Linking Wetland Functional Rapid Assessment Models with Quantitative Hydrological and Biogeochemical Measurements across a Restoration Chronosequence
The need for practical, repeatable, and technically sound ecosystem assessment methods remains essential to natural resource management. Rapid assessment methodologies determining ecosystem condition and function continue expansion, especially within wetlands. Few studies determine the accuracy of r...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Soil Science Society of America journal 2013-07, Vol.77 (4), p.1442-1451 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1451 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 1442 |
| container_title | Soil Science Society of America journal |
| container_volume | 77 |
| creator | Berkowitz, Jacob F. White, John R. |
| description | The need for practical, repeatable, and technically sound ecosystem assessment methods remains essential to natural resource management. Rapid assessment methodologies determining ecosystem condition and function continue expansion, especially within wetlands. Few studies determine the accuracy of rapid assessment approaches by applying quantitative parameters, especially with respect to biogeochemical functions. Functional measurements require extensive sampling and analytical expertise, beyond financial and time constraints of most restoration projects. Further, measuring biogeochemical ecosystem functions requires the coupling of abundance measures (e.g., soil nutrient concentrations) with processing or transport mechanisms (e.g., microbial activity, flood frequency). This work assessed nutrient cycling, organic C export, and water quality improvement functions applied to >300 km2 of restored bottomland hardwood forests, Mississippi River Valley. Assessment parameters (e.g., sapling shrub density, organic soil horizon thickness) and biogeochemical measures (e.g., microbial biomass C, potentially mineralizable N) were determined at 45 reforested areas and 21 control locations representing an 80‐yr restoration chronosequence. Significantly higher rapid assessment outcomes were associated with increased ecosystem functionality (P = 0.001–0.029). These findings suggest that rapid assessment tools serve as reliable proxies for measurements of nutrient and biogeochemical cycling; validating the procedure examined. Assessment scores were also associated with increased restoration stand age (ps < 0.001) supporting further development of similar rapid assessments using ecosystem classification, qualitative data collection, and scaling based on reference data. The wide variety of rapid assessments in use underscores the need for validation with biogeochemical and hydrological measurements. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.2136/sssaj2013.01.0044 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1655732357</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1651389861</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4214-79592c85591dfa92f07eb3441afe30b5d2445f40783bc1184fb62f34b38026183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUcuO00AQtBBIhIUP4DYSFy4O3fNw7GM2YllQVogNiKM1ttvJBMcTpm1W-RD-l3GCOHCBS7fUqkerKkleIswlquwNM9u9BFRzwDmA1o-SGWplUsgyfJzMQGWYmqIwT5NnzHsANAXALPm5dv0312_FVxo62zfiZuzrwfneduLeHl0jlszEfKB-EHe-oY7Fgxt24tNo-8ENdnA_SNyemuA7v3V1pE0q185vydc7OpxPd2R5DDSJsLB18ByXuCcefLCTm1jtgu890_eR-pqeJ09a2zG9-L2vki83bz-vbtP1x3fvV8t1arVEnS4KU8g6N6bAprWFbGFBldIabUsKKtNIrU2rYZGrqkbMdVtlslW6UjnIDHN1lby-6B6Dj848lAfHNXUxCfIjl5gZs1BSxfEfUFR5kWcYoa_-gu79GGKiEaUlxHfyszdeUOc4ArXlMbiDDacSoZw6Lf90WgKWU6eRc33hPLiOTv8mlJvlB7nZTDNeAc8ivwDRq6r9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1420078818</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Linking Wetland Functional Rapid Assessment Models with Quantitative Hydrological and Biogeochemical Measurements across a Restoration Chronosequence</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Berkowitz, Jacob F. ; White, John R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Berkowitz, Jacob F. ; White, John R.</creatorcontrib><description>The need for practical, repeatable, and technically sound ecosystem assessment methods remains essential to natural resource management. Rapid assessment methodologies determining ecosystem condition and function continue expansion, especially within wetlands. Few studies determine the accuracy of rapid assessment approaches by applying quantitative parameters, especially with respect to biogeochemical functions. Functional measurements require extensive sampling and analytical expertise, beyond financial and time constraints of most restoration projects. Further, measuring biogeochemical ecosystem functions requires the coupling of abundance measures (e.g., soil nutrient concentrations) with processing or transport mechanisms (e.g., microbial activity, flood frequency). This work assessed nutrient cycling, organic C export, and water quality improvement functions applied to >300 km2 of restored bottomland hardwood forests, Mississippi River Valley. Assessment parameters (e.g., sapling shrub density, organic soil horizon thickness) and biogeochemical measures (e.g., microbial biomass C, potentially mineralizable N) were determined at 45 reforested areas and 21 control locations representing an 80‐yr restoration chronosequence. Significantly higher rapid assessment outcomes were associated with increased ecosystem functionality (P = 0.001–0.029). These findings suggest that rapid assessment tools serve as reliable proxies for measurements of nutrient and biogeochemical cycling; validating the procedure examined. Assessment scores were also associated with increased restoration stand age (ps < 0.001) supporting further development of similar rapid assessments using ecosystem classification, qualitative data collection, and scaling based on reference data. The wide variety of rapid assessments in use underscores the need for validation with biogeochemical and hydrological measurements.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0361-5995</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-0661</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2013.01.0044</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SSSJD4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madison: The Soil Science Society of America, Inc</publisher><subject>Assessments ; Biogeochemical cycles ; Biogeochemistry ; Bottomland ; Data collection ; Density ; Ecological function ; Ecosystem assessment ; Ecosystems ; Flood frequency ; Mathematical models ; Methods ; Microbial activity ; Microorganisms ; Natural resource management ; Nutrient concentrations ; Nutrient cycles ; Nutrient transport ; Nutrients ; Organic soils ; Proxies ; Reforestation ; Restoration ; Soil (material) ; Soil horizons ; Soil nutrients ; Studies ; Water quality ; Wetlands</subject><ispartof>Soil Science Society of America journal, 2013-07, Vol.77 (4), p.1442-1451</ispartof><rights>Copyright © by the Soil Science Society of America, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Agronomy Jul/Aug 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4214-79592c85591dfa92f07eb3441afe30b5d2445f40783bc1184fb62f34b38026183</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4214-79592c85591dfa92f07eb3441afe30b5d2445f40783bc1184fb62f34b38026183</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2136%2Fsssaj2013.01.0044$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2136%2Fsssaj2013.01.0044$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Berkowitz, Jacob F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, John R.</creatorcontrib><title>Linking Wetland Functional Rapid Assessment Models with Quantitative Hydrological and Biogeochemical Measurements across a Restoration Chronosequence</title><title>Soil Science Society of America journal</title><description>The need for practical, repeatable, and technically sound ecosystem assessment methods remains essential to natural resource management. Rapid assessment methodologies determining ecosystem condition and function continue expansion, especially within wetlands. Few studies determine the accuracy of rapid assessment approaches by applying quantitative parameters, especially with respect to biogeochemical functions. Functional measurements require extensive sampling and analytical expertise, beyond financial and time constraints of most restoration projects. Further, measuring biogeochemical ecosystem functions requires the coupling of abundance measures (e.g., soil nutrient concentrations) with processing or transport mechanisms (e.g., microbial activity, flood frequency). This work assessed nutrient cycling, organic C export, and water quality improvement functions applied to >300 km2 of restored bottomland hardwood forests, Mississippi River Valley. Assessment parameters (e.g., sapling shrub density, organic soil horizon thickness) and biogeochemical measures (e.g., microbial biomass C, potentially mineralizable N) were determined at 45 reforested areas and 21 control locations representing an 80‐yr restoration chronosequence. Significantly higher rapid assessment outcomes were associated with increased ecosystem functionality (P = 0.001–0.029). These findings suggest that rapid assessment tools serve as reliable proxies for measurements of nutrient and biogeochemical cycling; validating the procedure examined. Assessment scores were also associated with increased restoration stand age (ps < 0.001) supporting further development of similar rapid assessments using ecosystem classification, qualitative data collection, and scaling based on reference data. The wide variety of rapid assessments in use underscores the need for validation with biogeochemical and hydrological measurements.</description><subject>Assessments</subject><subject>Biogeochemical cycles</subject><subject>Biogeochemistry</subject><subject>Bottomland</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Ecological function</subject><subject>Ecosystem assessment</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Flood frequency</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Microbial activity</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Natural resource management</subject><subject>Nutrient concentrations</subject><subject>Nutrient cycles</subject><subject>Nutrient transport</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Organic soils</subject><subject>Proxies</subject><subject>Reforestation</subject><subject>Restoration</subject><subject>Soil (material)</subject><subject>Soil horizons</subject><subject>Soil nutrients</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Water quality</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><issn>0361-5995</issn><issn>1435-0661</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUcuO00AQtBBIhIUP4DYSFy4O3fNw7GM2YllQVogNiKM1ttvJBMcTpm1W-RD-l3GCOHCBS7fUqkerKkleIswlquwNM9u9BFRzwDmA1o-SGWplUsgyfJzMQGWYmqIwT5NnzHsANAXALPm5dv0312_FVxo62zfiZuzrwfneduLeHl0jlszEfKB-EHe-oY7Fgxt24tNo-8ENdnA_SNyemuA7v3V1pE0q185vydc7OpxPd2R5DDSJsLB18ByXuCcefLCTm1jtgu890_eR-pqeJ09a2zG9-L2vki83bz-vbtP1x3fvV8t1arVEnS4KU8g6N6bAprWFbGFBldIabUsKKtNIrU2rYZGrqkbMdVtlslW6UjnIDHN1lby-6B6Dj848lAfHNXUxCfIjl5gZs1BSxfEfUFR5kWcYoa_-gu79GGKiEaUlxHfyszdeUOc4ArXlMbiDDacSoZw6Lf90WgKWU6eRc33hPLiOTv8mlJvlB7nZTDNeAc8ivwDRq6r9</recordid><startdate>201307</startdate><enddate>201307</enddate><creator>Berkowitz, Jacob F.</creator><creator>White, John R.</creator><general>The Soil Science Society of America, Inc</general><general>American Society of Agronomy</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201307</creationdate><title>Linking Wetland Functional Rapid Assessment Models with Quantitative Hydrological and Biogeochemical Measurements across a Restoration Chronosequence</title><author>Berkowitz, Jacob F. ; White, John R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4214-79592c85591dfa92f07eb3441afe30b5d2445f40783bc1184fb62f34b38026183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Assessments</topic><topic>Biogeochemical cycles</topic><topic>Biogeochemistry</topic><topic>Bottomland</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Ecological function</topic><topic>Ecosystem assessment</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Flood frequency</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Microbial activity</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Natural resource management</topic><topic>Nutrient concentrations</topic><topic>Nutrient cycles</topic><topic>Nutrient transport</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Organic soils</topic><topic>Proxies</topic><topic>Reforestation</topic><topic>Restoration</topic><topic>Soil (material)</topic><topic>Soil horizons</topic><topic>Soil nutrients</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Water quality</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Berkowitz, Jacob F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, John R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Soil Science Society of America journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Berkowitz, Jacob F.</au><au>White, John R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Linking Wetland Functional Rapid Assessment Models with Quantitative Hydrological and Biogeochemical Measurements across a Restoration Chronosequence</atitle><jtitle>Soil Science Society of America journal</jtitle><date>2013-07</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>77</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1442</spage><epage>1451</epage><pages>1442-1451</pages><issn>0361-5995</issn><eissn>1435-0661</eissn><coden>SSSJD4</coden><abstract>The need for practical, repeatable, and technically sound ecosystem assessment methods remains essential to natural resource management. Rapid assessment methodologies determining ecosystem condition and function continue expansion, especially within wetlands. Few studies determine the accuracy of rapid assessment approaches by applying quantitative parameters, especially with respect to biogeochemical functions. Functional measurements require extensive sampling and analytical expertise, beyond financial and time constraints of most restoration projects. Further, measuring biogeochemical ecosystem functions requires the coupling of abundance measures (e.g., soil nutrient concentrations) with processing or transport mechanisms (e.g., microbial activity, flood frequency). This work assessed nutrient cycling, organic C export, and water quality improvement functions applied to >300 km2 of restored bottomland hardwood forests, Mississippi River Valley. Assessment parameters (e.g., sapling shrub density, organic soil horizon thickness) and biogeochemical measures (e.g., microbial biomass C, potentially mineralizable N) were determined at 45 reforested areas and 21 control locations representing an 80‐yr restoration chronosequence. Significantly higher rapid assessment outcomes were associated with increased ecosystem functionality (P = 0.001–0.029). These findings suggest that rapid assessment tools serve as reliable proxies for measurements of nutrient and biogeochemical cycling; validating the procedure examined. Assessment scores were also associated with increased restoration stand age (ps < 0.001) supporting further development of similar rapid assessments using ecosystem classification, qualitative data collection, and scaling based on reference data. The wide variety of rapid assessments in use underscores the need for validation with biogeochemical and hydrological measurements.</abstract><cop>Madison</cop><pub>The Soil Science Society of America, Inc</pub><doi>10.2136/sssaj2013.01.0044</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0361-5995 |
| ispartof | Soil Science Society of America journal, 2013-07, Vol.77 (4), p.1442-1451 |
| issn | 0361-5995 1435-0661 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1655732357 |
| source | Access via Wiley Online Library |
| subjects | Assessments Biogeochemical cycles Biogeochemistry Bottomland Data collection Density Ecological function Ecosystem assessment Ecosystems Flood frequency Mathematical models Methods Microbial activity Microorganisms Natural resource management Nutrient concentrations Nutrient cycles Nutrient transport Nutrients Organic soils Proxies Reforestation Restoration Soil (material) Soil horizons Soil nutrients Studies Water quality Wetlands |
| title | Linking Wetland Functional Rapid Assessment Models with Quantitative Hydrological and Biogeochemical Measurements across a Restoration Chronosequence |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T16%3A03%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Linking%20Wetland%20Functional%20Rapid%20Assessment%20Models%20with%20Quantitative%20Hydrological%20and%20Biogeochemical%20Measurements%20across%20a%20Restoration%20Chronosequence&rft.jtitle=Soil%20Science%20Society%20of%20America%20journal&rft.au=Berkowitz,%20Jacob%20F.&rft.date=2013-07&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1442&rft.epage=1451&rft.pages=1442-1451&rft.issn=0361-5995&rft.eissn=1435-0661&rft.coden=SSSJD4&rft_id=info:doi/10.2136/sssaj2013.01.0044&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1651389861%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1420078818&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |