Suggested classification of stream trophic state: distributions of temperate stream types by chlorophyll, total nitrogen, and phosphorus

Aquatic scientists and managers have no conventional mechanism with which to characterize and compare nutrients and algal biomass in streams within a broader context analogous to trophic state categorization in lakes by chlorophyll (chl) and nutrients. We analyzed published data for a large number o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Water research (Oxford) 1998-03, Vol.32 (5), p.1455-1462
Hauptverfasser: Dodds, Walter K., Jones, John R., Welch, Eugene B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1462
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1455
container_title Water research (Oxford)
container_volume 32
creator Dodds, Walter K.
Jones, John R.
Welch, Eugene B.
description Aquatic scientists and managers have no conventional mechanism with which to characterize and compare nutrients and algal biomass in streams within a broader context analogous to trophic state categorization in lakes by chlorophyll (chl) and nutrients. We analyzed published data for a large number of distinct, temperate, stream sites for mean benthic chl ( n=286), maximum benthic chl ( n=176), sestonic chl ( n=292), total nitrogen ( n=1070), and total phosphorus ( n=1366) as a first effort to establish criteria for trophic boundaries. Two classification systems are proposed. In the first system, the boundary between oligotrophic and mesotrophic categories is defined by the lower third of the cumulative distribution of the values. The mesotrophic–eutrophic boundary is defined by the upper third of the distribution. In the second system, individual streams are placed more precisely in a broad geographic context by assessing the proportion of streams that have greater or lesser nutrient and chl values. The proposed relationships for streams were compared to trophic criteria published for lakes. The proposed trophic boundaries for streams generally include a broader range of values in the mesotrophic range than conventional criteria for lakes. The ratio of maximum to mean benthic chl for streams was significantly higher than that found for planktonic chl in lakes, reflecting the greater variance in streams. This high variance in streams suggests that the proposed stream trophic criteria should be viewed only as a general first approach to categorizing stream ecosystems.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0043-1354(97)00370-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16554346</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0043135497003709</els_id><sourcerecordid>16554346</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-ed3a3a19fc06278f1b4ddd9c4cca16a158ec391969ac5a07ba942aa1107b9b053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMGKFDEQhhtRcFx9BCEHEYVtTTrp7omXRZZdFRY8rJ5DdaV6JpLptElamDfwsU3vLHP1UKSSfP9f1F9VrwX_ILjoPt5zrmQtZKve6f4957LntX5SbcS213Wj1PZptTkjz6sXKf3inDeN1Jvq7_2y21HKZBl6SMmNDiG7MLEwspQjwYHlGOa9w3KFTJ-YdeXdDctKpRXLdJgplr-z4DhTYsOR4d6HVXz0_pLlkMGzyRW7HU2XDCbL5n1IpeKSXlbPRvCJXj2eF9XP25sf11_ru-9fvl1_vqtRSZlrshIkCD0i75p-O4pBWWs1KkQQHYh2Syi10J0GbIH3A2jVAAhRWj3wVl5Ub0--cwy_l7K5ObiE5D1MFJZkRNe2SqqugO0JxBhSijSaOboDxKMR3Ky5m4fczRqq0b15yN3oonvzOAASgh8jTOjSWdw0nep5U7CrE0Zl2T-OoknoaEKyLhJmY4P7z6B_EfGbFw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16554346</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Suggested classification of stream trophic state: distributions of temperate stream types by chlorophyll, total nitrogen, and phosphorus</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Dodds, Walter K. ; Jones, John R. ; Welch, Eugene B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dodds, Walter K. ; Jones, John R. ; Welch, Eugene B.</creatorcontrib><description>Aquatic scientists and managers have no conventional mechanism with which to characterize and compare nutrients and algal biomass in streams within a broader context analogous to trophic state categorization in lakes by chlorophyll (chl) and nutrients. We analyzed published data for a large number of distinct, temperate, stream sites for mean benthic chl ( n=286), maximum benthic chl ( n=176), sestonic chl ( n=292), total nitrogen ( n=1070), and total phosphorus ( n=1366) as a first effort to establish criteria for trophic boundaries. Two classification systems are proposed. In the first system, the boundary between oligotrophic and mesotrophic categories is defined by the lower third of the cumulative distribution of the values. The mesotrophic–eutrophic boundary is defined by the upper third of the distribution. In the second system, individual streams are placed more precisely in a broad geographic context by assessing the proportion of streams that have greater or lesser nutrient and chl values. The proposed relationships for streams were compared to trophic criteria published for lakes. The proposed trophic boundaries for streams generally include a broader range of values in the mesotrophic range than conventional criteria for lakes. The ratio of maximum to mean benthic chl for streams was significantly higher than that found for planktonic chl in lakes, reflecting the greater variance in streams. This high variance in streams suggests that the proposed stream trophic criteria should be viewed only as a general first approach to categorizing stream ecosystems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1354</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2448</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0043-1354(97)00370-9</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WATRAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Applied sciences ; Biological and medical sciences ; chlorophyll ; Continental surface waters ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution ; Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics ; eutrophic ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fresh water environment ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; mesotrophic ; Natural water pollution ; nitrogen ; nutrients ; oligotrophic ; periphyton ; phosphorus ; Pollution ; Pollution, environment geology ; rivers ; streams ; Water treatment and pollution</subject><ispartof>Water research (Oxford), 1998-03, Vol.32 (5), p.1455-1462</ispartof><rights>1997 Elsevier Science Ltd</rights><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-ed3a3a19fc06278f1b4ddd9c4cca16a158ec391969ac5a07ba942aa1107b9b053</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-ed3a3a19fc06278f1b4ddd9c4cca16a158ec391969ac5a07ba942aa1107b9b053</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(97)00370-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2264702$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dodds, Walter K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, John R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Welch, Eugene B.</creatorcontrib><title>Suggested classification of stream trophic state: distributions of temperate stream types by chlorophyll, total nitrogen, and phosphorus</title><title>Water research (Oxford)</title><description>Aquatic scientists and managers have no conventional mechanism with which to characterize and compare nutrients and algal biomass in streams within a broader context analogous to trophic state categorization in lakes by chlorophyll (chl) and nutrients. We analyzed published data for a large number of distinct, temperate, stream sites for mean benthic chl ( n=286), maximum benthic chl ( n=176), sestonic chl ( n=292), total nitrogen ( n=1070), and total phosphorus ( n=1366) as a first effort to establish criteria for trophic boundaries. Two classification systems are proposed. In the first system, the boundary between oligotrophic and mesotrophic categories is defined by the lower third of the cumulative distribution of the values. The mesotrophic–eutrophic boundary is defined by the upper third of the distribution. In the second system, individual streams are placed more precisely in a broad geographic context by assessing the proportion of streams that have greater or lesser nutrient and chl values. The proposed relationships for streams were compared to trophic criteria published for lakes. The proposed trophic boundaries for streams generally include a broader range of values in the mesotrophic range than conventional criteria for lakes. The ratio of maximum to mean benthic chl for streams was significantly higher than that found for planktonic chl in lakes, reflecting the greater variance in streams. This high variance in streams suggests that the proposed stream trophic criteria should be viewed only as a general first approach to categorizing stream ecosystems.</description><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>chlorophyll</subject><subject>Continental surface waters</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution</subject><subject>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</subject><subject>eutrophic</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fresh water environment</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>mesotrophic</subject><subject>Natural water pollution</subject><subject>nitrogen</subject><subject>nutrients</subject><subject>oligotrophic</subject><subject>periphyton</subject><subject>phosphorus</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Pollution, environment geology</subject><subject>rivers</subject><subject>streams</subject><subject>Water treatment and pollution</subject><issn>0043-1354</issn><issn>1879-2448</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMGKFDEQhhtRcFx9BCEHEYVtTTrp7omXRZZdFRY8rJ5DdaV6JpLptElamDfwsU3vLHP1UKSSfP9f1F9VrwX_ILjoPt5zrmQtZKve6f4957LntX5SbcS213Wj1PZptTkjz6sXKf3inDeN1Jvq7_2y21HKZBl6SMmNDiG7MLEwspQjwYHlGOa9w3KFTJ-YdeXdDctKpRXLdJgplr-z4DhTYsOR4d6HVXz0_pLlkMGzyRW7HU2XDCbL5n1IpeKSXlbPRvCJXj2eF9XP25sf11_ru-9fvl1_vqtRSZlrshIkCD0i75p-O4pBWWs1KkQQHYh2Syi10J0GbIH3A2jVAAhRWj3wVl5Ub0--cwy_l7K5ObiE5D1MFJZkRNe2SqqugO0JxBhSijSaOboDxKMR3Ky5m4fczRqq0b15yN3oonvzOAASgh8jTOjSWdw0nep5U7CrE0Zl2T-OoknoaEKyLhJmY4P7z6B_EfGbFw</recordid><startdate>19980301</startdate><enddate>19980301</enddate><creator>Dodds, Walter K.</creator><creator>Jones, John R.</creator><creator>Welch, Eugene B.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980301</creationdate><title>Suggested classification of stream trophic state: distributions of temperate stream types by chlorophyll, total nitrogen, and phosphorus</title><author>Dodds, Walter K. ; Jones, John R. ; Welch, Eugene B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-ed3a3a19fc06278f1b4ddd9c4cca16a158ec391969ac5a07ba942aa1107b9b053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>chlorophyll</topic><topic>Continental surface waters</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution</topic><topic>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</topic><topic>eutrophic</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fresh water environment</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>mesotrophic</topic><topic>Natural water pollution</topic><topic>nitrogen</topic><topic>nutrients</topic><topic>oligotrophic</topic><topic>periphyton</topic><topic>phosphorus</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Pollution, environment geology</topic><topic>rivers</topic><topic>streams</topic><topic>Water treatment and pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dodds, Walter K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, John R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Welch, Eugene B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Water research (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dodds, Walter K.</au><au>Jones, John R.</au><au>Welch, Eugene B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Suggested classification of stream trophic state: distributions of temperate stream types by chlorophyll, total nitrogen, and phosphorus</atitle><jtitle>Water research (Oxford)</jtitle><date>1998-03-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1455</spage><epage>1462</epage><pages>1455-1462</pages><issn>0043-1354</issn><eissn>1879-2448</eissn><coden>WATRAG</coden><abstract>Aquatic scientists and managers have no conventional mechanism with which to characterize and compare nutrients and algal biomass in streams within a broader context analogous to trophic state categorization in lakes by chlorophyll (chl) and nutrients. We analyzed published data for a large number of distinct, temperate, stream sites for mean benthic chl ( n=286), maximum benthic chl ( n=176), sestonic chl ( n=292), total nitrogen ( n=1070), and total phosphorus ( n=1366) as a first effort to establish criteria for trophic boundaries. Two classification systems are proposed. In the first system, the boundary between oligotrophic and mesotrophic categories is defined by the lower third of the cumulative distribution of the values. The mesotrophic–eutrophic boundary is defined by the upper third of the distribution. In the second system, individual streams are placed more precisely in a broad geographic context by assessing the proportion of streams that have greater or lesser nutrient and chl values. The proposed relationships for streams were compared to trophic criteria published for lakes. The proposed trophic boundaries for streams generally include a broader range of values in the mesotrophic range than conventional criteria for lakes. The ratio of maximum to mean benthic chl for streams was significantly higher than that found for planktonic chl in lakes, reflecting the greater variance in streams. This high variance in streams suggests that the proposed stream trophic criteria should be viewed only as a general first approach to categorizing stream ecosystems.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/S0043-1354(97)00370-9</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0043-1354
ispartof Water research (Oxford), 1998-03, Vol.32 (5), p.1455-1462
issn 0043-1354
1879-2448
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16554346
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Applied ecology
Applied sciences
Biological and medical sciences
chlorophyll
Continental surface waters
Earth sciences
Earth, ocean, space
Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution
Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics
eutrophic
Exact sciences and technology
Fresh water environment
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
mesotrophic
Natural water pollution
nitrogen
nutrients
oligotrophic
periphyton
phosphorus
Pollution
Pollution, environment geology
rivers
streams
Water treatment and pollution
title Suggested classification of stream trophic state: distributions of temperate stream types by chlorophyll, total nitrogen, and phosphorus
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T00%3A59%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Suggested%20classification%20of%20stream%20trophic%20state:%20distributions%20of%20temperate%20stream%20types%20by%20chlorophyll,%20total%20nitrogen,%20and%20phosphorus&rft.jtitle=Water%20research%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Dodds,%20Walter%20K.&rft.date=1998-03-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1455&rft.epage=1462&rft.pages=1455-1462&rft.issn=0043-1354&rft.eissn=1879-2448&rft.coden=WATRAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0043-1354(97)00370-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E16554346%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16554346&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0043135497003709&rfr_iscdi=true