Where along a river's length will vegetation most effectively stabilise stream banks?

Riparian vegetation has different impacts on stream processes depending upon its position in a catchment. Native riparian vegetation is increasingly becoming the favoured stream management tool but managers need to locate revegetation schemes where they will most effectively achieve ecological, geom...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Geomorphology (Amsterdam, Netherlands) Netherlands), 1998-05, Vol.23 (1), p.55-75
Hauptverfasser: Abernethy, Bruce, Rutherfurd, Ian D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 75
container_issue 1
container_start_page 55
container_title Geomorphology (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
container_volume 23
creator Abernethy, Bruce
Rutherfurd, Ian D
description Riparian vegetation has different impacts on stream processes depending upon its position in a catchment. Native riparian vegetation is increasingly becoming the favoured stream management tool but managers need to locate revegetation schemes where they will most effectively achieve ecological, geomorphological, or other, project goals. Using the Latrobe River in SE Australia as an example, this paper illustrates a structured decision-making approach for assessing the role of vegetation in stream bank erosion at different points throughout a catchment. Three bank-erosion process groups are identified: subaerial preparation, fluvial entrainment, and mass failure. Although these processes act on banks throughout the catchment there exists spatial zoning in the dominance of each process group over the others. Bank erosion in upper reaches is dominated by subaerial preparation, in mid-basin reaches by fluvial entrainment, and in the lower reaches by mass failure. We find that in upper reaches, windthrown trees are responsible for most bank sediment transfer to the flow. Where direct fluvial entrainment of bank material is the dominant erosion process, flow resistance due to vegetation becomes crucial. In reaches where bank slumping is the dominant erosion process, increased bank shear strength due to root reinforcement is the major role of vegetation in stabilising banks. Other effects, such as tree surcharge, and altered bank hydrology appear to exert only minor influences on the slumping process. Considering the above variables we are able to define a critical zone in which revegetation will be most effective in reducing bank erosion. On the Latrobe River, this zone occurs in that portion of the river where it first leaves the mountain front and meanders across a broad floodplain. This reach occupies the second quarter of the river's length. This information, combined with other scale analyses (e.g. ecological, hydrological), will assist river managers to plan physically based riparian revegetation strategies.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0169-555X(97)00089-5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16540234</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0169555X97000895</els_id><sourcerecordid>16540234</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a419t-bf3ae9578cf5488351523eaedb850e5ef4f99f98129a7d4ec93ace983e5a13a03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtKAzEUQIMoWKufIGQhPhajycykk6yKiC8ouNBid-E2vWmj6UxNxkr_3rSVbt3cB5z74BByytk1Z7x385qCyoQQo0tVXTHGZOr2SIfLKs96Soz2SWeHHJKjGD8SVFaKdcjwfYYBKfimnlKgwS0xXETqsZ62M_rjvKdLnGILrWtqOm9iS9FaNG0C_YrGFsbOu4ipCghzOob6M_aPyYEFH_HkL3fJ8OH-7e4pG7w8Pt_dDjIouWqzsS0AlaiksaKUshBc5AUCTsZSMBRoS6uUVZLnCqpJiUYVYFDJAgXwAljRJefbvYvQfH1jbPXcRYPeQ43Nd9S8J0qWF2UCxRY0oYkxoNWL4OYQVpozvZaoNxL12pBWld5I1CLNnf0dgGjA2wC1cXE3LGSlevJfLM9zVsn1F_0thsnJ0mHQ0TisDU5cSEr1pHH__PMLQ7aUUw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16540234</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Where along a river's length will vegetation most effectively stabilise stream banks?</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Abernethy, Bruce ; Rutherfurd, Ian D</creator><creatorcontrib>Abernethy, Bruce ; Rutherfurd, Ian D</creatorcontrib><description>Riparian vegetation has different impacts on stream processes depending upon its position in a catchment. Native riparian vegetation is increasingly becoming the favoured stream management tool but managers need to locate revegetation schemes where they will most effectively achieve ecological, geomorphological, or other, project goals. Using the Latrobe River in SE Australia as an example, this paper illustrates a structured decision-making approach for assessing the role of vegetation in stream bank erosion at different points throughout a catchment. Three bank-erosion process groups are identified: subaerial preparation, fluvial entrainment, and mass failure. Although these processes act on banks throughout the catchment there exists spatial zoning in the dominance of each process group over the others. Bank erosion in upper reaches is dominated by subaerial preparation, in mid-basin reaches by fluvial entrainment, and in the lower reaches by mass failure. We find that in upper reaches, windthrown trees are responsible for most bank sediment transfer to the flow. Where direct fluvial entrainment of bank material is the dominant erosion process, flow resistance due to vegetation becomes crucial. In reaches where bank slumping is the dominant erosion process, increased bank shear strength due to root reinforcement is the major role of vegetation in stabilising banks. Other effects, such as tree surcharge, and altered bank hydrology appear to exert only minor influences on the slumping process. Considering the above variables we are able to define a critical zone in which revegetation will be most effective in reducing bank erosion. On the Latrobe River, this zone occurs in that portion of the river where it first leaves the mountain front and meanders across a broad floodplain. This reach occupies the second quarter of the river's length. This information, combined with other scale analyses (e.g. ecological, hydrological), will assist river managers to plan physically based riparian revegetation strategies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0169-555X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-695X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0169-555X(97)00089-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Bgi / Prodig ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; erosion control ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fluvial forms and processes ; Freshwater ; Geomorphology ; Gippsland, Australia ; Marine and continental quaternary ; mass movements ; Physical geography ; river scale ; scour ; Surficial geology ; vegetation</subject><ispartof>Geomorphology (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 1998-05, Vol.23 (1), p.55-75</ispartof><rights>1998 Elsevier Science B.V.</rights><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Tous droits réservés © Prodig - Bibliographie Géographique Internationale (BGI), 1998</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a419t-bf3ae9578cf5488351523eaedb850e5ef4f99f98129a7d4ec93ace983e5a13a03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a419t-bf3ae9578cf5488351523eaedb850e5ef4f99f98129a7d4ec93ace983e5a13a03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-555X(97)00089-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2220784$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=5879685$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Abernethy, Bruce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rutherfurd, Ian D</creatorcontrib><title>Where along a river's length will vegetation most effectively stabilise stream banks?</title><title>Geomorphology (Amsterdam, Netherlands)</title><description>Riparian vegetation has different impacts on stream processes depending upon its position in a catchment. Native riparian vegetation is increasingly becoming the favoured stream management tool but managers need to locate revegetation schemes where they will most effectively achieve ecological, geomorphological, or other, project goals. Using the Latrobe River in SE Australia as an example, this paper illustrates a structured decision-making approach for assessing the role of vegetation in stream bank erosion at different points throughout a catchment. Three bank-erosion process groups are identified: subaerial preparation, fluvial entrainment, and mass failure. Although these processes act on banks throughout the catchment there exists spatial zoning in the dominance of each process group over the others. Bank erosion in upper reaches is dominated by subaerial preparation, in mid-basin reaches by fluvial entrainment, and in the lower reaches by mass failure. We find that in upper reaches, windthrown trees are responsible for most bank sediment transfer to the flow. Where direct fluvial entrainment of bank material is the dominant erosion process, flow resistance due to vegetation becomes crucial. In reaches where bank slumping is the dominant erosion process, increased bank shear strength due to root reinforcement is the major role of vegetation in stabilising banks. Other effects, such as tree surcharge, and altered bank hydrology appear to exert only minor influences on the slumping process. Considering the above variables we are able to define a critical zone in which revegetation will be most effective in reducing bank erosion. On the Latrobe River, this zone occurs in that portion of the river where it first leaves the mountain front and meanders across a broad floodplain. This reach occupies the second quarter of the river's length. This information, combined with other scale analyses (e.g. ecological, hydrological), will assist river managers to plan physically based riparian revegetation strategies.</description><subject>Bgi / Prodig</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>erosion control</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fluvial forms and processes</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Geomorphology</subject><subject>Gippsland, Australia</subject><subject>Marine and continental quaternary</subject><subject>mass movements</subject><subject>Physical geography</subject><subject>river scale</subject><subject>scour</subject><subject>Surficial geology</subject><subject>vegetation</subject><issn>0169-555X</issn><issn>1872-695X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMtKAzEUQIMoWKufIGQhPhajycykk6yKiC8ouNBid-E2vWmj6UxNxkr_3rSVbt3cB5z74BByytk1Z7x385qCyoQQo0tVXTHGZOr2SIfLKs96Soz2SWeHHJKjGD8SVFaKdcjwfYYBKfimnlKgwS0xXETqsZ62M_rjvKdLnGILrWtqOm9iS9FaNG0C_YrGFsbOu4ipCghzOob6M_aPyYEFH_HkL3fJ8OH-7e4pG7w8Pt_dDjIouWqzsS0AlaiksaKUshBc5AUCTsZSMBRoS6uUVZLnCqpJiUYVYFDJAgXwAljRJefbvYvQfH1jbPXcRYPeQ43Nd9S8J0qWF2UCxRY0oYkxoNWL4OYQVpozvZaoNxL12pBWld5I1CLNnf0dgGjA2wC1cXE3LGSlevJfLM9zVsn1F_0thsnJ0mHQ0TisDU5cSEr1pHH__PMLQ7aUUw</recordid><startdate>19980501</startdate><enddate>19980501</enddate><creator>Abernethy, Bruce</creator><creator>Rutherfurd, Ian D</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980501</creationdate><title>Where along a river's length will vegetation most effectively stabilise stream banks?</title><author>Abernethy, Bruce ; Rutherfurd, Ian D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a419t-bf3ae9578cf5488351523eaedb850e5ef4f99f98129a7d4ec93ace983e5a13a03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Bgi / Prodig</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>erosion control</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fluvial forms and processes</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Geomorphology</topic><topic>Gippsland, Australia</topic><topic>Marine and continental quaternary</topic><topic>mass movements</topic><topic>Physical geography</topic><topic>river scale</topic><topic>scour</topic><topic>Surficial geology</topic><topic>vegetation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Abernethy, Bruce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rutherfurd, Ian D</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Geomorphology (Amsterdam, Netherlands)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Abernethy, Bruce</au><au>Rutherfurd, Ian D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Where along a river's length will vegetation most effectively stabilise stream banks?</atitle><jtitle>Geomorphology (Amsterdam, Netherlands)</jtitle><date>1998-05-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>55</spage><epage>75</epage><pages>55-75</pages><issn>0169-555X</issn><eissn>1872-695X</eissn><abstract>Riparian vegetation has different impacts on stream processes depending upon its position in a catchment. Native riparian vegetation is increasingly becoming the favoured stream management tool but managers need to locate revegetation schemes where they will most effectively achieve ecological, geomorphological, or other, project goals. Using the Latrobe River in SE Australia as an example, this paper illustrates a structured decision-making approach for assessing the role of vegetation in stream bank erosion at different points throughout a catchment. Three bank-erosion process groups are identified: subaerial preparation, fluvial entrainment, and mass failure. Although these processes act on banks throughout the catchment there exists spatial zoning in the dominance of each process group over the others. Bank erosion in upper reaches is dominated by subaerial preparation, in mid-basin reaches by fluvial entrainment, and in the lower reaches by mass failure. We find that in upper reaches, windthrown trees are responsible for most bank sediment transfer to the flow. Where direct fluvial entrainment of bank material is the dominant erosion process, flow resistance due to vegetation becomes crucial. In reaches where bank slumping is the dominant erosion process, increased bank shear strength due to root reinforcement is the major role of vegetation in stabilising banks. Other effects, such as tree surcharge, and altered bank hydrology appear to exert only minor influences on the slumping process. Considering the above variables we are able to define a critical zone in which revegetation will be most effective in reducing bank erosion. On the Latrobe River, this zone occurs in that portion of the river where it first leaves the mountain front and meanders across a broad floodplain. This reach occupies the second quarter of the river's length. This information, combined with other scale analyses (e.g. ecological, hydrological), will assist river managers to plan physically based riparian revegetation strategies.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/S0169-555X(97)00089-5</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0169-555X
ispartof Geomorphology (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 1998-05, Vol.23 (1), p.55-75
issn 0169-555X
1872-695X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16540234
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Bgi / Prodig
Earth sciences
Earth, ocean, space
erosion control
Exact sciences and technology
Fluvial forms and processes
Freshwater
Geomorphology
Gippsland, Australia
Marine and continental quaternary
mass movements
Physical geography
river scale
scour
Surficial geology
vegetation
title Where along a river's length will vegetation most effectively stabilise stream banks?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T22%3A09%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Where%20along%20a%20river's%20length%20will%20vegetation%20most%20effectively%20stabilise%20stream%20banks?&rft.jtitle=Geomorphology%20(Amsterdam,%20Netherlands)&rft.au=Abernethy,%20Bruce&rft.date=1998-05-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=55&rft.epage=75&rft.pages=55-75&rft.issn=0169-555X&rft.eissn=1872-695X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0169-555X(97)00089-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E16540234%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16540234&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0169555X97000895&rfr_iscdi=true