Community air monitoring for pesticides. Part 1: selecting pesticides and a community
The CA Department of Pesticide Regulation (CDPR) developed methods to select pesticides and a community to fulfill criteria for an ambient air monitoring study it conducted as part of the CA Environmental Protection Agency's Environmental Justice Action Plan. Using a scoring system, CDPR evalua...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental monitoring and assessment 2014-03, Vol.186 (3), p.1327-1341 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1341 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 1327 |
| container_title | Environmental monitoring and assessment |
| container_volume | 186 |
| creator | Segawa, Randy Levine, Johanna Neal, Rosemary Brattesani, Madeline |
| description | The CA Department of Pesticide Regulation (CDPR) developed methods to select pesticides and a community to fulfill criteria for an ambient air monitoring study it conducted as part of the CA Environmental Protection Agency's Environmental Justice Action Plan. Using a scoring system, CDPR evaluated 100 pesticides based on statewide-reported pesticide use, volatility, and priority in CDPR's risk assessment process (indicators of exposure and toxicity) to produce a list of pesticides to consider as candidates for monitoring. The CDPR also evaluated and scored 83 communities based on demographics and health factors, availability of cumulative impacts data, and reported pesticide use to create a list of community candidates. The scores provide relative rankings to distinguish more highly impacted communities from less impacted ones and to identify which pesticides might contribute most to potential adverse health effects. These methods use criteria that can be quantified, validated, and verified in order to provide a transparent and fair selection process. Based on public comments and highest scores, CDPR recommended 40 pesticides (including some of their degradation products) and one community for its yearlong monitoring study. The CDPR then further refined its list of pesticides by soliciting input from local and technical advisory groups. The CDPR plans to use these methods to select pesticides and communities in future monitoring activities. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10661-013-3507-6 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1654694128</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1654694128</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-d325e32712c13f6ded44e86fb2289fe95ee912ab21007f926be49b5febba6c3e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtPxCAUhYnR6Pj4AW6UxI2bKhcoHdyZia_ERBOdNaHtxdRMywjtwn8vTX3FhSsIfOfcw4GQQ2BnwFhxHoEpBRkDkYmcFZnaIDPIC5FxnetNMmOg0qFQeofsxvjKGNOF1Ntkh0uhuNRqRpYL37ZD1_Tv1DaBtj5tfWi6F-p8oGuMfVM1NcYz-mhDT-GCRlxh1Y_Ezy21XU0trb689smWs6uIB5_rHlleXz0vbrP7h5u7xeV9Vkmu-6wWPEfBC-AVCKdqrKXEuXIl53PtUOeIGrgt-fhap7kqUeoyd1iWVlUCxR45nXzXwb8NKY5pm1jhamU79EM0oHKptAQ-T-jJH_TVD6FL6QxIDQXMc1CJgomqgo8xoDPr0LQ2vBtgZkxhps5N6tyMnZtRc_TpPJQt1t-Kr5ITwCcgrsdmMfwa_Y_r8SRy1hv7Eppolk-cgUy_mJJqJj4AiVeU-g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1491718516</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Community air monitoring for pesticides. Part 1: selecting pesticides and a community</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Segawa, Randy ; Levine, Johanna ; Neal, Rosemary ; Brattesani, Madeline</creator><creatorcontrib>Segawa, Randy ; Levine, Johanna ; Neal, Rosemary ; Brattesani, Madeline</creatorcontrib><description>The CA Department of Pesticide Regulation (CDPR) developed methods to select pesticides and a community to fulfill criteria for an ambient air monitoring study it conducted as part of the CA Environmental Protection Agency's Environmental Justice Action Plan. Using a scoring system, CDPR evaluated 100 pesticides based on statewide-reported pesticide use, volatility, and priority in CDPR's risk assessment process (indicators of exposure and toxicity) to produce a list of pesticides to consider as candidates for monitoring. The CDPR also evaluated and scored 83 communities based on demographics and health factors, availability of cumulative impacts data, and reported pesticide use to create a list of community candidates. The scores provide relative rankings to distinguish more highly impacted communities from less impacted ones and to identify which pesticides might contribute most to potential adverse health effects. These methods use criteria that can be quantified, validated, and verified in order to provide a transparent and fair selection process. Based on public comments and highest scores, CDPR recommended 40 pesticides (including some of their degradation products) and one community for its yearlong monitoring study. The CDPR then further refined its list of pesticides by soliciting input from local and technical advisory groups. The CDPR plans to use these methods to select pesticides and communities in future monitoring activities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-6369</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2959</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10661-013-3507-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24362496</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>adverse effects ; Agriculture ; air ; Air Pollutants - analysis ; Air pollution ; Air Pollution - legislation & jurisprudence ; Air Pollution - statistics & numerical data ; Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution ; California ; Chemical contaminants ; Community Participation ; Degradation products ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecology ; Ecotoxicology ; Environment ; Environmental Exposure - analysis ; Environmental Exposure - statistics & numerical data ; Environmental health ; Environmental justice ; Environmental Management ; Environmental monitoring ; Environmental Monitoring - methods ; Environmental protection ; Environmental Protection Agency ; Environmental regulations ; Health risks ; Humans ; Medical screening ; Monitoring/Environmental Analysis ; Outdoor air quality ; pesticide law ; Pesticides ; Pesticides - analysis ; Pollutants ; Public health ; Regulation ; Risk Assessment ; risk assessment process ; Socioeconomic factors ; Studies ; Toxicity ; Volatility</subject><ispartof>Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2014-03, Vol.186 (3), p.1327-1341</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013</rights><rights>Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-d325e32712c13f6ded44e86fb2289fe95ee912ab21007f926be49b5febba6c3e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-d325e32712c13f6ded44e86fb2289fe95ee912ab21007f926be49b5febba6c3e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10661-013-3507-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10661-013-3507-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51298</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24362496$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Segawa, Randy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levine, Johanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neal, Rosemary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brattesani, Madeline</creatorcontrib><title>Community air monitoring for pesticides. Part 1: selecting pesticides and a community</title><title>Environmental monitoring and assessment</title><addtitle>Environ Monit Assess</addtitle><addtitle>Environ Monit Assess</addtitle><description>The CA Department of Pesticide Regulation (CDPR) developed methods to select pesticides and a community to fulfill criteria for an ambient air monitoring study it conducted as part of the CA Environmental Protection Agency's Environmental Justice Action Plan. Using a scoring system, CDPR evaluated 100 pesticides based on statewide-reported pesticide use, volatility, and priority in CDPR's risk assessment process (indicators of exposure and toxicity) to produce a list of pesticides to consider as candidates for monitoring. The CDPR also evaluated and scored 83 communities based on demographics and health factors, availability of cumulative impacts data, and reported pesticide use to create a list of community candidates. The scores provide relative rankings to distinguish more highly impacted communities from less impacted ones and to identify which pesticides might contribute most to potential adverse health effects. These methods use criteria that can be quantified, validated, and verified in order to provide a transparent and fair selection process. Based on public comments and highest scores, CDPR recommended 40 pesticides (including some of their degradation products) and one community for its yearlong monitoring study. The CDPR then further refined its list of pesticides by soliciting input from local and technical advisory groups. The CDPR plans to use these methods to select pesticides and communities in future monitoring activities.</description><subject>adverse effects</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>air</subject><subject>Air Pollutants - analysis</subject><subject>Air pollution</subject><subject>Air Pollution - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Air Pollution - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</subject><subject>California</subject><subject>Chemical contaminants</subject><subject>Community Participation</subject><subject>Degradation products</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Exposure - analysis</subject><subject>Environmental Exposure - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Environmental health</subject><subject>Environmental justice</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Environmental monitoring</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - methods</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Environmental Protection Agency</subject><subject>Environmental regulations</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Monitoring/Environmental Analysis</subject><subject>Outdoor air quality</subject><subject>pesticide law</subject><subject>Pesticides</subject><subject>Pesticides - analysis</subject><subject>Pollutants</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>risk assessment process</subject><subject>Socioeconomic factors</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><subject>Volatility</subject><issn>0167-6369</issn><issn>1573-2959</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtPxCAUhYnR6Pj4AW6UxI2bKhcoHdyZia_ERBOdNaHtxdRMywjtwn8vTX3FhSsIfOfcw4GQQ2BnwFhxHoEpBRkDkYmcFZnaIDPIC5FxnetNMmOg0qFQeofsxvjKGNOF1Ntkh0uhuNRqRpYL37ZD1_Tv1DaBtj5tfWi6F-p8oGuMfVM1NcYz-mhDT-GCRlxh1Y_Ezy21XU0trb689smWs6uIB5_rHlleXz0vbrP7h5u7xeV9Vkmu-6wWPEfBC-AVCKdqrKXEuXIl53PtUOeIGrgt-fhap7kqUeoyd1iWVlUCxR45nXzXwb8NKY5pm1jhamU79EM0oHKptAQ-T-jJH_TVD6FL6QxIDQXMc1CJgomqgo8xoDPr0LQ2vBtgZkxhps5N6tyMnZtRc_TpPJQt1t-Kr5ITwCcgrsdmMfwa_Y_r8SRy1hv7Eppolk-cgUy_mJJqJj4AiVeU-g</recordid><startdate>20140301</startdate><enddate>20140301</enddate><creator>Segawa, Randy</creator><creator>Levine, Johanna</creator><creator>Neal, Rosemary</creator><creator>Brattesani, Madeline</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140301</creationdate><title>Community air monitoring for pesticides. Part 1: selecting pesticides and a community</title><author>Segawa, Randy ; Levine, Johanna ; Neal, Rosemary ; Brattesani, Madeline</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-d325e32712c13f6ded44e86fb2289fe95ee912ab21007f926be49b5febba6c3e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>adverse effects</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>air</topic><topic>Air Pollutants - analysis</topic><topic>Air pollution</topic><topic>Air Pollution - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Air Pollution - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</topic><topic>California</topic><topic>Chemical contaminants</topic><topic>Community Participation</topic><topic>Degradation products</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Exposure - analysis</topic><topic>Environmental Exposure - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Environmental health</topic><topic>Environmental justice</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Environmental monitoring</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - methods</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Environmental Protection Agency</topic><topic>Environmental regulations</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Monitoring/Environmental Analysis</topic><topic>Outdoor air quality</topic><topic>pesticide law</topic><topic>Pesticides</topic><topic>Pesticides - analysis</topic><topic>Pollutants</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>risk assessment process</topic><topic>Socioeconomic factors</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><topic>Volatility</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Segawa, Randy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levine, Johanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neal, Rosemary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brattesani, Madeline</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><jtitle>Environmental monitoring and assessment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Segawa, Randy</au><au>Levine, Johanna</au><au>Neal, Rosemary</au><au>Brattesani, Madeline</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Community air monitoring for pesticides. Part 1: selecting pesticides and a community</atitle><jtitle>Environmental monitoring and assessment</jtitle><stitle>Environ Monit Assess</stitle><addtitle>Environ Monit Assess</addtitle><date>2014-03-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>186</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1327</spage><epage>1341</epage><pages>1327-1341</pages><issn>0167-6369</issn><eissn>1573-2959</eissn><abstract>The CA Department of Pesticide Regulation (CDPR) developed methods to select pesticides and a community to fulfill criteria for an ambient air monitoring study it conducted as part of the CA Environmental Protection Agency's Environmental Justice Action Plan. Using a scoring system, CDPR evaluated 100 pesticides based on statewide-reported pesticide use, volatility, and priority in CDPR's risk assessment process (indicators of exposure and toxicity) to produce a list of pesticides to consider as candidates for monitoring. The CDPR also evaluated and scored 83 communities based on demographics and health factors, availability of cumulative impacts data, and reported pesticide use to create a list of community candidates. The scores provide relative rankings to distinguish more highly impacted communities from less impacted ones and to identify which pesticides might contribute most to potential adverse health effects. These methods use criteria that can be quantified, validated, and verified in order to provide a transparent and fair selection process. Based on public comments and highest scores, CDPR recommended 40 pesticides (including some of their degradation products) and one community for its yearlong monitoring study. The CDPR then further refined its list of pesticides by soliciting input from local and technical advisory groups. The CDPR plans to use these methods to select pesticides and communities in future monitoring activities.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>24362496</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10661-013-3507-6</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0167-6369 |
| ispartof | Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2014-03, Vol.186 (3), p.1327-1341 |
| issn | 0167-6369 1573-2959 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1654694128 |
| source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
| subjects | adverse effects Agriculture air Air Pollutants - analysis Air pollution Air Pollution - legislation & jurisprudence Air Pollution - statistics & numerical data Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution California Chemical contaminants Community Participation Degradation products Earth and Environmental Science Ecology Ecotoxicology Environment Environmental Exposure - analysis Environmental Exposure - statistics & numerical data Environmental health Environmental justice Environmental Management Environmental monitoring Environmental Monitoring - methods Environmental protection Environmental Protection Agency Environmental regulations Health risks Humans Medical screening Monitoring/Environmental Analysis Outdoor air quality pesticide law Pesticides Pesticides - analysis Pollutants Public health Regulation Risk Assessment risk assessment process Socioeconomic factors Studies Toxicity Volatility |
| title | Community air monitoring for pesticides. Part 1: selecting pesticides and a community |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T11%3A45%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Community%20air%20monitoring%20for%20pesticides.%20Part%201:%20selecting%20pesticides%20and%20a%20community&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20monitoring%20and%20assessment&rft.au=Segawa,%20Randy&rft.date=2014-03-01&rft.volume=186&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1327&rft.epage=1341&rft.pages=1327-1341&rft.issn=0167-6369&rft.eissn=1573-2959&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10661-013-3507-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1654694128%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1491718516&rft_id=info:pmid/24362496&rfr_iscdi=true |