Surgical treatment for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in Europe: a single center experience

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is the second most common primary liver tumor. The aim of this study was to analyze retrospectively the outcome of surgical treatment and prognostic factors. Clinical, histopathological and treatment data of 221 patients treated from 1995 to 2010 at our institution we...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences 2015-02, Vol.22 (2), p.131-137
Hauptverfasser: Bektas, Hüseyin, Yeyrek, Cemil, Kleine, Moritz, Vondran, Florian W. R., Timrott, Kai, Schweitzer, Nora, Vogel, Arndt, Jäger, Mark D., Schrem, Harald, Klempnauer, Jürgen, Kousoulas, Lampros
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 137
container_issue 2
container_start_page 131
container_title Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences
container_volume 22
creator Bektas, Hüseyin
Yeyrek, Cemil
Kleine, Moritz
Vondran, Florian W. R.
Timrott, Kai
Schweitzer, Nora
Vogel, Arndt
Jäger, Mark D.
Schrem, Harald
Klempnauer, Jürgen
Kousoulas, Lampros
description Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is the second most common primary liver tumor. The aim of this study was to analyze retrospectively the outcome of surgical treatment and prognostic factors. Clinical, histopathological and treatment data of 221 patients treated from 1995 to 2010 at our institution were investigated. Univariate and multivariate analysis of the patient's data was performed. Patients after R0 and R1 resection presented an overall survival of 67% and 54.5% after 1 year and 40% and 36.4% after 3 years, respectively. The survival of patients without resection of the tumor was dismal with 26% and 3.4% after 1 and 3 years, respectively. Survival after resection was not statistically different in cases with R0 versus R1 resection (P = 0.639, log rank). Univariate Cox regression revealed that higher T stages are a significant hazard for survival (P = 0.048, hazard ratio (HR): 1.211, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.002–2.465). Patients with tumor recurrence had a significantly inferior long‐term survival when compared to patients without recurrence (P < 0.001, log rank). Presence of lymph node metastasis (N1) was an independent prognostic factor for survival after resection in risk‐adjusted multivariate Cox regression (P < 0.001, HR: 2.577, 95% CI: 1.742–3.813). Adjuvant chemotherapy did not improve patient survival significantly (P = 0.550, log rank). Surgical resection is still the best treatment option for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma regarding the patient's long‐term survival. R0 and R1 resection enable both better survival rates when compared to surgical exploration without resection. T status, N status, and tumor recurrence seem to be the most important prognostic factors after resection.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jhbp.158
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1652430319</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3996465561</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5388-f87f27b43e44e15bc7c5fba6695ec3d77e719005c3cb987fc0720098577a44593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kNFqFDEUhoMotrQFn0AC3ngzNZkkcybe6VK7SmkFFUGEkEnP7GadmYzJDLZvb5bdriD03ORAvnz8-Ql5wdk5Z6x8s1k34zlX9RNyzOuqLipdl08PO8gjcpbShuURXGjBnpOjUnGlQfBj8vPLHFfe2Y5OEe3U4zDRNkTqhynaNY528o66dejssPLB2ej8EHqb7-nFHMOIb6mlyQ-rDqnLjzFSvBsxehwcnpJnre0Snu3PE_Ltw8XXxbK4urn8uHh3VTgl6rpoa2hLaKRAKZGrxoFTbWOrSit04hYAgWvGlBOu0Zl1DErGdK0ArJRKixPyeucdY_g9Y5pM75PDLofGMCfDK1VKkb-_RV_9h27CHIecznAApbiEqvwndDGkFLE1Y_S9jfeGM7Mt3WxLN7n0jL7cC-emx9sD-FBxBood8Md3eP-oyHxavv-8E-55nya8O_A2_jIVCFDm-_WlgR-LpSz1tVHiL9POmZ8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1775514762</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Surgical treatment for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in Europe: a single center experience</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Bektas, Hüseyin ; Yeyrek, Cemil ; Kleine, Moritz ; Vondran, Florian W. R. ; Timrott, Kai ; Schweitzer, Nora ; Vogel, Arndt ; Jäger, Mark D. ; Schrem, Harald ; Klempnauer, Jürgen ; Kousoulas, Lampros</creator><creatorcontrib>Bektas, Hüseyin ; Yeyrek, Cemil ; Kleine, Moritz ; Vondran, Florian W. R. ; Timrott, Kai ; Schweitzer, Nora ; Vogel, Arndt ; Jäger, Mark D. ; Schrem, Harald ; Klempnauer, Jürgen ; Kousoulas, Lampros</creatorcontrib><description>Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is the second most common primary liver tumor. The aim of this study was to analyze retrospectively the outcome of surgical treatment and prognostic factors. Clinical, histopathological and treatment data of 221 patients treated from 1995 to 2010 at our institution were investigated. Univariate and multivariate analysis of the patient's data was performed. Patients after R0 and R1 resection presented an overall survival of 67% and 54.5% after 1 year and 40% and 36.4% after 3 years, respectively. The survival of patients without resection of the tumor was dismal with 26% and 3.4% after 1 and 3 years, respectively. Survival after resection was not statistically different in cases with R0 versus R1 resection (P = 0.639, log rank). Univariate Cox regression revealed that higher T stages are a significant hazard for survival (P = 0.048, hazard ratio (HR): 1.211, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.002–2.465). Patients with tumor recurrence had a significantly inferior long‐term survival when compared to patients without recurrence (P &lt; 0.001, log rank). Presence of lymph node metastasis (N1) was an independent prognostic factor for survival after resection in risk‐adjusted multivariate Cox regression (P &lt; 0.001, HR: 2.577, 95% CI: 1.742–3.813). Adjuvant chemotherapy did not improve patient survival significantly (P = 0.550, log rank). Surgical resection is still the best treatment option for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma regarding the patient's long‐term survival. R0 and R1 resection enable both better survival rates when compared to surgical exploration without resection. T status, N status, and tumor recurrence seem to be the most important prognostic factors after resection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1868-6974</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1868-6982</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.158</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25159731</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Japan: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Bile Duct Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Bile Duct Neoplasms - surgery ; Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic ; Cholangiocarcinoma - epidemiology ; Cholangiocarcinoma - surgery ; Confidence intervals ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Germany - epidemiology ; Hepatectomy - methods ; Hepatectomy - mortality ; Humans ; Incidence ; Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma ; Male ; Medical prognosis ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate analysis ; Patients ; Prognostic factors ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgical treatment ; Survival Rate - trends ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences, 2015-02, Vol.22 (2), p.131-137</ispartof><rights>2014 Japanese Society of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Surgery</rights><rights>2014 Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5388-f87f27b43e44e15bc7c5fba6695ec3d77e719005c3cb987fc0720098577a44593</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5388-f87f27b43e44e15bc7c5fba6695ec3d77e719005c3cb987fc0720098577a44593</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjhbp.158$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjhbp.158$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25159731$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bektas, Hüseyin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeyrek, Cemil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kleine, Moritz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vondran, Florian W. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Timrott, Kai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schweitzer, Nora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vogel, Arndt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jäger, Mark D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schrem, Harald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klempnauer, Jürgen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kousoulas, Lampros</creatorcontrib><title>Surgical treatment for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in Europe: a single center experience</title><title>Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences</title><addtitle>J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci</addtitle><description>Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is the second most common primary liver tumor. The aim of this study was to analyze retrospectively the outcome of surgical treatment and prognostic factors. Clinical, histopathological and treatment data of 221 patients treated from 1995 to 2010 at our institution were investigated. Univariate and multivariate analysis of the patient's data was performed. Patients after R0 and R1 resection presented an overall survival of 67% and 54.5% after 1 year and 40% and 36.4% after 3 years, respectively. The survival of patients without resection of the tumor was dismal with 26% and 3.4% after 1 and 3 years, respectively. Survival after resection was not statistically different in cases with R0 versus R1 resection (P = 0.639, log rank). Univariate Cox regression revealed that higher T stages are a significant hazard for survival (P = 0.048, hazard ratio (HR): 1.211, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.002–2.465). Patients with tumor recurrence had a significantly inferior long‐term survival when compared to patients without recurrence (P &lt; 0.001, log rank). Presence of lymph node metastasis (N1) was an independent prognostic factor for survival after resection in risk‐adjusted multivariate Cox regression (P &lt; 0.001, HR: 2.577, 95% CI: 1.742–3.813). Adjuvant chemotherapy did not improve patient survival significantly (P = 0.550, log rank). Surgical resection is still the best treatment option for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma regarding the patient's long‐term survival. R0 and R1 resection enable both better survival rates when compared to surgical exploration without resection. T status, N status, and tumor recurrence seem to be the most important prognostic factors after resection.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Bile Duct Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Bile Duct Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic</subject><subject>Cholangiocarcinoma - epidemiology</subject><subject>Cholangiocarcinoma - surgery</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Germany - epidemiology</subject><subject>Hepatectomy - methods</subject><subject>Hepatectomy - mortality</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multivariate analysis</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prognostic factors</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgical treatment</subject><subject>Survival Rate - trends</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1868-6974</issn><issn>1868-6982</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kNFqFDEUhoMotrQFn0AC3ngzNZkkcybe6VK7SmkFFUGEkEnP7GadmYzJDLZvb5bdriD03ORAvnz8-Ql5wdk5Z6x8s1k34zlX9RNyzOuqLipdl08PO8gjcpbShuURXGjBnpOjUnGlQfBj8vPLHFfe2Y5OEe3U4zDRNkTqhynaNY528o66dejssPLB2ej8EHqb7-nFHMOIb6mlyQ-rDqnLjzFSvBsxehwcnpJnre0Snu3PE_Ltw8XXxbK4urn8uHh3VTgl6rpoa2hLaKRAKZGrxoFTbWOrSit04hYAgWvGlBOu0Zl1DErGdK0ArJRKixPyeucdY_g9Y5pM75PDLofGMCfDK1VKkb-_RV_9h27CHIecznAApbiEqvwndDGkFLE1Y_S9jfeGM7Mt3WxLN7n0jL7cC-emx9sD-FBxBood8Md3eP-oyHxavv-8E-55nya8O_A2_jIVCFDm-_WlgR-LpSz1tVHiL9POmZ8</recordid><startdate>201502</startdate><enddate>201502</enddate><creator>Bektas, Hüseyin</creator><creator>Yeyrek, Cemil</creator><creator>Kleine, Moritz</creator><creator>Vondran, Florian W. R.</creator><creator>Timrott, Kai</creator><creator>Schweitzer, Nora</creator><creator>Vogel, Arndt</creator><creator>Jäger, Mark D.</creator><creator>Schrem, Harald</creator><creator>Klempnauer, Jürgen</creator><creator>Kousoulas, Lampros</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201502</creationdate><title>Surgical treatment for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in Europe: a single center experience</title><author>Bektas, Hüseyin ; Yeyrek, Cemil ; Kleine, Moritz ; Vondran, Florian W. R. ; Timrott, Kai ; Schweitzer, Nora ; Vogel, Arndt ; Jäger, Mark D. ; Schrem, Harald ; Klempnauer, Jürgen ; Kousoulas, Lampros</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5388-f87f27b43e44e15bc7c5fba6695ec3d77e719005c3cb987fc0720098577a44593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Bile Duct Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Bile Duct Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic</topic><topic>Cholangiocarcinoma - epidemiology</topic><topic>Cholangiocarcinoma - surgery</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Germany - epidemiology</topic><topic>Hepatectomy - methods</topic><topic>Hepatectomy - mortality</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multivariate analysis</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prognostic factors</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgical treatment</topic><topic>Survival Rate - trends</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bektas, Hüseyin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeyrek, Cemil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kleine, Moritz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vondran, Florian W. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Timrott, Kai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schweitzer, Nora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vogel, Arndt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jäger, Mark D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schrem, Harald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klempnauer, Jürgen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kousoulas, Lampros</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bektas, Hüseyin</au><au>Yeyrek, Cemil</au><au>Kleine, Moritz</au><au>Vondran, Florian W. R.</au><au>Timrott, Kai</au><au>Schweitzer, Nora</au><au>Vogel, Arndt</au><au>Jäger, Mark D.</au><au>Schrem, Harald</au><au>Klempnauer, Jürgen</au><au>Kousoulas, Lampros</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Surgical treatment for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in Europe: a single center experience</atitle><jtitle>Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences</jtitle><addtitle>J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci</addtitle><date>2015-02</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>131</spage><epage>137</epage><pages>131-137</pages><issn>1868-6974</issn><eissn>1868-6982</eissn><abstract>Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is the second most common primary liver tumor. The aim of this study was to analyze retrospectively the outcome of surgical treatment and prognostic factors. Clinical, histopathological and treatment data of 221 patients treated from 1995 to 2010 at our institution were investigated. Univariate and multivariate analysis of the patient's data was performed. Patients after R0 and R1 resection presented an overall survival of 67% and 54.5% after 1 year and 40% and 36.4% after 3 years, respectively. The survival of patients without resection of the tumor was dismal with 26% and 3.4% after 1 and 3 years, respectively. Survival after resection was not statistically different in cases with R0 versus R1 resection (P = 0.639, log rank). Univariate Cox regression revealed that higher T stages are a significant hazard for survival (P = 0.048, hazard ratio (HR): 1.211, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.002–2.465). Patients with tumor recurrence had a significantly inferior long‐term survival when compared to patients without recurrence (P &lt; 0.001, log rank). Presence of lymph node metastasis (N1) was an independent prognostic factor for survival after resection in risk‐adjusted multivariate Cox regression (P &lt; 0.001, HR: 2.577, 95% CI: 1.742–3.813). Adjuvant chemotherapy did not improve patient survival significantly (P = 0.550, log rank). Surgical resection is still the best treatment option for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma regarding the patient's long‐term survival. R0 and R1 resection enable both better survival rates when compared to surgical exploration without resection. T status, N status, and tumor recurrence seem to be the most important prognostic factors after resection.</abstract><cop>Japan</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>25159731</pmid><doi>10.1002/jhbp.158</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1868-6974
ispartof Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences, 2015-02, Vol.22 (2), p.131-137
issn 1868-6974
1868-6982
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1652430319
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Bile Duct Neoplasms - epidemiology
Bile Duct Neoplasms - surgery
Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic
Cholangiocarcinoma - epidemiology
Cholangiocarcinoma - surgery
Confidence intervals
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Germany - epidemiology
Hepatectomy - methods
Hepatectomy - mortality
Humans
Incidence
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
Male
Medical prognosis
Middle Aged
Multivariate analysis
Patients
Prognostic factors
Retrospective Studies
Surgical treatment
Survival Rate - trends
Treatment Outcome
title Surgical treatment for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in Europe: a single center experience
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-20T02%3A52%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Surgical%20treatment%20for%20intrahepatic%20cholangiocarcinoma%20in%20Europe:%20a%20single%20center%20experience&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20hepato-biliary-pancreatic%20sciences&rft.au=Bektas,%20H%C3%BCseyin&rft.date=2015-02&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=131&rft.epage=137&rft.pages=131-137&rft.issn=1868-6974&rft.eissn=1868-6982&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jhbp.158&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3996465561%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1775514762&rft_id=info:pmid/25159731&rfr_iscdi=true