Investigating the mode of action of sulfoxaflor: a fourth‐generation neonicotinoid

BACKGROUND: The precise mode of action of sulfoxaflor, a new nicotinic acetylcholine receptor‐modulating insecticide, is unclear. A detailed understanding of the mode of action, especially in relation to the neonicotinoids, is essential for recommending effective pest management practices. RESULTS:...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pest management science 2013-05, Vol.69 (5), p.607-619
Hauptverfasser: Cutler, Penny, Slater, Russell, Edmunds, Andrew JF, Maienfisch, Peter, Hall, Roger G, Earley, Fergus GP, Pitterna, Thomas, Pal, Sitaram, Paul, Verity‐Laura, Goodchild, Jim, Blacker, Melissa, Hagmann, Leonhard, Crossthwaite, Andrew J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 619
container_issue 5
container_start_page 607
container_title Pest management science
container_volume 69
creator Cutler, Penny
Slater, Russell
Edmunds, Andrew JF
Maienfisch, Peter
Hall, Roger G
Earley, Fergus GP
Pitterna, Thomas
Pal, Sitaram
Paul, Verity‐Laura
Goodchild, Jim
Blacker, Melissa
Hagmann, Leonhard
Crossthwaite, Andrew J
description BACKGROUND: The precise mode of action of sulfoxaflor, a new nicotinic acetylcholine receptor‐modulating insecticide, is unclear. A detailed understanding of the mode of action, especially in relation to the neonicotinoids, is essential for recommending effective pest management practices. RESULTS: Radiolabel binding experiments using a tritiated analogue of sulfoxaflor ([³H]‐methyl‐SFX) performed on membranes from Myzus persicae demonstrate that sulfoxaflor interacts specifically with the high‐affinity imidacloprid binding site present in a subpopulation of the total nAChR pool. In competition studies, imidacloprid‐like neonicotinoids displace [³H]‐methyl‐SFX at pM concentrations. The effects of sulfoxaflor on the exposed aphid nervous system in situ are analogous to those of imidacloprid and nitenpyram, and finally the high‐affinity sulfoxaflor binding site is absent in a Myzus persicae strain (clone FRC) possessing a single amino acid point mutation (R81T) in the β‐nAChR, a region critical for neonicotinoid interaction. CONCLUSION: The nicotinic acetylcholine receptor pharmacological profile of sulfoxaflor in aphids is consistent with that of imidacloprid. Additionally, the insecticidal activity of sulfoxaflor and the current commercialised neonicotinoids is affected by the point mutation in FRC Myzus persicae. Therefore, it is suggested that sulfoxalfor be considered a neonicotinoid, and that this be taken into account when recommending insecticide rotation partnering for effective resistance management programmes. © 2012 Society of Chemical Industry
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ps.3413
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1654669993</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2946549591</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5363-90266cddb471d5c55ce7663e5450b718e7479f3582ce3590d555b8f1791059063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0ttqFDEYAOBQlJ4svoEOFKlQps1hkky8k6UnXLTQLd27kM0k29TZyZrM9HDnI_iMPomZzrqCIF7lD3z8h_wB4DWCRwhCfLyMR6RAZANsI4pZXghRvljH5XQL7MR4ByEUQuBNsIUJQhhBsg0mF829ia2bq9Y186y9NdnCVybzNlO6db7po9jV1j8qW_vwIVOZ9V1ob39-_zE3jQnqWTXGN077lMS76hV4aVUdzd7q3AXXpyeT0Xk-_nJ2Mfo4zjUljOQCYsZ0Vc0KjiqqKdWGM0YMLSiccVQaXnBhCS2xNoQKWFFKZ6VFXCCYrozsgvdD3mXw37o0hly4qE1dq9ROFyVitGAszUz-TwlmHAvBcKL7f9G7NHCTBulVCTHCDCZ1MCgdfIzBWLkMbqHCk0RQ9juRyyj7nST5ZpWvmy1MtXa_l5DAuxVQUavaBtVoF_84jgvMUd_Y4eAeXG2e_lVPXl6tyuaDdrE1j2utwlfJOOFU3nw-k1P86Xw8mkxl_5hvB2-Vl2oeUgfXVxiiIn0bLqDg5Bd3o7f2</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1328021260</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Investigating the mode of action of sulfoxaflor: a fourth‐generation neonicotinoid</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Cutler, Penny ; Slater, Russell ; Edmunds, Andrew JF ; Maienfisch, Peter ; Hall, Roger G ; Earley, Fergus GP ; Pitterna, Thomas ; Pal, Sitaram ; Paul, Verity‐Laura ; Goodchild, Jim ; Blacker, Melissa ; Hagmann, Leonhard ; Crossthwaite, Andrew J</creator><creatorcontrib>Cutler, Penny ; Slater, Russell ; Edmunds, Andrew JF ; Maienfisch, Peter ; Hall, Roger G ; Earley, Fergus GP ; Pitterna, Thomas ; Pal, Sitaram ; Paul, Verity‐Laura ; Goodchild, Jim ; Blacker, Melissa ; Hagmann, Leonhard ; Crossthwaite, Andrew J</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND: The precise mode of action of sulfoxaflor, a new nicotinic acetylcholine receptor‐modulating insecticide, is unclear. A detailed understanding of the mode of action, especially in relation to the neonicotinoids, is essential for recommending effective pest management practices. RESULTS: Radiolabel binding experiments using a tritiated analogue of sulfoxaflor ([³H]‐methyl‐SFX) performed on membranes from Myzus persicae demonstrate that sulfoxaflor interacts specifically with the high‐affinity imidacloprid binding site present in a subpopulation of the total nAChR pool. In competition studies, imidacloprid‐like neonicotinoids displace [³H]‐methyl‐SFX at pM concentrations. The effects of sulfoxaflor on the exposed aphid nervous system in situ are analogous to those of imidacloprid and nitenpyram, and finally the high‐affinity sulfoxaflor binding site is absent in a Myzus persicae strain (clone FRC) possessing a single amino acid point mutation (R81T) in the β‐nAChR, a region critical for neonicotinoid interaction. CONCLUSION: The nicotinic acetylcholine receptor pharmacological profile of sulfoxaflor in aphids is consistent with that of imidacloprid. Additionally, the insecticidal activity of sulfoxaflor and the current commercialised neonicotinoids is affected by the point mutation in FRC Myzus persicae. Therefore, it is suggested that sulfoxalfor be considered a neonicotinoid, and that this be taken into account when recommending insecticide rotation partnering for effective resistance management programmes. © 2012 Society of Chemical Industry</description><identifier>ISSN: 1526-498X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-4998</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ps.3413</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23112103</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PMSCFC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Aphididae ; Aphids ; Binding sites ; Binding, Competitive ; Biological and medical sciences ; Control ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Imidacloprid ; insecticidal properties ; Insecticide Resistance ; Insecticides ; Insecticides - toxicity ; Insects ; mechanism of action ; Mutation ; Myzus persicae ; nervous system ; nicotinic acetylcholine receptor ; nitenpyram ; Pest control ; pest management ; Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection ; point mutation ; Protozoa. Invertebrates ; Pyridines - chemical synthesis ; Pyridines - toxicity ; radiolabel ; Receptors, Nicotinic - chemistry ; resistance ; resistance management ; Sulfur Compounds - chemical synthesis ; Sulfur Compounds - toxicity ; Tritium</subject><ispartof>Pest management science, 2013-05, Vol.69 (5), p.607-619</ispartof><rights>2012 Society of Chemical Industry</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2012 Society of Chemical Industry.</rights><rights>Copyright Wiley Subscription Services, Inc. May 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5363-90266cddb471d5c55ce7663e5450b718e7479f3582ce3590d555b8f1791059063</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5363-90266cddb471d5c55ce7663e5450b718e7479f3582ce3590d555b8f1791059063</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fps.3413$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fps.3413$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=27242712$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23112103$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cutler, Penny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slater, Russell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edmunds, Andrew JF</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maienfisch, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, Roger G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Earley, Fergus GP</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pitterna, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pal, Sitaram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paul, Verity‐Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodchild, Jim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blacker, Melissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hagmann, Leonhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crossthwaite, Andrew J</creatorcontrib><title>Investigating the mode of action of sulfoxaflor: a fourth‐generation neonicotinoid</title><title>Pest management science</title><addtitle>Pest. Manag. Sci</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND: The precise mode of action of sulfoxaflor, a new nicotinic acetylcholine receptor‐modulating insecticide, is unclear. A detailed understanding of the mode of action, especially in relation to the neonicotinoids, is essential for recommending effective pest management practices. RESULTS: Radiolabel binding experiments using a tritiated analogue of sulfoxaflor ([³H]‐methyl‐SFX) performed on membranes from Myzus persicae demonstrate that sulfoxaflor interacts specifically with the high‐affinity imidacloprid binding site present in a subpopulation of the total nAChR pool. In competition studies, imidacloprid‐like neonicotinoids displace [³H]‐methyl‐SFX at pM concentrations. The effects of sulfoxaflor on the exposed aphid nervous system in situ are analogous to those of imidacloprid and nitenpyram, and finally the high‐affinity sulfoxaflor binding site is absent in a Myzus persicae strain (clone FRC) possessing a single amino acid point mutation (R81T) in the β‐nAChR, a region critical for neonicotinoid interaction. CONCLUSION: The nicotinic acetylcholine receptor pharmacological profile of sulfoxaflor in aphids is consistent with that of imidacloprid. Additionally, the insecticidal activity of sulfoxaflor and the current commercialised neonicotinoids is affected by the point mutation in FRC Myzus persicae. Therefore, it is suggested that sulfoxalfor be considered a neonicotinoid, and that this be taken into account when recommending insecticide rotation partnering for effective resistance management programmes. © 2012 Society of Chemical Industry</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Aphididae</subject><subject>Aphids</subject><subject>Binding sites</subject><subject>Binding, Competitive</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Imidacloprid</subject><subject>insecticidal properties</subject><subject>Insecticide Resistance</subject><subject>Insecticides</subject><subject>Insecticides - toxicity</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>mechanism of action</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>Myzus persicae</subject><subject>nervous system</subject><subject>nicotinic acetylcholine receptor</subject><subject>nitenpyram</subject><subject>Pest control</subject><subject>pest management</subject><subject>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</subject><subject>point mutation</subject><subject>Protozoa. Invertebrates</subject><subject>Pyridines - chemical synthesis</subject><subject>Pyridines - toxicity</subject><subject>radiolabel</subject><subject>Receptors, Nicotinic - chemistry</subject><subject>resistance</subject><subject>resistance management</subject><subject>Sulfur Compounds - chemical synthesis</subject><subject>Sulfur Compounds - toxicity</subject><subject>Tritium</subject><issn>1526-498X</issn><issn>1526-4998</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0ttqFDEYAOBQlJ4svoEOFKlQps1hkky8k6UnXLTQLd27kM0k29TZyZrM9HDnI_iMPomZzrqCIF7lD3z8h_wB4DWCRwhCfLyMR6RAZANsI4pZXghRvljH5XQL7MR4ByEUQuBNsIUJQhhBsg0mF829ia2bq9Y186y9NdnCVybzNlO6db7po9jV1j8qW_vwIVOZ9V1ob39-_zE3jQnqWTXGN077lMS76hV4aVUdzd7q3AXXpyeT0Xk-_nJ2Mfo4zjUljOQCYsZ0Vc0KjiqqKdWGM0YMLSiccVQaXnBhCS2xNoQKWFFKZ6VFXCCYrozsgvdD3mXw37o0hly4qE1dq9ROFyVitGAszUz-TwlmHAvBcKL7f9G7NHCTBulVCTHCDCZ1MCgdfIzBWLkMbqHCk0RQ9juRyyj7nST5ZpWvmy1MtXa_l5DAuxVQUavaBtVoF_84jgvMUd_Y4eAeXG2e_lVPXl6tyuaDdrE1j2utwlfJOOFU3nw-k1P86Xw8mkxl_5hvB2-Vl2oeUgfXVxiiIn0bLqDg5Bd3o7f2</recordid><startdate>201305</startdate><enddate>201305</enddate><creator>Cutler, Penny</creator><creator>Slater, Russell</creator><creator>Edmunds, Andrew JF</creator><creator>Maienfisch, Peter</creator><creator>Hall, Roger G</creator><creator>Earley, Fergus GP</creator><creator>Pitterna, Thomas</creator><creator>Pal, Sitaram</creator><creator>Paul, Verity‐Laura</creator><creator>Goodchild, Jim</creator><creator>Blacker, Melissa</creator><creator>Hagmann, Leonhard</creator><creator>Crossthwaite, Andrew J</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201305</creationdate><title>Investigating the mode of action of sulfoxaflor: a fourth‐generation neonicotinoid</title><author>Cutler, Penny ; Slater, Russell ; Edmunds, Andrew JF ; Maienfisch, Peter ; Hall, Roger G ; Earley, Fergus GP ; Pitterna, Thomas ; Pal, Sitaram ; Paul, Verity‐Laura ; Goodchild, Jim ; Blacker, Melissa ; Hagmann, Leonhard ; Crossthwaite, Andrew J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5363-90266cddb471d5c55ce7663e5450b718e7479f3582ce3590d555b8f1791059063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Aphididae</topic><topic>Aphids</topic><topic>Binding sites</topic><topic>Binding, Competitive</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Imidacloprid</topic><topic>insecticidal properties</topic><topic>Insecticide Resistance</topic><topic>Insecticides</topic><topic>Insecticides - toxicity</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>mechanism of action</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>Myzus persicae</topic><topic>nervous system</topic><topic>nicotinic acetylcholine receptor</topic><topic>nitenpyram</topic><topic>Pest control</topic><topic>pest management</topic><topic>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</topic><topic>point mutation</topic><topic>Protozoa. Invertebrates</topic><topic>Pyridines - chemical synthesis</topic><topic>Pyridines - toxicity</topic><topic>radiolabel</topic><topic>Receptors, Nicotinic - chemistry</topic><topic>resistance</topic><topic>resistance management</topic><topic>Sulfur Compounds - chemical synthesis</topic><topic>Sulfur Compounds - toxicity</topic><topic>Tritium</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cutler, Penny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slater, Russell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edmunds, Andrew JF</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maienfisch, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, Roger G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Earley, Fergus GP</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pitterna, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pal, Sitaram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paul, Verity‐Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodchild, Jim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blacker, Melissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hagmann, Leonhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crossthwaite, Andrew J</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pest management science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cutler, Penny</au><au>Slater, Russell</au><au>Edmunds, Andrew JF</au><au>Maienfisch, Peter</au><au>Hall, Roger G</au><au>Earley, Fergus GP</au><au>Pitterna, Thomas</au><au>Pal, Sitaram</au><au>Paul, Verity‐Laura</au><au>Goodchild, Jim</au><au>Blacker, Melissa</au><au>Hagmann, Leonhard</au><au>Crossthwaite, Andrew J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Investigating the mode of action of sulfoxaflor: a fourth‐generation neonicotinoid</atitle><jtitle>Pest management science</jtitle><addtitle>Pest. Manag. Sci</addtitle><date>2013-05</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>607</spage><epage>619</epage><pages>607-619</pages><issn>1526-498X</issn><eissn>1526-4998</eissn><coden>PMSCFC</coden><abstract>BACKGROUND: The precise mode of action of sulfoxaflor, a new nicotinic acetylcholine receptor‐modulating insecticide, is unclear. A detailed understanding of the mode of action, especially in relation to the neonicotinoids, is essential for recommending effective pest management practices. RESULTS: Radiolabel binding experiments using a tritiated analogue of sulfoxaflor ([³H]‐methyl‐SFX) performed on membranes from Myzus persicae demonstrate that sulfoxaflor interacts specifically with the high‐affinity imidacloprid binding site present in a subpopulation of the total nAChR pool. In competition studies, imidacloprid‐like neonicotinoids displace [³H]‐methyl‐SFX at pM concentrations. The effects of sulfoxaflor on the exposed aphid nervous system in situ are analogous to those of imidacloprid and nitenpyram, and finally the high‐affinity sulfoxaflor binding site is absent in a Myzus persicae strain (clone FRC) possessing a single amino acid point mutation (R81T) in the β‐nAChR, a region critical for neonicotinoid interaction. CONCLUSION: The nicotinic acetylcholine receptor pharmacological profile of sulfoxaflor in aphids is consistent with that of imidacloprid. Additionally, the insecticidal activity of sulfoxaflor and the current commercialised neonicotinoids is affected by the point mutation in FRC Myzus persicae. Therefore, it is suggested that sulfoxalfor be considered a neonicotinoid, and that this be taken into account when recommending insecticide rotation partnering for effective resistance management programmes. © 2012 Society of Chemical Industry</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><pmid>23112103</pmid><doi>10.1002/ps.3413</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1526-498X
ispartof Pest management science, 2013-05, Vol.69 (5), p.607-619
issn 1526-498X
1526-4998
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1654669993
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Animals
Aphididae
Aphids
Binding sites
Binding, Competitive
Biological and medical sciences
Control
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Imidacloprid
insecticidal properties
Insecticide Resistance
Insecticides
Insecticides - toxicity
Insects
mechanism of action
Mutation
Myzus persicae
nervous system
nicotinic acetylcholine receptor
nitenpyram
Pest control
pest management
Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection
point mutation
Protozoa. Invertebrates
Pyridines - chemical synthesis
Pyridines - toxicity
radiolabel
Receptors, Nicotinic - chemistry
resistance
resistance management
Sulfur Compounds - chemical synthesis
Sulfur Compounds - toxicity
Tritium
title Investigating the mode of action of sulfoxaflor: a fourth‐generation neonicotinoid
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T05%3A30%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Investigating%20the%20mode%20of%20action%20of%20sulfoxaflor:%20a%20fourth%E2%80%90generation%20neonicotinoid&rft.jtitle=Pest%20management%20science&rft.au=Cutler,%20Penny&rft.date=2013-05&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=607&rft.epage=619&rft.pages=607-619&rft.issn=1526-498X&rft.eissn=1526-4998&rft.coden=PMSCFC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ps.3413&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2946549591%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1328021260&rft_id=info:pmid/23112103&rfr_iscdi=true