Comparison of Conventional Freezing and Vitrification with Dimethylformamide and Ethylene Glycol for Cryopreservation of Ovine Embryos

The aim of this work was to evaluate the efficiency of the cryoprotectants dimethylformamide and ethylene glycol for cryopreservation of ovine embryos using vitrification and conventional freezing. The recovered embryos were distributed randomly in three treatment groups: Gr. 1: conventional freezin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Reproduction in domestic animals 2014-10, Vol.49 (5), p.839-844
Hauptverfasser: Varago, FC, Moutacas, VS, Carvalho, BC, Serapião, RV, Vieira, F, Chiarini‐Garcia, H, Brandão, FZ, Camargo, LS, Henry, M, Lagares, MA
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 844
container_issue 5
container_start_page 839
container_title Reproduction in domestic animals
container_volume 49
creator Varago, FC
Moutacas, VS
Carvalho, BC
Serapião, RV
Vieira, F
Chiarini‐Garcia, H
Brandão, FZ
Camargo, LS
Henry, M
Lagares, MA
description The aim of this work was to evaluate the efficiency of the cryoprotectants dimethylformamide and ethylene glycol for cryopreservation of ovine embryos using vitrification and conventional freezing. The recovered embryos were distributed randomly in three treatment groups: Gr. 1: conventional freezing (n = 44), Gr. 2: vitrification with ethylene glycol (n = 39) and Gr. 3: vitrification with dimethylformamide (n = 38). Quality of fresh embryos in control group as well as of frozen and vitrified embryos was examined by three methodologies: staining with propidium iodide and Hoechst 33258 and evaluation under fluorescent microscopy, evaluation of re‐expansion and hatching rates after culture, and determination of apoptotic index with TUNEL technique. It was established that re‐expansion rate in all treatment groups was similar. In the same time, hatching rates were higher in Gr. 1 (40.5%) and Gr. 2 (35.3%) in comparison with Gr. 3 (15.5%, p < 0.05). The number of dead cells in vitrified embryos of Gr. 2 and Gr. 3 was higher (42.6 ± 26.2 and 63.2 ± 34.65, respectively) in comparison with Gr. 1 (conventional freezing, 10.1 ± 8.5, p < 0.05). Embryos vitrified with dimethylformamide included the same quality of apoptotic cells that Gr. 1 (conventional freezing) and fresh embryos. In conclusion, the dimethylformamide and ethylene glycol used as cryoprotectant to vitrify ovine embryos, in the concentrations and exposition time tested in this work, were not as efficient as the conventional freezing for cryopreservation of ovine embryos Thus, the conventional freezing with ethylene glycol was the most efficient method to cryopreserve ovine embryos in comparison with vitrification.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/rda.12376
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1654680200</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1654680200</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5186-252190c109454a296758cbf159a754ec4b2bef50681f83255009cb803a7b35fd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0k1PFDEYB_DGaGRFD34BbcJFDgN97_RIhmU1QUhQ3MRL05npQHFmurazi8MH8HPbZYCDibGXJn1-z9Ok_wLwFqMDnNZhqM0BJlSKZ2CGGVUZ4hQ_BzOkqMiEFPkOeBXjDUKY51K-BDuEY4oZZjPwu_DdygQXfQ99Awvfb2w_ON-bFp4Ea-9cfwVNX8NvbgiucZXZFuGtG67hsevscD22jQ-d6Vxt7-F8e2R7CxftWPkWpioswuhXwUYbNlN_uup84xKad2WqxdfgRWPaaN887Lvg8mT-tfiYnZ4vPhVHp1nFcS4ywglWqMJIMc4MUULyvCobzJWRnNmKlaS0DUcix01OCecIqarMETWypLyp6S74MM1dBf9zbeOgOxcr27amt34dNRaciRwRhP5PucBKCKJ4ont_0Ru_DukJJ4VzJphKan9SVfAxBtvoVXCdCaPGSG9z1ClHfZ9jsu8eJq7LztZP8jG4BA4ncOtaO_57kr44PnocmU0dLg7211OHCT-0kFRyvTxb6LMLuVh-5t_1Mvn3k2-M1-YqfRF9-YUgzNI3ooxhRP8AuHe_hA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1561184649</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Conventional Freezing and Vitrification with Dimethylformamide and Ethylene Glycol for Cryopreservation of Ovine Embryos</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals</source><creator>Varago, FC ; Moutacas, VS ; Carvalho, BC ; Serapião, RV ; Vieira, F ; Chiarini‐Garcia, H ; Brandão, FZ ; Camargo, LS ; Henry, M ; Lagares, MA</creator><creatorcontrib>Varago, FC ; Moutacas, VS ; Carvalho, BC ; Serapião, RV ; Vieira, F ; Chiarini‐Garcia, H ; Brandão, FZ ; Camargo, LS ; Henry, M ; Lagares, MA</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this work was to evaluate the efficiency of the cryoprotectants dimethylformamide and ethylene glycol for cryopreservation of ovine embryos using vitrification and conventional freezing. The recovered embryos were distributed randomly in three treatment groups: Gr. 1: conventional freezing (n = 44), Gr. 2: vitrification with ethylene glycol (n = 39) and Gr. 3: vitrification with dimethylformamide (n = 38). Quality of fresh embryos in control group as well as of frozen and vitrified embryos was examined by three methodologies: staining with propidium iodide and Hoechst 33258 and evaluation under fluorescent microscopy, evaluation of re‐expansion and hatching rates after culture, and determination of apoptotic index with TUNEL technique. It was established that re‐expansion rate in all treatment groups was similar. In the same time, hatching rates were higher in Gr. 1 (40.5%) and Gr. 2 (35.3%) in comparison with Gr. 3 (15.5%, p &lt; 0.05). The number of dead cells in vitrified embryos of Gr. 2 and Gr. 3 was higher (42.6 ± 26.2 and 63.2 ± 34.65, respectively) in comparison with Gr. 1 (conventional freezing, 10.1 ± 8.5, p &lt; 0.05). Embryos vitrified with dimethylformamide included the same quality of apoptotic cells that Gr. 1 (conventional freezing) and fresh embryos. In conclusion, the dimethylformamide and ethylene glycol used as cryoprotectant to vitrify ovine embryos, in the concentrations and exposition time tested in this work, were not as efficient as the conventional freezing for cryopreservation of ovine embryos Thus, the conventional freezing with ethylene glycol was the most efficient method to cryopreserve ovine embryos in comparison with vitrification.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0936-6768</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1439-0531</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/rda.12376</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25131414</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: P. Parey Scientific Publishers</publisher><subject>Animal reproduction ; Animals ; Antifreeze solutions ; apoptosis ; Cryogenic engineering ; cryopreservation ; Cryopreservation - veterinary ; cryoprotectants ; Cryoprotective Agents - pharmacology ; dimethylformamide ; Dimethylformamide - pharmacology ; Embryo, Mammalian - drug effects ; Embryo, Mammalian - physiology ; Embryos ; ethylene glycol ; Ethylene Glycol - pharmacology ; fluorescence microscopy ; Freezing ; hatching ; propidium ; Random Allocation ; sheep ; Sheep - embryology ; Vitrification</subject><ispartof>Reproduction in domestic animals, 2014-10, Vol.49 (5), p.839-844</ispartof><rights>2014 Blackwell Verlag GmbH</rights><rights>2014 Blackwell Verlag GmbH.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH &amp; Co. KGaA Weinheim</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5186-252190c109454a296758cbf159a754ec4b2bef50681f83255009cb803a7b35fd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5186-252190c109454a296758cbf159a754ec4b2bef50681f83255009cb803a7b35fd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Frda.12376$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Frda.12376$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25131414$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Varago, FC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moutacas, VS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, BC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serapião, RV</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vieira, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiarini‐Garcia, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brandão, FZ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Camargo, LS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henry, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lagares, MA</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Conventional Freezing and Vitrification with Dimethylformamide and Ethylene Glycol for Cryopreservation of Ovine Embryos</title><title>Reproduction in domestic animals</title><addtitle>Reprod Dom Anim</addtitle><description>The aim of this work was to evaluate the efficiency of the cryoprotectants dimethylformamide and ethylene glycol for cryopreservation of ovine embryos using vitrification and conventional freezing. The recovered embryos were distributed randomly in three treatment groups: Gr. 1: conventional freezing (n = 44), Gr. 2: vitrification with ethylene glycol (n = 39) and Gr. 3: vitrification with dimethylformamide (n = 38). Quality of fresh embryos in control group as well as of frozen and vitrified embryos was examined by three methodologies: staining with propidium iodide and Hoechst 33258 and evaluation under fluorescent microscopy, evaluation of re‐expansion and hatching rates after culture, and determination of apoptotic index with TUNEL technique. It was established that re‐expansion rate in all treatment groups was similar. In the same time, hatching rates were higher in Gr. 1 (40.5%) and Gr. 2 (35.3%) in comparison with Gr. 3 (15.5%, p &lt; 0.05). The number of dead cells in vitrified embryos of Gr. 2 and Gr. 3 was higher (42.6 ± 26.2 and 63.2 ± 34.65, respectively) in comparison with Gr. 1 (conventional freezing, 10.1 ± 8.5, p &lt; 0.05). Embryos vitrified with dimethylformamide included the same quality of apoptotic cells that Gr. 1 (conventional freezing) and fresh embryos. In conclusion, the dimethylformamide and ethylene glycol used as cryoprotectant to vitrify ovine embryos, in the concentrations and exposition time tested in this work, were not as efficient as the conventional freezing for cryopreservation of ovine embryos Thus, the conventional freezing with ethylene glycol was the most efficient method to cryopreserve ovine embryos in comparison with vitrification.</description><subject>Animal reproduction</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antifreeze solutions</subject><subject>apoptosis</subject><subject>Cryogenic engineering</subject><subject>cryopreservation</subject><subject>Cryopreservation - veterinary</subject><subject>cryoprotectants</subject><subject>Cryoprotective Agents - pharmacology</subject><subject>dimethylformamide</subject><subject>Dimethylformamide - pharmacology</subject><subject>Embryo, Mammalian - drug effects</subject><subject>Embryo, Mammalian - physiology</subject><subject>Embryos</subject><subject>ethylene glycol</subject><subject>Ethylene Glycol - pharmacology</subject><subject>fluorescence microscopy</subject><subject>Freezing</subject><subject>hatching</subject><subject>propidium</subject><subject>Random Allocation</subject><subject>sheep</subject><subject>Sheep - embryology</subject><subject>Vitrification</subject><issn>0936-6768</issn><issn>1439-0531</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0k1PFDEYB_DGaGRFD34BbcJFDgN97_RIhmU1QUhQ3MRL05npQHFmurazi8MH8HPbZYCDibGXJn1-z9Ok_wLwFqMDnNZhqM0BJlSKZ2CGGVUZ4hQ_BzOkqMiEFPkOeBXjDUKY51K-BDuEY4oZZjPwu_DdygQXfQ99Awvfb2w_ON-bFp4Ea-9cfwVNX8NvbgiucZXZFuGtG67hsevscD22jQ-d6Vxt7-F8e2R7CxftWPkWpioswuhXwUYbNlN_uup84xKad2WqxdfgRWPaaN887Lvg8mT-tfiYnZ4vPhVHp1nFcS4ywglWqMJIMc4MUULyvCobzJWRnNmKlaS0DUcix01OCecIqarMETWypLyp6S74MM1dBf9zbeOgOxcr27amt34dNRaciRwRhP5PucBKCKJ4ont_0Ru_DukJJ4VzJphKan9SVfAxBtvoVXCdCaPGSG9z1ClHfZ9jsu8eJq7LztZP8jG4BA4ncOtaO_57kr44PnocmU0dLg7211OHCT-0kFRyvTxb6LMLuVh-5t_1Mvn3k2-M1-YqfRF9-YUgzNI3ooxhRP8AuHe_hA</recordid><startdate>201410</startdate><enddate>201410</enddate><creator>Varago, FC</creator><creator>Moutacas, VS</creator><creator>Carvalho, BC</creator><creator>Serapião, RV</creator><creator>Vieira, F</creator><creator>Chiarini‐Garcia, H</creator><creator>Brandão, FZ</creator><creator>Camargo, LS</creator><creator>Henry, M</creator><creator>Lagares, MA</creator><general>P. Parey Scientific Publishers</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201410</creationdate><title>Comparison of Conventional Freezing and Vitrification with Dimethylformamide and Ethylene Glycol for Cryopreservation of Ovine Embryos</title><author>Varago, FC ; Moutacas, VS ; Carvalho, BC ; Serapião, RV ; Vieira, F ; Chiarini‐Garcia, H ; Brandão, FZ ; Camargo, LS ; Henry, M ; Lagares, MA</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5186-252190c109454a296758cbf159a754ec4b2bef50681f83255009cb803a7b35fd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Animal reproduction</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antifreeze solutions</topic><topic>apoptosis</topic><topic>Cryogenic engineering</topic><topic>cryopreservation</topic><topic>Cryopreservation - veterinary</topic><topic>cryoprotectants</topic><topic>Cryoprotective Agents - pharmacology</topic><topic>dimethylformamide</topic><topic>Dimethylformamide - pharmacology</topic><topic>Embryo, Mammalian - drug effects</topic><topic>Embryo, Mammalian - physiology</topic><topic>Embryos</topic><topic>ethylene glycol</topic><topic>Ethylene Glycol - pharmacology</topic><topic>fluorescence microscopy</topic><topic>Freezing</topic><topic>hatching</topic><topic>propidium</topic><topic>Random Allocation</topic><topic>sheep</topic><topic>Sheep - embryology</topic><topic>Vitrification</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Varago, FC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moutacas, VS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, BC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serapião, RV</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vieira, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiarini‐Garcia, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brandão, FZ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Camargo, LS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henry, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lagares, MA</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Reproduction in domestic animals</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Varago, FC</au><au>Moutacas, VS</au><au>Carvalho, BC</au><au>Serapião, RV</au><au>Vieira, F</au><au>Chiarini‐Garcia, H</au><au>Brandão, FZ</au><au>Camargo, LS</au><au>Henry, M</au><au>Lagares, MA</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Conventional Freezing and Vitrification with Dimethylformamide and Ethylene Glycol for Cryopreservation of Ovine Embryos</atitle><jtitle>Reproduction in domestic animals</jtitle><addtitle>Reprod Dom Anim</addtitle><date>2014-10</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>839</spage><epage>844</epage><pages>839-844</pages><issn>0936-6768</issn><eissn>1439-0531</eissn><abstract>The aim of this work was to evaluate the efficiency of the cryoprotectants dimethylformamide and ethylene glycol for cryopreservation of ovine embryos using vitrification and conventional freezing. The recovered embryos were distributed randomly in three treatment groups: Gr. 1: conventional freezing (n = 44), Gr. 2: vitrification with ethylene glycol (n = 39) and Gr. 3: vitrification with dimethylformamide (n = 38). Quality of fresh embryos in control group as well as of frozen and vitrified embryos was examined by three methodologies: staining with propidium iodide and Hoechst 33258 and evaluation under fluorescent microscopy, evaluation of re‐expansion and hatching rates after culture, and determination of apoptotic index with TUNEL technique. It was established that re‐expansion rate in all treatment groups was similar. In the same time, hatching rates were higher in Gr. 1 (40.5%) and Gr. 2 (35.3%) in comparison with Gr. 3 (15.5%, p &lt; 0.05). The number of dead cells in vitrified embryos of Gr. 2 and Gr. 3 was higher (42.6 ± 26.2 and 63.2 ± 34.65, respectively) in comparison with Gr. 1 (conventional freezing, 10.1 ± 8.5, p &lt; 0.05). Embryos vitrified with dimethylformamide included the same quality of apoptotic cells that Gr. 1 (conventional freezing) and fresh embryos. In conclusion, the dimethylformamide and ethylene glycol used as cryoprotectant to vitrify ovine embryos, in the concentrations and exposition time tested in this work, were not as efficient as the conventional freezing for cryopreservation of ovine embryos Thus, the conventional freezing with ethylene glycol was the most efficient method to cryopreserve ovine embryos in comparison with vitrification.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>P. Parey Scientific Publishers</pub><pmid>25131414</pmid><doi>10.1111/rda.12376</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0936-6768
ispartof Reproduction in domestic animals, 2014-10, Vol.49 (5), p.839-844
issn 0936-6768
1439-0531
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1654680200
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals
subjects Animal reproduction
Animals
Antifreeze solutions
apoptosis
Cryogenic engineering
cryopreservation
Cryopreservation - veterinary
cryoprotectants
Cryoprotective Agents - pharmacology
dimethylformamide
Dimethylformamide - pharmacology
Embryo, Mammalian - drug effects
Embryo, Mammalian - physiology
Embryos
ethylene glycol
Ethylene Glycol - pharmacology
fluorescence microscopy
Freezing
hatching
propidium
Random Allocation
sheep
Sheep - embryology
Vitrification
title Comparison of Conventional Freezing and Vitrification with Dimethylformamide and Ethylene Glycol for Cryopreservation of Ovine Embryos
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T16%3A51%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Conventional%20Freezing%20and%20Vitrification%20with%20Dimethylformamide%20and%20Ethylene%20Glycol%20for%20Cryopreservation%20of%20Ovine%20Embryos&rft.jtitle=Reproduction%20in%20domestic%20animals&rft.au=Varago,%20FC&rft.date=2014-10&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=839&rft.epage=844&rft.pages=839-844&rft.issn=0936-6768&rft.eissn=1439-0531&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/rda.12376&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1654680200%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1561184649&rft_id=info:pmid/25131414&rfr_iscdi=true