Modeling phytoplankton growth rates and chlorophyll to carbon ratios in California coastal and pelagic ecosystems

To understand and quantify plankton community dynamics in the ocean, high‐resolution models are needed to capture the temporal and spatial variations of physical, biological, and biogeochemical processes. However, ecosystem models often fail to agree with observations. This failure can be due to ina...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences 2010-12, Vol.115 (G4), p.np-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Li, Qian P., Franks, Peter J. S., Landry, Michael R., Goericke, Ralf, Taylor, Andrew G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue G4
container_start_page np
container_title Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences
container_volume 115
creator Li, Qian P.
Franks, Peter J. S.
Landry, Michael R.
Goericke, Ralf
Taylor, Andrew G.
description To understand and quantify plankton community dynamics in the ocean, high‐resolution models are needed to capture the temporal and spatial variations of physical, biological, and biogeochemical processes. However, ecosystem models often fail to agree with observations. This failure can be due to inadequacies in the data and/or inadequacies in the model formulation and parameterization. Here we parameterize and optimize a two‐phytoplankton functional type model of phytoplankton growth rate and chlorophyll/carbon (Chl:C) ratio using data from the Lagrangian field measurements conducted during process cruises of the Long‐Term Ecosystem Research–California Current Ecosystem (CCE) program. We parameterize the model based on a small coastal subset of the data and then extend and test it with the full data set, including data from offshore regions. The CCE process studies were focused on quantifying the size‐resolved planktonic growth, grazing, production, and export rates while following water parcels. The resulting data therefore provided strong constraints for the model we employed. The modeled growth rates and Chl:C ratios were in good agreement with observations. Our results indicate that the model can accurately predict Chl:C ratios, biomasses, and growth rates of dominant functional types using relatively easily measured environmental variables (temperature, nutrients, and bulk chlorophyll). The model also accurately reproduces the subsurface maxima of growth rates, the spatial separation of carbon and chlorophyll maxima, and many other observations in the California Current coastal and pelagic ecosystems.
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2009JG001111
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1654675107</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1654675107</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a5320-6dab5d546f75d62d18e19efe6a5be4df53295c52bf48632841e5af95559f94d83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9vFCEYh4nRxE3bmx-AmJh4cCowwAxHs9Gxu60a08YjeZeBXVp2mMJs2v32sm7TGA--Fw48z48_P4TeUHJOCVMfGSFq0RFCy7xAM0aFrBgj7CWaEcrbijDWvEZnOd-SMlxITugM3V_F3gY_rPG42U9xDDDcTXHA6xQfpg1OMNmMYeix2YSYYoFCwFPEBtKqYGXfx4z9gOcQvItp8IBNhDxB-KONNsDaG2xNzPs82W0-Ra8chGzPntYTdPPl8_X8a3X5vbuYf7qsQNSMVLKHlegFl64RvWQ9bS1V1lkJYmV57wqkhBFs5Xgra9ZyagU4JYRQTvG-rU_Q-2PumOL9zuZJb302NpQX2rjLmsoS3ghKmoK-_Qe9jbs0lNtpRXlDayoPeR-OkEkx52SdHpPfQtprSvShAf13AwV_95QJ2UBwCQbj87PD6laUWg5n0yP34IPd_zdTL7qfnaSkONXR8eVHH58dSHdaNnUj9K9vnb5SP_hyuWj0sv4NvM6jTw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>914713168</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Modeling phytoplankton growth rates and chlorophyll to carbon ratios in California coastal and pelagic ecosystems</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Li, Qian P. ; Franks, Peter J. S. ; Landry, Michael R. ; Goericke, Ralf ; Taylor, Andrew G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Qian P. ; Franks, Peter J. S. ; Landry, Michael R. ; Goericke, Ralf ; Taylor, Andrew G.</creatorcontrib><description>To understand and quantify plankton community dynamics in the ocean, high‐resolution models are needed to capture the temporal and spatial variations of physical, biological, and biogeochemical processes. However, ecosystem models often fail to agree with observations. This failure can be due to inadequacies in the data and/or inadequacies in the model formulation and parameterization. Here we parameterize and optimize a two‐phytoplankton functional type model of phytoplankton growth rate and chlorophyll/carbon (Chl:C) ratio using data from the Lagrangian field measurements conducted during process cruises of the Long‐Term Ecosystem Research–California Current Ecosystem (CCE) program. We parameterize the model based on a small coastal subset of the data and then extend and test it with the full data set, including data from offshore regions. The CCE process studies were focused on quantifying the size‐resolved planktonic growth, grazing, production, and export rates while following water parcels. The resulting data therefore provided strong constraints for the model we employed. The modeled growth rates and Chl:C ratios were in good agreement with observations. Our results indicate that the model can accurately predict Chl:C ratios, biomasses, and growth rates of dominant functional types using relatively easily measured environmental variables (temperature, nutrients, and bulk chlorophyll). The model also accurately reproduces the subsurface maxima of growth rates, the spatial separation of carbon and chlorophyll maxima, and many other observations in the California Current coastal and pelagic ecosystems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-0227</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2169-8953</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2156-2202</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-8961</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2009JG001111</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Biological oceanography ; California current ecosystem ; Carbon ; Chemical oceanography ; Chlorophyll ; chlorophyll to carbon ratio ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; ecosystem modeling ; Ecosystem models ; Exact sciences and technology ; Marine ecosystems ; Phytoplankton ; phytoplankton growth rate</subject><ispartof>Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 2010-12, Vol.115 (G4), p.np-n/a</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2010 by the American Geophysical Union.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright 2010 by American Geophysical Union</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a5320-6dab5d546f75d62d18e19efe6a5be4df53295c52bf48632841e5af95559f94d83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a5320-6dab5d546f75d62d18e19efe6a5be4df53295c52bf48632841e5af95559f94d83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2009JG001111$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2009JG001111$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,1433,11514,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46468,46833,46892</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=23850147$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Qian P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franks, Peter J. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Landry, Michael R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goericke, Ralf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Andrew G.</creatorcontrib><title>Modeling phytoplankton growth rates and chlorophyll to carbon ratios in California coastal and pelagic ecosystems</title><title>Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences</title><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res</addtitle><description>To understand and quantify plankton community dynamics in the ocean, high‐resolution models are needed to capture the temporal and spatial variations of physical, biological, and biogeochemical processes. However, ecosystem models often fail to agree with observations. This failure can be due to inadequacies in the data and/or inadequacies in the model formulation and parameterization. Here we parameterize and optimize a two‐phytoplankton functional type model of phytoplankton growth rate and chlorophyll/carbon (Chl:C) ratio using data from the Lagrangian field measurements conducted during process cruises of the Long‐Term Ecosystem Research–California Current Ecosystem (CCE) program. We parameterize the model based on a small coastal subset of the data and then extend and test it with the full data set, including data from offshore regions. The CCE process studies were focused on quantifying the size‐resolved planktonic growth, grazing, production, and export rates while following water parcels. The resulting data therefore provided strong constraints for the model we employed. The modeled growth rates and Chl:C ratios were in good agreement with observations. Our results indicate that the model can accurately predict Chl:C ratios, biomasses, and growth rates of dominant functional types using relatively easily measured environmental variables (temperature, nutrients, and bulk chlorophyll). The model also accurately reproduces the subsurface maxima of growth rates, the spatial separation of carbon and chlorophyll maxima, and many other observations in the California Current coastal and pelagic ecosystems.</description><subject>Biological oceanography</subject><subject>California current ecosystem</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Chemical oceanography</subject><subject>Chlorophyll</subject><subject>chlorophyll to carbon ratio</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>ecosystem modeling</subject><subject>Ecosystem models</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Marine ecosystems</subject><subject>Phytoplankton</subject><subject>phytoplankton growth rate</subject><issn>0148-0227</issn><issn>2169-8953</issn><issn>2156-2202</issn><issn>2169-8961</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9vFCEYh4nRxE3bmx-AmJh4cCowwAxHs9Gxu60a08YjeZeBXVp2mMJs2v32sm7TGA--Fw48z48_P4TeUHJOCVMfGSFq0RFCy7xAM0aFrBgj7CWaEcrbijDWvEZnOd-SMlxITugM3V_F3gY_rPG42U9xDDDcTXHA6xQfpg1OMNmMYeix2YSYYoFCwFPEBtKqYGXfx4z9gOcQvItp8IBNhDxB-KONNsDaG2xNzPs82W0-Ra8chGzPntYTdPPl8_X8a3X5vbuYf7qsQNSMVLKHlegFl64RvWQ9bS1V1lkJYmV57wqkhBFs5Xgra9ZyagU4JYRQTvG-rU_Q-2PumOL9zuZJb302NpQX2rjLmsoS3ghKmoK-_Qe9jbs0lNtpRXlDayoPeR-OkEkx52SdHpPfQtprSvShAf13AwV_95QJ2UBwCQbj87PD6laUWg5n0yP34IPd_zdTL7qfnaSkONXR8eVHH58dSHdaNnUj9K9vnb5SP_hyuWj0sv4NvM6jTw</recordid><startdate>201012</startdate><enddate>201012</enddate><creator>Li, Qian P.</creator><creator>Franks, Peter J. S.</creator><creator>Landry, Michael R.</creator><creator>Goericke, Ralf</creator><creator>Taylor, Andrew G.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>American Geophysical Union</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>M7N</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201012</creationdate><title>Modeling phytoplankton growth rates and chlorophyll to carbon ratios in California coastal and pelagic ecosystems</title><author>Li, Qian P. ; Franks, Peter J. S. ; Landry, Michael R. ; Goericke, Ralf ; Taylor, Andrew G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a5320-6dab5d546f75d62d18e19efe6a5be4df53295c52bf48632841e5af95559f94d83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Biological oceanography</topic><topic>California current ecosystem</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Chemical oceanography</topic><topic>Chlorophyll</topic><topic>chlorophyll to carbon ratio</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>ecosystem modeling</topic><topic>Ecosystem models</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Marine ecosystems</topic><topic>Phytoplankton</topic><topic>phytoplankton growth rate</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Qian P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franks, Peter J. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Landry, Michael R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goericke, Ralf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Andrew G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><jtitle>Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Qian P.</au><au>Franks, Peter J. S.</au><au>Landry, Michael R.</au><au>Goericke, Ralf</au><au>Taylor, Andrew G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Modeling phytoplankton growth rates and chlorophyll to carbon ratios in California coastal and pelagic ecosystems</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences</jtitle><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res</addtitle><date>2010-12</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>115</volume><issue>G4</issue><spage>np</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>np-n/a</pages><issn>0148-0227</issn><issn>2169-8953</issn><eissn>2156-2202</eissn><eissn>2169-8961</eissn><abstract>To understand and quantify plankton community dynamics in the ocean, high‐resolution models are needed to capture the temporal and spatial variations of physical, biological, and biogeochemical processes. However, ecosystem models often fail to agree with observations. This failure can be due to inadequacies in the data and/or inadequacies in the model formulation and parameterization. Here we parameterize and optimize a two‐phytoplankton functional type model of phytoplankton growth rate and chlorophyll/carbon (Chl:C) ratio using data from the Lagrangian field measurements conducted during process cruises of the Long‐Term Ecosystem Research–California Current Ecosystem (CCE) program. We parameterize the model based on a small coastal subset of the data and then extend and test it with the full data set, including data from offshore regions. The CCE process studies were focused on quantifying the size‐resolved planktonic growth, grazing, production, and export rates while following water parcels. The resulting data therefore provided strong constraints for the model we employed. The modeled growth rates and Chl:C ratios were in good agreement with observations. Our results indicate that the model can accurately predict Chl:C ratios, biomasses, and growth rates of dominant functional types using relatively easily measured environmental variables (temperature, nutrients, and bulk chlorophyll). The model also accurately reproduces the subsurface maxima of growth rates, the spatial separation of carbon and chlorophyll maxima, and many other observations in the California Current coastal and pelagic ecosystems.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2009JG001111</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0148-0227
ispartof Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 2010-12, Vol.115 (G4), p.np-n/a
issn 0148-0227
2169-8953
2156-2202
2169-8961
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1654675107
source Access via Wiley Online Library; Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection); Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Biological oceanography
California current ecosystem
Carbon
Chemical oceanography
Chlorophyll
chlorophyll to carbon ratio
Earth sciences
Earth, ocean, space
ecosystem modeling
Ecosystem models
Exact sciences and technology
Marine ecosystems
Phytoplankton
phytoplankton growth rate
title Modeling phytoplankton growth rates and chlorophyll to carbon ratios in California coastal and pelagic ecosystems
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T03%3A43%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Modeling%20phytoplankton%20growth%20rates%20and%20chlorophyll%20to%20carbon%20ratios%20in%20California%20coastal%20and%20pelagic%20ecosystems&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Geophysical%20Research:%20Biogeosciences&rft.au=Li,%20Qian%20P.&rft.date=2010-12&rft.volume=115&rft.issue=G4&rft.spage=np&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=np-n/a&rft.issn=0148-0227&rft.eissn=2156-2202&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2009JG001111&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1654675107%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=914713168&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true