Symbolic Regression of Upstream, Stormwater, and Tributary E. Coli Concentrations Using River Flows

Symbolic regression was used to model E. Coli concentrations of upstream boundary, tributaries, and stormwater in the lower Passaic River at Paterson, New Jersey. These models were used to simulate boundary concentrations for a water quality analysis simulation program to model the river. River flow...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Water environment research 2015-01, Vol.87 (1), p.26-34
Hauptverfasser: Jagupilla, Sarath Chandra K, Vaccari, David A, Miskewitz, Robert, Su, Tsan-Liang, Hires, Richard I
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 34
container_issue 1
container_start_page 26
container_title Water environment research
container_volume 87
creator Jagupilla, Sarath Chandra K
Vaccari, David A
Miskewitz, Robert
Su, Tsan-Liang
Hires, Richard I
description Symbolic regression was used to model E. Coli concentrations of upstream boundary, tributaries, and stormwater in the lower Passaic River at Paterson, New Jersey. These models were used to simulate boundary concentrations for a water quality analysis simulation program to model the river. River flows from upstream and downstream boundaries of the study area were used as predictors. The symbolic regression technique developed a variety of candidate models to choose from due to multiple transformations and model structures considered. The resulting models had advantages such as better goodness-of-fit statistics, reasonable bounds to outputs, and smooth behavior. The major disadvantages of the technique are model complexity, difficulty to interpret, and overfitting. The Nash-Sutcliffe efficiencies of the models ranged from 0.61 to 0.88, and they adequately captured the upstream boundary, tributary, and stormwater concentrations. The results suggest symbolic regression can have significant applications in the areas of hydrologic, hydrodynamic, and water quality modeling.
doi_str_mv 10.2175/106143014X14062131178998
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1654670440</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1654670440</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_16546704403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVi81OAjEURhujiai8w126YKB32s7AmkBc85O4I2W4kJpOi70dCW9vF76Am-98i3OEAJTTGlszQ9mgVhL1J2rZ1KgQ2_liMX8QIzRGV61R-Fh-0ariqWfxwvwlJda11CPRbe_9MXrXwYYuiZhdDBDPsL9yTmT7CWxzTP3NZkoTsOEEu-SOQ7bpDqspLEtaJnQUcrK5xAx7duECG_dDCdY-3vhNPJ2tZxr_8VW8r1e75Ud1TfF7IM6H3nFH3ttAceADNkY3rdRaqn-ov2j6UYY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1654670440</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Symbolic Regression of Upstream, Stormwater, and Tributary E. Coli Concentrations Using River Flows</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Jagupilla, Sarath Chandra K ; Vaccari, David A ; Miskewitz, Robert ; Su, Tsan-Liang ; Hires, Richard I</creator><creatorcontrib>Jagupilla, Sarath Chandra K ; Vaccari, David A ; Miskewitz, Robert ; Su, Tsan-Liang ; Hires, Richard I</creatorcontrib><description>Symbolic regression was used to model E. Coli concentrations of upstream boundary, tributaries, and stormwater in the lower Passaic River at Paterson, New Jersey. These models were used to simulate boundary concentrations for a water quality analysis simulation program to model the river. River flows from upstream and downstream boundaries of the study area were used as predictors. The symbolic regression technique developed a variety of candidate models to choose from due to multiple transformations and model structures considered. The resulting models had advantages such as better goodness-of-fit statistics, reasonable bounds to outputs, and smooth behavior. The major disadvantages of the technique are model complexity, difficulty to interpret, and overfitting. The Nash-Sutcliffe efficiencies of the models ranged from 0.61 to 0.88, and they adequately captured the upstream boundary, tributary, and stormwater concentrations. The results suggest symbolic regression can have significant applications in the areas of hydrologic, hydrodynamic, and water quality modeling.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1061-4303</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1554-7531</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2175/106143014X14062131178998</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Freshwater</subject><ispartof>Water environment research, 2015-01, Vol.87 (1), p.26-34</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jagupilla, Sarath Chandra K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaccari, David A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miskewitz, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Su, Tsan-Liang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hires, Richard I</creatorcontrib><title>Symbolic Regression of Upstream, Stormwater, and Tributary E. Coli Concentrations Using River Flows</title><title>Water environment research</title><description>Symbolic regression was used to model E. Coli concentrations of upstream boundary, tributaries, and stormwater in the lower Passaic River at Paterson, New Jersey. These models were used to simulate boundary concentrations for a water quality analysis simulation program to model the river. River flows from upstream and downstream boundaries of the study area were used as predictors. The symbolic regression technique developed a variety of candidate models to choose from due to multiple transformations and model structures considered. The resulting models had advantages such as better goodness-of-fit statistics, reasonable bounds to outputs, and smooth behavior. The major disadvantages of the technique are model complexity, difficulty to interpret, and overfitting. The Nash-Sutcliffe efficiencies of the models ranged from 0.61 to 0.88, and they adequately captured the upstream boundary, tributary, and stormwater concentrations. The results suggest symbolic regression can have significant applications in the areas of hydrologic, hydrodynamic, and water quality modeling.</description><subject>Freshwater</subject><issn>1061-4303</issn><issn>1554-7531</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVi81OAjEURhujiai8w126YKB32s7AmkBc85O4I2W4kJpOi70dCW9vF76Am-98i3OEAJTTGlszQ9mgVhL1J2rZ1KgQ2_liMX8QIzRGV61R-Fh-0ariqWfxwvwlJda11CPRbe_9MXrXwYYuiZhdDBDPsL9yTmT7CWxzTP3NZkoTsOEEu-SOQ7bpDqspLEtaJnQUcrK5xAx7duECG_dDCdY-3vhNPJ2tZxr_8VW8r1e75Ud1TfF7IM6H3nFH3ttAceADNkY3rdRaqn-ov2j6UYY</recordid><startdate>20150101</startdate><enddate>20150101</enddate><creator>Jagupilla, Sarath Chandra K</creator><creator>Vaccari, David A</creator><creator>Miskewitz, Robert</creator><creator>Su, Tsan-Liang</creator><creator>Hires, Richard I</creator><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150101</creationdate><title>Symbolic Regression of Upstream, Stormwater, and Tributary E. Coli Concentrations Using River Flows</title><author>Jagupilla, Sarath Chandra K ; Vaccari, David A ; Miskewitz, Robert ; Su, Tsan-Liang ; Hires, Richard I</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_16546704403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Freshwater</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jagupilla, Sarath Chandra K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaccari, David A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miskewitz, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Su, Tsan-Liang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hires, Richard I</creatorcontrib><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water environment research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jagupilla, Sarath Chandra K</au><au>Vaccari, David A</au><au>Miskewitz, Robert</au><au>Su, Tsan-Liang</au><au>Hires, Richard I</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Symbolic Regression of Upstream, Stormwater, and Tributary E. Coli Concentrations Using River Flows</atitle><jtitle>Water environment research</jtitle><date>2015-01-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>87</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>26</spage><epage>34</epage><pages>26-34</pages><issn>1061-4303</issn><eissn>1554-7531</eissn><abstract>Symbolic regression was used to model E. Coli concentrations of upstream boundary, tributaries, and stormwater in the lower Passaic River at Paterson, New Jersey. These models were used to simulate boundary concentrations for a water quality analysis simulation program to model the river. River flows from upstream and downstream boundaries of the study area were used as predictors. The symbolic regression technique developed a variety of candidate models to choose from due to multiple transformations and model structures considered. The resulting models had advantages such as better goodness-of-fit statistics, reasonable bounds to outputs, and smooth behavior. The major disadvantages of the technique are model complexity, difficulty to interpret, and overfitting. The Nash-Sutcliffe efficiencies of the models ranged from 0.61 to 0.88, and they adequately captured the upstream boundary, tributary, and stormwater concentrations. The results suggest symbolic regression can have significant applications in the areas of hydrologic, hydrodynamic, and water quality modeling.</abstract><doi>10.2175/106143014X14062131178998</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1061-4303
ispartof Water environment research, 2015-01, Vol.87 (1), p.26-34
issn 1061-4303
1554-7531
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1654670440
source Wiley Journals; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Freshwater
title Symbolic Regression of Upstream, Stormwater, and Tributary E. Coli Concentrations Using River Flows
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T14%3A42%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Symbolic%20Regression%20of%20Upstream,%20Stormwater,%20and%20Tributary%20E.%20Coli%20Concentrations%20Using%20River%20Flows&rft.jtitle=Water%20environment%20research&rft.au=Jagupilla,%20Sarath%20Chandra%20K&rft.date=2015-01-01&rft.volume=87&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=26&rft.epage=34&rft.pages=26-34&rft.issn=1061-4303&rft.eissn=1554-7531&rft_id=info:doi/10.2175/106143014X14062131178998&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1654670440%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1654670440&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true