Improving Achievement in Secondary Schools: Impact of a Literacy Project on Reading Comprehension and Secondary School Qualifications
This paper examines whether a literacy intervention involving generic and content area literacy components can improve both achievement on a standardized reading test and the attainment of secondary school qualifications, and whether the intervention can be implemented by teachers in their regular c...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Reading research quarterly 2014-07, Vol.49 (3), p.305-334 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 334 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 305 |
container_title | Reading research quarterly |
container_volume | 49 |
creator | Lai, Mei Kuin Wilson, Aaron McNaughton, Stuart Hsiao, Selena |
description | This paper examines whether a literacy intervention involving generic and content area literacy components can improve both achievement on a standardized reading test and the attainment of secondary school qualifications, and whether the intervention can be implemented by teachers in their regular classroom settings. We report on a design-based approach for whole-school improvement, the Learning Schools Model (LSM), which was implemented in seven schools with low secondary school qualification rates. The LSM's core premises are that instructional practices need to be developed from evidence about teaching and learning in specific contexts and that professional learning communities need to fine-tune their instructional practices through collaborative analysis of data. The study employed a quasi-experimental design within a design-based approach and included classroom observations and teacher and student surveys. Reading achievement postintervention was statistically significantly higher than the projected achievement levels had the intervention not occurred. Effect sizes for tracked cohorts were Cohen's d = 0.50 and 0.62. The hierarchical linear model of reading achievement, which included students' attitudes toward reading, accounted for about 95% of the total variance. The attainment of secondary school qualifications (measured by odds ratios) increased significantly compared with school attainment prior to the intervention. The rates of attaining these qualifications were faster than national rates. The results suggest that both generic and content area literacy instruction are required and that a strong foundation in generic literacy should be maintained. However, the appropriate blend of literacy instruction is determined by a profiling of teaching and learning needs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/rrq.73 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1660012665</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1031488</ericid><jstor_id>43497186</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>43497186</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4663-d9376be9629ee76a0d2736ba590415802bdd53a8f100207f2aa3dd1e6483b3a53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkV1rFDEUhgex4NrqPxACgtSLqfmYJDPelaWutYO620ovQzZzxs06m7TJbNv9Af5vM0xZRBHMTeC8Dw_nI8teEnxCMKbvQrg9kexJNiEVEzmVlD7NJhizIsecs2fZ8xjXOD1O2ST7eb65Cf7Ouu_o1Kws3MEGXI-sQ5dgvGt02KFLs_K-i-9RYrXpkW-RRrXtIWizQ1-DX8NQdWgBuhlMU5-ksAIXbapq1_wlQ_Ot7mxrje4TEo-yg1Z3EV48_ofZtw9nV9OPef1ldj49rXNTCMHypmJSLKEStAKQQuOGSiaWmle4ILzEdNk0nOmyHfaAZUu1Zk1DQBQlWzLN2WF2PHrTzLdbiL3a2Gig67QDv42KCIExoUL8J5q2ikVCX_-Brv02uDSIIrzgJSVcDtSbkTLBxxigVTfBbtJKFMFqaFilwynJEvhqBCFYs4fOPhHMSFGWKX875ve2g90_LGqxmP_uWsfehz1bsKKSpByaysfcxh4e9rkOP5SQTHJ1_XmmFrOLazqvr1TNfgEUcrrI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1545821576</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Improving Achievement in Secondary Schools: Impact of a Literacy Project on Reading Comprehension and Secondary School Qualifications</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Education Source</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Lai, Mei Kuin ; Wilson, Aaron ; McNaughton, Stuart ; Hsiao, Selena</creator><creatorcontrib>Lai, Mei Kuin ; Wilson, Aaron ; McNaughton, Stuart ; Hsiao, Selena</creatorcontrib><description>This paper examines whether a literacy intervention involving generic and content area literacy components can improve both achievement on a standardized reading test and the attainment of secondary school qualifications, and whether the intervention can be implemented by teachers in their regular classroom settings. We report on a design-based approach for whole-school improvement, the Learning Schools Model (LSM), which was implemented in seven schools with low secondary school qualification rates. The LSM's core premises are that instructional practices need to be developed from evidence about teaching and learning in specific contexts and that professional learning communities need to fine-tune their instructional practices through collaborative analysis of data. The study employed a quasi-experimental design within a design-based approach and included classroom observations and teacher and student surveys. Reading achievement postintervention was statistically significantly higher than the projected achievement levels had the intervention not occurred. Effect sizes for tracked cohorts were Cohen's d = 0.50 and 0.62. The hierarchical linear model of reading achievement, which included students' attitudes toward reading, accounted for about 95% of the total variance. The attainment of secondary school qualifications (measured by odds ratios) increased significantly compared with school attainment prior to the intervention. The rates of attaining these qualifications were faster than national rates. The results suggest that both generic and content area literacy instruction are required and that a strong foundation in generic literacy should be maintained. However, the appropriate blend of literacy instruction is determined by a profiling of teaching and learning needs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0034-0553</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1936-2722</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/rrq.73</identifier><identifier>CODEN: RRQUA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Newark: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Achievement Gains ; Achievement gap ; Adolescence ; Classroom observation ; Collaboration ; Content literacy ; Early adolescence ; Effect Size ; Elementary school students ; Hierarchical Linear Modeling ; High school students ; Instructional intervention ; Intervention ; Learning ; Literacy ; Literacy Education ; Literature ; Numeracy ; Observation ; Program Effectiveness ; Qualifications ; Quasiexperimental Design ; Reading Achievement ; Reading comprehension ; Reading Instruction ; Reading preferences ; Reading Tests ; Research design ; Schools ; Secondary School Students ; Secondary School Teachers ; Secondary schools ; Standardized Tests ; Struggling learners ; Student Attitudes ; Student Surveys ; Teacher Surveys ; Teachers ; Teaching ; Teaching Methods ; Writing instruction</subject><ispartof>Reading research quarterly, 2014-07, Vol.49 (3), p.305-334</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2014 International Reading Association</rights><rights>2014 International Reading Association</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Jul-Sep 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4663-d9376be9629ee76a0d2736ba590415802bdd53a8f100207f2aa3dd1e6483b3a53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4663-d9376be9629ee76a0d2736ba590415802bdd53a8f100207f2aa3dd1e6483b3a53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/43497186$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/43497186$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1031488$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lai, Mei Kuin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Aaron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNaughton, Stuart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsiao, Selena</creatorcontrib><title>Improving Achievement in Secondary Schools: Impact of a Literacy Project on Reading Comprehension and Secondary School Qualifications</title><title>Reading research quarterly</title><addtitle>Read Res Q</addtitle><description>This paper examines whether a literacy intervention involving generic and content area literacy components can improve both achievement on a standardized reading test and the attainment of secondary school qualifications, and whether the intervention can be implemented by teachers in their regular classroom settings. We report on a design-based approach for whole-school improvement, the Learning Schools Model (LSM), which was implemented in seven schools with low secondary school qualification rates. The LSM's core premises are that instructional practices need to be developed from evidence about teaching and learning in specific contexts and that professional learning communities need to fine-tune their instructional practices through collaborative analysis of data. The study employed a quasi-experimental design within a design-based approach and included classroom observations and teacher and student surveys. Reading achievement postintervention was statistically significantly higher than the projected achievement levels had the intervention not occurred. Effect sizes for tracked cohorts were Cohen's d = 0.50 and 0.62. The hierarchical linear model of reading achievement, which included students' attitudes toward reading, accounted for about 95% of the total variance. The attainment of secondary school qualifications (measured by odds ratios) increased significantly compared with school attainment prior to the intervention. The rates of attaining these qualifications were faster than national rates. The results suggest that both generic and content area literacy instruction are required and that a strong foundation in generic literacy should be maintained. However, the appropriate blend of literacy instruction is determined by a profiling of teaching and learning needs.</description><subject>Achievement Gains</subject><subject>Achievement gap</subject><subject>Adolescence</subject><subject>Classroom observation</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Content literacy</subject><subject>Early adolescence</subject><subject>Effect Size</subject><subject>Elementary school students</subject><subject>Hierarchical Linear Modeling</subject><subject>High school students</subject><subject>Instructional intervention</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Literacy</subject><subject>Literacy Education</subject><subject>Literature</subject><subject>Numeracy</subject><subject>Observation</subject><subject>Program Effectiveness</subject><subject>Qualifications</subject><subject>Quasiexperimental Design</subject><subject>Reading Achievement</subject><subject>Reading comprehension</subject><subject>Reading Instruction</subject><subject>Reading preferences</subject><subject>Reading Tests</subject><subject>Research design</subject><subject>Schools</subject><subject>Secondary School Students</subject><subject>Secondary School Teachers</subject><subject>Secondary schools</subject><subject>Standardized Tests</subject><subject>Struggling learners</subject><subject>Student Attitudes</subject><subject>Student Surveys</subject><subject>Teacher Surveys</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Writing instruction</subject><issn>0034-0553</issn><issn>1936-2722</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkV1rFDEUhgex4NrqPxACgtSLqfmYJDPelaWutYO620ovQzZzxs06m7TJbNv9Af5vM0xZRBHMTeC8Dw_nI8teEnxCMKbvQrg9kexJNiEVEzmVlD7NJhizIsecs2fZ8xjXOD1O2ST7eb65Cf7Ouu_o1Kws3MEGXI-sQ5dgvGt02KFLs_K-i-9RYrXpkW-RRrXtIWizQ1-DX8NQdWgBuhlMU5-ksAIXbapq1_wlQ_Ot7mxrje4TEo-yg1Z3EV48_ofZtw9nV9OPef1ldj49rXNTCMHypmJSLKEStAKQQuOGSiaWmle4ILzEdNk0nOmyHfaAZUu1Zk1DQBQlWzLN2WF2PHrTzLdbiL3a2Gig67QDv42KCIExoUL8J5q2ikVCX_-Brv02uDSIIrzgJSVcDtSbkTLBxxigVTfBbtJKFMFqaFilwynJEvhqBCFYs4fOPhHMSFGWKX875ve2g90_LGqxmP_uWsfehz1bsKKSpByaysfcxh4e9rkOP5SQTHJ1_XmmFrOLazqvr1TNfgEUcrrI</recordid><startdate>20140701</startdate><enddate>20140701</enddate><creator>Lai, Mei Kuin</creator><creator>Wilson, Aaron</creator><creator>McNaughton, Stuart</creator><creator>Hsiao, Selena</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140701</creationdate><title>Improving Achievement in Secondary Schools: Impact of a Literacy Project on Reading Comprehension and Secondary School Qualifications</title><author>Lai, Mei Kuin ; Wilson, Aaron ; McNaughton, Stuart ; Hsiao, Selena</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4663-d9376be9629ee76a0d2736ba590415802bdd53a8f100207f2aa3dd1e6483b3a53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Achievement Gains</topic><topic>Achievement gap</topic><topic>Adolescence</topic><topic>Classroom observation</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Content literacy</topic><topic>Early adolescence</topic><topic>Effect Size</topic><topic>Elementary school students</topic><topic>Hierarchical Linear Modeling</topic><topic>High school students</topic><topic>Instructional intervention</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Literacy</topic><topic>Literacy Education</topic><topic>Literature</topic><topic>Numeracy</topic><topic>Observation</topic><topic>Program Effectiveness</topic><topic>Qualifications</topic><topic>Quasiexperimental Design</topic><topic>Reading Achievement</topic><topic>Reading comprehension</topic><topic>Reading Instruction</topic><topic>Reading preferences</topic><topic>Reading Tests</topic><topic>Research design</topic><topic>Schools</topic><topic>Secondary School Students</topic><topic>Secondary School Teachers</topic><topic>Secondary schools</topic><topic>Standardized Tests</topic><topic>Struggling learners</topic><topic>Student Attitudes</topic><topic>Student Surveys</topic><topic>Teacher Surveys</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Writing instruction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lai, Mei Kuin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Aaron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNaughton, Stuart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsiao, Selena</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>Reading research quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lai, Mei Kuin</au><au>Wilson, Aaron</au><au>McNaughton, Stuart</au><au>Hsiao, Selena</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1031488</ericid><atitle>Improving Achievement in Secondary Schools: Impact of a Literacy Project on Reading Comprehension and Secondary School Qualifications</atitle><jtitle>Reading research quarterly</jtitle><addtitle>Read Res Q</addtitle><date>2014-07-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>305</spage><epage>334</epage><pages>305-334</pages><issn>0034-0553</issn><eissn>1936-2722</eissn><coden>RRQUA6</coden><abstract>This paper examines whether a literacy intervention involving generic and content area literacy components can improve both achievement on a standardized reading test and the attainment of secondary school qualifications, and whether the intervention can be implemented by teachers in their regular classroom settings. We report on a design-based approach for whole-school improvement, the Learning Schools Model (LSM), which was implemented in seven schools with low secondary school qualification rates. The LSM's core premises are that instructional practices need to be developed from evidence about teaching and learning in specific contexts and that professional learning communities need to fine-tune their instructional practices through collaborative analysis of data. The study employed a quasi-experimental design within a design-based approach and included classroom observations and teacher and student surveys. Reading achievement postintervention was statistically significantly higher than the projected achievement levels had the intervention not occurred. Effect sizes for tracked cohorts were Cohen's d = 0.50 and 0.62. The hierarchical linear model of reading achievement, which included students' attitudes toward reading, accounted for about 95% of the total variance. The attainment of secondary school qualifications (measured by odds ratios) increased significantly compared with school attainment prior to the intervention. The rates of attaining these qualifications were faster than national rates. The results suggest that both generic and content area literacy instruction are required and that a strong foundation in generic literacy should be maintained. However, the appropriate blend of literacy instruction is determined by a profiling of teaching and learning needs.</abstract><cop>Newark</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/rrq.73</doi><tpages>30</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0034-0553 |
ispartof | Reading research quarterly, 2014-07, Vol.49 (3), p.305-334 |
issn | 0034-0553 1936-2722 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1660012665 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Education Source; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Achievement Gains Achievement gap Adolescence Classroom observation Collaboration Content literacy Early adolescence Effect Size Elementary school students Hierarchical Linear Modeling High school students Instructional intervention Intervention Learning Literacy Literacy Education Literature Numeracy Observation Program Effectiveness Qualifications Quasiexperimental Design Reading Achievement Reading comprehension Reading Instruction Reading preferences Reading Tests Research design Schools Secondary School Students Secondary School Teachers Secondary schools Standardized Tests Struggling learners Student Attitudes Student Surveys Teacher Surveys Teachers Teaching Teaching Methods Writing instruction |
title | Improving Achievement in Secondary Schools: Impact of a Literacy Project on Reading Comprehension and Secondary School Qualifications |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T16%3A06%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Improving%20Achievement%20in%20Secondary%20Schools:%20Impact%20of%20a%20Literacy%20Project%20on%20Reading%20Comprehension%20and%20Secondary%20School%20Qualifications&rft.jtitle=Reading%20research%20quarterly&rft.au=Lai,%20Mei%20Kuin&rft.date=2014-07-01&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=305&rft.epage=334&rft.pages=305-334&rft.issn=0034-0553&rft.eissn=1936-2722&rft.coden=RRQUA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/rrq.73&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E43497186%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1545821576&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1031488&rft_jstor_id=43497186&rfr_iscdi=true |