Five on one side: Personal and social information in spatial choice

•Rats were tested in an open field choice task.•The outcome of previous choices provided information about the approximate location of food.•Social information from a foraging partner was necessary to determine exact food location.•Personal information and social information can jointly control spat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Behavioural processes 2015-03, Vol.112, p.130-137
Hauptverfasser: Brown, Michael F., Saxon, Marie E., Bisbing, Teagan, Evans, Jessica, Ruff, Jennifer, Stokesbury, Andrew
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 137
container_issue
container_start_page 130
container_title Behavioural processes
container_volume 112
creator Brown, Michael F.
Saxon, Marie E.
Bisbing, Teagan
Evans, Jessica
Ruff, Jennifer
Stokesbury, Andrew
description •Rats were tested in an open field choice task.•The outcome of previous choices provided information about the approximate location of food.•Social information from a foraging partner was necessary to determine exact food location.•Personal information and social information can jointly control spatial choices. To examine whether the outcome of a rat’s own choices (“personal information”) and the choice behavior of another rat (“social information”) can jointly control spatial choices, rats were tested in an open field task in which they searched for food. For the rats of primary interest (Subject Rats), the baited locations were all on one side of the arena, but the specific locations baited and the side on which they occurred varied over trials. The Subject Rats were sometimes tested together with an informed “Model” rat that had learned to find food in the same five locations (all on the same side of the arena) on every trial. Unintended perceptual cues apparently controlled spatial choices at first, but when perceptual cues to food location were not available, choices were controlled by both personal information (allowing the baited side of the arena to be determined) and social information (allowing baited locations to be determined more precisely). This shows that control by personal and social information are not mutually exclusive and supports the view that these two kinds of information can be used flexibly and adaptively to guide spatial choices. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: tribute to Tom Zentall.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.12.012
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1652436854</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0376635714003234</els_id><sourcerecordid>1652436854</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-1b035c97a97ac7c8fcfae17576e00c45d803653cff63e6f7213f769efe44ac583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEQgIMoWqv_QGSPXnbNO9GDIMUXCHrQc0hnJ5jSbmrSCv57U1o9CgMzDN_MMB8hZ4x2jDJ9OeumuMwJOk6Z7BjvKON7ZMSs4a0V1O6TERVGt1ooc0SOS5lRSpml-pAccaUMl8qOyOQ-fmGThhrYlNjjdfOKuaTBzxs_9E1JEGsZh5Dywq9iJePQlGUtaxs-UgQ8IQfBzwue7vKYvN_fvU0e2-eXh6fJ7XMLUvBVy6ZUKLgyvgYYsAGCR2aU0UgpSNVbKrQSEIIWqIPhTASjrzCglB6UFWNysd1b3_5cY1m5RSyA87kfMK2LY1pxKbRVsqJyi0JOpWQMbpnjwudvx6jb6HMzt9XnNvoc467qq2Pnuwvr6QL7v6FfXxW42QJY__yKmF2BiANgHzPCyvUp_n_hB7RdgfI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1652436854</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Five on one side: Personal and social information in spatial choice</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Brown, Michael F. ; Saxon, Marie E. ; Bisbing, Teagan ; Evans, Jessica ; Ruff, Jennifer ; Stokesbury, Andrew</creator><creatorcontrib>Brown, Michael F. ; Saxon, Marie E. ; Bisbing, Teagan ; Evans, Jessica ; Ruff, Jennifer ; Stokesbury, Andrew</creatorcontrib><description>•Rats were tested in an open field choice task.•The outcome of previous choices provided information about the approximate location of food.•Social information from a foraging partner was necessary to determine exact food location.•Personal information and social information can jointly control spatial choices. To examine whether the outcome of a rat’s own choices (“personal information”) and the choice behavior of another rat (“social information”) can jointly control spatial choices, rats were tested in an open field task in which they searched for food. For the rats of primary interest (Subject Rats), the baited locations were all on one side of the arena, but the specific locations baited and the side on which they occurred varied over trials. The Subject Rats were sometimes tested together with an informed “Model” rat that had learned to find food in the same five locations (all on the same side of the arena) on every trial. Unintended perceptual cues apparently controlled spatial choices at first, but when perceptual cues to food location were not available, choices were controlled by both personal information (allowing the baited side of the arena to be determined) and social information (allowing baited locations to be determined more precisely). This shows that control by personal and social information are not mutually exclusive and supports the view that these two kinds of information can be used flexibly and adaptively to guide spatial choices. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: tribute to Tom Zentall.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0376-6357</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-8308</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.12.012</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25572458</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Animals ; Appetitive Behavior ; Choice Behavior ; Imitative Behavior ; Male ; Personal information ; Rats ; Social cognition ; Space Perception ; Spatial cognition ; Spatial cues</subject><ispartof>Behavioural processes, 2015-03, Vol.112, p.130-137</ispartof><rights>2015 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-1b035c97a97ac7c8fcfae17576e00c45d803653cff63e6f7213f769efe44ac583</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-1b035c97a97ac7c8fcfae17576e00c45d803653cff63e6f7213f769efe44ac583</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2327-4744</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376635714003234$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25572458$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brown, Michael F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saxon, Marie E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bisbing, Teagan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruff, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stokesbury, Andrew</creatorcontrib><title>Five on one side: Personal and social information in spatial choice</title><title>Behavioural processes</title><addtitle>Behav Processes</addtitle><description>•Rats were tested in an open field choice task.•The outcome of previous choices provided information about the approximate location of food.•Social information from a foraging partner was necessary to determine exact food location.•Personal information and social information can jointly control spatial choices. To examine whether the outcome of a rat’s own choices (“personal information”) and the choice behavior of another rat (“social information”) can jointly control spatial choices, rats were tested in an open field task in which they searched for food. For the rats of primary interest (Subject Rats), the baited locations were all on one side of the arena, but the specific locations baited and the side on which they occurred varied over trials. The Subject Rats were sometimes tested together with an informed “Model” rat that had learned to find food in the same five locations (all on the same side of the arena) on every trial. Unintended perceptual cues apparently controlled spatial choices at first, but when perceptual cues to food location were not available, choices were controlled by both personal information (allowing the baited side of the arena to be determined) and social information (allowing baited locations to be determined more precisely). This shows that control by personal and social information are not mutually exclusive and supports the view that these two kinds of information can be used flexibly and adaptively to guide spatial choices. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: tribute to Tom Zentall.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Appetitive Behavior</subject><subject>Choice Behavior</subject><subject>Imitative Behavior</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Personal information</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Social cognition</subject><subject>Space Perception</subject><subject>Spatial cognition</subject><subject>Spatial cues</subject><issn>0376-6357</issn><issn>1872-8308</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEQgIMoWqv_QGSPXnbNO9GDIMUXCHrQc0hnJ5jSbmrSCv57U1o9CgMzDN_MMB8hZ4x2jDJ9OeumuMwJOk6Z7BjvKON7ZMSs4a0V1O6TERVGt1ooc0SOS5lRSpml-pAccaUMl8qOyOQ-fmGThhrYlNjjdfOKuaTBzxs_9E1JEGsZh5Dywq9iJePQlGUtaxs-UgQ8IQfBzwue7vKYvN_fvU0e2-eXh6fJ7XMLUvBVy6ZUKLgyvgYYsAGCR2aU0UgpSNVbKrQSEIIWqIPhTASjrzCglB6UFWNysd1b3_5cY1m5RSyA87kfMK2LY1pxKbRVsqJyi0JOpWQMbpnjwudvx6jb6HMzt9XnNvoc467qq2Pnuwvr6QL7v6FfXxW42QJY__yKmF2BiANgHzPCyvUp_n_hB7RdgfI</recordid><startdate>20150301</startdate><enddate>20150301</enddate><creator>Brown, Michael F.</creator><creator>Saxon, Marie E.</creator><creator>Bisbing, Teagan</creator><creator>Evans, Jessica</creator><creator>Ruff, Jennifer</creator><creator>Stokesbury, Andrew</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2327-4744</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20150301</creationdate><title>Five on one side: Personal and social information in spatial choice</title><author>Brown, Michael F. ; Saxon, Marie E. ; Bisbing, Teagan ; Evans, Jessica ; Ruff, Jennifer ; Stokesbury, Andrew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-1b035c97a97ac7c8fcfae17576e00c45d803653cff63e6f7213f769efe44ac583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Appetitive Behavior</topic><topic>Choice Behavior</topic><topic>Imitative Behavior</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Personal information</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Social cognition</topic><topic>Space Perception</topic><topic>Spatial cognition</topic><topic>Spatial cues</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brown, Michael F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saxon, Marie E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bisbing, Teagan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruff, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stokesbury, Andrew</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Behavioural processes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brown, Michael F.</au><au>Saxon, Marie E.</au><au>Bisbing, Teagan</au><au>Evans, Jessica</au><au>Ruff, Jennifer</au><au>Stokesbury, Andrew</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Five on one side: Personal and social information in spatial choice</atitle><jtitle>Behavioural processes</jtitle><addtitle>Behav Processes</addtitle><date>2015-03-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>112</volume><spage>130</spage><epage>137</epage><pages>130-137</pages><issn>0376-6357</issn><eissn>1872-8308</eissn><abstract>•Rats were tested in an open field choice task.•The outcome of previous choices provided information about the approximate location of food.•Social information from a foraging partner was necessary to determine exact food location.•Personal information and social information can jointly control spatial choices. To examine whether the outcome of a rat’s own choices (“personal information”) and the choice behavior of another rat (“social information”) can jointly control spatial choices, rats were tested in an open field task in which they searched for food. For the rats of primary interest (Subject Rats), the baited locations were all on one side of the arena, but the specific locations baited and the side on which they occurred varied over trials. The Subject Rats were sometimes tested together with an informed “Model” rat that had learned to find food in the same five locations (all on the same side of the arena) on every trial. Unintended perceptual cues apparently controlled spatial choices at first, but when perceptual cues to food location were not available, choices were controlled by both personal information (allowing the baited side of the arena to be determined) and social information (allowing baited locations to be determined more precisely). This shows that control by personal and social information are not mutually exclusive and supports the view that these two kinds of information can be used flexibly and adaptively to guide spatial choices. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: tribute to Tom Zentall.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>25572458</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.beproc.2014.12.012</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2327-4744</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0376-6357
ispartof Behavioural processes, 2015-03, Vol.112, p.130-137
issn 0376-6357
1872-8308
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1652436854
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Animals
Appetitive Behavior
Choice Behavior
Imitative Behavior
Male
Personal information
Rats
Social cognition
Space Perception
Spatial cognition
Spatial cues
title Five on one side: Personal and social information in spatial choice
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T09%3A25%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Five%20on%20one%20side:%20Personal%20and%20social%20information%20in%20spatial%20choice&rft.jtitle=Behavioural%20processes&rft.au=Brown,%20Michael%20F.&rft.date=2015-03-01&rft.volume=112&rft.spage=130&rft.epage=137&rft.pages=130-137&rft.issn=0376-6357&rft.eissn=1872-8308&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.beproc.2014.12.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1652436854%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1652436854&rft_id=info:pmid/25572458&rft_els_id=S0376635714003234&rfr_iscdi=true