Does the Slow movement have anything to offer nursing education?
The ideas of the Slow movement continue to gain support among those weary of the apparent incessant need for speed endemic in the 21st century. Currently the demands of efficiency require, if not doing more with less, then at least doing more within existing resources. Nursing education has not esca...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Nurse education today 2014-12, Vol.34 (12), p.1414-1416 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1416 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 1414 |
container_title | Nurse education today |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Sellman, Derek |
description | The ideas of the Slow movement continue to gain support among those weary of the apparent incessant need for speed endemic in the 21st century. Currently the demands of efficiency require, if not doing more with less, then at least doing more within existing resources. Nursing education has not escaped this efficiency requirement and nurse academics will be familiar with pressures that accompany demands to accomplish more with less. For good reason the pre-registration nursing curriculum remains under review, and revisions tend to add content to an already crowded curriculum. 6 references |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.nedt.2014.08.008 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1652767843</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0260691714002718</els_id><sourcerecordid>1629964279</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-17a9a7f66b3c8afc615da316ca4d734794cb315414ef55cc0143c3d7e64a34413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEtLw0AUhQdRbK3-AReSpZvEeWUmAUGlPqHgQl0P08mNTWlmdGZS6b83odWluLpw-c6B8yF0SnBGMBEXy8xCFTOKCc9wkWFc7KExyRlNqSzZPhpjKnAqSiJH6CiEJe4JSdkhGtGcEpHLcoyubx2EJC4geVm5r6R1a2jBxmSh15Bou4mLxr4n0SWursEntvNheEDVGR0bZ6-O0UGtVwFOdneC3u7vXqeP6ez54Wl6M0sNJzimROpSy1qIOTOFro0geaUZEUbzSjIuS27mjOSccKjz3Jh-EzOskiC4ZpwTNkHn294P7z47CFG1TTCwWmkLrguq30OlkAVn_0BpWQo-SJogukWNdyF4qNWHb1rtN4pgNUhWSzVIVoNkhQvVK-xDZ7v-bt5C9Rv5sdoDl1sAeiHrBrwKpgFroGo8mKgq1_zV_w1aWIw6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1629964279</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does the Slow movement have anything to offer nursing education?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Sellman, Derek</creator><creatorcontrib>Sellman, Derek</creatorcontrib><description>The ideas of the Slow movement continue to gain support among those weary of the apparent incessant need for speed endemic in the 21st century. Currently the demands of efficiency require, if not doing more with less, then at least doing more within existing resources. Nursing education has not escaped this efficiency requirement and nurse academics will be familiar with pressures that accompany demands to accomplish more with less. For good reason the pre-registration nursing curriculum remains under review, and revisions tend to add content to an already crowded curriculum. 6 references</description><identifier>ISSN: 0260-6917</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2793</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2014.08.008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25216579</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Scotland: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Donald Schön ; Education, Nursing ; Models, Educational ; Nursing ; Nursing education ; Nursing Theory ; Reflection ; The Slow movement ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Nurse education today, 2014-12, Vol.34 (12), p.1414-1416</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-17a9a7f66b3c8afc615da316ca4d734794cb315414ef55cc0143c3d7e64a34413</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2014.08.008$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25216579$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sellman, Derek</creatorcontrib><title>Does the Slow movement have anything to offer nursing education?</title><title>Nurse education today</title><addtitle>Nurse Educ Today</addtitle><description>The ideas of the Slow movement continue to gain support among those weary of the apparent incessant need for speed endemic in the 21st century. Currently the demands of efficiency require, if not doing more with less, then at least doing more within existing resources. Nursing education has not escaped this efficiency requirement and nurse academics will be familiar with pressures that accompany demands to accomplish more with less. For good reason the pre-registration nursing curriculum remains under review, and revisions tend to add content to an already crowded curriculum. 6 references</description><subject>Donald Schön</subject><subject>Education, Nursing</subject><subject>Models, Educational</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing education</subject><subject>Nursing Theory</subject><subject>Reflection</subject><subject>The Slow movement</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0260-6917</issn><issn>1532-2793</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkEtLw0AUhQdRbK3-AReSpZvEeWUmAUGlPqHgQl0P08mNTWlmdGZS6b83odWluLpw-c6B8yF0SnBGMBEXy8xCFTOKCc9wkWFc7KExyRlNqSzZPhpjKnAqSiJH6CiEJe4JSdkhGtGcEpHLcoyubx2EJC4geVm5r6R1a2jBxmSh15Bou4mLxr4n0SWursEntvNheEDVGR0bZ6-O0UGtVwFOdneC3u7vXqeP6ez54Wl6M0sNJzimROpSy1qIOTOFro0geaUZEUbzSjIuS27mjOSccKjz3Jh-EzOskiC4ZpwTNkHn294P7z47CFG1TTCwWmkLrguq30OlkAVn_0BpWQo-SJogukWNdyF4qNWHb1rtN4pgNUhWSzVIVoNkhQvVK-xDZ7v-bt5C9Rv5sdoDl1sAeiHrBrwKpgFroGo8mKgq1_zV_w1aWIw6</recordid><startdate>20141201</startdate><enddate>20141201</enddate><creator>Sellman, Derek</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141201</creationdate><title>Does the Slow movement have anything to offer nursing education?</title><author>Sellman, Derek</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-17a9a7f66b3c8afc615da316ca4d734794cb315414ef55cc0143c3d7e64a34413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Donald Schön</topic><topic>Education, Nursing</topic><topic>Models, Educational</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing education</topic><topic>Nursing Theory</topic><topic>Reflection</topic><topic>The Slow movement</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sellman, Derek</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><jtitle>Nurse education today</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sellman, Derek</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does the Slow movement have anything to offer nursing education?</atitle><jtitle>Nurse education today</jtitle><addtitle>Nurse Educ Today</addtitle><date>2014-12-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1414</spage><epage>1416</epage><pages>1414-1416</pages><issn>0260-6917</issn><eissn>1532-2793</eissn><abstract>The ideas of the Slow movement continue to gain support among those weary of the apparent incessant need for speed endemic in the 21st century. Currently the demands of efficiency require, if not doing more with less, then at least doing more within existing resources. Nursing education has not escaped this efficiency requirement and nurse academics will be familiar with pressures that accompany demands to accomplish more with less. For good reason the pre-registration nursing curriculum remains under review, and revisions tend to add content to an already crowded curriculum. 6 references</abstract><cop>Scotland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>25216579</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.nedt.2014.08.008</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0260-6917 |
ispartof | Nurse education today, 2014-12, Vol.34 (12), p.1414-1416 |
issn | 0260-6917 1532-2793 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1652767843 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Donald Schön Education, Nursing Models, Educational Nursing Nursing education Nursing Theory Reflection The Slow movement Time Factors |
title | Does the Slow movement have anything to offer nursing education? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T20%3A31%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20the%20Slow%20movement%20have%20anything%20to%20offer%20nursing%20education?&rft.jtitle=Nurse%20education%20today&rft.au=Sellman,%20Derek&rft.date=2014-12-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1414&rft.epage=1416&rft.pages=1414-1416&rft.issn=0260-6917&rft.eissn=1532-2793&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.nedt.2014.08.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1629964279%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1629964279&rft_id=info:pmid/25216579&rft_els_id=S0260691714002718&rfr_iscdi=true |