Five on one side: Personal and social information in spatial choice
•Rats were tested in an open field choice task.•The outcome of previous choices provided information about the approximate location of food.•Social information from a foraging partner was necessary to determine exact food location.•Personal information and social information can jointly control spat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Behavioural processes 2015-03, Vol.112, p.130-137 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 137 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 130 |
container_title | Behavioural processes |
container_volume | 112 |
creator | Brown, Michael F. Saxon, Marie E. Bisbing, Teagan Evans, Jessica Ruff, Jennifer Stokesbury, Andrew |
description | •Rats were tested in an open field choice task.•The outcome of previous choices provided information about the approximate location of food.•Social information from a foraging partner was necessary to determine exact food location.•Personal information and social information can jointly control spatial choices.
To examine whether the outcome of a rat’s own choices (“personal information”) and the choice behavior of another rat (“social information”) can jointly control spatial choices, rats were tested in an open field task in which they searched for food. For the rats of primary interest (Subject Rats), the baited locations were all on one side of the arena, but the specific locations baited and the side on which they occurred varied over trials. The Subject Rats were sometimes tested together with an informed “Model” rat that had learned to find food in the same five locations (all on the same side of the arena) on every trial. Unintended perceptual cues apparently controlled spatial choices at first, but when perceptual cues to food location were not available, choices were controlled by both personal information (allowing the baited side of the arena to be determined) and social information (allowing baited locations to be determined more precisely). This shows that control by personal and social information are not mutually exclusive and supports the view that these two kinds of information can be used flexibly and adaptively to guide spatial choices.
This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: tribute to Tom Zentall. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.12.012 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1652436854</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0376635714003234</els_id><sourcerecordid>1652436854</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-1b035c97a97ac7c8fcfae17576e00c45d803653cff63e6f7213f769efe44ac583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEQgIMoWqv_QGSPXnbNO9GDIMUXCHrQc0hnJ5jSbmrSCv57U1o9CgMzDN_MMB8hZ4x2jDJ9OeumuMwJOk6Z7BjvKON7ZMSs4a0V1O6TERVGt1ooc0SOS5lRSpml-pAccaUMl8qOyOQ-fmGThhrYlNjjdfOKuaTBzxs_9E1JEGsZh5Dywq9iJePQlGUtaxs-UgQ8IQfBzwue7vKYvN_fvU0e2-eXh6fJ7XMLUvBVy6ZUKLgyvgYYsAGCR2aU0UgpSNVbKrQSEIIWqIPhTASjrzCglB6UFWNysd1b3_5cY1m5RSyA87kfMK2LY1pxKbRVsqJyi0JOpWQMbpnjwudvx6jb6HMzt9XnNvoc467qq2Pnuwvr6QL7v6FfXxW42QJY__yKmF2BiANgHzPCyvUp_n_hB7RdgfI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1652436854</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Five on one side: Personal and social information in spatial choice</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Brown, Michael F. ; Saxon, Marie E. ; Bisbing, Teagan ; Evans, Jessica ; Ruff, Jennifer ; Stokesbury, Andrew</creator><creatorcontrib>Brown, Michael F. ; Saxon, Marie E. ; Bisbing, Teagan ; Evans, Jessica ; Ruff, Jennifer ; Stokesbury, Andrew</creatorcontrib><description>•Rats were tested in an open field choice task.•The outcome of previous choices provided information about the approximate location of food.•Social information from a foraging partner was necessary to determine exact food location.•Personal information and social information can jointly control spatial choices.
To examine whether the outcome of a rat’s own choices (“personal information”) and the choice behavior of another rat (“social information”) can jointly control spatial choices, rats were tested in an open field task in which they searched for food. For the rats of primary interest (Subject Rats), the baited locations were all on one side of the arena, but the specific locations baited and the side on which they occurred varied over trials. The Subject Rats were sometimes tested together with an informed “Model” rat that had learned to find food in the same five locations (all on the same side of the arena) on every trial. Unintended perceptual cues apparently controlled spatial choices at first, but when perceptual cues to food location were not available, choices were controlled by both personal information (allowing the baited side of the arena to be determined) and social information (allowing baited locations to be determined more precisely). This shows that control by personal and social information are not mutually exclusive and supports the view that these two kinds of information can be used flexibly and adaptively to guide spatial choices.
This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: tribute to Tom Zentall.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0376-6357</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-8308</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.12.012</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25572458</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Animals ; Appetitive Behavior ; Choice Behavior ; Imitative Behavior ; Male ; Personal information ; Rats ; Social cognition ; Space Perception ; Spatial cognition ; Spatial cues</subject><ispartof>Behavioural processes, 2015-03, Vol.112, p.130-137</ispartof><rights>2015 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-1b035c97a97ac7c8fcfae17576e00c45d803653cff63e6f7213f769efe44ac583</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-1b035c97a97ac7c8fcfae17576e00c45d803653cff63e6f7213f769efe44ac583</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2327-4744</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376635714003234$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25572458$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brown, Michael F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saxon, Marie E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bisbing, Teagan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruff, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stokesbury, Andrew</creatorcontrib><title>Five on one side: Personal and social information in spatial choice</title><title>Behavioural processes</title><addtitle>Behav Processes</addtitle><description>•Rats were tested in an open field choice task.•The outcome of previous choices provided information about the approximate location of food.•Social information from a foraging partner was necessary to determine exact food location.•Personal information and social information can jointly control spatial choices.
To examine whether the outcome of a rat’s own choices (“personal information”) and the choice behavior of another rat (“social information”) can jointly control spatial choices, rats were tested in an open field task in which they searched for food. For the rats of primary interest (Subject Rats), the baited locations were all on one side of the arena, but the specific locations baited and the side on which they occurred varied over trials. The Subject Rats were sometimes tested together with an informed “Model” rat that had learned to find food in the same five locations (all on the same side of the arena) on every trial. Unintended perceptual cues apparently controlled spatial choices at first, but when perceptual cues to food location were not available, choices were controlled by both personal information (allowing the baited side of the arena to be determined) and social information (allowing baited locations to be determined more precisely). This shows that control by personal and social information are not mutually exclusive and supports the view that these two kinds of information can be used flexibly and adaptively to guide spatial choices.
This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: tribute to Tom Zentall.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Appetitive Behavior</subject><subject>Choice Behavior</subject><subject>Imitative Behavior</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Personal information</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Social cognition</subject><subject>Space Perception</subject><subject>Spatial cognition</subject><subject>Spatial cues</subject><issn>0376-6357</issn><issn>1872-8308</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEQgIMoWqv_QGSPXnbNO9GDIMUXCHrQc0hnJ5jSbmrSCv57U1o9CgMzDN_MMB8hZ4x2jDJ9OeumuMwJOk6Z7BjvKON7ZMSs4a0V1O6TERVGt1ooc0SOS5lRSpml-pAccaUMl8qOyOQ-fmGThhrYlNjjdfOKuaTBzxs_9E1JEGsZh5Dywq9iJePQlGUtaxs-UgQ8IQfBzwue7vKYvN_fvU0e2-eXh6fJ7XMLUvBVy6ZUKLgyvgYYsAGCR2aU0UgpSNVbKrQSEIIWqIPhTASjrzCglB6UFWNysd1b3_5cY1m5RSyA87kfMK2LY1pxKbRVsqJyi0JOpWQMbpnjwudvx6jb6HMzt9XnNvoc467qq2Pnuwvr6QL7v6FfXxW42QJY__yKmF2BiANgHzPCyvUp_n_hB7RdgfI</recordid><startdate>20150301</startdate><enddate>20150301</enddate><creator>Brown, Michael F.</creator><creator>Saxon, Marie E.</creator><creator>Bisbing, Teagan</creator><creator>Evans, Jessica</creator><creator>Ruff, Jennifer</creator><creator>Stokesbury, Andrew</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2327-4744</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20150301</creationdate><title>Five on one side: Personal and social information in spatial choice</title><author>Brown, Michael F. ; Saxon, Marie E. ; Bisbing, Teagan ; Evans, Jessica ; Ruff, Jennifer ; Stokesbury, Andrew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-1b035c97a97ac7c8fcfae17576e00c45d803653cff63e6f7213f769efe44ac583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Appetitive Behavior</topic><topic>Choice Behavior</topic><topic>Imitative Behavior</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Personal information</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Social cognition</topic><topic>Space Perception</topic><topic>Spatial cognition</topic><topic>Spatial cues</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brown, Michael F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saxon, Marie E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bisbing, Teagan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruff, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stokesbury, Andrew</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Behavioural processes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brown, Michael F.</au><au>Saxon, Marie E.</au><au>Bisbing, Teagan</au><au>Evans, Jessica</au><au>Ruff, Jennifer</au><au>Stokesbury, Andrew</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Five on one side: Personal and social information in spatial choice</atitle><jtitle>Behavioural processes</jtitle><addtitle>Behav Processes</addtitle><date>2015-03-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>112</volume><spage>130</spage><epage>137</epage><pages>130-137</pages><issn>0376-6357</issn><eissn>1872-8308</eissn><abstract>•Rats were tested in an open field choice task.•The outcome of previous choices provided information about the approximate location of food.•Social information from a foraging partner was necessary to determine exact food location.•Personal information and social information can jointly control spatial choices.
To examine whether the outcome of a rat’s own choices (“personal information”) and the choice behavior of another rat (“social information”) can jointly control spatial choices, rats were tested in an open field task in which they searched for food. For the rats of primary interest (Subject Rats), the baited locations were all on one side of the arena, but the specific locations baited and the side on which they occurred varied over trials. The Subject Rats were sometimes tested together with an informed “Model” rat that had learned to find food in the same five locations (all on the same side of the arena) on every trial. Unintended perceptual cues apparently controlled spatial choices at first, but when perceptual cues to food location were not available, choices were controlled by both personal information (allowing the baited side of the arena to be determined) and social information (allowing baited locations to be determined more precisely). This shows that control by personal and social information are not mutually exclusive and supports the view that these two kinds of information can be used flexibly and adaptively to guide spatial choices.
This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: tribute to Tom Zentall.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>25572458</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.beproc.2014.12.012</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2327-4744</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0376-6357 |
ispartof | Behavioural processes, 2015-03, Vol.112, p.130-137 |
issn | 0376-6357 1872-8308 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1652436854 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Animals Appetitive Behavior Choice Behavior Imitative Behavior Male Personal information Rats Social cognition Space Perception Spatial cognition Spatial cues |
title | Five on one side: Personal and social information in spatial choice |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T09%3A25%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Five%20on%20one%20side:%20Personal%20and%20social%20information%20in%20spatial%20choice&rft.jtitle=Behavioural%20processes&rft.au=Brown,%20Michael%20F.&rft.date=2015-03-01&rft.volume=112&rft.spage=130&rft.epage=137&rft.pages=130-137&rft.issn=0376-6357&rft.eissn=1872-8308&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.beproc.2014.12.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1652436854%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1652436854&rft_id=info:pmid/25572458&rft_els_id=S0376635714003234&rfr_iscdi=true |