Quantitative analysis of technological innovation in minimally invasive surgery

Background In the past 30 years surgical practice has changed considerably owing to the advent of minimally invasive surgery (MIS). This paper investigates the changing surgical landscape chronologically and quantitatively, examining the technologies that have played, and are forecast to play, the l...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of surgery 2015-01, Vol.102 (2), p.e151-e157
Hauptverfasser: Hughes-Hallett, A., Mayer, E. K., Pratt, P. J., Vale, J. A., Darzi, A. W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e157
container_issue 2
container_start_page e151
container_title British journal of surgery
container_volume 102
creator Hughes-Hallett, A.
Mayer, E. K.
Pratt, P. J.
Vale, J. A.
Darzi, A. W.
description Background In the past 30 years surgical practice has changed considerably owing to the advent of minimally invasive surgery (MIS). This paper investigates the changing surgical landscape chronologically and quantitatively, examining the technologies that have played, and are forecast to play, the largest part in this shift in surgical practice. Methods Electronic patent and publication databases were searched over the interval 1980–2011 for (‘minimally invasive’ OR laparoscopic OR laparoscopy OR ‘minimal access’ OR ‘key hole’) AND (surgery OR surgical OR surgeon). The resulting patent codes were allocated into technology clusters. Technology clusters referred to repeatedly in the contemporary surgical literature were also included in the analysis. Growth curves of patents and publications for the resulting technology clusters were then plotted. Results The initial search revealed 27 920 patents and 95 420 publications meeting the search criteria. The clusters meeting the criteria for in‐depth analysis were: instruments, image guidance, surgical robotics, sutures, single‐incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) and natural‐orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). Three patterns of growth were observed among these technology clusters: an S‐shape (instruments and sutures), a gradual exponential rise (surgical robotics and image guidance), and a rapid contemporaneous exponential rise (NOTES and SILS). Conclusion Technological innovation in MIS has been largely stagnant since its initial inception nearly 30 years ago, with few novel technologies emerging. The present study adds objective data to the previous claims that SILS, a surgical technique currently adopted by very few, represents an important part of the future of MIS. Single‐incision laparoscopic surgery spikes
doi_str_mv 10.1002/bjs.9706
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1652417637</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1652417637</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4546-16eadfa34a8475475aabf985491b1b70f6ce2d3496d7e7cde48cb4409f355cf03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0V1LwzAUBuAgiptT8BdIwRtvOvOd9VKHTt1wyPy4DGmbzsysnU077b83ZXOCEDgJeXLg5AXgFME-ghBfxgvXjwTke6CLCGchRnywD7oQQhEigkkHHDm3gBARyPAh6GDGsUA46oLpU63yylSqMmsdqFzZxhkXFFlQ6eQ9L2wxN4mygcnzYu1RkfttsDS5WSprG39YK9c-dXU512VzDA4yZZ0-2dYeeLm9eR7ehZPp6H54NQkTyigPEdcqzRShakAF80upOIsGjEYoRrGAGU80TgmNeCq0SFJNB0lMKYwywliSQdIDF5u-q7L4rLWr5NK4RFurcl3UTiLOMEWCE-Hp-T-6KOrST-qVYIQTiHnk1dlW1fFSp3JV-gnLRv5-lQfhBnwZq5vdPYKyjUD6CGQbgbx-mLX1zxtX6e-dV-WH5IIIJt8eR5LOxmjCX4kckx-LPIel</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1753630269</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantitative analysis of technological innovation in minimally invasive surgery</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Hughes-Hallett, A. ; Mayer, E. K. ; Pratt, P. J. ; Vale, J. A. ; Darzi, A. W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hughes-Hallett, A. ; Mayer, E. K. ; Pratt, P. J. ; Vale, J. A. ; Darzi, A. W.</creatorcontrib><description>Background In the past 30 years surgical practice has changed considerably owing to the advent of minimally invasive surgery (MIS). This paper investigates the changing surgical landscape chronologically and quantitatively, examining the technologies that have played, and are forecast to play, the largest part in this shift in surgical practice. Methods Electronic patent and publication databases were searched over the interval 1980–2011 for (‘minimally invasive’ OR laparoscopic OR laparoscopy OR ‘minimal access’ OR ‘key hole’) AND (surgery OR surgical OR surgeon). The resulting patent codes were allocated into technology clusters. Technology clusters referred to repeatedly in the contemporary surgical literature were also included in the analysis. Growth curves of patents and publications for the resulting technology clusters were then plotted. Results The initial search revealed 27 920 patents and 95 420 publications meeting the search criteria. The clusters meeting the criteria for in‐depth analysis were: instruments, image guidance, surgical robotics, sutures, single‐incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) and natural‐orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). Three patterns of growth were observed among these technology clusters: an S‐shape (instruments and sutures), a gradual exponential rise (surgical robotics and image guidance), and a rapid contemporaneous exponential rise (NOTES and SILS). Conclusion Technological innovation in MIS has been largely stagnant since its initial inception nearly 30 years ago, with few novel technologies emerging. The present study adds objective data to the previous claims that SILS, a surgical technique currently adopted by very few, represents an important part of the future of MIS. Single‐incision laparoscopic surgery spikes</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1323</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2168</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9706</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25627129</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJSUAM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Humans ; Inventions - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Laparoscopy ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - trends ; Patents as Topic - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Publishing - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Robotics ; Surgery ; Therapies, Investigational - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Therapies, Investigational - trends</subject><ispartof>British journal of surgery, 2015-01, Vol.102 (2), p.e151-e157</ispartof><rights>2015 BJS Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2015 BJS Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2015 BJS Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4546-16eadfa34a8475475aabf985491b1b70f6ce2d3496d7e7cde48cb4409f355cf03</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fbjs.9706$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fbjs.9706$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27929,27930,45579,45580</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25627129$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hughes-Hallett, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayer, E. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pratt, P. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vale, J. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darzi, A. W.</creatorcontrib><title>Quantitative analysis of technological innovation in minimally invasive surgery</title><title>British journal of surgery</title><addtitle>Br J Surg</addtitle><description>Background In the past 30 years surgical practice has changed considerably owing to the advent of minimally invasive surgery (MIS). This paper investigates the changing surgical landscape chronologically and quantitatively, examining the technologies that have played, and are forecast to play, the largest part in this shift in surgical practice. Methods Electronic patent and publication databases were searched over the interval 1980–2011 for (‘minimally invasive’ OR laparoscopic OR laparoscopy OR ‘minimal access’ OR ‘key hole’) AND (surgery OR surgical OR surgeon). The resulting patent codes were allocated into technology clusters. Technology clusters referred to repeatedly in the contemporary surgical literature were also included in the analysis. Growth curves of patents and publications for the resulting technology clusters were then plotted. Results The initial search revealed 27 920 patents and 95 420 publications meeting the search criteria. The clusters meeting the criteria for in‐depth analysis were: instruments, image guidance, surgical robotics, sutures, single‐incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) and natural‐orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). Three patterns of growth were observed among these technology clusters: an S‐shape (instruments and sutures), a gradual exponential rise (surgical robotics and image guidance), and a rapid contemporaneous exponential rise (NOTES and SILS). Conclusion Technological innovation in MIS has been largely stagnant since its initial inception nearly 30 years ago, with few novel technologies emerging. The present study adds objective data to the previous claims that SILS, a surgical technique currently adopted by very few, represents an important part of the future of MIS. Single‐incision laparoscopic surgery spikes</description><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inventions - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - trends</subject><subject>Patents as Topic - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Publishing - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Robotics</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Therapies, Investigational - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Therapies, Investigational - trends</subject><issn>0007-1323</issn><issn>1365-2168</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0V1LwzAUBuAgiptT8BdIwRtvOvOd9VKHTt1wyPy4DGmbzsysnU077b83ZXOCEDgJeXLg5AXgFME-ghBfxgvXjwTke6CLCGchRnywD7oQQhEigkkHHDm3gBARyPAh6GDGsUA46oLpU63yylSqMmsdqFzZxhkXFFlQ6eQ9L2wxN4mygcnzYu1RkfttsDS5WSprG39YK9c-dXU512VzDA4yZZ0-2dYeeLm9eR7ehZPp6H54NQkTyigPEdcqzRShakAF80upOIsGjEYoRrGAGU80TgmNeCq0SFJNB0lMKYwywliSQdIDF5u-q7L4rLWr5NK4RFurcl3UTiLOMEWCE-Hp-T-6KOrST-qVYIQTiHnk1dlW1fFSp3JV-gnLRv5-lQfhBnwZq5vdPYKyjUD6CGQbgbx-mLX1zxtX6e-dV-WH5IIIJt8eR5LOxmjCX4kckx-LPIel</recordid><startdate>201501</startdate><enddate>201501</enddate><creator>Hughes-Hallett, A.</creator><creator>Mayer, E. K.</creator><creator>Pratt, P. J.</creator><creator>Vale, J. A.</creator><creator>Darzi, A. W.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201501</creationdate><title>Quantitative analysis of technological innovation in minimally invasive surgery</title><author>Hughes-Hallett, A. ; Mayer, E. K. ; Pratt, P. J. ; Vale, J. A. ; Darzi, A. W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4546-16eadfa34a8475475aabf985491b1b70f6ce2d3496d7e7cde48cb4409f355cf03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inventions - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - trends</topic><topic>Patents as Topic - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Publishing - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Robotics</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Therapies, Investigational - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Therapies, Investigational - trends</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hughes-Hallett, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayer, E. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pratt, P. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vale, J. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darzi, A. W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British journal of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hughes-Hallett, A.</au><au>Mayer, E. K.</au><au>Pratt, P. J.</au><au>Vale, J. A.</au><au>Darzi, A. W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantitative analysis of technological innovation in minimally invasive surgery</atitle><jtitle>British journal of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Surg</addtitle><date>2015-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>102</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>e151</spage><epage>e157</epage><pages>e151-e157</pages><issn>0007-1323</issn><eissn>1365-2168</eissn><coden>BJSUAM</coden><abstract>Background In the past 30 years surgical practice has changed considerably owing to the advent of minimally invasive surgery (MIS). This paper investigates the changing surgical landscape chronologically and quantitatively, examining the technologies that have played, and are forecast to play, the largest part in this shift in surgical practice. Methods Electronic patent and publication databases were searched over the interval 1980–2011 for (‘minimally invasive’ OR laparoscopic OR laparoscopy OR ‘minimal access’ OR ‘key hole’) AND (surgery OR surgical OR surgeon). The resulting patent codes were allocated into technology clusters. Technology clusters referred to repeatedly in the contemporary surgical literature were also included in the analysis. Growth curves of patents and publications for the resulting technology clusters were then plotted. Results The initial search revealed 27 920 patents and 95 420 publications meeting the search criteria. The clusters meeting the criteria for in‐depth analysis were: instruments, image guidance, surgical robotics, sutures, single‐incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) and natural‐orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). Three patterns of growth were observed among these technology clusters: an S‐shape (instruments and sutures), a gradual exponential rise (surgical robotics and image guidance), and a rapid contemporaneous exponential rise (NOTES and SILS). Conclusion Technological innovation in MIS has been largely stagnant since its initial inception nearly 30 years ago, with few novel technologies emerging. The present study adds objective data to the previous claims that SILS, a surgical technique currently adopted by very few, represents an important part of the future of MIS. Single‐incision laparoscopic surgery spikes</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><pmid>25627129</pmid><doi>10.1002/bjs.9706</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-1323
ispartof British journal of surgery, 2015-01, Vol.102 (2), p.e151-e157
issn 0007-1323
1365-2168
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1652417637
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects Humans
Inventions - statistics & numerical data
Laparoscopy
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - statistics & numerical data
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - trends
Patents as Topic - statistics & numerical data
Publishing - statistics & numerical data
Robotics
Surgery
Therapies, Investigational - statistics & numerical data
Therapies, Investigational - trends
title Quantitative analysis of technological innovation in minimally invasive surgery
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T03%3A12%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantitative%20analysis%20of%20technological%20innovation%20in%20minimally%20invasive%20surgery&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Hughes-Hallett,%20A.&rft.date=2015-01&rft.volume=102&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=e151&rft.epage=e157&rft.pages=e151-e157&rft.issn=0007-1323&rft.eissn=1365-2168&rft.coden=BJSUAM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/bjs.9706&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1652417637%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1753630269&rft_id=info:pmid/25627129&rfr_iscdi=true