Comparison of Conventional Freezing and Vitrification with Dimethylformamide and Ethylene Glycol for Cryopreservation of Ovine Embryos
The aim of this work was to evaluate the efficiency of the cryoprotectants dimethylformamide and ethylene glycol for cryopreservation of ovine embryos using vitrification and conventional freezing. The recovered embryos were distributed randomly in three treatment groups: Gr. 1: conventional freezin...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Reproduction in domestic animals 2014-10, Vol.49 (5), p.839-844 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 844 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 839 |
container_title | Reproduction in domestic animals |
container_volume | 49 |
creator | Varago, FC Moutacas, VS Carvalho, BC Serapião, RV Vieira, F Chiarini‐Garcia, H Brandão, FZ Camargo, LS Henry, M Lagares, MA |
description | The aim of this work was to evaluate the efficiency of the cryoprotectants dimethylformamide and ethylene glycol for cryopreservation of ovine embryos using vitrification and conventional freezing. The recovered embryos were distributed randomly in three treatment groups: Gr. 1: conventional freezing (n = 44), Gr. 2: vitrification with ethylene glycol (n = 39) and Gr. 3: vitrification with dimethylformamide (n = 38). Quality of fresh embryos in control group as well as of frozen and vitrified embryos was examined by three methodologies: staining with propidium iodide and Hoechst 33258 and evaluation under fluorescent microscopy, evaluation of re‐expansion and hatching rates after culture, and determination of apoptotic index with TUNEL technique. It was established that re‐expansion rate in all treatment groups was similar. In the same time, hatching rates were higher in Gr. 1 (40.5%) and Gr. 2 (35.3%) in comparison with Gr. 3 (15.5%, p < 0.05). The number of dead cells in vitrified embryos of Gr. 2 and Gr. 3 was higher (42.6 ± 26.2 and 63.2 ± 34.65, respectively) in comparison with Gr. 1 (conventional freezing, 10.1 ± 8.5, p < 0.05). Embryos vitrified with dimethylformamide included the same quality of apoptotic cells that Gr. 1 (conventional freezing) and fresh embryos. In conclusion, the dimethylformamide and ethylene glycol used as cryoprotectant to vitrify ovine embryos, in the concentrations and exposition time tested in this work, were not as efficient as the conventional freezing for cryopreservation of ovine embryos Thus, the conventional freezing with ethylene glycol was the most efficient method to cryopreserve ovine embryos in comparison with vitrification. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/rda.12376 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1654680200</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1654680200</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5186-252190c109454a296758cbf159a754ec4b2bef50681f83255009cb803a7b35fd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0k1PFDEYB_DGaGRFD34BbcJFDgN97_RIhmU1QUhQ3MRL05npQHFmurazi8MH8HPbZYCDibGXJn1-z9Ok_wLwFqMDnNZhqM0BJlSKZ2CGGVUZ4hQ_BzOkqMiEFPkOeBXjDUKY51K-BDuEY4oZZjPwu_DdygQXfQ99Awvfb2w_ON-bFp4Ea-9cfwVNX8NvbgiucZXZFuGtG67hsevscD22jQ-d6Vxt7-F8e2R7CxftWPkWpioswuhXwUYbNlN_uup84xKad2WqxdfgRWPaaN887Lvg8mT-tfiYnZ4vPhVHp1nFcS4ywglWqMJIMc4MUULyvCobzJWRnNmKlaS0DUcix01OCecIqarMETWypLyp6S74MM1dBf9zbeOgOxcr27amt34dNRaciRwRhP5PucBKCKJ4ont_0Ru_DukJJ4VzJphKan9SVfAxBtvoVXCdCaPGSG9z1ClHfZ9jsu8eJq7LztZP8jG4BA4ncOtaO_57kr44PnocmU0dLg7211OHCT-0kFRyvTxb6LMLuVh-5t_1Mvn3k2-M1-YqfRF9-YUgzNI3ooxhRP8AuHe_hA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1561184649</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Conventional Freezing and Vitrification with Dimethylformamide and Ethylene Glycol for Cryopreservation of Ovine Embryos</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals</source><creator>Varago, FC ; Moutacas, VS ; Carvalho, BC ; Serapião, RV ; Vieira, F ; Chiarini‐Garcia, H ; Brandão, FZ ; Camargo, LS ; Henry, M ; Lagares, MA</creator><creatorcontrib>Varago, FC ; Moutacas, VS ; Carvalho, BC ; Serapião, RV ; Vieira, F ; Chiarini‐Garcia, H ; Brandão, FZ ; Camargo, LS ; Henry, M ; Lagares, MA</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this work was to evaluate the efficiency of the cryoprotectants dimethylformamide and ethylene glycol for cryopreservation of ovine embryos using vitrification and conventional freezing. The recovered embryos were distributed randomly in three treatment groups: Gr. 1: conventional freezing (n = 44), Gr. 2: vitrification with ethylene glycol (n = 39) and Gr. 3: vitrification with dimethylformamide (n = 38). Quality of fresh embryos in control group as well as of frozen and vitrified embryos was examined by three methodologies: staining with propidium iodide and Hoechst 33258 and evaluation under fluorescent microscopy, evaluation of re‐expansion and hatching rates after culture, and determination of apoptotic index with TUNEL technique. It was established that re‐expansion rate in all treatment groups was similar. In the same time, hatching rates were higher in Gr. 1 (40.5%) and Gr. 2 (35.3%) in comparison with Gr. 3 (15.5%, p < 0.05). The number of dead cells in vitrified embryos of Gr. 2 and Gr. 3 was higher (42.6 ± 26.2 and 63.2 ± 34.65, respectively) in comparison with Gr. 1 (conventional freezing, 10.1 ± 8.5, p < 0.05). Embryos vitrified with dimethylformamide included the same quality of apoptotic cells that Gr. 1 (conventional freezing) and fresh embryos. In conclusion, the dimethylformamide and ethylene glycol used as cryoprotectant to vitrify ovine embryos, in the concentrations and exposition time tested in this work, were not as efficient as the conventional freezing for cryopreservation of ovine embryos Thus, the conventional freezing with ethylene glycol was the most efficient method to cryopreserve ovine embryos in comparison with vitrification.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0936-6768</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1439-0531</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/rda.12376</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25131414</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: P. Parey Scientific Publishers</publisher><subject>Animal reproduction ; Animals ; Antifreeze solutions ; apoptosis ; Cryogenic engineering ; cryopreservation ; Cryopreservation - veterinary ; cryoprotectants ; Cryoprotective Agents - pharmacology ; dimethylformamide ; Dimethylformamide - pharmacology ; Embryo, Mammalian - drug effects ; Embryo, Mammalian - physiology ; Embryos ; ethylene glycol ; Ethylene Glycol - pharmacology ; fluorescence microscopy ; Freezing ; hatching ; propidium ; Random Allocation ; sheep ; Sheep - embryology ; Vitrification</subject><ispartof>Reproduction in domestic animals, 2014-10, Vol.49 (5), p.839-844</ispartof><rights>2014 Blackwell Verlag GmbH</rights><rights>2014 Blackwell Verlag GmbH.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA Weinheim</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5186-252190c109454a296758cbf159a754ec4b2bef50681f83255009cb803a7b35fd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5186-252190c109454a296758cbf159a754ec4b2bef50681f83255009cb803a7b35fd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Frda.12376$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Frda.12376$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25131414$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Varago, FC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moutacas, VS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, BC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serapião, RV</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vieira, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiarini‐Garcia, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brandão, FZ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Camargo, LS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henry, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lagares, MA</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Conventional Freezing and Vitrification with Dimethylformamide and Ethylene Glycol for Cryopreservation of Ovine Embryos</title><title>Reproduction in domestic animals</title><addtitle>Reprod Dom Anim</addtitle><description>The aim of this work was to evaluate the efficiency of the cryoprotectants dimethylformamide and ethylene glycol for cryopreservation of ovine embryos using vitrification and conventional freezing. The recovered embryos were distributed randomly in three treatment groups: Gr. 1: conventional freezing (n = 44), Gr. 2: vitrification with ethylene glycol (n = 39) and Gr. 3: vitrification with dimethylformamide (n = 38). Quality of fresh embryos in control group as well as of frozen and vitrified embryos was examined by three methodologies: staining with propidium iodide and Hoechst 33258 and evaluation under fluorescent microscopy, evaluation of re‐expansion and hatching rates after culture, and determination of apoptotic index with TUNEL technique. It was established that re‐expansion rate in all treatment groups was similar. In the same time, hatching rates were higher in Gr. 1 (40.5%) and Gr. 2 (35.3%) in comparison with Gr. 3 (15.5%, p < 0.05). The number of dead cells in vitrified embryos of Gr. 2 and Gr. 3 was higher (42.6 ± 26.2 and 63.2 ± 34.65, respectively) in comparison with Gr. 1 (conventional freezing, 10.1 ± 8.5, p < 0.05). Embryos vitrified with dimethylformamide included the same quality of apoptotic cells that Gr. 1 (conventional freezing) and fresh embryos. In conclusion, the dimethylformamide and ethylene glycol used as cryoprotectant to vitrify ovine embryos, in the concentrations and exposition time tested in this work, were not as efficient as the conventional freezing for cryopreservation of ovine embryos Thus, the conventional freezing with ethylene glycol was the most efficient method to cryopreserve ovine embryos in comparison with vitrification.</description><subject>Animal reproduction</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antifreeze solutions</subject><subject>apoptosis</subject><subject>Cryogenic engineering</subject><subject>cryopreservation</subject><subject>Cryopreservation - veterinary</subject><subject>cryoprotectants</subject><subject>Cryoprotective Agents - pharmacology</subject><subject>dimethylformamide</subject><subject>Dimethylformamide - pharmacology</subject><subject>Embryo, Mammalian - drug effects</subject><subject>Embryo, Mammalian - physiology</subject><subject>Embryos</subject><subject>ethylene glycol</subject><subject>Ethylene Glycol - pharmacology</subject><subject>fluorescence microscopy</subject><subject>Freezing</subject><subject>hatching</subject><subject>propidium</subject><subject>Random Allocation</subject><subject>sheep</subject><subject>Sheep - embryology</subject><subject>Vitrification</subject><issn>0936-6768</issn><issn>1439-0531</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0k1PFDEYB_DGaGRFD34BbcJFDgN97_RIhmU1QUhQ3MRL05npQHFmurazi8MH8HPbZYCDibGXJn1-z9Ok_wLwFqMDnNZhqM0BJlSKZ2CGGVUZ4hQ_BzOkqMiEFPkOeBXjDUKY51K-BDuEY4oZZjPwu_DdygQXfQ99Awvfb2w_ON-bFp4Ea-9cfwVNX8NvbgiucZXZFuGtG67hsevscD22jQ-d6Vxt7-F8e2R7CxftWPkWpioswuhXwUYbNlN_uup84xKad2WqxdfgRWPaaN887Lvg8mT-tfiYnZ4vPhVHp1nFcS4ywglWqMJIMc4MUULyvCobzJWRnNmKlaS0DUcix01OCecIqarMETWypLyp6S74MM1dBf9zbeOgOxcr27amt34dNRaciRwRhP5PucBKCKJ4ont_0Ru_DukJJ4VzJphKan9SVfAxBtvoVXCdCaPGSG9z1ClHfZ9jsu8eJq7LztZP8jG4BA4ncOtaO_57kr44PnocmU0dLg7211OHCT-0kFRyvTxb6LMLuVh-5t_1Mvn3k2-M1-YqfRF9-YUgzNI3ooxhRP8AuHe_hA</recordid><startdate>201410</startdate><enddate>201410</enddate><creator>Varago, FC</creator><creator>Moutacas, VS</creator><creator>Carvalho, BC</creator><creator>Serapião, RV</creator><creator>Vieira, F</creator><creator>Chiarini‐Garcia, H</creator><creator>Brandão, FZ</creator><creator>Camargo, LS</creator><creator>Henry, M</creator><creator>Lagares, MA</creator><general>P. Parey Scientific Publishers</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201410</creationdate><title>Comparison of Conventional Freezing and Vitrification with Dimethylformamide and Ethylene Glycol for Cryopreservation of Ovine Embryos</title><author>Varago, FC ; Moutacas, VS ; Carvalho, BC ; Serapião, RV ; Vieira, F ; Chiarini‐Garcia, H ; Brandão, FZ ; Camargo, LS ; Henry, M ; Lagares, MA</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5186-252190c109454a296758cbf159a754ec4b2bef50681f83255009cb803a7b35fd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Animal reproduction</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antifreeze solutions</topic><topic>apoptosis</topic><topic>Cryogenic engineering</topic><topic>cryopreservation</topic><topic>Cryopreservation - veterinary</topic><topic>cryoprotectants</topic><topic>Cryoprotective Agents - pharmacology</topic><topic>dimethylformamide</topic><topic>Dimethylformamide - pharmacology</topic><topic>Embryo, Mammalian - drug effects</topic><topic>Embryo, Mammalian - physiology</topic><topic>Embryos</topic><topic>ethylene glycol</topic><topic>Ethylene Glycol - pharmacology</topic><topic>fluorescence microscopy</topic><topic>Freezing</topic><topic>hatching</topic><topic>propidium</topic><topic>Random Allocation</topic><topic>sheep</topic><topic>Sheep - embryology</topic><topic>Vitrification</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Varago, FC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moutacas, VS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, BC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serapião, RV</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vieira, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiarini‐Garcia, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brandão, FZ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Camargo, LS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henry, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lagares, MA</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Reproduction in domestic animals</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Varago, FC</au><au>Moutacas, VS</au><au>Carvalho, BC</au><au>Serapião, RV</au><au>Vieira, F</au><au>Chiarini‐Garcia, H</au><au>Brandão, FZ</au><au>Camargo, LS</au><au>Henry, M</au><au>Lagares, MA</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Conventional Freezing and Vitrification with Dimethylformamide and Ethylene Glycol for Cryopreservation of Ovine Embryos</atitle><jtitle>Reproduction in domestic animals</jtitle><addtitle>Reprod Dom Anim</addtitle><date>2014-10</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>839</spage><epage>844</epage><pages>839-844</pages><issn>0936-6768</issn><eissn>1439-0531</eissn><abstract>The aim of this work was to evaluate the efficiency of the cryoprotectants dimethylformamide and ethylene glycol for cryopreservation of ovine embryos using vitrification and conventional freezing. The recovered embryos were distributed randomly in three treatment groups: Gr. 1: conventional freezing (n = 44), Gr. 2: vitrification with ethylene glycol (n = 39) and Gr. 3: vitrification with dimethylformamide (n = 38). Quality of fresh embryos in control group as well as of frozen and vitrified embryos was examined by three methodologies: staining with propidium iodide and Hoechst 33258 and evaluation under fluorescent microscopy, evaluation of re‐expansion and hatching rates after culture, and determination of apoptotic index with TUNEL technique. It was established that re‐expansion rate in all treatment groups was similar. In the same time, hatching rates were higher in Gr. 1 (40.5%) and Gr. 2 (35.3%) in comparison with Gr. 3 (15.5%, p < 0.05). The number of dead cells in vitrified embryos of Gr. 2 and Gr. 3 was higher (42.6 ± 26.2 and 63.2 ± 34.65, respectively) in comparison with Gr. 1 (conventional freezing, 10.1 ± 8.5, p < 0.05). Embryos vitrified with dimethylformamide included the same quality of apoptotic cells that Gr. 1 (conventional freezing) and fresh embryos. In conclusion, the dimethylformamide and ethylene glycol used as cryoprotectant to vitrify ovine embryos, in the concentrations and exposition time tested in this work, were not as efficient as the conventional freezing for cryopreservation of ovine embryos Thus, the conventional freezing with ethylene glycol was the most efficient method to cryopreserve ovine embryos in comparison with vitrification.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>P. Parey Scientific Publishers</pub><pmid>25131414</pmid><doi>10.1111/rda.12376</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0936-6768 |
ispartof | Reproduction in domestic animals, 2014-10, Vol.49 (5), p.839-844 |
issn | 0936-6768 1439-0531 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1654680200 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals |
subjects | Animal reproduction Animals Antifreeze solutions apoptosis Cryogenic engineering cryopreservation Cryopreservation - veterinary cryoprotectants Cryoprotective Agents - pharmacology dimethylformamide Dimethylformamide - pharmacology Embryo, Mammalian - drug effects Embryo, Mammalian - physiology Embryos ethylene glycol Ethylene Glycol - pharmacology fluorescence microscopy Freezing hatching propidium Random Allocation sheep Sheep - embryology Vitrification |
title | Comparison of Conventional Freezing and Vitrification with Dimethylformamide and Ethylene Glycol for Cryopreservation of Ovine Embryos |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T16%3A51%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Conventional%20Freezing%20and%20Vitrification%20with%20Dimethylformamide%20and%20Ethylene%20Glycol%20for%20Cryopreservation%20of%20Ovine%20Embryos&rft.jtitle=Reproduction%20in%20domestic%20animals&rft.au=Varago,%20FC&rft.date=2014-10&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=839&rft.epage=844&rft.pages=839-844&rft.issn=0936-6768&rft.eissn=1439-0531&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/rda.12376&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1654680200%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1561184649&rft_id=info:pmid/25131414&rfr_iscdi=true |