A randomized controlled study of manikin simulator fidelity on neonatal resuscitation program learning outcomes
The neonatal resuscitation program (NRP) has been developed to educate physicians and other health care providers about newborn resuscitation and has been shown to improve neonatal resuscitation skills. Simulation-based training is recommended as an effective modality for instructing neonatal resusc...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice 2015-03, Vol.20 (1), p.205-218 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 218 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 205 |
| container_title | Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice |
| container_volume | 20 |
| creator | Curran, Vernon Fleet, Lisa White, Susan Bessell, Clare Deshpandey, Akhil Drover, Anne Hayward, Mark Valcour, James |
| description | The neonatal resuscitation program (NRP) has been developed to educate physicians and other health care providers about newborn resuscitation and has been shown to improve neonatal resuscitation skills. Simulation-based training is recommended as an effective modality for instructing neonatal resuscitation and both low and high-fidelity manikin simulators are used. There is limited research that has compared the effect of low and high-fidelity manikin simulators for NRP learning outcomes, and more specifically on teamwork performance and confidence. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of using low versus high-fidelity manikin simulators in NRP instruction. A randomized posttest-only control group study design was conducted. Third year undergraduate medical students participated in NRP instruction and were assigned to an experimental group (high-fidelity manikin simulator) or control group (low-fidelity manikin simulator). Integrated skills station (megacode) performance, participant satisfaction, confidence and teamwork behaviour scores were compared between the study groups. Participants in the high-fidelity manikin simulator instructional group reported significantly higher total scores in overall satisfaction (
p
= 0.001) and confidence (
p
= 0.001). There were no significant differences in teamwork behaviour scores, as observed by two independent raters, nor differences on mandatory integrated skills station performance items at the
p
|
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10459-014-9522-8 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1652450443</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1051192</ericid><sourcerecordid>2259132340</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-fce3e268ae254f95afda873970317c9de9b93c2b5ab6dd9d59438a2f672d36733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1vFiEUhYnR2A_9AS40JN24GcvnMCybprWaJm7qmvDCnTdUBiowi_rr5c3Umpi44obz3HsPHITeUfKJEqLOKyVC6oFQMWjJ2DC9QMdUKj7QUamXveYTG4TW4xE6qfWeEMLpNL1GR0xoOmopjlG-wMUmn5fwCzx2ObWSY-xlbat_xHnGi03hR0i4hmWNtuWC5-AhhtbVhBPkZJuNuEBdqwvNttCvH0reF7vgCLakkPY4r83lBeob9Gq2scLbp_MUfb--uru8GW6_ff5yeXE7OMFUG2YHHNg4WWBSzFra2dtJca36C5TTHvROc8d20u5G77WXWvDJsnlUzPNRcX6KPm5zu5OfK9RmllAdxGi747UaOkomJBHigJ79g97ntaTuzjAmNeWMC9IpulGu5FoLzOahhMWWR0OJOaRhtjRMT8Mc0jBT7_nwNHndLeCfO_58fwfebwCU4J7lq6-USEo16zrb9Nq1tIfy19r_t_4GS2egVQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2259132340</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A randomized controlled study of manikin simulator fidelity on neonatal resuscitation program learning outcomes</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Curran, Vernon ; Fleet, Lisa ; White, Susan ; Bessell, Clare ; Deshpandey, Akhil ; Drover, Anne ; Hayward, Mark ; Valcour, James</creator><creatorcontrib>Curran, Vernon ; Fleet, Lisa ; White, Susan ; Bessell, Clare ; Deshpandey, Akhil ; Drover, Anne ; Hayward, Mark ; Valcour, James</creatorcontrib><description>The neonatal resuscitation program (NRP) has been developed to educate physicians and other health care providers about newborn resuscitation and has been shown to improve neonatal resuscitation skills. Simulation-based training is recommended as an effective modality for instructing neonatal resuscitation and both low and high-fidelity manikin simulators are used. There is limited research that has compared the effect of low and high-fidelity manikin simulators for NRP learning outcomes, and more specifically on teamwork performance and confidence. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of using low versus high-fidelity manikin simulators in NRP instruction. A randomized posttest-only control group study design was conducted. Third year undergraduate medical students participated in NRP instruction and were assigned to an experimental group (high-fidelity manikin simulator) or control group (low-fidelity manikin simulator). Integrated skills station (megacode) performance, participant satisfaction, confidence and teamwork behaviour scores were compared between the study groups. Participants in the high-fidelity manikin simulator instructional group reported significantly higher total scores in overall satisfaction (
p
= 0.001) and confidence (
p
= 0.001). There were no significant differences in teamwork behaviour scores, as observed by two independent raters, nor differences on mandatory integrated skills station performance items at the
p
< 0.05 level. Medical students’ reported greater satisfaction and confidence with high-fidelity manikin simulators, but did not demonstrate overall significantly improved teamwork or integrated skills station performance. Low and high-fidelity manikin simulators facilitate similar levels of objectively measured NRP outcomes for integrated skills station and teamwork performance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1382-4996</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1677</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10459-014-9522-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24916954</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Adult ; Cardiopulmonary resuscitation ; Clinical Competence ; Comparative Analysis ; Control Groups ; CPR ; Curriculum ; Education ; Education, Medical, Undergraduate - methods ; Educational Measurement ; Experimental Groups ; Female ; Fidelity ; First Aid ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Male ; Manikins ; Medical Education ; Medical Students ; Neonates ; Neonatology - education ; Outcomes of Education ; Participant Satisfaction ; Pretests Posttests ; Resuscitation - education ; Satisfaction ; Scores ; Self Esteem ; Simulation ; Student Behavior ; Teamwork ; Undergraduate Students</subject><ispartof>Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice, 2015-03, Vol.20 (1), p.205-218</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014</rights><rights>Advances in Health Sciences Education is a copyright of Springer, (2014). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-fce3e268ae254f95afda873970317c9de9b93c2b5ab6dd9d59438a2f672d36733</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-fce3e268ae254f95afda873970317c9de9b93c2b5ab6dd9d59438a2f672d36733</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10459-014-9522-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10459-014-9522-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1051192$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24916954$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Curran, Vernon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fleet, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bessell, Clare</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deshpandey, Akhil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drover, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayward, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valcour, James</creatorcontrib><title>A randomized controlled study of manikin simulator fidelity on neonatal resuscitation program learning outcomes</title><title>Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice</title><addtitle>Adv in Health Sci Educ</addtitle><addtitle>Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract</addtitle><description>The neonatal resuscitation program (NRP) has been developed to educate physicians and other health care providers about newborn resuscitation and has been shown to improve neonatal resuscitation skills. Simulation-based training is recommended as an effective modality for instructing neonatal resuscitation and both low and high-fidelity manikin simulators are used. There is limited research that has compared the effect of low and high-fidelity manikin simulators for NRP learning outcomes, and more specifically on teamwork performance and confidence. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of using low versus high-fidelity manikin simulators in NRP instruction. A randomized posttest-only control group study design was conducted. Third year undergraduate medical students participated in NRP instruction and were assigned to an experimental group (high-fidelity manikin simulator) or control group (low-fidelity manikin simulator). Integrated skills station (megacode) performance, participant satisfaction, confidence and teamwork behaviour scores were compared between the study groups. Participants in the high-fidelity manikin simulator instructional group reported significantly higher total scores in overall satisfaction (
p
= 0.001) and confidence (
p
= 0.001). There were no significant differences in teamwork behaviour scores, as observed by two independent raters, nor differences on mandatory integrated skills station performance items at the
p
< 0.05 level. Medical students’ reported greater satisfaction and confidence with high-fidelity manikin simulators, but did not demonstrate overall significantly improved teamwork or integrated skills station performance. Low and high-fidelity manikin simulators facilitate similar levels of objectively measured NRP outcomes for integrated skills station and teamwork performance.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Cardiopulmonary resuscitation</subject><subject>Clinical Competence</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Control Groups</subject><subject>CPR</subject><subject>Curriculum</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Education, Medical, Undergraduate - methods</subject><subject>Educational Measurement</subject><subject>Experimental Groups</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fidelity</subject><subject>First Aid</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Manikins</subject><subject>Medical Education</subject><subject>Medical Students</subject><subject>Neonates</subject><subject>Neonatology - education</subject><subject>Outcomes of Education</subject><subject>Participant Satisfaction</subject><subject>Pretests Posttests</subject><subject>Resuscitation - education</subject><subject>Satisfaction</subject><subject>Scores</subject><subject>Self Esteem</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Student Behavior</subject><subject>Teamwork</subject><subject>Undergraduate Students</subject><issn>1382-4996</issn><issn>1573-1677</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1vFiEUhYnR2A_9AS40JN24GcvnMCybprWaJm7qmvDCnTdUBiowi_rr5c3Umpi44obz3HsPHITeUfKJEqLOKyVC6oFQMWjJ2DC9QMdUKj7QUamXveYTG4TW4xE6qfWeEMLpNL1GR0xoOmopjlG-wMUmn5fwCzx2ObWSY-xlbat_xHnGi03hR0i4hmWNtuWC5-AhhtbVhBPkZJuNuEBdqwvNttCvH0reF7vgCLakkPY4r83lBeob9Gq2scLbp_MUfb--uru8GW6_ff5yeXE7OMFUG2YHHNg4WWBSzFra2dtJca36C5TTHvROc8d20u5G77WXWvDJsnlUzPNRcX6KPm5zu5OfK9RmllAdxGi747UaOkomJBHigJ79g97ntaTuzjAmNeWMC9IpulGu5FoLzOahhMWWR0OJOaRhtjRMT8Mc0jBT7_nwNHndLeCfO_58fwfebwCU4J7lq6-USEo16zrb9Nq1tIfy19r_t_4GS2egVQ</recordid><startdate>20150301</startdate><enddate>20150301</enddate><creator>Curran, Vernon</creator><creator>Fleet, Lisa</creator><creator>White, Susan</creator><creator>Bessell, Clare</creator><creator>Deshpandey, Akhil</creator><creator>Drover, Anne</creator><creator>Hayward, Mark</creator><creator>Valcour, James</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150301</creationdate><title>A randomized controlled study of manikin simulator fidelity on neonatal resuscitation program learning outcomes</title><author>Curran, Vernon ; Fleet, Lisa ; White, Susan ; Bessell, Clare ; Deshpandey, Akhil ; Drover, Anne ; Hayward, Mark ; Valcour, James</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-fce3e268ae254f95afda873970317c9de9b93c2b5ab6dd9d59438a2f672d36733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Cardiopulmonary resuscitation</topic><topic>Clinical Competence</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Control Groups</topic><topic>CPR</topic><topic>Curriculum</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Education, Medical, Undergraduate - methods</topic><topic>Educational Measurement</topic><topic>Experimental Groups</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fidelity</topic><topic>First Aid</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Manikins</topic><topic>Medical Education</topic><topic>Medical Students</topic><topic>Neonates</topic><topic>Neonatology - education</topic><topic>Outcomes of Education</topic><topic>Participant Satisfaction</topic><topic>Pretests Posttests</topic><topic>Resuscitation - education</topic><topic>Satisfaction</topic><topic>Scores</topic><topic>Self Esteem</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Student Behavior</topic><topic>Teamwork</topic><topic>Undergraduate Students</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Curran, Vernon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fleet, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bessell, Clare</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deshpandey, Akhil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drover, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayward, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valcour, James</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Curran, Vernon</au><au>Fleet, Lisa</au><au>White, Susan</au><au>Bessell, Clare</au><au>Deshpandey, Akhil</au><au>Drover, Anne</au><au>Hayward, Mark</au><au>Valcour, James</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1051192</ericid><atitle>A randomized controlled study of manikin simulator fidelity on neonatal resuscitation program learning outcomes</atitle><jtitle>Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice</jtitle><stitle>Adv in Health Sci Educ</stitle><addtitle>Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract</addtitle><date>2015-03-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>205</spage><epage>218</epage><pages>205-218</pages><issn>1382-4996</issn><eissn>1573-1677</eissn><abstract>The neonatal resuscitation program (NRP) has been developed to educate physicians and other health care providers about newborn resuscitation and has been shown to improve neonatal resuscitation skills. Simulation-based training is recommended as an effective modality for instructing neonatal resuscitation and both low and high-fidelity manikin simulators are used. There is limited research that has compared the effect of low and high-fidelity manikin simulators for NRP learning outcomes, and more specifically on teamwork performance and confidence. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of using low versus high-fidelity manikin simulators in NRP instruction. A randomized posttest-only control group study design was conducted. Third year undergraduate medical students participated in NRP instruction and were assigned to an experimental group (high-fidelity manikin simulator) or control group (low-fidelity manikin simulator). Integrated skills station (megacode) performance, participant satisfaction, confidence and teamwork behaviour scores were compared between the study groups. Participants in the high-fidelity manikin simulator instructional group reported significantly higher total scores in overall satisfaction (
p
= 0.001) and confidence (
p
= 0.001). There were no significant differences in teamwork behaviour scores, as observed by two independent raters, nor differences on mandatory integrated skills station performance items at the
p
< 0.05 level. Medical students’ reported greater satisfaction and confidence with high-fidelity manikin simulators, but did not demonstrate overall significantly improved teamwork or integrated skills station performance. Low and high-fidelity manikin simulators facilitate similar levels of objectively measured NRP outcomes for integrated skills station and teamwork performance.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>24916954</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10459-014-9522-8</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1382-4996 |
| ispartof | Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice, 2015-03, Vol.20 (1), p.205-218 |
| issn | 1382-4996 1573-1677 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1652450443 |
| source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
| subjects | Adult Cardiopulmonary resuscitation Clinical Competence Comparative Analysis Control Groups CPR Curriculum Education Education, Medical, Undergraduate - methods Educational Measurement Experimental Groups Female Fidelity First Aid Humans Infant, Newborn Male Manikins Medical Education Medical Students Neonates Neonatology - education Outcomes of Education Participant Satisfaction Pretests Posttests Resuscitation - education Satisfaction Scores Self Esteem Simulation Student Behavior Teamwork Undergraduate Students |
| title | A randomized controlled study of manikin simulator fidelity on neonatal resuscitation program learning outcomes |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T12%3A05%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20randomized%20controlled%20study%20of%20manikin%20simulator%20fidelity%20on%20neonatal%20resuscitation%20program%20learning%20outcomes&rft.jtitle=Advances%20in%20health%20sciences%20education%20:%20theory%20and%20practice&rft.au=Curran,%20Vernon&rft.date=2015-03-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=205&rft.epage=218&rft.pages=205-218&rft.issn=1382-4996&rft.eissn=1573-1677&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10459-014-9522-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2259132340%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2259132340&rft_id=info:pmid/24916954&rft_ericid=EJ1051192&rfr_iscdi=true |