creator>Scharff, H.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140701</creationdate><title>A new economic instrument for financing accelerated landfill aftercare</title><author>Beaven, R.P. ; Knox, K. ; Gronow, J.R. ; Hjelmar, O. ; Greedy, D. ; Scharff, H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-9cf4b0e1518c6586463ff2a28bc06a33d72b5f939079055f03c4babb02bbd9da3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Aftercare</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Carbon - chemistry</topic><topic>Economic instruments</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Environmental Pollution - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Extraction</topic><topic>Financial provisions</topic><topic>Flushing</topic><topic>General treatment and storage processes</topic><topic>In situ leaching</topic><topic>Landfill</topic><topic>Landfills</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Nitrogen - chemistry</topic><topic>Operators</topic><topic>Other wastes and particular components of wastes</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Refuse Disposal - economics</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Urban and domestic wastes</topic><topic>Waste Disposal Facilities - economics</topic><topic>Waste management</topic><topic>Wastes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Beaven, R.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knox, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gronow, J.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hjelmar, O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greedy, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scharff, H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Waste management (Elmsford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Beaven, R.P.</au><au>Knox, K.</au><au>Gronow, J.R.</au><au>Hjelmar, O.</au><au>Greedy, D.</au><au>Scharff, H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A new economic instrument for financing accelerated landfill aftercare</atitle><jtitle>Waste management (Elmsford)</jtitle><addtitle>Waste Manag</addtitle><date>2014-07-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1191</spage><epage>1198</epage><pages>1191-1198</pages><issn>0956-053X</issn><eissn>1879-2456</eissn><abstract>•The long timescales and uncertain funding of landfill aftercare is a problem.•The impact of discount rates and investment period on funding aftercare are explored.•A proposal is made for an economic instrument that could shorten landfill aftercare.•A landfill tax or aftercare provision rebate may promote landfill stabilization.•A rebate would be paid for leachate treated and commercially unviable carbon removed. The key aspects of landfill operation that remain unresolved are the extended timescale and uncertain funding of the post-closure period. This paper reviews the topic and proposes an economic instrument to resolve the unsustainable nature of the current situation. Unsustainability arises from the sluggish degradation of organic material and also the slow flushing of potential pollutants that is exacerbated by low-permeability capping. A landfill tax or aftercare provision rebate is proposed as an economic instrument to encourage operators to actively advance the stabilization of landfilled waste. The rebate could be accommodated within existing regulatory and tax regimes and would be paid for: (i) every tonne of nitrogen (or other agreed leachate marker) whose removal is advanced via the accelerated production and extraction of leachate; (ii) every tonne of non-commercially viable carbon removed via landfill gas collection and treatment. The rebates would be set at a level that would make it financially attractive to operators and would encourage measures such as leachate recirculation, in situ aeration, and enhanced flushing. Illustrative calculations suggest that a maximum rebate of up to ∼€50/tonne MSW would provide an adequate incentive.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>24768257</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.wasman.2014.03.024</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0956-053X
ispartof Waste management (Elmsford), 2014-07, Vol.34 (7), p.1191-1198
issn 0956-053X
1879-2456
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1660038181
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Aftercare
Applied sciences
Carbon
Carbon - chemistry
Economic instruments
Economics
Environmental Pollution - prevention & control
Exact sciences and technology
Extraction
Financial provisions
Flushing
General treatment and storage processes
In situ leaching
Landfill
Landfills
Models, Theoretical
Nitrogen - chemistry
Operators
Other wastes and particular components of wastes
Pollution
Refuse Disposal - economics
Sustainability
Time Factors
Urban and domestic wastes
Waste Disposal Facilities - economics
Waste management
Wastes
title A new economic instrument for financing accelerated landfill aftercare
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T03%3A31%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20new%20economic%20instrument%20for%20financing%20accelerated%20landfill%20aftercare&rft.jtitle=Waste%20management%20(Elmsford)&rft.au=Beaven,%20R.P.&rft.date=2014-07-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1191&rft.epage=1198&rft.pages=1191-1198&rft.issn=0956-053X&rft.eissn=1879-2456&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.03.024&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1534796511%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1534796511&rft_id=info:pmid/24768257&rft_els_id=S0956053X14001330&rfr_iscdi=true