Surgical treatment for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in Europe: a single center experience
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is the second most common primary liver tumor. The aim of this study was to analyze retrospectively the outcome of surgical treatment and prognostic factors. Clinical, histopathological and treatment data of 221 patients treated from 1995 to 2010 at our institution we...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences 2015-02, Vol.22 (2), p.131-137 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 137 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 131 |
container_title | Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Bektas, Hüseyin Yeyrek, Cemil Kleine, Moritz Vondran, Florian W. R. Timrott, Kai Schweitzer, Nora Vogel, Arndt Jäger, Mark D. Schrem, Harald Klempnauer, Jürgen Kousoulas, Lampros |
description | Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is the second most common primary liver tumor. The aim of this study was to analyze retrospectively the outcome of surgical treatment and prognostic factors. Clinical, histopathological and treatment data of 221 patients treated from 1995 to 2010 at our institution were investigated. Univariate and multivariate analysis of the patient's data was performed. Patients after R0 and R1 resection presented an overall survival of 67% and 54.5% after 1 year and 40% and 36.4% after 3 years, respectively. The survival of patients without resection of the tumor was dismal with 26% and 3.4% after 1 and 3 years, respectively. Survival after resection was not statistically different in cases with R0 versus R1 resection (P = 0.639, log rank). Univariate Cox regression revealed that higher T stages are a significant hazard for survival (P = 0.048, hazard ratio (HR): 1.211, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.002–2.465). Patients with tumor recurrence had a significantly inferior long‐term survival when compared to patients without recurrence (P < 0.001, log rank). Presence of lymph node metastasis (N1) was an independent prognostic factor for survival after resection in risk‐adjusted multivariate Cox regression (P < 0.001, HR: 2.577, 95% CI: 1.742–3.813). Adjuvant chemotherapy did not improve patient survival significantly (P = 0.550, log rank). Surgical resection is still the best treatment option for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma regarding the patient's long‐term survival. R0 and R1 resection enable both better survival rates when compared to surgical exploration without resection. T status, N status, and tumor recurrence seem to be the most important prognostic factors after resection. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jhbp.158 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1652430319</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3996465561</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5388-f87f27b43e44e15bc7c5fba6695ec3d77e719005c3cb987fc0720098577a44593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kNFqFDEUhoMotrQFn0AC3ngzNZkkcybe6VK7SmkFFUGEkEnP7GadmYzJDLZvb5bdriD03ORAvnz8-Ql5wdk5Z6x8s1k34zlX9RNyzOuqLipdl08PO8gjcpbShuURXGjBnpOjUnGlQfBj8vPLHFfe2Y5OEe3U4zDRNkTqhynaNY528o66dejssPLB2ej8EHqb7-nFHMOIb6mlyQ-rDqnLjzFSvBsxehwcnpJnre0Snu3PE_Ltw8XXxbK4urn8uHh3VTgl6rpoa2hLaKRAKZGrxoFTbWOrSit04hYAgWvGlBOu0Zl1DErGdK0ArJRKixPyeucdY_g9Y5pM75PDLofGMCfDK1VKkb-_RV_9h27CHIecznAApbiEqvwndDGkFLE1Y_S9jfeGM7Mt3WxLN7n0jL7cC-emx9sD-FBxBood8Md3eP-oyHxavv-8E-55nya8O_A2_jIVCFDm-_WlgR-LpSz1tVHiL9POmZ8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1775514762</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Surgical treatment for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in Europe: a single center experience</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Bektas, Hüseyin ; Yeyrek, Cemil ; Kleine, Moritz ; Vondran, Florian W. R. ; Timrott, Kai ; Schweitzer, Nora ; Vogel, Arndt ; Jäger, Mark D. ; Schrem, Harald ; Klempnauer, Jürgen ; Kousoulas, Lampros</creator><creatorcontrib>Bektas, Hüseyin ; Yeyrek, Cemil ; Kleine, Moritz ; Vondran, Florian W. R. ; Timrott, Kai ; Schweitzer, Nora ; Vogel, Arndt ; Jäger, Mark D. ; Schrem, Harald ; Klempnauer, Jürgen ; Kousoulas, Lampros</creatorcontrib><description>Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is the second most common primary liver tumor. The aim of this study was to analyze retrospectively the outcome of surgical treatment and prognostic factors. Clinical, histopathological and treatment data of 221 patients treated from 1995 to 2010 at our institution were investigated. Univariate and multivariate analysis of the patient's data was performed. Patients after R0 and R1 resection presented an overall survival of 67% and 54.5% after 1 year and 40% and 36.4% after 3 years, respectively. The survival of patients without resection of the tumor was dismal with 26% and 3.4% after 1 and 3 years, respectively. Survival after resection was not statistically different in cases with R0 versus R1 resection (P = 0.639, log rank). Univariate Cox regression revealed that higher T stages are a significant hazard for survival (P = 0.048, hazard ratio (HR): 1.211, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.002–2.465). Patients with tumor recurrence had a significantly inferior long‐term survival when compared to patients without recurrence (P < 0.001, log rank). Presence of lymph node metastasis (N1) was an independent prognostic factor for survival after resection in risk‐adjusted multivariate Cox regression (P < 0.001, HR: 2.577, 95% CI: 1.742–3.813). Adjuvant chemotherapy did not improve patient survival significantly (P = 0.550, log rank). Surgical resection is still the best treatment option for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma regarding the patient's long‐term survival. R0 and R1 resection enable both better survival rates when compared to surgical exploration without resection. T status, N status, and tumor recurrence seem to be the most important prognostic factors after resection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1868-6974</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1868-6982</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.158</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25159731</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Japan: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Bile Duct Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Bile Duct Neoplasms - surgery ; Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic ; Cholangiocarcinoma - epidemiology ; Cholangiocarcinoma - surgery ; Confidence intervals ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Germany - epidemiology ; Hepatectomy - methods ; Hepatectomy - mortality ; Humans ; Incidence ; Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma ; Male ; Medical prognosis ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate analysis ; Patients ; Prognostic factors ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgical treatment ; Survival Rate - trends ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences, 2015-02, Vol.22 (2), p.131-137</ispartof><rights>2014 Japanese Society of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Surgery</rights><rights>2014 Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5388-f87f27b43e44e15bc7c5fba6695ec3d77e719005c3cb987fc0720098577a44593</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5388-f87f27b43e44e15bc7c5fba6695ec3d77e719005c3cb987fc0720098577a44593</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjhbp.158$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjhbp.158$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25159731$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bektas, Hüseyin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeyrek, Cemil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kleine, Moritz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vondran, Florian W. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Timrott, Kai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schweitzer, Nora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vogel, Arndt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jäger, Mark D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schrem, Harald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klempnauer, Jürgen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kousoulas, Lampros</creatorcontrib><title>Surgical treatment for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in Europe: a single center experience</title><title>Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences</title><addtitle>J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci</addtitle><description>Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is the second most common primary liver tumor. The aim of this study was to analyze retrospectively the outcome of surgical treatment and prognostic factors. Clinical, histopathological and treatment data of 221 patients treated from 1995 to 2010 at our institution were investigated. Univariate and multivariate analysis of the patient's data was performed. Patients after R0 and R1 resection presented an overall survival of 67% and 54.5% after 1 year and 40% and 36.4% after 3 years, respectively. The survival of patients without resection of the tumor was dismal with 26% and 3.4% after 1 and 3 years, respectively. Survival after resection was not statistically different in cases with R0 versus R1 resection (P = 0.639, log rank). Univariate Cox regression revealed that higher T stages are a significant hazard for survival (P = 0.048, hazard ratio (HR): 1.211, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.002–2.465). Patients with tumor recurrence had a significantly inferior long‐term survival when compared to patients without recurrence (P < 0.001, log rank). Presence of lymph node metastasis (N1) was an independent prognostic factor for survival after resection in risk‐adjusted multivariate Cox regression (P < 0.001, HR: 2.577, 95% CI: 1.742–3.813). Adjuvant chemotherapy did not improve patient survival significantly (P = 0.550, log rank). Surgical resection is still the best treatment option for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma regarding the patient's long‐term survival. R0 and R1 resection enable both better survival rates when compared to surgical exploration without resection. T status, N status, and tumor recurrence seem to be the most important prognostic factors after resection.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Bile Duct Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Bile Duct Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic</subject><subject>Cholangiocarcinoma - epidemiology</subject><subject>Cholangiocarcinoma - surgery</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Germany - epidemiology</subject><subject>Hepatectomy - methods</subject><subject>Hepatectomy - mortality</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multivariate analysis</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prognostic factors</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgical treatment</subject><subject>Survival Rate - trends</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1868-6974</issn><issn>1868-6982</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kNFqFDEUhoMotrQFn0AC3ngzNZkkcybe6VK7SmkFFUGEkEnP7GadmYzJDLZvb5bdriD03ORAvnz8-Ql5wdk5Z6x8s1k34zlX9RNyzOuqLipdl08PO8gjcpbShuURXGjBnpOjUnGlQfBj8vPLHFfe2Y5OEe3U4zDRNkTqhynaNY528o66dejssPLB2ej8EHqb7-nFHMOIb6mlyQ-rDqnLjzFSvBsxehwcnpJnre0Snu3PE_Ltw8XXxbK4urn8uHh3VTgl6rpoa2hLaKRAKZGrxoFTbWOrSit04hYAgWvGlBOu0Zl1DErGdK0ArJRKixPyeucdY_g9Y5pM75PDLofGMCfDK1VKkb-_RV_9h27CHIecznAApbiEqvwndDGkFLE1Y_S9jfeGM7Mt3WxLN7n0jL7cC-emx9sD-FBxBood8Md3eP-oyHxavv-8E-55nya8O_A2_jIVCFDm-_WlgR-LpSz1tVHiL9POmZ8</recordid><startdate>201502</startdate><enddate>201502</enddate><creator>Bektas, Hüseyin</creator><creator>Yeyrek, Cemil</creator><creator>Kleine, Moritz</creator><creator>Vondran, Florian W. R.</creator><creator>Timrott, Kai</creator><creator>Schweitzer, Nora</creator><creator>Vogel, Arndt</creator><creator>Jäger, Mark D.</creator><creator>Schrem, Harald</creator><creator>Klempnauer, Jürgen</creator><creator>Kousoulas, Lampros</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201502</creationdate><title>Surgical treatment for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in Europe: a single center experience</title><author>Bektas, Hüseyin ; Yeyrek, Cemil ; Kleine, Moritz ; Vondran, Florian W. R. ; Timrott, Kai ; Schweitzer, Nora ; Vogel, Arndt ; Jäger, Mark D. ; Schrem, Harald ; Klempnauer, Jürgen ; Kousoulas, Lampros</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5388-f87f27b43e44e15bc7c5fba6695ec3d77e719005c3cb987fc0720098577a44593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Bile Duct Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Bile Duct Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic</topic><topic>Cholangiocarcinoma - epidemiology</topic><topic>Cholangiocarcinoma - surgery</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Germany - epidemiology</topic><topic>Hepatectomy - methods</topic><topic>Hepatectomy - mortality</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multivariate analysis</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prognostic factors</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgical treatment</topic><topic>Survival Rate - trends</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bektas, Hüseyin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeyrek, Cemil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kleine, Moritz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vondran, Florian W. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Timrott, Kai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schweitzer, Nora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vogel, Arndt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jäger, Mark D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schrem, Harald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klempnauer, Jürgen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kousoulas, Lampros</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bektas, Hüseyin</au><au>Yeyrek, Cemil</au><au>Kleine, Moritz</au><au>Vondran, Florian W. R.</au><au>Timrott, Kai</au><au>Schweitzer, Nora</au><au>Vogel, Arndt</au><au>Jäger, Mark D.</au><au>Schrem, Harald</au><au>Klempnauer, Jürgen</au><au>Kousoulas, Lampros</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Surgical treatment for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in Europe: a single center experience</atitle><jtitle>Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences</jtitle><addtitle>J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci</addtitle><date>2015-02</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>131</spage><epage>137</epage><pages>131-137</pages><issn>1868-6974</issn><eissn>1868-6982</eissn><abstract>Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is the second most common primary liver tumor. The aim of this study was to analyze retrospectively the outcome of surgical treatment and prognostic factors. Clinical, histopathological and treatment data of 221 patients treated from 1995 to 2010 at our institution were investigated. Univariate and multivariate analysis of the patient's data was performed. Patients after R0 and R1 resection presented an overall survival of 67% and 54.5% after 1 year and 40% and 36.4% after 3 years, respectively. The survival of patients without resection of the tumor was dismal with 26% and 3.4% after 1 and 3 years, respectively. Survival after resection was not statistically different in cases with R0 versus R1 resection (P = 0.639, log rank). Univariate Cox regression revealed that higher T stages are a significant hazard for survival (P = 0.048, hazard ratio (HR): 1.211, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.002–2.465). Patients with tumor recurrence had a significantly inferior long‐term survival when compared to patients without recurrence (P < 0.001, log rank). Presence of lymph node metastasis (N1) was an independent prognostic factor for survival after resection in risk‐adjusted multivariate Cox regression (P < 0.001, HR: 2.577, 95% CI: 1.742–3.813). Adjuvant chemotherapy did not improve patient survival significantly (P = 0.550, log rank). Surgical resection is still the best treatment option for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma regarding the patient's long‐term survival. R0 and R1 resection enable both better survival rates when compared to surgical exploration without resection. T status, N status, and tumor recurrence seem to be the most important prognostic factors after resection.</abstract><cop>Japan</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>25159731</pmid><doi>10.1002/jhbp.158</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1868-6974 |
ispartof | Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences, 2015-02, Vol.22 (2), p.131-137 |
issn | 1868-6974 1868-6982 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1652430319 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Bile Duct Neoplasms - epidemiology Bile Duct Neoplasms - surgery Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma - epidemiology Cholangiocarcinoma - surgery Confidence intervals Female Follow-Up Studies Germany - epidemiology Hepatectomy - methods Hepatectomy - mortality Humans Incidence Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma Male Medical prognosis Middle Aged Multivariate analysis Patients Prognostic factors Retrospective Studies Surgical treatment Survival Rate - trends Treatment Outcome |
title | Surgical treatment for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in Europe: a single center experience |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-20T02%3A52%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Surgical%20treatment%20for%20intrahepatic%20cholangiocarcinoma%20in%20Europe:%20a%20single%20center%20experience&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20hepato-biliary-pancreatic%20sciences&rft.au=Bektas,%20H%C3%BCseyin&rft.date=2015-02&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=131&rft.epage=137&rft.pages=131-137&rft.issn=1868-6974&rft.eissn=1868-6982&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jhbp.158&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3996465561%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1775514762&rft_id=info:pmid/25159731&rfr_iscdi=true |