Aboveground Counts of Black-Tailed Prairie Dogs: Temporal Nature and Relationship to Burrow Entrance Density

Black-tailed prairie dog (Cynomys ludovicianus) colonies are important to many vertebrate populations in the shortgrass prairie ecosystem. Because it is often desirable to assess black-tailed prairie dog populations, and indirect methods generally are more economical than direct counts, we tested wh...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of wildlife management 1994-04, Vol.58 (2), p.361-366
Hauptverfasser: Powell, Kenneth L., Robel, Robert J., Kemp, Kenneth E., Nellis, M. Duane
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 366
container_issue 2
container_start_page 361
container_title The Journal of wildlife management
container_volume 58
creator Powell, Kenneth L.
Robel, Robert J.
Kemp, Kenneth E.
Nellis, M. Duane
description Black-tailed prairie dog (Cynomys ludovicianus) colonies are important to many vertebrate populations in the shortgrass prairie ecosystem. Because it is often desirable to assess black-tailed prairie dog populations, and indirect methods generally are more economical than direct counts, we tested whether aboveground counts of black-tailed prairie dogs were related to burrow entrance densities. Higher densities of burrow entrances have been assumed to reflect higher prairie dog densities. We determined if maximum aboveground counts of black-tailed prairie dogs differed temporally in morning and evening in southwestern Kansas, compared maximum aboveground count data with burrow entrance densities, and evaluated the effect of juvenile prairie dog emergence on the temporal nature of morning and evening maximum aboveground counts. Average maximum aboveground counts varied temporally in the morning (P = 0.05) and evening (P = 0.03) but not in the morning with the emergence of juvenile prairie dogs (P = 0.23). Maximum counts were higher in the evening (P < 0.001), and differed among low, medium, or high burrow entrance density areas (P = 0.02), but not linearly.
doi_str_mv 10.2307/3809403
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16588237</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3809403</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3809403</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-434dfa2e6d60fcefa582327b54a38f42ad3edceb274bc4c21caa831c3903a6243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kNtKAzEQhoMoWKv4CkFEr1Zz6h68a2s9QFGRCt4ts9lsTU03a5JV-vZuaRERvJm5-f6PmR-hY0ouGCfJJU9JJgjfQT2a8SRiKU12UY8QxqKBoK_76MD7BSGc0jTuITMs7KeaO9vWJR53M3hsKzwyIN-jGWijSvzkQDut8LWd-ys8U8vGOjD4AULrFIYu-KwMBG1r_6YbHCwetc7ZLzypg4NadklVex1Wh2ivAuPV0Xb30cvNZDa-i6aPt_fj4TSSnGchElyUFTAVlzGppKpgkDLOkmIggKeVYFByVUpVsEQUUkhGJUDKqeQZ4RAzwfvobONtnP1olQ_5UnupjIFa2dbnNB6knTLpwJM_4MK2ru5uyxkXNGaUraHzDSSd9d6pKm-cXoJb5ZTk68rzbeUdebrVgZdgqvXz2v_ggtIsE7-whQ_W_Wv7Bh_Lixc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>234162127</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Aboveground Counts of Black-Tailed Prairie Dogs: Temporal Nature and Relationship to Burrow Entrance Density</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Powell, Kenneth L. ; Robel, Robert J. ; Kemp, Kenneth E. ; Nellis, M. Duane</creator><creatorcontrib>Powell, Kenneth L. ; Robel, Robert J. ; Kemp, Kenneth E. ; Nellis, M. Duane</creatorcontrib><description>Black-tailed prairie dog (Cynomys ludovicianus) colonies are important to many vertebrate populations in the shortgrass prairie ecosystem. Because it is often desirable to assess black-tailed prairie dog populations, and indirect methods generally are more economical than direct counts, we tested whether aboveground counts of black-tailed prairie dogs were related to burrow entrance densities. Higher densities of burrow entrances have been assumed to reflect higher prairie dog densities. We determined if maximum aboveground counts of black-tailed prairie dogs differed temporally in morning and evening in southwestern Kansas, compared maximum aboveground count data with burrow entrance densities, and evaluated the effect of juvenile prairie dog emergence on the temporal nature of morning and evening maximum aboveground counts. Average maximum aboveground counts varied temporally in the morning (P = 0.05) and evening (P = 0.03) but not in the morning with the emergence of juvenile prairie dogs (P = 0.23). Maximum counts were higher in the evening (P &lt; 0.001), and differed among low, medium, or high burrow entrance density areas (P = 0.02), but not linearly.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-541X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-2817</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/3809403</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JWMAA9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bethesda, MD: The Wildlife Society</publisher><subject>Agricultural management ; Animal populations ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Censuses ; Cloud cover ; Cynomys ludovicianus ; Dogs ; Ecosystems ; Ferrets ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects. Techniques ; Methods and techniques (sampling, tagging, trapping, modelling...) ; Population density ; Prairies ; Towns ; Vegetation ; Weather ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>The Journal of wildlife management, 1994-04, Vol.58 (2), p.361-366</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1994 The Wildlife Society</rights><rights>1994 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Wildlife Society Apr 1994</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-434dfa2e6d60fcefa582327b54a38f42ad3edceb274bc4c21caa831c3903a6243</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3809403$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3809403$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,27905,27906,57998,58231</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=4119943$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Powell, Kenneth L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robel, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kemp, Kenneth E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nellis, M. Duane</creatorcontrib><title>Aboveground Counts of Black-Tailed Prairie Dogs: Temporal Nature and Relationship to Burrow Entrance Density</title><title>The Journal of wildlife management</title><description>Black-tailed prairie dog (Cynomys ludovicianus) colonies are important to many vertebrate populations in the shortgrass prairie ecosystem. Because it is often desirable to assess black-tailed prairie dog populations, and indirect methods generally are more economical than direct counts, we tested whether aboveground counts of black-tailed prairie dogs were related to burrow entrance densities. Higher densities of burrow entrances have been assumed to reflect higher prairie dog densities. We determined if maximum aboveground counts of black-tailed prairie dogs differed temporally in morning and evening in southwestern Kansas, compared maximum aboveground count data with burrow entrance densities, and evaluated the effect of juvenile prairie dog emergence on the temporal nature of morning and evening maximum aboveground counts. Average maximum aboveground counts varied temporally in the morning (P = 0.05) and evening (P = 0.03) but not in the morning with the emergence of juvenile prairie dogs (P = 0.23). Maximum counts were higher in the evening (P &lt; 0.001), and differed among low, medium, or high burrow entrance density areas (P = 0.02), but not linearly.</description><subject>Agricultural management</subject><subject>Animal populations</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Censuses</subject><subject>Cloud cover</subject><subject>Cynomys ludovicianus</subject><subject>Dogs</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Ferrets</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects. Techniques</subject><subject>Methods and techniques (sampling, tagging, trapping, modelling...)</subject><subject>Population density</subject><subject>Prairies</subject><subject>Towns</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>Weather</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>0022-541X</issn><issn>1937-2817</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kNtKAzEQhoMoWKv4CkFEr1Zz6h68a2s9QFGRCt4ts9lsTU03a5JV-vZuaRERvJm5-f6PmR-hY0ouGCfJJU9JJgjfQT2a8SRiKU12UY8QxqKBoK_76MD7BSGc0jTuITMs7KeaO9vWJR53M3hsKzwyIN-jGWijSvzkQDut8LWd-ys8U8vGOjD4AULrFIYu-KwMBG1r_6YbHCwetc7ZLzypg4NadklVex1Wh2ivAuPV0Xb30cvNZDa-i6aPt_fj4TSSnGchElyUFTAVlzGppKpgkDLOkmIggKeVYFByVUpVsEQUUkhGJUDKqeQZ4RAzwfvobONtnP1olQ_5UnupjIFa2dbnNB6knTLpwJM_4MK2ru5uyxkXNGaUraHzDSSd9d6pKm-cXoJb5ZTk68rzbeUdebrVgZdgqvXz2v_ggtIsE7-whQ_W_Wv7Bh_Lixc</recordid><startdate>19940401</startdate><enddate>19940401</enddate><creator>Powell, Kenneth L.</creator><creator>Robel, Robert J.</creator><creator>Kemp, Kenneth E.</creator><creator>Nellis, M. Duane</creator><general>The Wildlife Society</general><general>Wildlife Society</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19940401</creationdate><title>Aboveground Counts of Black-Tailed Prairie Dogs: Temporal Nature and Relationship to Burrow Entrance Density</title><author>Powell, Kenneth L. ; Robel, Robert J. ; Kemp, Kenneth E. ; Nellis, M. Duane</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-434dfa2e6d60fcefa582327b54a38f42ad3edceb274bc4c21caa831c3903a6243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Agricultural management</topic><topic>Animal populations</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Censuses</topic><topic>Cloud cover</topic><topic>Cynomys ludovicianus</topic><topic>Dogs</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Ferrets</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects. Techniques</topic><topic>Methods and techniques (sampling, tagging, trapping, modelling...)</topic><topic>Population density</topic><topic>Prairies</topic><topic>Towns</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>Weather</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Powell, Kenneth L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robel, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kemp, Kenneth E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nellis, M. Duane</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Powell, Kenneth L.</au><au>Robel, Robert J.</au><au>Kemp, Kenneth E.</au><au>Nellis, M. Duane</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Aboveground Counts of Black-Tailed Prairie Dogs: Temporal Nature and Relationship to Burrow Entrance Density</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle><date>1994-04-01</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>361</spage><epage>366</epage><pages>361-366</pages><issn>0022-541X</issn><eissn>1937-2817</eissn><coden>JWMAA9</coden><abstract>Black-tailed prairie dog (Cynomys ludovicianus) colonies are important to many vertebrate populations in the shortgrass prairie ecosystem. Because it is often desirable to assess black-tailed prairie dog populations, and indirect methods generally are more economical than direct counts, we tested whether aboveground counts of black-tailed prairie dogs were related to burrow entrance densities. Higher densities of burrow entrances have been assumed to reflect higher prairie dog densities. We determined if maximum aboveground counts of black-tailed prairie dogs differed temporally in morning and evening in southwestern Kansas, compared maximum aboveground count data with burrow entrance densities, and evaluated the effect of juvenile prairie dog emergence on the temporal nature of morning and evening maximum aboveground counts. Average maximum aboveground counts varied temporally in the morning (P = 0.05) and evening (P = 0.03) but not in the morning with the emergence of juvenile prairie dogs (P = 0.23). Maximum counts were higher in the evening (P &lt; 0.001), and differed among low, medium, or high burrow entrance density areas (P = 0.02), but not linearly.</abstract><cop>Bethesda, MD</cop><pub>The Wildlife Society</pub><doi>10.2307/3809403</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-541X
ispartof The Journal of wildlife management, 1994-04, Vol.58 (2), p.361-366
issn 0022-541X
1937-2817
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16588237
source Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Agricultural management
Animal populations
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Biological and medical sciences
Censuses
Cloud cover
Cynomys ludovicianus
Dogs
Ecosystems
Ferrets
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General aspects. Techniques
Methods and techniques (sampling, tagging, trapping, modelling...)
Population density
Prairies
Towns
Vegetation
Weather
Wildlife conservation
title Aboveground Counts of Black-Tailed Prairie Dogs: Temporal Nature and Relationship to Burrow Entrance Density
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T22%3A54%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Aboveground%20Counts%20of%20Black-Tailed%20Prairie%20Dogs:%20Temporal%20Nature%20and%20Relationship%20to%20Burrow%20Entrance%20Density&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20wildlife%20management&rft.au=Powell,%20Kenneth%20L.&rft.date=1994-04-01&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=361&rft.epage=366&rft.pages=361-366&rft.issn=0022-541X&rft.eissn=1937-2817&rft.coden=JWMAA9&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/3809403&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3809403%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=234162127&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3809403&rfr_iscdi=true