Which Theory for the Origin of Syphilis Is True?
There are four theories about the origin of syphilis, of which the mostly represented one is the Columbian theory. This theory suggests that syphilis was brought into Europe in 1493 ad by the ship from Caribbean islands. The aim of this study is to test all theories on a sample of 403 skeletons: 135...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of sexual medicine 2014-12, Vol.11 (12), p.3112-3118 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 3118 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 12 |
| container_start_page | 3112 |
| container_title | Journal of sexual medicine |
| container_volume | 11 |
| creator | Anteric, Ivana Basic, Zeljana Vilovic, Katarina Kolic, Kresimir Andjelinovic, Simun |
| description | There are four theories about the origin of syphilis, of which the mostly represented one is the Columbian theory. This theory suggests that syphilis was brought into Europe in 1493 ad by the ship from Caribbean islands.
The aim of this study is to test all theories on a sample of 403 skeletons: 135 from prehistory, 134 from antique, and 134 from medieval period and new age from the Dalmatia (Croatia).
All skeletons were examined using standard anthropological methods. Paleopathological analysis was performed on each skeleton as well as additional radiographic method on one isolated skeleton.
Paleopathological changes on skeletal remains connected with treponematosis.
Paleopathological analysis revealed one skeleton from the antique period (second to 6th century ad) that exhibited skeletal markers similar to those described in one clinical case in which congenital syphilis was confirmed by a Wasserman reaction. Skeletal remains of this person were examined macroscopically and radiographically, and the differential diagnostics eliminated other considered pathologies as well as trauma.
The finding of skeletal markers of syphilis on a skeleton from the antique supports the theory of pre‐Columbian syphilis origin. Anteric I, Basic Z, Vilovic K, Kolic K, and Andjelinovic S. Which theory for the origin of syphilis is true? J Sex Med 2014;11:3112–3118. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jsm.12674 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1654694988</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1743609515306500</els_id><sourcerecordid>1634284135</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4724-c90cf53525886c6450668202da77ec2f1f975cd2e964e17d4add8d54061f31e43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkD1PwzAQhi0EoqUw8AdQRhjS-tvJhFDFRxGoQ4sYrWBfiKu0KXYDyr8nkJYJJN7lbnju1elB6JTgIWkzWoTlkFCp-B7qE8VZLAlO93c7TkUPHYWwwJi1oYeoRwVJFKO0j_Bz4UwRzQuofBPllY82BURT717dKqryaNasC1e6EE1CNPc1XB6jgzwrA5xs5wA93VzPx3fxw_R2Mr56iA1XlMcmxSYXTFCRJNJILrCUCcXUZkqBoTnJUyWMpZBKDkRZnlmbWMGxJDkjwNkAnXe9a1-91RA2eumCgbLMVlDVQRMpuEx5miT_QBmnCSdMtOhFhxpfheAh12vvlplvNMH6y6VuXepvly17tq2tX5Zgf8idvBYYdcCHK6H5u0nfzx53lay7gNbcuwOvg3GwMmCdB7PRtnK_PPIJA6mL_Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1634284135</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Which Theory for the Origin of Syphilis Is True?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Anteric, Ivana ; Basic, Zeljana ; Vilovic, Katarina ; Kolic, Kresimir ; Andjelinovic, Simun</creator><creatorcontrib>Anteric, Ivana ; Basic, Zeljana ; Vilovic, Katarina ; Kolic, Kresimir ; Andjelinovic, Simun</creatorcontrib><description>There are four theories about the origin of syphilis, of which the mostly represented one is the Columbian theory. This theory suggests that syphilis was brought into Europe in 1493 ad by the ship from Caribbean islands.
The aim of this study is to test all theories on a sample of 403 skeletons: 135 from prehistory, 134 from antique, and 134 from medieval period and new age from the Dalmatia (Croatia).
All skeletons were examined using standard anthropological methods. Paleopathological analysis was performed on each skeleton as well as additional radiographic method on one isolated skeleton.
Paleopathological changes on skeletal remains connected with treponematosis.
Paleopathological analysis revealed one skeleton from the antique period (second to 6th century ad) that exhibited skeletal markers similar to those described in one clinical case in which congenital syphilis was confirmed by a Wasserman reaction. Skeletal remains of this person were examined macroscopically and radiographically, and the differential diagnostics eliminated other considered pathologies as well as trauma.
The finding of skeletal markers of syphilis on a skeleton from the antique supports the theory of pre‐Columbian syphilis origin. Anteric I, Basic Z, Vilovic K, Kolic K, and Andjelinovic S. Which theory for the origin of syphilis is true? J Sex Med 2014;11:3112–3118.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1743-6095</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1743-6109</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jsm.12674</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25187322</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Child, Preschool ; Croatia ; Dalmatia (Croatia) ; Diagnosis, Differential ; Female ; History, 15th Century ; History, 16th Century ; History, Ancient ; History, Medieval ; Humans ; Male ; Paleopathology ; Pre‐Columbian Theory ; Syphilis ; Syphilis - diagnosis ; Syphilis - etiology ; Syphilis - history ; Treponema pallidum ; Treponematosis</subject><ispartof>Journal of sexual medicine, 2014-12, Vol.11 (12), p.3112-3118</ispartof><rights>2014 International Society for Sexual Medicine</rights><rights>2014 International Society for Sexual Medicine.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4724-c90cf53525886c6450668202da77ec2f1f975cd2e964e17d4add8d54061f31e43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4724-c90cf53525886c6450668202da77ec2f1f975cd2e964e17d4add8d54061f31e43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjsm.12674$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjsm.12674$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25187322$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Anteric, Ivana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basic, Zeljana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vilovic, Katarina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolic, Kresimir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andjelinovic, Simun</creatorcontrib><title>Which Theory for the Origin of Syphilis Is True?</title><title>Journal of sexual medicine</title><addtitle>J Sex Med</addtitle><description>There are four theories about the origin of syphilis, of which the mostly represented one is the Columbian theory. This theory suggests that syphilis was brought into Europe in 1493 ad by the ship from Caribbean islands.
The aim of this study is to test all theories on a sample of 403 skeletons: 135 from prehistory, 134 from antique, and 134 from medieval period and new age from the Dalmatia (Croatia).
All skeletons were examined using standard anthropological methods. Paleopathological analysis was performed on each skeleton as well as additional radiographic method on one isolated skeleton.
Paleopathological changes on skeletal remains connected with treponematosis.
Paleopathological analysis revealed one skeleton from the antique period (second to 6th century ad) that exhibited skeletal markers similar to those described in one clinical case in which congenital syphilis was confirmed by a Wasserman reaction. Skeletal remains of this person were examined macroscopically and radiographically, and the differential diagnostics eliminated other considered pathologies as well as trauma.
The finding of skeletal markers of syphilis on a skeleton from the antique supports the theory of pre‐Columbian syphilis origin. Anteric I, Basic Z, Vilovic K, Kolic K, and Andjelinovic S. Which theory for the origin of syphilis is true? J Sex Med 2014;11:3112–3118.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Croatia</subject><subject>Dalmatia (Croatia)</subject><subject>Diagnosis, Differential</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>History, 15th Century</subject><subject>History, 16th Century</subject><subject>History, Ancient</subject><subject>History, Medieval</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Paleopathology</subject><subject>Pre‐Columbian Theory</subject><subject>Syphilis</subject><subject>Syphilis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Syphilis - etiology</subject><subject>Syphilis - history</subject><subject>Treponema pallidum</subject><subject>Treponematosis</subject><issn>1743-6095</issn><issn>1743-6109</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkD1PwzAQhi0EoqUw8AdQRhjS-tvJhFDFRxGoQ4sYrWBfiKu0KXYDyr8nkJYJJN7lbnju1elB6JTgIWkzWoTlkFCp-B7qE8VZLAlO93c7TkUPHYWwwJi1oYeoRwVJFKO0j_Bz4UwRzQuofBPllY82BURT717dKqryaNasC1e6EE1CNPc1XB6jgzwrA5xs5wA93VzPx3fxw_R2Mr56iA1XlMcmxSYXTFCRJNJILrCUCcXUZkqBoTnJUyWMpZBKDkRZnlmbWMGxJDkjwNkAnXe9a1-91RA2eumCgbLMVlDVQRMpuEx5miT_QBmnCSdMtOhFhxpfheAh12vvlplvNMH6y6VuXepvly17tq2tX5Zgf8idvBYYdcCHK6H5u0nfzx53lay7gNbcuwOvg3GwMmCdB7PRtnK_PPIJA6mL_Q</recordid><startdate>201412</startdate><enddate>201412</enddate><creator>Anteric, Ivana</creator><creator>Basic, Zeljana</creator><creator>Vilovic, Katarina</creator><creator>Kolic, Kresimir</creator><creator>Andjelinovic, Simun</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201412</creationdate><title>Which Theory for the Origin of Syphilis Is True?</title><author>Anteric, Ivana ; Basic, Zeljana ; Vilovic, Katarina ; Kolic, Kresimir ; Andjelinovic, Simun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4724-c90cf53525886c6450668202da77ec2f1f975cd2e964e17d4add8d54061f31e43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Croatia</topic><topic>Dalmatia (Croatia)</topic><topic>Diagnosis, Differential</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>History, 15th Century</topic><topic>History, 16th Century</topic><topic>History, Ancient</topic><topic>History, Medieval</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Paleopathology</topic><topic>Pre‐Columbian Theory</topic><topic>Syphilis</topic><topic>Syphilis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Syphilis - etiology</topic><topic>Syphilis - history</topic><topic>Treponema pallidum</topic><topic>Treponematosis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Anteric, Ivana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basic, Zeljana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vilovic, Katarina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolic, Kresimir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andjelinovic, Simun</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Journal of sexual medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Anteric, Ivana</au><au>Basic, Zeljana</au><au>Vilovic, Katarina</au><au>Kolic, Kresimir</au><au>Andjelinovic, Simun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Which Theory for the Origin of Syphilis Is True?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of sexual medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Sex Med</addtitle><date>2014-12</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>3112</spage><epage>3118</epage><pages>3112-3118</pages><issn>1743-6095</issn><eissn>1743-6109</eissn><abstract>There are four theories about the origin of syphilis, of which the mostly represented one is the Columbian theory. This theory suggests that syphilis was brought into Europe in 1493 ad by the ship from Caribbean islands.
The aim of this study is to test all theories on a sample of 403 skeletons: 135 from prehistory, 134 from antique, and 134 from medieval period and new age from the Dalmatia (Croatia).
All skeletons were examined using standard anthropological methods. Paleopathological analysis was performed on each skeleton as well as additional radiographic method on one isolated skeleton.
Paleopathological changes on skeletal remains connected with treponematosis.
Paleopathological analysis revealed one skeleton from the antique period (second to 6th century ad) that exhibited skeletal markers similar to those described in one clinical case in which congenital syphilis was confirmed by a Wasserman reaction. Skeletal remains of this person were examined macroscopically and radiographically, and the differential diagnostics eliminated other considered pathologies as well as trauma.
The finding of skeletal markers of syphilis on a skeleton from the antique supports the theory of pre‐Columbian syphilis origin. Anteric I, Basic Z, Vilovic K, Kolic K, and Andjelinovic S. Which theory for the origin of syphilis is true? J Sex Med 2014;11:3112–3118.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>25187322</pmid><doi>10.1111/jsm.12674</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1743-6095 |
| ispartof | Journal of sexual medicine, 2014-12, Vol.11 (12), p.3112-3118 |
| issn | 1743-6095 1743-6109 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1654694988 |
| source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
| subjects | Adult Child, Preschool Croatia Dalmatia (Croatia) Diagnosis, Differential Female History, 15th Century History, 16th Century History, Ancient History, Medieval Humans Male Paleopathology Pre‐Columbian Theory Syphilis Syphilis - diagnosis Syphilis - etiology Syphilis - history Treponema pallidum Treponematosis |
| title | Which Theory for the Origin of Syphilis Is True? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T19%3A15%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Which%20Theory%20for%20the%20Origin%20of%20Syphilis%20Is%20True?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20sexual%20medicine&rft.au=Anteric,%20Ivana&rft.date=2014-12&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=3112&rft.epage=3118&rft.pages=3112-3118&rft.issn=1743-6095&rft.eissn=1743-6109&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jsm.12674&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1634284135%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1634284135&rft_id=info:pmid/25187322&rft_els_id=S1743609515306500&rfr_iscdi=true |