The Degree of Facial Movement following Microvascular Muscle Transfer in Pediatric Facial Reanimation Depends on Donor Motor Nerve Axonal Density

Free functional muscle transfer to the face is a standard of facial animation. The contralateral facial nerve, via a cross-face nerve graft, provides spontaneous innervation for the transferred muscle, but is not universally available and has additional shortcomings. The motor nerve to the masseter...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963) 2015-02, Vol.135 (2), p.370e-381e
Hauptverfasser: Snyder-Warwick, Alison K., Fattah, Adel Y., Zive, Leanne, Halliday, William, Borschel, Gregory H., Zuker, Ronald M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 381e
container_issue 2
container_start_page 370e
container_title Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)
container_volume 135
creator Snyder-Warwick, Alison K.
Fattah, Adel Y.
Zive, Leanne
Halliday, William
Borschel, Gregory H.
Zuker, Ronald M.
description Free functional muscle transfer to the face is a standard of facial animation. The contralateral facial nerve, via a cross-face nerve graft, provides spontaneous innervation for the transferred muscle, but is not universally available and has additional shortcomings. The motor nerve to the masseter provides an alternative innervation source. In this study, the authors compared donor nerve histomorphometry and clinical outcomes in a single patient population undergoing free muscle transfer to the face. Pediatric patients undergoing dynamic facial (re-)animation with intraoperative nerve biopsies and gracilis transfer to the face powered by either the contralateral facial nerve via a cross-face nerve graft or the motor nerve to the masseter were reviewed over a 7-year period. Myelinated nerve counts were assessed histomorphometrically, and functional outcomes were evaluated with the Scaled Measurement of Improvement in Lip Excursion software. From 2004 to 2011, 91 facial (re-)animation procedures satisfied study inclusion criteria. Average myelinated fiber counts were 6757 per mm2 in the donor facial nerve branch, 1647 per mm in the downstream cross-face nerve graft at the second stage, and 5289 per mm in the masseteric nerve. Reconstructions with either innervation source resulted in improvements in oral commissure excursion and smile symmetry, with the greatest amounts of oral commissure excursion noted in the masseteric nerve group. Facial (re-)animation procedures with use of the cross-face nerve graft or masseteric nerve are effective and result in symmetric smiles. The masseteric nerve provides a more robust innervation source and results in greater commissure excursion. Therapeutic, III.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000860
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1652423350</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1652423350</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4182-74320e8426bda6bab01859de7dd62412d9d50a1647a8ddd1d80fc30024b4b1143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkd9OHCEUxompqavtG5iGy96MPTDAzF4ardXEVWO31xNmOONSWVhhZlcfwzcWq7amJPxLvvM78H2E7DM4YDCtvl1d_zyA96NWsEUmTPJpIbjgH8gEoOQFA8l3yG5KvwFYVSr5kexwqbiqOZuQx_kC6THeREQaenqiO6sdnYU1LtEPtA_OhY31N3RmuxjWOnWj05HOxtQ5pPOofeoxUuvpFRqrh2i7N8g1am-XerDB5w4r9CbR52PwIQPCkNcLjGukh_fBZ_0x-mSHh09ku9cu4efXfY_8Ovk-Pzotzi9_nB0dnhedYDUvKlFywFpw1RqtWt0Cq-XUYGWM4oJxMzUSNFOi0rUxhpka-q4E4KIVLWOi3CNfX7irGO5GTEOztKlD57THMKaGKZldLEsJWSpepNmClCL2zSrmn8WHhkHzHEaTw2j-DyOXfXntMLZLNH-L3tz_x90EN2BMt27cYGwWqN2w-MNTshQFByaB51uRZ37SEyAblVI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1652423350</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Degree of Facial Movement following Microvascular Muscle Transfer in Pediatric Facial Reanimation Depends on Donor Motor Nerve Axonal Density</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Snyder-Warwick, Alison K. ; Fattah, Adel Y. ; Zive, Leanne ; Halliday, William ; Borschel, Gregory H. ; Zuker, Ronald M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Snyder-Warwick, Alison K. ; Fattah, Adel Y. ; Zive, Leanne ; Halliday, William ; Borschel, Gregory H. ; Zuker, Ronald M.</creatorcontrib><description>Free functional muscle transfer to the face is a standard of facial animation. The contralateral facial nerve, via a cross-face nerve graft, provides spontaneous innervation for the transferred muscle, but is not universally available and has additional shortcomings. The motor nerve to the masseter provides an alternative innervation source. In this study, the authors compared donor nerve histomorphometry and clinical outcomes in a single patient population undergoing free muscle transfer to the face. Pediatric patients undergoing dynamic facial (re-)animation with intraoperative nerve biopsies and gracilis transfer to the face powered by either the contralateral facial nerve via a cross-face nerve graft or the motor nerve to the masseter were reviewed over a 7-year period. Myelinated nerve counts were assessed histomorphometrically, and functional outcomes were evaluated with the Scaled Measurement of Improvement in Lip Excursion software. From 2004 to 2011, 91 facial (re-)animation procedures satisfied study inclusion criteria. Average myelinated fiber counts were 6757 per mm2 in the donor facial nerve branch, 1647 per mm in the downstream cross-face nerve graft at the second stage, and 5289 per mm in the masseteric nerve. Reconstructions with either innervation source resulted in improvements in oral commissure excursion and smile symmetry, with the greatest amounts of oral commissure excursion noted in the masseteric nerve group. Facial (re-)animation procedures with use of the cross-face nerve graft or masseteric nerve are effective and result in symmetric smiles. The masseteric nerve provides a more robust innervation source and results in greater commissure excursion. Therapeutic, III.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-1052</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1529-4242</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000860</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25626821</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Society of Plastic Surgeons</publisher><subject>Axons - ultrastructure ; Cell Count ; Child ; Esthetics ; Facial Asymmetry - prevention &amp; control ; Facial Expression ; Facial Muscles - innervation ; Facial Muscles - physiology ; Facial Nerve - physiology ; Facial Nerve - surgery ; Facial Paralysis - physiopathology ; Facial Paralysis - surgery ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Mandibular Nerve - physiology ; Mandibular Nerve - surgery ; Masseter Muscle - innervation ; Motor Neurons - physiology ; Movement ; Muscle, Skeletal - transplantation ; Nerve Fibers, Myelinated - ultrastructure ; Nerve Transfer - methods ; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods ; Recovery of Function ; Smiling - physiology ; Tissue Donors ; Transplantation, Heterotopic ; Transplants - innervation ; Transplants - physiology ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963), 2015-02, Vol.135 (2), p.370e-381e</ispartof><rights>American Society of Plastic Surgeons</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4182-74320e8426bda6bab01859de7dd62412d9d50a1647a8ddd1d80fc30024b4b1143</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4182-74320e8426bda6bab01859de7dd62412d9d50a1647a8ddd1d80fc30024b4b1143</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25626821$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Snyder-Warwick, Alison K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fattah, Adel Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zive, Leanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halliday, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borschel, Gregory H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zuker, Ronald M.</creatorcontrib><title>The Degree of Facial Movement following Microvascular Muscle Transfer in Pediatric Facial Reanimation Depends on Donor Motor Nerve Axonal Density</title><title>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</title><addtitle>Plast Reconstr Surg</addtitle><description>Free functional muscle transfer to the face is a standard of facial animation. The contralateral facial nerve, via a cross-face nerve graft, provides spontaneous innervation for the transferred muscle, but is not universally available and has additional shortcomings. The motor nerve to the masseter provides an alternative innervation source. In this study, the authors compared donor nerve histomorphometry and clinical outcomes in a single patient population undergoing free muscle transfer to the face. Pediatric patients undergoing dynamic facial (re-)animation with intraoperative nerve biopsies and gracilis transfer to the face powered by either the contralateral facial nerve via a cross-face nerve graft or the motor nerve to the masseter were reviewed over a 7-year period. Myelinated nerve counts were assessed histomorphometrically, and functional outcomes were evaluated with the Scaled Measurement of Improvement in Lip Excursion software. From 2004 to 2011, 91 facial (re-)animation procedures satisfied study inclusion criteria. Average myelinated fiber counts were 6757 per mm2 in the donor facial nerve branch, 1647 per mm in the downstream cross-face nerve graft at the second stage, and 5289 per mm in the masseteric nerve. Reconstructions with either innervation source resulted in improvements in oral commissure excursion and smile symmetry, with the greatest amounts of oral commissure excursion noted in the masseteric nerve group. Facial (re-)animation procedures with use of the cross-face nerve graft or masseteric nerve are effective and result in symmetric smiles. The masseteric nerve provides a more robust innervation source and results in greater commissure excursion. Therapeutic, III.</description><subject>Axons - ultrastructure</subject><subject>Cell Count</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Esthetics</subject><subject>Facial Asymmetry - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Facial Expression</subject><subject>Facial Muscles - innervation</subject><subject>Facial Muscles - physiology</subject><subject>Facial Nerve - physiology</subject><subject>Facial Nerve - surgery</subject><subject>Facial Paralysis - physiopathology</subject><subject>Facial Paralysis - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mandibular Nerve - physiology</subject><subject>Mandibular Nerve - surgery</subject><subject>Masseter Muscle - innervation</subject><subject>Motor Neurons - physiology</subject><subject>Movement</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - transplantation</subject><subject>Nerve Fibers, Myelinated - ultrastructure</subject><subject>Nerve Transfer - methods</subject><subject>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Recovery of Function</subject><subject>Smiling - physiology</subject><subject>Tissue Donors</subject><subject>Transplantation, Heterotopic</subject><subject>Transplants - innervation</subject><subject>Transplants - physiology</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0032-1052</issn><issn>1529-4242</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkd9OHCEUxompqavtG5iGy96MPTDAzF4ardXEVWO31xNmOONSWVhhZlcfwzcWq7amJPxLvvM78H2E7DM4YDCtvl1d_zyA96NWsEUmTPJpIbjgH8gEoOQFA8l3yG5KvwFYVSr5kexwqbiqOZuQx_kC6THeREQaenqiO6sdnYU1LtEPtA_OhY31N3RmuxjWOnWj05HOxtQ5pPOofeoxUuvpFRqrh2i7N8g1am-XerDB5w4r9CbR52PwIQPCkNcLjGukh_fBZ_0x-mSHh09ku9cu4efXfY_8Ovk-Pzotzi9_nB0dnhedYDUvKlFywFpw1RqtWt0Cq-XUYGWM4oJxMzUSNFOi0rUxhpka-q4E4KIVLWOi3CNfX7irGO5GTEOztKlD57THMKaGKZldLEsJWSpepNmClCL2zSrmn8WHhkHzHEaTw2j-DyOXfXntMLZLNH-L3tz_x90EN2BMt27cYGwWqN2w-MNTshQFByaB51uRZ37SEyAblVI</recordid><startdate>20150201</startdate><enddate>20150201</enddate><creator>Snyder-Warwick, Alison K.</creator><creator>Fattah, Adel Y.</creator><creator>Zive, Leanne</creator><creator>Halliday, William</creator><creator>Borschel, Gregory H.</creator><creator>Zuker, Ronald M.</creator><general>American Society of Plastic Surgeons</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150201</creationdate><title>The Degree of Facial Movement following Microvascular Muscle Transfer in Pediatric Facial Reanimation Depends on Donor Motor Nerve Axonal Density</title><author>Snyder-Warwick, Alison K. ; Fattah, Adel Y. ; Zive, Leanne ; Halliday, William ; Borschel, Gregory H. ; Zuker, Ronald M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4182-74320e8426bda6bab01859de7dd62412d9d50a1647a8ddd1d80fc30024b4b1143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Axons - ultrastructure</topic><topic>Cell Count</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Esthetics</topic><topic>Facial Asymmetry - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Facial Expression</topic><topic>Facial Muscles - innervation</topic><topic>Facial Muscles - physiology</topic><topic>Facial Nerve - physiology</topic><topic>Facial Nerve - surgery</topic><topic>Facial Paralysis - physiopathology</topic><topic>Facial Paralysis - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mandibular Nerve - physiology</topic><topic>Mandibular Nerve - surgery</topic><topic>Masseter Muscle - innervation</topic><topic>Motor Neurons - physiology</topic><topic>Movement</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - transplantation</topic><topic>Nerve Fibers, Myelinated - ultrastructure</topic><topic>Nerve Transfer - methods</topic><topic>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Recovery of Function</topic><topic>Smiling - physiology</topic><topic>Tissue Donors</topic><topic>Transplantation, Heterotopic</topic><topic>Transplants - innervation</topic><topic>Transplants - physiology</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Snyder-Warwick, Alison K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fattah, Adel Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zive, Leanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halliday, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borschel, Gregory H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zuker, Ronald M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Snyder-Warwick, Alison K.</au><au>Fattah, Adel Y.</au><au>Zive, Leanne</au><au>Halliday, William</au><au>Borschel, Gregory H.</au><au>Zuker, Ronald M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Degree of Facial Movement following Microvascular Muscle Transfer in Pediatric Facial Reanimation Depends on Donor Motor Nerve Axonal Density</atitle><jtitle>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</jtitle><addtitle>Plast Reconstr Surg</addtitle><date>2015-02-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>135</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>370e</spage><epage>381e</epage><pages>370e-381e</pages><issn>0032-1052</issn><eissn>1529-4242</eissn><abstract>Free functional muscle transfer to the face is a standard of facial animation. The contralateral facial nerve, via a cross-face nerve graft, provides spontaneous innervation for the transferred muscle, but is not universally available and has additional shortcomings. The motor nerve to the masseter provides an alternative innervation source. In this study, the authors compared donor nerve histomorphometry and clinical outcomes in a single patient population undergoing free muscle transfer to the face. Pediatric patients undergoing dynamic facial (re-)animation with intraoperative nerve biopsies and gracilis transfer to the face powered by either the contralateral facial nerve via a cross-face nerve graft or the motor nerve to the masseter were reviewed over a 7-year period. Myelinated nerve counts were assessed histomorphometrically, and functional outcomes were evaluated with the Scaled Measurement of Improvement in Lip Excursion software. From 2004 to 2011, 91 facial (re-)animation procedures satisfied study inclusion criteria. Average myelinated fiber counts were 6757 per mm2 in the donor facial nerve branch, 1647 per mm in the downstream cross-face nerve graft at the second stage, and 5289 per mm in the masseteric nerve. Reconstructions with either innervation source resulted in improvements in oral commissure excursion and smile symmetry, with the greatest amounts of oral commissure excursion noted in the masseteric nerve group. Facial (re-)animation procedures with use of the cross-face nerve graft or masseteric nerve are effective and result in symmetric smiles. The masseteric nerve provides a more robust innervation source and results in greater commissure excursion. Therapeutic, III.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Society of Plastic Surgeons</pub><pmid>25626821</pmid><doi>10.1097/PRS.0000000000000860</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0032-1052
ispartof Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963), 2015-02, Vol.135 (2), p.370e-381e
issn 0032-1052
1529-4242
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1652423350
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Axons - ultrastructure
Cell Count
Child
Esthetics
Facial Asymmetry - prevention & control
Facial Expression
Facial Muscles - innervation
Facial Muscles - physiology
Facial Nerve - physiology
Facial Nerve - surgery
Facial Paralysis - physiopathology
Facial Paralysis - surgery
Female
Humans
Male
Mandibular Nerve - physiology
Mandibular Nerve - surgery
Masseter Muscle - innervation
Motor Neurons - physiology
Movement
Muscle, Skeletal - transplantation
Nerve Fibers, Myelinated - ultrastructure
Nerve Transfer - methods
Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods
Recovery of Function
Smiling - physiology
Tissue Donors
Transplantation, Heterotopic
Transplants - innervation
Transplants - physiology
Treatment Outcome
title The Degree of Facial Movement following Microvascular Muscle Transfer in Pediatric Facial Reanimation Depends on Donor Motor Nerve Axonal Density
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T13%3A15%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Degree%20of%20Facial%20Movement%20following%20Microvascular%20Muscle%20Transfer%20in%20Pediatric%20Facial%20Reanimation%20Depends%20on%20Donor%20Motor%20Nerve%20Axonal%20Density&rft.jtitle=Plastic%20and%20reconstructive%20surgery%20(1963)&rft.au=Snyder-Warwick,%20Alison%20K.&rft.date=2015-02-01&rft.volume=135&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=370e&rft.epage=381e&rft.pages=370e-381e&rft.issn=0032-1052&rft.eissn=1529-4242&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/PRS.0000000000000860&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1652423350%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1652423350&rft_id=info:pmid/25626821&rfr_iscdi=true