Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction to Formic Acid Using a Ru(II)–Re(I) Supramolecular Complex in an Aqueous Solution

In an aqueous solution, photophysical, photochemical, and photocatalytic abilities of a Ru(II)–Re(I) binuclear complex (RuReCl), of which Ru(II) photosensitizer and Re(I) catalyst units were connected with a bridging ligand, have been investigated in details. RuReCl could photocatalyze CO2 reduction...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Inorganic chemistry 2015-02, Vol.54 (4), p.1800-1807
Hauptverfasser: Nakada, Akinobu, Koike, Kazuhide, Nakashima, Takuya, Morimoto, Tatsuki, Ishitani, Osamu
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1807
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1800
container_title Inorganic chemistry
container_volume 54
creator Nakada, Akinobu
Koike, Kazuhide
Nakashima, Takuya
Morimoto, Tatsuki
Ishitani, Osamu
description In an aqueous solution, photophysical, photochemical, and photocatalytic abilities of a Ru(II)–Re(I) binuclear complex (RuReCl), of which Ru(II) photosensitizer and Re(I) catalyst units were connected with a bridging ligand, have been investigated in details. RuReCl could photocatalyze CO2 reduction using ascorbate as an electron donor, even in an aqueous solution. The main product of the photocatalytic reaction was formic acid in the aqueous solution; this is very different in product distribution from that in a dimethylformamide (DMF) and triethanolamine (TEOA) mixed solution in which the main product was CO. A 13CO2 labeling experiment clearly showed that formic acid was produced from CO2. The turnover number and selectivity of the formic acid production were 25 and 83%, respectively. The quantum yield of the formic acid formation was 0.2%, which was much lower, compared to that in the DMF–TEOA mixed solution. Detail studies of the photochemical electron-transfer process showed back-electron transfer from the one-electron-reduced species (OERS) of the photosensitizer unit to an oxidized ascorbate efficiently proceeded, and this should be one of the main reasons why the photocatalytic efficiency was lower in the aqueous solution. In the aqueous solution, ligand substitution of the Ru(II) photosensitizer unit proceeded during the photocatalytic reaction, which was a main deactivation process of the photocatalytic reaction. The product of the ligand substitution was a Ru(II) bisdiimine complex or complexes with ascorbate as a ligand or ligands.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/ic502707t
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1656046528</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1656046528</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a351t-7edc5b117b746777f3abcb01cb0a3a3fecf12e3a0667fa945b7145f18f59d42b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kNFKwzAUhoMobk4vfAHJjbBdVJO2SdbLUZwWBpPNgXflNE01o21qm4C78x18Q5_Ejk0vDudw-Pj5-BG6puSOEp_ea8mIL4iwJ2hImU88RsnrKRoS0t-U82iALrpuSwiJgpCfo4HPOAvZlA9R8_xurJFgodxZLXG89PFK5U5abWpsDZ6btur_M6lzvOl0_YYBr9w4SSY_X98rNU4meO2aFipTKulKaHFsqqZUn1jXGGo8-3DKuA6vTen2mZforICyU1fHPUKb-cNL_OQtlo9JPFt4EDBqPaFyyTJKRSZCLoQoAshkRmg_EEBQKFlQXwVAOBcFRCHLBA1ZQacFi_LQz4IRGh9ym9b0Cp1NK91JVZZQ731SyhknIWf-tEdvjqjLKpWnTasraHfpX0s9cHsAQHbp1ri27s1TStJ9--l_-8EvvqB0zg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1656046528</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction to Formic Acid Using a Ru(II)–Re(I) Supramolecular Complex in an Aqueous Solution</title><source>ACS Publications</source><creator>Nakada, Akinobu ; Koike, Kazuhide ; Nakashima, Takuya ; Morimoto, Tatsuki ; Ishitani, Osamu</creator><creatorcontrib>Nakada, Akinobu ; Koike, Kazuhide ; Nakashima, Takuya ; Morimoto, Tatsuki ; Ishitani, Osamu</creatorcontrib><description>In an aqueous solution, photophysical, photochemical, and photocatalytic abilities of a Ru(II)–Re(I) binuclear complex (RuReCl), of which Ru(II) photosensitizer and Re(I) catalyst units were connected with a bridging ligand, have been investigated in details. RuReCl could photocatalyze CO2 reduction using ascorbate as an electron donor, even in an aqueous solution. The main product of the photocatalytic reaction was formic acid in the aqueous solution; this is very different in product distribution from that in a dimethylformamide (DMF) and triethanolamine (TEOA) mixed solution in which the main product was CO. A 13CO2 labeling experiment clearly showed that formic acid was produced from CO2. The turnover number and selectivity of the formic acid production were 25 and 83%, respectively. The quantum yield of the formic acid formation was 0.2%, which was much lower, compared to that in the DMF–TEOA mixed solution. Detail studies of the photochemical electron-transfer process showed back-electron transfer from the one-electron-reduced species (OERS) of the photosensitizer unit to an oxidized ascorbate efficiently proceeded, and this should be one of the main reasons why the photocatalytic efficiency was lower in the aqueous solution. In the aqueous solution, ligand substitution of the Ru(II) photosensitizer unit proceeded during the photocatalytic reaction, which was a main deactivation process of the photocatalytic reaction. The product of the ligand substitution was a Ru(II) bisdiimine complex or complexes with ascorbate as a ligand or ligands.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-1669</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-510X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/ic502707t</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25654586</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Chemical Society</publisher><ispartof>Inorganic chemistry, 2015-02, Vol.54 (4), p.1800-1807</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2015 American Chemical Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/ic502707t$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ic502707t$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27076,27924,27925,56738,56788</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25654586$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nakada, Akinobu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koike, Kazuhide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakashima, Takuya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morimoto, Tatsuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishitani, Osamu</creatorcontrib><title>Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction to Formic Acid Using a Ru(II)–Re(I) Supramolecular Complex in an Aqueous Solution</title><title>Inorganic chemistry</title><addtitle>Inorg. Chem</addtitle><description>In an aqueous solution, photophysical, photochemical, and photocatalytic abilities of a Ru(II)–Re(I) binuclear complex (RuReCl), of which Ru(II) photosensitizer and Re(I) catalyst units were connected with a bridging ligand, have been investigated in details. RuReCl could photocatalyze CO2 reduction using ascorbate as an electron donor, even in an aqueous solution. The main product of the photocatalytic reaction was formic acid in the aqueous solution; this is very different in product distribution from that in a dimethylformamide (DMF) and triethanolamine (TEOA) mixed solution in which the main product was CO. A 13CO2 labeling experiment clearly showed that formic acid was produced from CO2. The turnover number and selectivity of the formic acid production were 25 and 83%, respectively. The quantum yield of the formic acid formation was 0.2%, which was much lower, compared to that in the DMF–TEOA mixed solution. Detail studies of the photochemical electron-transfer process showed back-electron transfer from the one-electron-reduced species (OERS) of the photosensitizer unit to an oxidized ascorbate efficiently proceeded, and this should be one of the main reasons why the photocatalytic efficiency was lower in the aqueous solution. In the aqueous solution, ligand substitution of the Ru(II) photosensitizer unit proceeded during the photocatalytic reaction, which was a main deactivation process of the photocatalytic reaction. The product of the ligand substitution was a Ru(II) bisdiimine complex or complexes with ascorbate as a ligand or ligands.</description><issn>0020-1669</issn><issn>1520-510X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kNFKwzAUhoMobk4vfAHJjbBdVJO2SdbLUZwWBpPNgXflNE01o21qm4C78x18Q5_Ejk0vDudw-Pj5-BG6puSOEp_ea8mIL4iwJ2hImU88RsnrKRoS0t-U82iALrpuSwiJgpCfo4HPOAvZlA9R8_xurJFgodxZLXG89PFK5U5abWpsDZ6btur_M6lzvOl0_YYBr9w4SSY_X98rNU4meO2aFipTKulKaHFsqqZUn1jXGGo8-3DKuA6vTen2mZforICyU1fHPUKb-cNL_OQtlo9JPFt4EDBqPaFyyTJKRSZCLoQoAshkRmg_EEBQKFlQXwVAOBcFRCHLBA1ZQacFi_LQz4IRGh9ym9b0Cp1NK91JVZZQ731SyhknIWf-tEdvjqjLKpWnTasraHfpX0s9cHsAQHbp1ri27s1TStJ9--l_-8EvvqB0zg</recordid><startdate>20150216</startdate><enddate>20150216</enddate><creator>Nakada, Akinobu</creator><creator>Koike, Kazuhide</creator><creator>Nakashima, Takuya</creator><creator>Morimoto, Tatsuki</creator><creator>Ishitani, Osamu</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150216</creationdate><title>Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction to Formic Acid Using a Ru(II)–Re(I) Supramolecular Complex in an Aqueous Solution</title><author>Nakada, Akinobu ; Koike, Kazuhide ; Nakashima, Takuya ; Morimoto, Tatsuki ; Ishitani, Osamu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a351t-7edc5b117b746777f3abcb01cb0a3a3fecf12e3a0667fa945b7145f18f59d42b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nakada, Akinobu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koike, Kazuhide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakashima, Takuya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morimoto, Tatsuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishitani, Osamu</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Inorganic chemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nakada, Akinobu</au><au>Koike, Kazuhide</au><au>Nakashima, Takuya</au><au>Morimoto, Tatsuki</au><au>Ishitani, Osamu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction to Formic Acid Using a Ru(II)–Re(I) Supramolecular Complex in an Aqueous Solution</atitle><jtitle>Inorganic chemistry</jtitle><addtitle>Inorg. Chem</addtitle><date>2015-02-16</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1800</spage><epage>1807</epage><pages>1800-1807</pages><issn>0020-1669</issn><eissn>1520-510X</eissn><abstract>In an aqueous solution, photophysical, photochemical, and photocatalytic abilities of a Ru(II)–Re(I) binuclear complex (RuReCl), of which Ru(II) photosensitizer and Re(I) catalyst units were connected with a bridging ligand, have been investigated in details. RuReCl could photocatalyze CO2 reduction using ascorbate as an electron donor, even in an aqueous solution. The main product of the photocatalytic reaction was formic acid in the aqueous solution; this is very different in product distribution from that in a dimethylformamide (DMF) and triethanolamine (TEOA) mixed solution in which the main product was CO. A 13CO2 labeling experiment clearly showed that formic acid was produced from CO2. The turnover number and selectivity of the formic acid production were 25 and 83%, respectively. The quantum yield of the formic acid formation was 0.2%, which was much lower, compared to that in the DMF–TEOA mixed solution. Detail studies of the photochemical electron-transfer process showed back-electron transfer from the one-electron-reduced species (OERS) of the photosensitizer unit to an oxidized ascorbate efficiently proceeded, and this should be one of the main reasons why the photocatalytic efficiency was lower in the aqueous solution. In the aqueous solution, ligand substitution of the Ru(II) photosensitizer unit proceeded during the photocatalytic reaction, which was a main deactivation process of the photocatalytic reaction. The product of the ligand substitution was a Ru(II) bisdiimine complex or complexes with ascorbate as a ligand or ligands.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>25654586</pmid><doi>10.1021/ic502707t</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0020-1669
ispartof Inorganic chemistry, 2015-02, Vol.54 (4), p.1800-1807
issn 0020-1669
1520-510X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1656046528
source ACS Publications
title Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction to Formic Acid Using a Ru(II)–Re(I) Supramolecular Complex in an Aqueous Solution
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T05%3A12%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Photocatalytic%20CO2%20Reduction%20to%20Formic%20Acid%20Using%20a%20Ru(II)%E2%80%93Re(I)%20Supramolecular%20Complex%20in%20an%20Aqueous%20Solution&rft.jtitle=Inorganic%20chemistry&rft.au=Nakada,%20Akinobu&rft.date=2015-02-16&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1800&rft.epage=1807&rft.pages=1800-1807&rft.issn=0020-1669&rft.eissn=1520-510X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/ic502707t&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1656046528%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1656046528&rft_id=info:pmid/25654586&rfr_iscdi=true