Magnetic resonance imaging improves breast screening sensitivity in BRCA mutation carriers age ≥ 50 years: evidence from an individual patient data meta-analysis

There is no consensus on whether magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) should be included in breast screening protocols for women with BRCA1/2 mutations age ≥ 50 years. Therefore, we investigated the evidence on age-related screening accuracy in women with BRCA1/2 mutations using individual patient data...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical oncology 2015-02, Vol.33 (4), p.349-356
Hauptverfasser: Phi, Xuan-Anh, Houssami, Nehmat, Obdeijn, Inge-Marie, Warner, Ellen, Sardanelli, Francesco, Leach, Martin O, Riedl, Christopher C, Trop, Isabelle, Tilanus-Linthorst, Madeleine M A, Mandel, Rodica, Santoro, Filippo, Kwan-Lim, Gek, Helbich, Thomas H, de Koning, Harry J, Van den Heuvel, Edwin R, de Bock, Geertruida H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 356
container_issue 4
container_start_page 349
container_title Journal of clinical oncology
container_volume 33
creator Phi, Xuan-Anh
Houssami, Nehmat
Obdeijn, Inge-Marie
Warner, Ellen
Sardanelli, Francesco
Leach, Martin O
Riedl, Christopher C
Trop, Isabelle
Tilanus-Linthorst, Madeleine M A
Mandel, Rodica
Santoro, Filippo
Kwan-Lim, Gek
Helbich, Thomas H
de Koning, Harry J
Van den Heuvel, Edwin R
de Bock, Geertruida H
description There is no consensus on whether magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) should be included in breast screening protocols for women with BRCA1/2 mutations age ≥ 50 years. Therefore, we investigated the evidence on age-related screening accuracy in women with BRCA1/2 mutations using individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis. IPD were pooled from six high-risk screening trials including women with BRCA1/2 mutations who had completed at least one screening round with both MRI and mammography. A generalized linear mixed model with repeated measurements and a random effect of studies estimated sensitivity and specificity of MRI, mammography, and the combination in all women and specifically in those age ≥ 50 years. Pooled analysis showed that in women age ≥ 50 years, screening sensitivity was not different from that in women age < 50 years, whereas screening specificity was. In women age ≥ 50 years, combining MRI and mammography significantly increased screening sensitivity compared with mammography alone (94.1%; 95% CI, 77.7% to 98.7% v 38.1%; 95% CI, 22.4% to 56.7%; P < .001). The combination was not significantly more sensitive than MRI alone (94.1%; 95% CI, 77.7% to 98.7% v 84.4%; 95% CI, 61.8% to 94.8%; P = .28). Combining MRI and mammography in women age ≥ 50 years resulted in sensitivity similar to that in women age < 50 years (94.1%; 95% CI, 77.7% to 98.7% v 93.2%; 95% CI, 79.3% to 98%; P = .79). Addition of MRI to mammography for screening BRCA1/2 mutation carriers age ≥ 50 years improves screening sensitivity by a magnitude similar to that observed in younger women. Limiting screening MRI in BRCA1/2 carriers age ≥ 50 years should be reconsidered.
doi_str_mv 10.1200/JCO.2014.56.6232
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1652443487</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1652443487</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-b2713c1fd425e425fdc994ff59a7eef439262f3b9060edabcdd51d0c56f574243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kc-KFDEQxoMo7rh69yQ5eukxf7unva3D-o-VBVHwFqqTyhDpTo9JemAewecQX8wnMc2uHoo61Pd9RdWPkOecbblg7NXH_e1WMK62ut22QooHZMO16Jqu0_oh2bBOiobv5LcL8iTn76wqd1I_JhdCa6lkzzbk1yc4RCzB0oR5jhAt0jDBIcRD7cc0nzDTISHkQrNNiHGdZIw5lHAK5UxDpG8-76_otBQoYY7UQkoBU6ZwQPrn52-qGT0jpPya4ik4XFf4NE8UYjW7muIWGOmxujEW6qAAnbBAAxHGcw75KXnkYcz47L5fkq9vr7_s3zc3t-8-7K9uGisVL80gOi4t904JjbW8s32vvNc9dIi-3ita4eXQs5ahg8E6p7ljVrded0ooeUle3uXWs38smIuZQrY4jhBxXrLhrRZKSbXrqpTdSW2ac07ozTHVt6Wz4cysaExFY1Y0RrdmRVMtL-7Tl2FC99_wj4X8CxpcjfU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1652443487</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Magnetic resonance imaging improves breast screening sensitivity in BRCA mutation carriers age ≥ 50 years: evidence from an individual patient data meta-analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Society of Clinical Oncology Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Phi, Xuan-Anh ; Houssami, Nehmat ; Obdeijn, Inge-Marie ; Warner, Ellen ; Sardanelli, Francesco ; Leach, Martin O ; Riedl, Christopher C ; Trop, Isabelle ; Tilanus-Linthorst, Madeleine M A ; Mandel, Rodica ; Santoro, Filippo ; Kwan-Lim, Gek ; Helbich, Thomas H ; de Koning, Harry J ; Van den Heuvel, Edwin R ; de Bock, Geertruida H</creator><creatorcontrib>Phi, Xuan-Anh ; Houssami, Nehmat ; Obdeijn, Inge-Marie ; Warner, Ellen ; Sardanelli, Francesco ; Leach, Martin O ; Riedl, Christopher C ; Trop, Isabelle ; Tilanus-Linthorst, Madeleine M A ; Mandel, Rodica ; Santoro, Filippo ; Kwan-Lim, Gek ; Helbich, Thomas H ; de Koning, Harry J ; Van den Heuvel, Edwin R ; de Bock, Geertruida H</creatorcontrib><description>There is no consensus on whether magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) should be included in breast screening protocols for women with BRCA1/2 mutations age ≥ 50 years. Therefore, we investigated the evidence on age-related screening accuracy in women with BRCA1/2 mutations using individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis. IPD were pooled from six high-risk screening trials including women with BRCA1/2 mutations who had completed at least one screening round with both MRI and mammography. A generalized linear mixed model with repeated measurements and a random effect of studies estimated sensitivity and specificity of MRI, mammography, and the combination in all women and specifically in those age ≥ 50 years. Pooled analysis showed that in women age ≥ 50 years, screening sensitivity was not different from that in women age &lt; 50 years, whereas screening specificity was. In women age ≥ 50 years, combining MRI and mammography significantly increased screening sensitivity compared with mammography alone (94.1%; 95% CI, 77.7% to 98.7% v 38.1%; 95% CI, 22.4% to 56.7%; P &lt; .001). The combination was not significantly more sensitive than MRI alone (94.1%; 95% CI, 77.7% to 98.7% v 84.4%; 95% CI, 61.8% to 94.8%; P = .28). Combining MRI and mammography in women age ≥ 50 years resulted in sensitivity similar to that in women age &lt; 50 years (94.1%; 95% CI, 77.7% to 98.7% v 93.2%; 95% CI, 79.3% to 98%; P = .79). Addition of MRI to mammography for screening BRCA1/2 mutation carriers age ≥ 50 years improves screening sensitivity by a magnitude similar to that observed in younger women. Limiting screening MRI in BRCA1/2 carriers age ≥ 50 years should be reconsidered.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0732-183X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-7755</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2014.56.6232</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25534390</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; BRCA1 Protein - genetics ; BRCA2 Protein - genetics ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Breast Neoplasms - genetics ; Early Detection of Cancer - methods ; Female ; Genetic Predisposition to Disease - genetics ; Genetic Testing - methods ; Heterozygote ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Mammography - methods ; Middle Aged ; Mutation ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical oncology, 2015-02, Vol.33 (4), p.349-356</ispartof><rights>2014 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-b2713c1fd425e425fdc994ff59a7eef439262f3b9060edabcdd51d0c56f574243</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-b2713c1fd425e425fdc994ff59a7eef439262f3b9060edabcdd51d0c56f574243</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3729,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25534390$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Phi, Xuan-Anh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houssami, Nehmat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Obdeijn, Inge-Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warner, Ellen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sardanelli, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leach, Martin O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riedl, Christopher C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trop, Isabelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tilanus-Linthorst, Madeleine M A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mandel, Rodica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santoro, Filippo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwan-Lim, Gek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helbich, Thomas H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Koning, Harry J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van den Heuvel, Edwin R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Bock, Geertruida H</creatorcontrib><title>Magnetic resonance imaging improves breast screening sensitivity in BRCA mutation carriers age ≥ 50 years: evidence from an individual patient data meta-analysis</title><title>Journal of clinical oncology</title><addtitle>J Clin Oncol</addtitle><description>There is no consensus on whether magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) should be included in breast screening protocols for women with BRCA1/2 mutations age ≥ 50 years. Therefore, we investigated the evidence on age-related screening accuracy in women with BRCA1/2 mutations using individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis. IPD were pooled from six high-risk screening trials including women with BRCA1/2 mutations who had completed at least one screening round with both MRI and mammography. A generalized linear mixed model with repeated measurements and a random effect of studies estimated sensitivity and specificity of MRI, mammography, and the combination in all women and specifically in those age ≥ 50 years. Pooled analysis showed that in women age ≥ 50 years, screening sensitivity was not different from that in women age &lt; 50 years, whereas screening specificity was. In women age ≥ 50 years, combining MRI and mammography significantly increased screening sensitivity compared with mammography alone (94.1%; 95% CI, 77.7% to 98.7% v 38.1%; 95% CI, 22.4% to 56.7%; P &lt; .001). The combination was not significantly more sensitive than MRI alone (94.1%; 95% CI, 77.7% to 98.7% v 84.4%; 95% CI, 61.8% to 94.8%; P = .28). Combining MRI and mammography in women age ≥ 50 years resulted in sensitivity similar to that in women age &lt; 50 years (94.1%; 95% CI, 77.7% to 98.7% v 93.2%; 95% CI, 79.3% to 98%; P = .79). Addition of MRI to mammography for screening BRCA1/2 mutation carriers age ≥ 50 years improves screening sensitivity by a magnitude similar to that observed in younger women. Limiting screening MRI in BRCA1/2 carriers age ≥ 50 years should be reconsidered.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>BRCA1 Protein - genetics</subject><subject>BRCA2 Protein - genetics</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - genetics</subject><subject>Early Detection of Cancer - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Genetic Predisposition to Disease - genetics</subject><subject>Genetic Testing - methods</subject><subject>Heterozygote</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Mammography - methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0732-183X</issn><issn>1527-7755</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kc-KFDEQxoMo7rh69yQ5eukxf7unva3D-o-VBVHwFqqTyhDpTo9JemAewecQX8wnMc2uHoo61Pd9RdWPkOecbblg7NXH_e1WMK62ut22QooHZMO16Jqu0_oh2bBOiobv5LcL8iTn76wqd1I_JhdCa6lkzzbk1yc4RCzB0oR5jhAt0jDBIcRD7cc0nzDTISHkQrNNiHGdZIw5lHAK5UxDpG8-76_otBQoYY7UQkoBU6ZwQPrn52-qGT0jpPya4ik4XFf4NE8UYjW7muIWGOmxujEW6qAAnbBAAxHGcw75KXnkYcz47L5fkq9vr7_s3zc3t-8-7K9uGisVL80gOi4t904JjbW8s32vvNc9dIi-3ita4eXQs5ahg8E6p7ljVrded0ooeUle3uXWs38smIuZQrY4jhBxXrLhrRZKSbXrqpTdSW2ac07ozTHVt6Wz4cysaExFY1Y0RrdmRVMtL-7Tl2FC99_wj4X8CxpcjfU</recordid><startdate>20150201</startdate><enddate>20150201</enddate><creator>Phi, Xuan-Anh</creator><creator>Houssami, Nehmat</creator><creator>Obdeijn, Inge-Marie</creator><creator>Warner, Ellen</creator><creator>Sardanelli, Francesco</creator><creator>Leach, Martin O</creator><creator>Riedl, Christopher C</creator><creator>Trop, Isabelle</creator><creator>Tilanus-Linthorst, Madeleine M A</creator><creator>Mandel, Rodica</creator><creator>Santoro, Filippo</creator><creator>Kwan-Lim, Gek</creator><creator>Helbich, Thomas H</creator><creator>de Koning, Harry J</creator><creator>Van den Heuvel, Edwin R</creator><creator>de Bock, Geertruida H</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150201</creationdate><title>Magnetic resonance imaging improves breast screening sensitivity in BRCA mutation carriers age ≥ 50 years: evidence from an individual patient data meta-analysis</title><author>Phi, Xuan-Anh ; Houssami, Nehmat ; Obdeijn, Inge-Marie ; Warner, Ellen ; Sardanelli, Francesco ; Leach, Martin O ; Riedl, Christopher C ; Trop, Isabelle ; Tilanus-Linthorst, Madeleine M A ; Mandel, Rodica ; Santoro, Filippo ; Kwan-Lim, Gek ; Helbich, Thomas H ; de Koning, Harry J ; Van den Heuvel, Edwin R ; de Bock, Geertruida H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-b2713c1fd425e425fdc994ff59a7eef439262f3b9060edabcdd51d0c56f574243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>BRCA1 Protein - genetics</topic><topic>BRCA2 Protein - genetics</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - genetics</topic><topic>Early Detection of Cancer - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Genetic Predisposition to Disease - genetics</topic><topic>Genetic Testing - methods</topic><topic>Heterozygote</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Mammography - methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Phi, Xuan-Anh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houssami, Nehmat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Obdeijn, Inge-Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warner, Ellen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sardanelli, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leach, Martin O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riedl, Christopher C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trop, Isabelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tilanus-Linthorst, Madeleine M A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mandel, Rodica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santoro, Filippo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwan-Lim, Gek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helbich, Thomas H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Koning, Harry J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van den Heuvel, Edwin R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Bock, Geertruida H</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Phi, Xuan-Anh</au><au>Houssami, Nehmat</au><au>Obdeijn, Inge-Marie</au><au>Warner, Ellen</au><au>Sardanelli, Francesco</au><au>Leach, Martin O</au><au>Riedl, Christopher C</au><au>Trop, Isabelle</au><au>Tilanus-Linthorst, Madeleine M A</au><au>Mandel, Rodica</au><au>Santoro, Filippo</au><au>Kwan-Lim, Gek</au><au>Helbich, Thomas H</au><au>de Koning, Harry J</au><au>Van den Heuvel, Edwin R</au><au>de Bock, Geertruida H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Magnetic resonance imaging improves breast screening sensitivity in BRCA mutation carriers age ≥ 50 years: evidence from an individual patient data meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical oncology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Oncol</addtitle><date>2015-02-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>349</spage><epage>356</epage><pages>349-356</pages><issn>0732-183X</issn><eissn>1527-7755</eissn><abstract>There is no consensus on whether magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) should be included in breast screening protocols for women with BRCA1/2 mutations age ≥ 50 years. Therefore, we investigated the evidence on age-related screening accuracy in women with BRCA1/2 mutations using individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis. IPD were pooled from six high-risk screening trials including women with BRCA1/2 mutations who had completed at least one screening round with both MRI and mammography. A generalized linear mixed model with repeated measurements and a random effect of studies estimated sensitivity and specificity of MRI, mammography, and the combination in all women and specifically in those age ≥ 50 years. Pooled analysis showed that in women age ≥ 50 years, screening sensitivity was not different from that in women age &lt; 50 years, whereas screening specificity was. In women age ≥ 50 years, combining MRI and mammography significantly increased screening sensitivity compared with mammography alone (94.1%; 95% CI, 77.7% to 98.7% v 38.1%; 95% CI, 22.4% to 56.7%; P &lt; .001). The combination was not significantly more sensitive than MRI alone (94.1%; 95% CI, 77.7% to 98.7% v 84.4%; 95% CI, 61.8% to 94.8%; P = .28). Combining MRI and mammography in women age ≥ 50 years resulted in sensitivity similar to that in women age &lt; 50 years (94.1%; 95% CI, 77.7% to 98.7% v 93.2%; 95% CI, 79.3% to 98%; P = .79). Addition of MRI to mammography for screening BRCA1/2 mutation carriers age ≥ 50 years improves screening sensitivity by a magnitude similar to that observed in younger women. Limiting screening MRI in BRCA1/2 carriers age ≥ 50 years should be reconsidered.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>25534390</pmid><doi>10.1200/JCO.2014.56.6232</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0732-183X
ispartof Journal of clinical oncology, 2015-02, Vol.33 (4), p.349-356
issn 0732-183X
1527-7755
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1652443487
source MEDLINE; American Society of Clinical Oncology Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Aged
BRCA1 Protein - genetics
BRCA2 Protein - genetics
Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis
Breast Neoplasms - genetics
Early Detection of Cancer - methods
Female
Genetic Predisposition to Disease - genetics
Genetic Testing - methods
Heterozygote
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
Mammography - methods
Middle Aged
Mutation
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
Young Adult
title Magnetic resonance imaging improves breast screening sensitivity in BRCA mutation carriers age ≥ 50 years: evidence from an individual patient data meta-analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T12%3A46%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Magnetic%20resonance%20imaging%20improves%20breast%20screening%20sensitivity%20in%20BRCA%20mutation%20carriers%20age%20%E2%89%A5%2050%20years:%20evidence%20from%20an%20individual%20patient%20data%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20oncology&rft.au=Phi,%20Xuan-Anh&rft.date=2015-02-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=349&rft.epage=356&rft.pages=349-356&rft.issn=0732-183X&rft.eissn=1527-7755&rft_id=info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2014.56.6232&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1652443487%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1652443487&rft_id=info:pmid/25534390&rfr_iscdi=true