An Investigation of Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes) and Eurasian Badger (Meles meles) Scavenging, Scattering, and Removal of Deer Remains: Forensic Implications and Applications

Within northwest Europe, especially the United Kingdom, the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) and the Eurasian Badger (Meles meles) are the largest wild scavengers capable of modifying a set of remains through scavenging. Knowledge of region‐specific and species‐typical scavenging behaviors of scavengers with...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of forensic sciences 2015-01, Vol.60 (s1), p.S39-S55
Hauptverfasser: Young, Alexandria, Márquez-Grant, Nicholas, Stillman, Richard, Smith, Martin J., Korstjens, Amanda H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page S55
container_issue s1
container_start_page S39
container_title Journal of forensic sciences
container_volume 60
creator Young, Alexandria
Márquez-Grant, Nicholas
Stillman, Richard
Smith, Martin J.
Korstjens, Amanda H.
description Within northwest Europe, especially the United Kingdom, the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) and the Eurasian Badger (Meles meles) are the largest wild scavengers capable of modifying a set of remains through scavenging. Knowledge of region‐specific and species‐typical scavenging behaviors of scavengers within the crime scene area and surroundings can aid in more efficient and accurate interpretations. The scavenging behaviors of captive and wild foxes and badgers were recorded and compared through actualistic methods and direct observation. The scavenging by wild foxes and badgers of surface‐deposited baits and whole deer (Cervus nippon; Capreolus capreolus) in a woodland was observed and analyzed. Wild foxes were found to scavenge deer more frequently than badgers. The scavenging of deer remains by foxes was also compared with forensic cases. The scavenging pattern and recovery distances of deer and human remains scavenged by foxes were similar but were potentially affected by the condition and deposition of a body, and the presence of clothing.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1556-4029.12554
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1652438639</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1652438639</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5494-37d99b88aee264090f32964bf92337229b977aaeb9b31882763a98916c214f9d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhiMEokvhzA1Z4rKVSOuP2Im5LaW7LBQqlS-pF8tJJiuXxAl2srQ_iX-Jk20XiQs-eMaj550Z-Y2i5wQfk3BOCOciTjCVx4RynjyIZvvKw2iGMaUxITI7iJ54f40xFkSQx9EB5VhwKdNZ9Hth0dpuwfdmo3vTWtRW6BJKtGxv0PzbUHfg0XYKR0jbEp0NTnujLXqjyw04NP8IdUCa8T5Cnwu9BbsxdvNqzPse3JSPykto2q2uxwFvISjDWxvrX4dRDqw3BVo3XW2KaQ0_SRbd38LT6FGlaw_P7uJh9HV59uX0XXx-sVqfLs7jgicyiVlaSplnmQagIsESV4xKkeSVpIyllMpcpqnWkMuckSyjqWBaZpKIgpKkkiU7jOa7vp1rfw7hY1RjfAF1rS20g1dEcJqwTDAZ0Jf_oNft4GzYLlBJmoZ5jAXqZEcVrvXeQaU6ZxrtbhXBanRRjZ6p0TM1uRgUL-76DnkD5Z6_ty0AfAf8MjXc_q-fer-8uG8c73TG93Cz12n3Q4mwLVffP63UUqb8avXhSlH2BwWPtKo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1647737233</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An Investigation of Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes) and Eurasian Badger (Meles meles) Scavenging, Scattering, and Removal of Deer Remains: Forensic Implications and Applications</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Young, Alexandria ; Márquez-Grant, Nicholas ; Stillman, Richard ; Smith, Martin J. ; Korstjens, Amanda H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Young, Alexandria ; Márquez-Grant, Nicholas ; Stillman, Richard ; Smith, Martin J. ; Korstjens, Amanda H.</creatorcontrib><description>Within northwest Europe, especially the United Kingdom, the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) and the Eurasian Badger (Meles meles) are the largest wild scavengers capable of modifying a set of remains through scavenging. Knowledge of region‐specific and species‐typical scavenging behaviors of scavengers within the crime scene area and surroundings can aid in more efficient and accurate interpretations. The scavenging behaviors of captive and wild foxes and badgers were recorded and compared through actualistic methods and direct observation. The scavenging by wild foxes and badgers of surface‐deposited baits and whole deer (Cervus nippon; Capreolus capreolus) in a woodland was observed and analyzed. Wild foxes were found to scavenge deer more frequently than badgers. The scavenging of deer remains by foxes was also compared with forensic cases. The scavenging pattern and recovery distances of deer and human remains scavenged by foxes were similar but were potentially affected by the condition and deposition of a body, and the presence of clothing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1198</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-4029</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.12554</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25065997</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JFSCAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; Animals ; Deer ; ecology ; Feeding Behavior ; Forensic Anthropology ; forensic archeology ; forensic science ; Forensic sciences ; Foxes ; Human remains ; Mustelidae ; Postmortem Changes ; scavenging ; Swine ; taphonomy ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>Journal of forensic sciences, 2015-01, Vol.60 (s1), p.S39-S55</ispartof><rights>2014 American Academy of Forensic Sciences</rights><rights>2014 American Academy of Forensic Sciences.</rights><rights>2015 American Academy of Forensic Sciences</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5494-37d99b88aee264090f32964bf92337229b977aaeb9b31882763a98916c214f9d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5494-37d99b88aee264090f32964bf92337229b977aaeb9b31882763a98916c214f9d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1556-4029.12554$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1556-4029.12554$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25065997$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Young, Alexandria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Márquez-Grant, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stillman, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Martin J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korstjens, Amanda H.</creatorcontrib><title>An Investigation of Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes) and Eurasian Badger (Meles meles) Scavenging, Scattering, and Removal of Deer Remains: Forensic Implications and Applications</title><title>Journal of forensic sciences</title><addtitle>J Forensic Sci</addtitle><description>Within northwest Europe, especially the United Kingdom, the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) and the Eurasian Badger (Meles meles) are the largest wild scavengers capable of modifying a set of remains through scavenging. Knowledge of region‐specific and species‐typical scavenging behaviors of scavengers within the crime scene area and surroundings can aid in more efficient and accurate interpretations. The scavenging behaviors of captive and wild foxes and badgers were recorded and compared through actualistic methods and direct observation. The scavenging by wild foxes and badgers of surface‐deposited baits and whole deer (Cervus nippon; Capreolus capreolus) in a woodland was observed and analyzed. Wild foxes were found to scavenge deer more frequently than badgers. The scavenging of deer remains by foxes was also compared with forensic cases. The scavenging pattern and recovery distances of deer and human remains scavenged by foxes were similar but were potentially affected by the condition and deposition of a body, and the presence of clothing.</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Deer</subject><subject>ecology</subject><subject>Feeding Behavior</subject><subject>Forensic Anthropology</subject><subject>forensic archeology</subject><subject>forensic science</subject><subject>Forensic sciences</subject><subject>Foxes</subject><subject>Human remains</subject><subject>Mustelidae</subject><subject>Postmortem Changes</subject><subject>scavenging</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>taphonomy</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>0022-1198</issn><issn>1556-4029</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhiMEokvhzA1Z4rKVSOuP2Im5LaW7LBQqlS-pF8tJJiuXxAl2srQ_iX-Jk20XiQs-eMaj550Z-Y2i5wQfk3BOCOciTjCVx4RynjyIZvvKw2iGMaUxITI7iJ54f40xFkSQx9EB5VhwKdNZ9Hth0dpuwfdmo3vTWtRW6BJKtGxv0PzbUHfg0XYKR0jbEp0NTnujLXqjyw04NP8IdUCa8T5Cnwu9BbsxdvNqzPse3JSPykto2q2uxwFvISjDWxvrX4dRDqw3BVo3XW2KaQ0_SRbd38LT6FGlaw_P7uJh9HV59uX0XXx-sVqfLs7jgicyiVlaSplnmQagIsESV4xKkeSVpIyllMpcpqnWkMuckSyjqWBaZpKIgpKkkiU7jOa7vp1rfw7hY1RjfAF1rS20g1dEcJqwTDAZ0Jf_oNft4GzYLlBJmoZ5jAXqZEcVrvXeQaU6ZxrtbhXBanRRjZ6p0TM1uRgUL-76DnkD5Z6_ty0AfAf8MjXc_q-fer-8uG8c73TG93Cz12n3Q4mwLVffP63UUqb8avXhSlH2BwWPtKo</recordid><startdate>201501</startdate><enddate>201501</enddate><creator>Young, Alexandria</creator><creator>Márquez-Grant, Nicholas</creator><creator>Stillman, Richard</creator><creator>Smith, Martin J.</creator><creator>Korstjens, Amanda H.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201501</creationdate><title>An Investigation of Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes) and Eurasian Badger (Meles meles) Scavenging, Scattering, and Removal of Deer Remains: Forensic Implications and Applications</title><author>Young, Alexandria ; Márquez-Grant, Nicholas ; Stillman, Richard ; Smith, Martin J. ; Korstjens, Amanda H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5494-37d99b88aee264090f32964bf92337229b977aaeb9b31882763a98916c214f9d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Deer</topic><topic>ecology</topic><topic>Feeding Behavior</topic><topic>Forensic Anthropology</topic><topic>forensic archeology</topic><topic>forensic science</topic><topic>Forensic sciences</topic><topic>Foxes</topic><topic>Human remains</topic><topic>Mustelidae</topic><topic>Postmortem Changes</topic><topic>scavenging</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>taphonomy</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Young, Alexandria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Márquez-Grant, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stillman, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Martin J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korstjens, Amanda H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of forensic sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Young, Alexandria</au><au>Márquez-Grant, Nicholas</au><au>Stillman, Richard</au><au>Smith, Martin J.</au><au>Korstjens, Amanda H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An Investigation of Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes) and Eurasian Badger (Meles meles) Scavenging, Scattering, and Removal of Deer Remains: Forensic Implications and Applications</atitle><jtitle>Journal of forensic sciences</jtitle><addtitle>J Forensic Sci</addtitle><date>2015-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>s1</issue><spage>S39</spage><epage>S55</epage><pages>S39-S55</pages><issn>0022-1198</issn><eissn>1556-4029</eissn><coden>JFSCAS</coden><abstract>Within northwest Europe, especially the United Kingdom, the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) and the Eurasian Badger (Meles meles) are the largest wild scavengers capable of modifying a set of remains through scavenging. Knowledge of region‐specific and species‐typical scavenging behaviors of scavengers within the crime scene area and surroundings can aid in more efficient and accurate interpretations. The scavenging behaviors of captive and wild foxes and badgers were recorded and compared through actualistic methods and direct observation. The scavenging by wild foxes and badgers of surface‐deposited baits and whole deer (Cervus nippon; Capreolus capreolus) in a woodland was observed and analyzed. Wild foxes were found to scavenge deer more frequently than badgers. The scavenging of deer remains by foxes was also compared with forensic cases. The scavenging pattern and recovery distances of deer and human remains scavenged by foxes were similar but were potentially affected by the condition and deposition of a body, and the presence of clothing.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>25065997</pmid><doi>10.1111/1556-4029.12554</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-1198
ispartof Journal of forensic sciences, 2015-01, Vol.60 (s1), p.S39-S55
issn 0022-1198
1556-4029
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1652438639
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Animal behavior
Animals
Deer
ecology
Feeding Behavior
Forensic Anthropology
forensic archeology
forensic science
Forensic sciences
Foxes
Human remains
Mustelidae
Postmortem Changes
scavenging
Swine
taphonomy
United Kingdom
title An Investigation of Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes) and Eurasian Badger (Meles meles) Scavenging, Scattering, and Removal of Deer Remains: Forensic Implications and Applications
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T00%3A14%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20Investigation%20of%20Red%20Fox%20(Vulpes%20vulpes)%20and%20Eurasian%20Badger%20(Meles%20meles)%20Scavenging,%20Scattering,%20and%20Removal%20of%20Deer%20Remains:%20Forensic%20Implications%20and%20Applications&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20forensic%20sciences&rft.au=Young,%20Alexandria&rft.date=2015-01&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=s1&rft.spage=S39&rft.epage=S55&rft.pages=S39-S55&rft.issn=0022-1198&rft.eissn=1556-4029&rft.coden=JFSCAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1556-4029.12554&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1652438639%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1647737233&rft_id=info:pmid/25065997&rfr_iscdi=true