When a hazard occurs where it is not expected: risk judgments about different regions after the Christchurch earthquakes
Research on risk judgments about hazards has not examined risk perception inside and outside the affected regions when a disaster occurs in an unexpected location. This research examined preparedness and judgments of earthquake risk after the 2011 Christchurch earthquake in three New Zealand cities:...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Natural hazards (Dordrecht) 2015-01, Vol.75 (1), p.635-652 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 652 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 635 |
container_title | Natural hazards (Dordrecht) |
container_volume | 75 |
creator | McClure, John Johnston, David Henrich, Liv Milfont, Taciano L. Becker, Julia |
description | Research on risk judgments about hazards has not examined risk perception inside and outside the affected regions when a disaster occurs in an unexpected location. This research examined preparedness and judgments of earthquake risk after the 2011 Christchurch earthquake in three New Zealand cities: Christchurch, Wellington, and Palmerston North. We selected Christchurch, because its citizens did not expect an earthquake (but it occurred there); Wellington, because its citizens expected an earthquake (but it did not occur there); and Palmerston North, because its citizens did not expect an earthquake (and it did not occur there) and is thus comparable to Christchurch before the earthquakes. The research examined the relation of participant city to risk assessments for before (recall) and after the earthquakes, participants’ attributions for their risk judgments and for (not) preparing, and earthquake damage for Christchurch participants. Participants reported that prior to the earthquakes, they saw an earthquake as more likely in Wellington than in Christchurch and Palmerston North. In all three samples, expectations of another earthquake in Christchurch were significantly higher after the Christchurch earthquakes. Palmerston North expectancies of a local earthquake were also higher after the earthquakes, whereas Wellington citizens’ expectancies of a local earthquake were only marginally higher. Preparations increased after the earthquakes, particularly in Christchurch. These findings suggest that prior expectancies and disaster experiences affect earthquake risk judgments and preparation inside and outside the affected region. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11069-014-1338-6 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1654690448</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1654690448</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-2b41b896d0556672224f9bcc51edd5d0509aed330a954e100ce8717babdac343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1r3DAQhkVJoZu0P6A3QS65OJnRl-3cytKkgUAvgfYmZGm89mbX3kgySfvrq7A9lEKhp4HheYaZeRn7iHCJAPVVQgTTVoCqQimbyrxhK9S1rKBRcMJW0AqsQML3d-w0pS0AohHtir18G2jijg_up4uBz94vMfHngSLxMfMx8WnOnF4O5DOFax7H9Mi3S9jsacqJu25eMg9j3xdhyjzSZpyn0u8zRZ4H4uuhKNkPS_QDJxfz8LS4R0rv2dve7RJ9-F3P2MPN54f1l-r-6-3d-tN95ZUWuRKdwq5pTQCtjamFEKpvO-81Ugi6dKF1FKQE12pF5RWemhrrznXBeankGbs4jj3E-WmhlO1-TJ52OzfRvCSLRivTglLN_6AoG1UjFPT8L3Q7L3EqdxRKCo1lV10oPFI-zilF6u0hjnsXf1gE-5qaPaZmS2r2NTVriiOOTirstKH4x-R_Sr8AKqmatA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1632515665</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>When a hazard occurs where it is not expected: risk judgments about different regions after the Christchurch earthquakes</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>McClure, John ; Johnston, David ; Henrich, Liv ; Milfont, Taciano L. ; Becker, Julia</creator><creatorcontrib>McClure, John ; Johnston, David ; Henrich, Liv ; Milfont, Taciano L. ; Becker, Julia</creatorcontrib><description>Research on risk judgments about hazards has not examined risk perception inside and outside the affected regions when a disaster occurs in an unexpected location. This research examined preparedness and judgments of earthquake risk after the 2011 Christchurch earthquake in three New Zealand cities: Christchurch, Wellington, and Palmerston North. We selected Christchurch, because its citizens did not expect an earthquake (but it occurred there); Wellington, because its citizens expected an earthquake (but it did not occur there); and Palmerston North, because its citizens did not expect an earthquake (and it did not occur there) and is thus comparable to Christchurch before the earthquakes. The research examined the relation of participant city to risk assessments for before (recall) and after the earthquakes, participants’ attributions for their risk judgments and for (not) preparing, and earthquake damage for Christchurch participants. Participants reported that prior to the earthquakes, they saw an earthquake as more likely in Wellington than in Christchurch and Palmerston North. In all three samples, expectations of another earthquake in Christchurch were significantly higher after the Christchurch earthquakes. Palmerston North expectancies of a local earthquake were also higher after the earthquakes, whereas Wellington citizens’ expectancies of a local earthquake were only marginally higher. Preparations increased after the earthquakes, particularly in Christchurch. These findings suggest that prior expectancies and disaster experiences affect earthquake risk judgments and preparation inside and outside the affected region.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0921-030X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0840</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11069-014-1338-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Civil Engineering ; Disasters ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Earthquake damage ; Earthquakes ; Environmental Management ; Environmental risk ; Geophysics/Geodesy ; Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences ; Hazards ; Hydrogeology ; Judgments ; Natural Hazards ; Original Paper ; Recall ; Regions ; Risk ; Risk assessment ; Seismic activity ; Seismic phenomena</subject><ispartof>Natural hazards (Dordrecht), 2015-01, Vol.75 (1), p.635-652</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-2b41b896d0556672224f9bcc51edd5d0509aed330a954e100ce8717babdac343</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-2b41b896d0556672224f9bcc51edd5d0509aed330a954e100ce8717babdac343</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11069-014-1338-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-014-1338-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>McClure, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henrich, Liv</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milfont, Taciano L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becker, Julia</creatorcontrib><title>When a hazard occurs where it is not expected: risk judgments about different regions after the Christchurch earthquakes</title><title>Natural hazards (Dordrecht)</title><addtitle>Nat Hazards</addtitle><description>Research on risk judgments about hazards has not examined risk perception inside and outside the affected regions when a disaster occurs in an unexpected location. This research examined preparedness and judgments of earthquake risk after the 2011 Christchurch earthquake in three New Zealand cities: Christchurch, Wellington, and Palmerston North. We selected Christchurch, because its citizens did not expect an earthquake (but it occurred there); Wellington, because its citizens expected an earthquake (but it did not occur there); and Palmerston North, because its citizens did not expect an earthquake (and it did not occur there) and is thus comparable to Christchurch before the earthquakes. The research examined the relation of participant city to risk assessments for before (recall) and after the earthquakes, participants’ attributions for their risk judgments and for (not) preparing, and earthquake damage for Christchurch participants. Participants reported that prior to the earthquakes, they saw an earthquake as more likely in Wellington than in Christchurch and Palmerston North. In all three samples, expectations of another earthquake in Christchurch were significantly higher after the Christchurch earthquakes. Palmerston North expectancies of a local earthquake were also higher after the earthquakes, whereas Wellington citizens’ expectancies of a local earthquake were only marginally higher. Preparations increased after the earthquakes, particularly in Christchurch. These findings suggest that prior expectancies and disaster experiences affect earthquake risk judgments and preparation inside and outside the affected region.</description><subject>Civil Engineering</subject><subject>Disasters</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Earthquake damage</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Environmental risk</subject><subject>Geophysics/Geodesy</subject><subject>Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Hazards</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Judgments</subject><subject>Natural Hazards</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Recall</subject><subject>Regions</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Seismic activity</subject><subject>Seismic phenomena</subject><issn>0921-030X</issn><issn>1573-0840</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1r3DAQhkVJoZu0P6A3QS65OJnRl-3cytKkgUAvgfYmZGm89mbX3kgySfvrq7A9lEKhp4HheYaZeRn7iHCJAPVVQgTTVoCqQimbyrxhK9S1rKBRcMJW0AqsQML3d-w0pS0AohHtir18G2jijg_up4uBz94vMfHngSLxMfMx8WnOnF4O5DOFax7H9Mi3S9jsacqJu25eMg9j3xdhyjzSZpyn0u8zRZ4H4uuhKNkPS_QDJxfz8LS4R0rv2dve7RJ9-F3P2MPN54f1l-r-6-3d-tN95ZUWuRKdwq5pTQCtjamFEKpvO-81Ugi6dKF1FKQE12pF5RWemhrrznXBeankGbs4jj3E-WmhlO1-TJ52OzfRvCSLRivTglLN_6AoG1UjFPT8L3Q7L3EqdxRKCo1lV10oPFI-zilF6u0hjnsXf1gE-5qaPaZmS2r2NTVriiOOTirstKH4x-R_Sr8AKqmatA</recordid><startdate>20150101</startdate><enddate>20150101</enddate><creator>McClure, John</creator><creator>Johnston, David</creator><creator>Henrich, Liv</creator><creator>Milfont, Taciano L.</creator><creator>Becker, Julia</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SM</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150101</creationdate><title>When a hazard occurs where it is not expected: risk judgments about different regions after the Christchurch earthquakes</title><author>McClure, John ; Johnston, David ; Henrich, Liv ; Milfont, Taciano L. ; Becker, Julia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-2b41b896d0556672224f9bcc51edd5d0509aed330a954e100ce8717babdac343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Civil Engineering</topic><topic>Disasters</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Earthquake damage</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Environmental risk</topic><topic>Geophysics/Geodesy</topic><topic>Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Hazards</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Judgments</topic><topic>Natural Hazards</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Recall</topic><topic>Regions</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Seismic activity</topic><topic>Seismic phenomena</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McClure, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henrich, Liv</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milfont, Taciano L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becker, Julia</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Earthquake Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><jtitle>Natural hazards (Dordrecht)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McClure, John</au><au>Johnston, David</au><au>Henrich, Liv</au><au>Milfont, Taciano L.</au><au>Becker, Julia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>When a hazard occurs where it is not expected: risk judgments about different regions after the Christchurch earthquakes</atitle><jtitle>Natural hazards (Dordrecht)</jtitle><stitle>Nat Hazards</stitle><date>2015-01-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>75</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>635</spage><epage>652</epage><pages>635-652</pages><issn>0921-030X</issn><eissn>1573-0840</eissn><abstract>Research on risk judgments about hazards has not examined risk perception inside and outside the affected regions when a disaster occurs in an unexpected location. This research examined preparedness and judgments of earthquake risk after the 2011 Christchurch earthquake in three New Zealand cities: Christchurch, Wellington, and Palmerston North. We selected Christchurch, because its citizens did not expect an earthquake (but it occurred there); Wellington, because its citizens expected an earthquake (but it did not occur there); and Palmerston North, because its citizens did not expect an earthquake (and it did not occur there) and is thus comparable to Christchurch before the earthquakes. The research examined the relation of participant city to risk assessments for before (recall) and after the earthquakes, participants’ attributions for their risk judgments and for (not) preparing, and earthquake damage for Christchurch participants. Participants reported that prior to the earthquakes, they saw an earthquake as more likely in Wellington than in Christchurch and Palmerston North. In all three samples, expectations of another earthquake in Christchurch were significantly higher after the Christchurch earthquakes. Palmerston North expectancies of a local earthquake were also higher after the earthquakes, whereas Wellington citizens’ expectancies of a local earthquake were only marginally higher. Preparations increased after the earthquakes, particularly in Christchurch. These findings suggest that prior expectancies and disaster experiences affect earthquake risk judgments and preparation inside and outside the affected region.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11069-014-1338-6</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0921-030X |
ispartof | Natural hazards (Dordrecht), 2015-01, Vol.75 (1), p.635-652 |
issn | 0921-030X 1573-0840 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1654690448 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Civil Engineering Disasters Earth and Environmental Science Earth Sciences Earthquake damage Earthquakes Environmental Management Environmental risk Geophysics/Geodesy Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences Hazards Hydrogeology Judgments Natural Hazards Original Paper Recall Regions Risk Risk assessment Seismic activity Seismic phenomena |
title | When a hazard occurs where it is not expected: risk judgments about different regions after the Christchurch earthquakes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T10%3A57%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=When%20a%20hazard%20occurs%20where%20it%20is%20not%20expected:%20risk%20judgments%20about%20different%20regions%20after%20the%20Christchurch%20earthquakes&rft.jtitle=Natural%20hazards%20(Dordrecht)&rft.au=McClure,%20John&rft.date=2015-01-01&rft.volume=75&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=635&rft.epage=652&rft.pages=635-652&rft.issn=0921-030X&rft.eissn=1573-0840&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11069-014-1338-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1654690448%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1632515665&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |