Fabrics for testing the ignition propensity of cigarettes
This paper reports an analysis of data from a study conducted by the cigarette industry to determine whether the fabrics used in a measurement method for cigarette ignition propensity reasonably represent the ignition behaviour of actual upholstery fabrics. A ‘consistency score’ is defined to evalua...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Fire and materials 1997-11, Vol.21 (6), p.259-264 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 264 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 259 |
container_title | Fire and materials |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Eberhardt, Keith R. Levenson, Mark S. Gann, Richard G. |
description | This paper reports an analysis of data from a study conducted by the cigarette industry to determine whether the fabrics used in a measurement method for cigarette ignition propensity reasonably represent the ignition behaviour of actual upholstery fabrics. A ‘consistency score’ is defined to evaluate objectively the relative agreement of ignition test results on various test fabrics compared with the cotton duck fabrics used in the measurement method. Particular attention is paid to those cases where the cigarettes show statistically significant differences by the chi‐squared test. This analysis finds that the aggregated set of 79 industry fabrics ranks the four test cigarettes in the same order as do the three cotton duck fabrics in the measurement method. Thus, to the extent that the industry set is representative of those fabrics used in upholstery, it would be proper to use the three test fabrics as surrogates for the purpose of determining the relative ignition propensity of a cigarette. The analysis does identify six to ten fabrics that would be expected to show persistent reversals compared to the aggregate ordering; however, three‐fourths of the fabrics rank the cigarettes consistently with the cotton duck fabrics. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1018(199711/12)21:6<259::AID-FAM619>3.0.CO;2-U |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16541805</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>16541805</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3329-fa5a6faaf41e706da12cc49fb2fbb0c79536d4d5ed43fc260f9feeb056de714b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkFGL00AUhYMoWFf_Qx5Edh_SvXcmmWSqCCW1a2G1gltX8eEymczU0WxSZ7Jo_70pKX1R8Glg-O45hy-K5ghTBGCX5x9X5eoCQcoEAYtzlDJHvER2wXAmXrFMzmbz1SJZzt8JlK_5FKbl-iVLNg-iyenqYTQBDkUCGeDj6EkI3wGgKHIxieRSVd7pENvOx70JvWu3cf_NxG7but51bbzz3c60wfX7uLOxdlvlTT-QT6NHVjXBPDu-Z9Fm-eamfJtcr69W5fw60ZwzmViVKWGVsimaHEStkGmdSlsxW1Wgc5lxUad1ZuqUW80EWGmNqSATtckxrfhZ9GLMHYb8vB8W0p0L2jSNak13HwhFlmIB2QB-GUHtuxC8sbTz7k75PSHQQSbRQSYdtNBBC40yCRkxJEGDTKJBJo0yiRNQuSZGmyH7-XGEClo11qtWu3AqYFgUkOOAfR2xX64x-7_6_1__z_bjz5CejOku9Ob3KV35HyRynmd0-_6KFvnik_j84ZZu-B8CRqWe</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16541805</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fabrics for testing the ignition propensity of cigarettes</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Eberhardt, Keith R. ; Levenson, Mark S. ; Gann, Richard G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Eberhardt, Keith R. ; Levenson, Mark S. ; Gann, Richard G.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper reports an analysis of data from a study conducted by the cigarette industry to determine whether the fabrics used in a measurement method for cigarette ignition propensity reasonably represent the ignition behaviour of actual upholstery fabrics. A ‘consistency score’ is defined to evaluate objectively the relative agreement of ignition test results on various test fabrics compared with the cotton duck fabrics used in the measurement method. Particular attention is paid to those cases where the cigarettes show statistically significant differences by the chi‐squared test. This analysis finds that the aggregated set of 79 industry fabrics ranks the four test cigarettes in the same order as do the three cotton duck fabrics in the measurement method. Thus, to the extent that the industry set is representative of those fabrics used in upholstery, it would be proper to use the three test fabrics as surrogates for the purpose of determining the relative ignition propensity of a cigarette. The analysis does identify six to ten fabrics that would be expected to show persistent reversals compared to the aggregate ordering; however, three‐fourths of the fabrics rank the cigarettes consistently with the cotton duck fabrics. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0308-0501</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1018</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1018(199711/12)21:6<259::AID-FAM619>3.0.CO;2-U</identifier><identifier>CODEN: FMATDV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Building technical equipments ; Buildings ; Buildings. Public works ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fire behavior of materials and structures ; Fire protection</subject><ispartof>Fire and materials, 1997-11, Vol.21 (6), p.259-264</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2F%28SICI%291099-1018%28199711%2F12%2921%3A6%3C259%3A%3AAID-FAM619%3E3.0.CO%3B2-U$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2F%28SICI%291099-1018%28199711%2F12%2921%3A6%3C259%3A%3AAID-FAM619%3E3.0.CO%3B2-U$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2188071$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eberhardt, Keith R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levenson, Mark S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gann, Richard G.</creatorcontrib><title>Fabrics for testing the ignition propensity of cigarettes</title><title>Fire and materials</title><addtitle>Fire Mater</addtitle><description>This paper reports an analysis of data from a study conducted by the cigarette industry to determine whether the fabrics used in a measurement method for cigarette ignition propensity reasonably represent the ignition behaviour of actual upholstery fabrics. A ‘consistency score’ is defined to evaluate objectively the relative agreement of ignition test results on various test fabrics compared with the cotton duck fabrics used in the measurement method. Particular attention is paid to those cases where the cigarettes show statistically significant differences by the chi‐squared test. This analysis finds that the aggregated set of 79 industry fabrics ranks the four test cigarettes in the same order as do the three cotton duck fabrics in the measurement method. Thus, to the extent that the industry set is representative of those fabrics used in upholstery, it would be proper to use the three test fabrics as surrogates for the purpose of determining the relative ignition propensity of a cigarette. The analysis does identify six to ten fabrics that would be expected to show persistent reversals compared to the aggregate ordering; however, three‐fourths of the fabrics rank the cigarettes consistently with the cotton duck fabrics. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Building technical equipments</subject><subject>Buildings</subject><subject>Buildings. Public works</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fire behavior of materials and structures</subject><subject>Fire protection</subject><issn>0308-0501</issn><issn>1099-1018</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkFGL00AUhYMoWFf_Qx5Edh_SvXcmmWSqCCW1a2G1gltX8eEymczU0WxSZ7Jo_70pKX1R8Glg-O45hy-K5ghTBGCX5x9X5eoCQcoEAYtzlDJHvER2wXAmXrFMzmbz1SJZzt8JlK_5FKbl-iVLNg-iyenqYTQBDkUCGeDj6EkI3wGgKHIxieRSVd7pENvOx70JvWu3cf_NxG7but51bbzz3c60wfX7uLOxdlvlTT-QT6NHVjXBPDu-Z9Fm-eamfJtcr69W5fw60ZwzmViVKWGVsimaHEStkGmdSlsxW1Wgc5lxUad1ZuqUW80EWGmNqSATtckxrfhZ9GLMHYb8vB8W0p0L2jSNak13HwhFlmIB2QB-GUHtuxC8sbTz7k75PSHQQSbRQSYdtNBBC40yCRkxJEGDTKJBJo0yiRNQuSZGmyH7-XGEClo11qtWu3AqYFgUkOOAfR2xX64x-7_6_1__z_bjz5CejOku9Ob3KV35HyRynmd0-_6KFvnik_j84ZZu-B8CRqWe</recordid><startdate>199711</startdate><enddate>199711</enddate><creator>Eberhardt, Keith R.</creator><creator>Levenson, Mark S.</creator><creator>Gann, Richard G.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199711</creationdate><title>Fabrics for testing the ignition propensity of cigarettes</title><author>Eberhardt, Keith R. ; Levenson, Mark S. ; Gann, Richard G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3329-fa5a6faaf41e706da12cc49fb2fbb0c79536d4d5ed43fc260f9feeb056de714b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Building technical equipments</topic><topic>Buildings</topic><topic>Buildings. Public works</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fire behavior of materials and structures</topic><topic>Fire protection</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eberhardt, Keith R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levenson, Mark S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gann, Richard G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Fire and materials</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eberhardt, Keith R.</au><au>Levenson, Mark S.</au><au>Gann, Richard G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fabrics for testing the ignition propensity of cigarettes</atitle><jtitle>Fire and materials</jtitle><addtitle>Fire Mater</addtitle><date>1997-11</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>259</spage><epage>264</epage><pages>259-264</pages><issn>0308-0501</issn><eissn>1099-1018</eissn><coden>FMATDV</coden><abstract>This paper reports an analysis of data from a study conducted by the cigarette industry to determine whether the fabrics used in a measurement method for cigarette ignition propensity reasonably represent the ignition behaviour of actual upholstery fabrics. A ‘consistency score’ is defined to evaluate objectively the relative agreement of ignition test results on various test fabrics compared with the cotton duck fabrics used in the measurement method. Particular attention is paid to those cases where the cigarettes show statistically significant differences by the chi‐squared test. This analysis finds that the aggregated set of 79 industry fabrics ranks the four test cigarettes in the same order as do the three cotton duck fabrics in the measurement method. Thus, to the extent that the industry set is representative of those fabrics used in upholstery, it would be proper to use the three test fabrics as surrogates for the purpose of determining the relative ignition propensity of a cigarette. The analysis does identify six to ten fabrics that would be expected to show persistent reversals compared to the aggregate ordering; however, three‐fourths of the fabrics rank the cigarettes consistently with the cotton duck fabrics. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/(SICI)1099-1018(199711/12)21:6<259::AID-FAM619>3.0.CO;2-U</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0308-0501 |
ispartof | Fire and materials, 1997-11, Vol.21 (6), p.259-264 |
issn | 0308-0501 1099-1018 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16541805 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Applied sciences Building technical equipments Buildings Buildings. Public works Exact sciences and technology Fire behavior of materials and structures Fire protection |
title | Fabrics for testing the ignition propensity of cigarettes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T09%3A34%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fabrics%20for%20testing%20the%20ignition%20propensity%20of%20cigarettes&rft.jtitle=Fire%20and%20materials&rft.au=Eberhardt,%20Keith%20R.&rft.date=1997-11&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=259&rft.epage=264&rft.pages=259-264&rft.issn=0308-0501&rft.eissn=1099-1018&rft.coden=FMATDV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1018(199711/12)21:6%3C259::AID-FAM619%3E3.0.CO;2-U&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E16541805%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16541805&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |