The ‘who are all these people?’ study
Background Overcrowding of emergency departments (EDs) adversely affects the delivery of emergency care and results in increased patient mortality. Objective and methods To examine what contributes to the ED crowd and to specifically examine the patient associated population. The ED in which the res...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Emergency medicine journal : EMJ 2015-02, Vol.32 (2), p.109-111 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 111 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 109 |
container_title | Emergency medicine journal : EMJ |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Gilligan, Peadar Joseph, Danny Bartlett, Matthew Morris, Aoife Mahajan, Ajay McHugh, Karen Hillary, Fiona O'Kelly, Patrick |
description | Background Overcrowding of emergency departments (EDs) adversely affects the delivery of emergency care and results in increased patient mortality. Objective and methods To examine what contributes to the ED crowd and to specifically examine the patient associated population. The ED in which the research was performed is consistently one of the most overcrowded in Ireland. Results On average 66.7% of the patients in the ED during the study period were boarded awaiting a hospital bed following full processing by the ED staff and agreement by the on-call team that admission was required. The most overcrowded part of the department was the majors area. In this area 55.5% of those present were patients, visitors accounted for 16.6% of occupants, nursing staff 11%, on-call teams 7% and the ED doctors 6.3%. Conclusions Knowing who the people in the crowd are helps to guide management decisions about how the crowd might be reduced. Our department now has a strict accompanying person/visitor policy that limits the number of visitors to patients and limits visiting times for those relatives with a patient who is experiencing a prolonged stay in the ED. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/emermed-2013-202478 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1652416167</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1652416167</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b405t-7d985b567d7a7fccb7cec65c09f6120d34b28ed95c548dd3464aff5df70fee13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMtKAzEUhoMotlafQJABN7qYmnumK5HiDQpuug8zyQltmemMyQzSXR9DX69PYspUF67cJDnkOz8_H0KXBI8JYfIOKvAV2JRiwuJBucqO0JBwRVNMCTv-fWMxQGchrDAmYsKzUzSgnFBGpBqi2_kCkt3282NRJ7mHJC_LpF1AgKSBuinhfrf9SkLb2c05OnF5GeDicI_Q_OlxPn1JZ2_Pr9OHWVpwLNpU2UkmCiGVVblyxhTKgJHC4ImThGLLeEEzsBNhBM9sHCXPnRPWKewACBuhmz628fV7B6HV1TIYKMt8DXUXNJEitpexfESv_6CruvPrWE4TlWHMacZYpFhPGV-H4MHpxi-r3G80wXovUh9E6r1I3YuMW1eH7K7Y__3s_JiLwLgHimr1r8RvbRd-gw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1780042833</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The ‘who are all these people?’ study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><creator>Gilligan, Peadar ; Joseph, Danny ; Bartlett, Matthew ; Morris, Aoife ; Mahajan, Ajay ; McHugh, Karen ; Hillary, Fiona ; O'Kelly, Patrick</creator><creatorcontrib>Gilligan, Peadar ; Joseph, Danny ; Bartlett, Matthew ; Morris, Aoife ; Mahajan, Ajay ; McHugh, Karen ; Hillary, Fiona ; O'Kelly, Patrick</creatorcontrib><description>Background Overcrowding of emergency departments (EDs) adversely affects the delivery of emergency care and results in increased patient mortality. Objective and methods To examine what contributes to the ED crowd and to specifically examine the patient associated population. The ED in which the research was performed is consistently one of the most overcrowded in Ireland. Results On average 66.7% of the patients in the ED during the study period were boarded awaiting a hospital bed following full processing by the ED staff and agreement by the on-call team that admission was required. The most overcrowded part of the department was the majors area. In this area 55.5% of those present were patients, visitors accounted for 16.6% of occupants, nursing staff 11%, on-call teams 7% and the ED doctors 6.3%. Conclusions Knowing who the people in the crowd are helps to guide management decisions about how the crowd might be reduced. Our department now has a strict accompanying person/visitor policy that limits the number of visitors to patients and limits visiting times for those relatives with a patient who is experiencing a prolonged stay in the ED.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1472-0205</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-0213</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2013-202478</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24123167</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><subject>Crowding ; Emergency medical care ; Emergency Service, Hospital - statistics & numerical data ; Emergency services ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Inpatients - statistics & numerical data ; Ireland ; Length of Stay ; Mortality ; Nursing ; Patients ; Personnel, Hospital - statistics & numerical data ; Physicians ; Population ; Prospective Studies ; Studies ; Time Factors ; Visitors to Patients - statistics & numerical data ; Workloads</subject><ispartof>Emergency medicine journal : EMJ, 2015-02, Vol.32 (2), p.109-111</ispartof><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.</rights><rights>Copyright: 2015 Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b405t-7d985b567d7a7fccb7cec65c09f6120d34b28ed95c548dd3464aff5df70fee13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b405t-7d985b567d7a7fccb7cec65c09f6120d34b28ed95c548dd3464aff5df70fee13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://emj.bmj.com/content/32/2/109.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://emj.bmj.com/content/32/2/109.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,315,781,785,3197,23576,27929,27930,77605,77636</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24123167$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gilligan, Peadar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joseph, Danny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartlett, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morris, Aoife</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahajan, Ajay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McHugh, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hillary, Fiona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Kelly, Patrick</creatorcontrib><title>The ‘who are all these people?’ study</title><title>Emergency medicine journal : EMJ</title><addtitle>Emerg Med J</addtitle><description>Background Overcrowding of emergency departments (EDs) adversely affects the delivery of emergency care and results in increased patient mortality. Objective and methods To examine what contributes to the ED crowd and to specifically examine the patient associated population. The ED in which the research was performed is consistently one of the most overcrowded in Ireland. Results On average 66.7% of the patients in the ED during the study period were boarded awaiting a hospital bed following full processing by the ED staff and agreement by the on-call team that admission was required. The most overcrowded part of the department was the majors area. In this area 55.5% of those present were patients, visitors accounted for 16.6% of occupants, nursing staff 11%, on-call teams 7% and the ED doctors 6.3%. Conclusions Knowing who the people in the crowd are helps to guide management decisions about how the crowd might be reduced. Our department now has a strict accompanying person/visitor policy that limits the number of visitors to patients and limits visiting times for those relatives with a patient who is experiencing a prolonged stay in the ED.</description><subject>Crowding</subject><subject>Emergency medical care</subject><subject>Emergency Service, Hospital - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Emergency services</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inpatients - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Ireland</subject><subject>Length of Stay</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Personnel, Hospital - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Visitors to Patients - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Workloads</subject><issn>1472-0205</issn><issn>1472-0213</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkMtKAzEUhoMotlafQJABN7qYmnumK5HiDQpuug8zyQltmemMyQzSXR9DX69PYspUF67cJDnkOz8_H0KXBI8JYfIOKvAV2JRiwuJBucqO0JBwRVNMCTv-fWMxQGchrDAmYsKzUzSgnFBGpBqi2_kCkt3282NRJ7mHJC_LpF1AgKSBuinhfrf9SkLb2c05OnF5GeDicI_Q_OlxPn1JZ2_Pr9OHWVpwLNpU2UkmCiGVVblyxhTKgJHC4ImThGLLeEEzsBNhBM9sHCXPnRPWKewACBuhmz628fV7B6HV1TIYKMt8DXUXNJEitpexfESv_6CruvPrWE4TlWHMacZYpFhPGV-H4MHpxi-r3G80wXovUh9E6r1I3YuMW1eH7K7Y__3s_JiLwLgHimr1r8RvbRd-gw</recordid><startdate>20150201</startdate><enddate>20150201</enddate><creator>Gilligan, Peadar</creator><creator>Joseph, Danny</creator><creator>Bartlett, Matthew</creator><creator>Morris, Aoife</creator><creator>Mahajan, Ajay</creator><creator>McHugh, Karen</creator><creator>Hillary, Fiona</creator><creator>O'Kelly, Patrick</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150201</creationdate><title>The ‘who are all these people?’ study</title><author>Gilligan, Peadar ; Joseph, Danny ; Bartlett, Matthew ; Morris, Aoife ; Mahajan, Ajay ; McHugh, Karen ; Hillary, Fiona ; O'Kelly, Patrick</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b405t-7d985b567d7a7fccb7cec65c09f6120d34b28ed95c548dd3464aff5df70fee13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Crowding</topic><topic>Emergency medical care</topic><topic>Emergency Service, Hospital - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Emergency services</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inpatients - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Ireland</topic><topic>Length of Stay</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Personnel, Hospital - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Visitors to Patients - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Workloads</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gilligan, Peadar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joseph, Danny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartlett, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morris, Aoife</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahajan, Ajay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McHugh, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hillary, Fiona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Kelly, Patrick</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Emergency medicine journal : EMJ</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gilligan, Peadar</au><au>Joseph, Danny</au><au>Bartlett, Matthew</au><au>Morris, Aoife</au><au>Mahajan, Ajay</au><au>McHugh, Karen</au><au>Hillary, Fiona</au><au>O'Kelly, Patrick</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The ‘who are all these people?’ study</atitle><jtitle>Emergency medicine journal : EMJ</jtitle><addtitle>Emerg Med J</addtitle><date>2015-02-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>109</spage><epage>111</epage><pages>109-111</pages><issn>1472-0205</issn><eissn>1472-0213</eissn><abstract>Background Overcrowding of emergency departments (EDs) adversely affects the delivery of emergency care and results in increased patient mortality. Objective and methods To examine what contributes to the ED crowd and to specifically examine the patient associated population. The ED in which the research was performed is consistently one of the most overcrowded in Ireland. Results On average 66.7% of the patients in the ED during the study period were boarded awaiting a hospital bed following full processing by the ED staff and agreement by the on-call team that admission was required. The most overcrowded part of the department was the majors area. In this area 55.5% of those present were patients, visitors accounted for 16.6% of occupants, nursing staff 11%, on-call teams 7% and the ED doctors 6.3%. Conclusions Knowing who the people in the crowd are helps to guide management decisions about how the crowd might be reduced. Our department now has a strict accompanying person/visitor policy that limits the number of visitors to patients and limits visiting times for those relatives with a patient who is experiencing a prolonged stay in the ED.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><pmid>24123167</pmid><doi>10.1136/emermed-2013-202478</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1472-0205 |
ispartof | Emergency medicine journal : EMJ, 2015-02, Vol.32 (2), p.109-111 |
issn | 1472-0205 1472-0213 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1652416167 |
source | MEDLINE; BMJ Journals - NESLi2 |
subjects | Crowding Emergency medical care Emergency Service, Hospital - statistics & numerical data Emergency services Hospitals Humans Inpatients - statistics & numerical data Ireland Length of Stay Mortality Nursing Patients Personnel, Hospital - statistics & numerical data Physicians Population Prospective Studies Studies Time Factors Visitors to Patients - statistics & numerical data Workloads |
title | The ‘who are all these people?’ study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T17%3A40%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20%E2%80%98who%20are%20all%20these%20people?%E2%80%99%20study&rft.jtitle=Emergency%20medicine%20journal%20:%20EMJ&rft.au=Gilligan,%20Peadar&rft.date=2015-02-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=109&rft.epage=111&rft.pages=109-111&rft.issn=1472-0205&rft.eissn=1472-0213&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2013-202478&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1652416167%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1780042833&rft_id=info:pmid/24123167&rfr_iscdi=true |