Fabrics for testing the ignition propensity of cigarettes

This paper reports an analysis of data from a study conducted by the cigarette industry to determine whether the fabrics used in a measurement method for cigarette ignition propensity reasonably represent the ignition behaviour of actual upholstery fabrics. A ‘consistency score’ is defined to evalua...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Fire and materials 1997-11, Vol.21 (6), p.259-264
Hauptverfasser: Eberhardt, Keith R., Levenson, Mark S., Gann, Richard G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 264
container_issue 6
container_start_page 259
container_title Fire and materials
container_volume 21
creator Eberhardt, Keith R.
Levenson, Mark S.
Gann, Richard G.
description This paper reports an analysis of data from a study conducted by the cigarette industry to determine whether the fabrics used in a measurement method for cigarette ignition propensity reasonably represent the ignition behaviour of actual upholstery fabrics. A ‘consistency score’ is defined to evaluate objectively the relative agreement of ignition test results on various test fabrics compared with the cotton duck fabrics used in the measurement method. Particular attention is paid to those cases where the cigarettes show statistically significant differences by the chi‐squared test. This analysis finds that the aggregated set of 79 industry fabrics ranks the four test cigarettes in the same order as do the three cotton duck fabrics in the measurement method. Thus, to the extent that the industry set is representative of those fabrics used in upholstery, it would be proper to use the three test fabrics as surrogates for the purpose of determining the relative ignition propensity of a cigarette. The analysis does identify six to ten fabrics that would be expected to show persistent reversals compared to the aggregate ordering; however, three‐fourths of the fabrics rank the cigarettes consistently with the cotton duck fabrics. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1018(199711/12)21:6<259::AID-FAM619>3.0.CO;2-U
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16541805</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>16541805</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3329-fa5a6faaf41e706da12cc49fb2fbb0c79536d4d5ed43fc260f9feeb056de714b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkFGL00AUhYMoWFf_Qx5Edh_SvXcmmWSqCCW1a2G1gltX8eEymczU0WxSZ7Jo_70pKX1R8Glg-O45hy-K5ghTBGCX5x9X5eoCQcoEAYtzlDJHvER2wXAmXrFMzmbz1SJZzt8JlK_5FKbl-iVLNg-iyenqYTQBDkUCGeDj6EkI3wGgKHIxieRSVd7pENvOx70JvWu3cf_NxG7but51bbzz3c60wfX7uLOxdlvlTT-QT6NHVjXBPDu-Z9Fm-eamfJtcr69W5fw60ZwzmViVKWGVsimaHEStkGmdSlsxW1Wgc5lxUad1ZuqUW80EWGmNqSATtckxrfhZ9GLMHYb8vB8W0p0L2jSNak13HwhFlmIB2QB-GUHtuxC8sbTz7k75PSHQQSbRQSYdtNBBC40yCRkxJEGDTKJBJo0yiRNQuSZGmyH7-XGEClo11qtWu3AqYFgUkOOAfR2xX64x-7_6_1__z_bjz5CejOku9Ob3KV35HyRynmd0-_6KFvnik_j84ZZu-B8CRqWe</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16541805</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fabrics for testing the ignition propensity of cigarettes</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Eberhardt, Keith R. ; Levenson, Mark S. ; Gann, Richard G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Eberhardt, Keith R. ; Levenson, Mark S. ; Gann, Richard G.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper reports an analysis of data from a study conducted by the cigarette industry to determine whether the fabrics used in a measurement method for cigarette ignition propensity reasonably represent the ignition behaviour of actual upholstery fabrics. A ‘consistency score’ is defined to evaluate objectively the relative agreement of ignition test results on various test fabrics compared with the cotton duck fabrics used in the measurement method. Particular attention is paid to those cases where the cigarettes show statistically significant differences by the chi‐squared test. This analysis finds that the aggregated set of 79 industry fabrics ranks the four test cigarettes in the same order as do the three cotton duck fabrics in the measurement method. Thus, to the extent that the industry set is representative of those fabrics used in upholstery, it would be proper to use the three test fabrics as surrogates for the purpose of determining the relative ignition propensity of a cigarette. The analysis does identify six to ten fabrics that would be expected to show persistent reversals compared to the aggregate ordering; however, three‐fourths of the fabrics rank the cigarettes consistently with the cotton duck fabrics. © 1997 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0308-0501</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1018</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1018(199711/12)21:6&lt;259::AID-FAM619&gt;3.0.CO;2-U</identifier><identifier>CODEN: FMATDV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Building technical equipments ; Buildings ; Buildings. Public works ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fire behavior of materials and structures ; Fire protection</subject><ispartof>Fire and materials, 1997-11, Vol.21 (6), p.259-264</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1997 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2F%28SICI%291099-1018%28199711%2F12%2921%3A6%3C259%3A%3AAID-FAM619%3E3.0.CO%3B2-U$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2F%28SICI%291099-1018%28199711%2F12%2921%3A6%3C259%3A%3AAID-FAM619%3E3.0.CO%3B2-U$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2188071$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eberhardt, Keith R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levenson, Mark S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gann, Richard G.</creatorcontrib><title>Fabrics for testing the ignition propensity of cigarettes</title><title>Fire and materials</title><addtitle>Fire Mater</addtitle><description>This paper reports an analysis of data from a study conducted by the cigarette industry to determine whether the fabrics used in a measurement method for cigarette ignition propensity reasonably represent the ignition behaviour of actual upholstery fabrics. A ‘consistency score’ is defined to evaluate objectively the relative agreement of ignition test results on various test fabrics compared with the cotton duck fabrics used in the measurement method. Particular attention is paid to those cases where the cigarettes show statistically significant differences by the chi‐squared test. This analysis finds that the aggregated set of 79 industry fabrics ranks the four test cigarettes in the same order as do the three cotton duck fabrics in the measurement method. Thus, to the extent that the industry set is representative of those fabrics used in upholstery, it would be proper to use the three test fabrics as surrogates for the purpose of determining the relative ignition propensity of a cigarette. The analysis does identify six to ten fabrics that would be expected to show persistent reversals compared to the aggregate ordering; however, three‐fourths of the fabrics rank the cigarettes consistently with the cotton duck fabrics. © 1997 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Building technical equipments</subject><subject>Buildings</subject><subject>Buildings. Public works</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fire behavior of materials and structures</subject><subject>Fire protection</subject><issn>0308-0501</issn><issn>1099-1018</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkFGL00AUhYMoWFf_Qx5Edh_SvXcmmWSqCCW1a2G1gltX8eEymczU0WxSZ7Jo_70pKX1R8Glg-O45hy-K5ghTBGCX5x9X5eoCQcoEAYtzlDJHvER2wXAmXrFMzmbz1SJZzt8JlK_5FKbl-iVLNg-iyenqYTQBDkUCGeDj6EkI3wGgKHIxieRSVd7pENvOx70JvWu3cf_NxG7but51bbzz3c60wfX7uLOxdlvlTT-QT6NHVjXBPDu-Z9Fm-eamfJtcr69W5fw60ZwzmViVKWGVsimaHEStkGmdSlsxW1Wgc5lxUad1ZuqUW80EWGmNqSATtckxrfhZ9GLMHYb8vB8W0p0L2jSNak13HwhFlmIB2QB-GUHtuxC8sbTz7k75PSHQQSbRQSYdtNBBC40yCRkxJEGDTKJBJo0yiRNQuSZGmyH7-XGEClo11qtWu3AqYFgUkOOAfR2xX64x-7_6_1__z_bjz5CejOku9Ob3KV35HyRynmd0-_6KFvnik_j84ZZu-B8CRqWe</recordid><startdate>199711</startdate><enddate>199711</enddate><creator>Eberhardt, Keith R.</creator><creator>Levenson, Mark S.</creator><creator>Gann, Richard G.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199711</creationdate><title>Fabrics for testing the ignition propensity of cigarettes</title><author>Eberhardt, Keith R. ; Levenson, Mark S. ; Gann, Richard G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3329-fa5a6faaf41e706da12cc49fb2fbb0c79536d4d5ed43fc260f9feeb056de714b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Building technical equipments</topic><topic>Buildings</topic><topic>Buildings. Public works</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fire behavior of materials and structures</topic><topic>Fire protection</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eberhardt, Keith R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levenson, Mark S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gann, Richard G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Fire and materials</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eberhardt, Keith R.</au><au>Levenson, Mark S.</au><au>Gann, Richard G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fabrics for testing the ignition propensity of cigarettes</atitle><jtitle>Fire and materials</jtitle><addtitle>Fire Mater</addtitle><date>1997-11</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>259</spage><epage>264</epage><pages>259-264</pages><issn>0308-0501</issn><eissn>1099-1018</eissn><coden>FMATDV</coden><abstract>This paper reports an analysis of data from a study conducted by the cigarette industry to determine whether the fabrics used in a measurement method for cigarette ignition propensity reasonably represent the ignition behaviour of actual upholstery fabrics. A ‘consistency score’ is defined to evaluate objectively the relative agreement of ignition test results on various test fabrics compared with the cotton duck fabrics used in the measurement method. Particular attention is paid to those cases where the cigarettes show statistically significant differences by the chi‐squared test. This analysis finds that the aggregated set of 79 industry fabrics ranks the four test cigarettes in the same order as do the three cotton duck fabrics in the measurement method. Thus, to the extent that the industry set is representative of those fabrics used in upholstery, it would be proper to use the three test fabrics as surrogates for the purpose of determining the relative ignition propensity of a cigarette. The analysis does identify six to ten fabrics that would be expected to show persistent reversals compared to the aggregate ordering; however, three‐fourths of the fabrics rank the cigarettes consistently with the cotton duck fabrics. © 1997 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/(SICI)1099-1018(199711/12)21:6&lt;259::AID-FAM619&gt;3.0.CO;2-U</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0308-0501
ispartof Fire and materials, 1997-11, Vol.21 (6), p.259-264
issn 0308-0501
1099-1018
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16541805
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Applied sciences
Building technical equipments
Buildings
Buildings. Public works
Exact sciences and technology
Fire behavior of materials and structures
Fire protection
title Fabrics for testing the ignition propensity of cigarettes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T09%3A34%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fabrics%20for%20testing%20the%20ignition%20propensity%20of%20cigarettes&rft.jtitle=Fire%20and%20materials&rft.au=Eberhardt,%20Keith%20R.&rft.date=1997-11&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=259&rft.epage=264&rft.pages=259-264&rft.issn=0308-0501&rft.eissn=1099-1018&rft.coden=FMATDV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1018(199711/12)21:6%3C259::AID-FAM619%3E3.0.CO;2-U&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E16541805%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16541805&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true