Neumann vs Leontief: two models, two approaches to the economy
The paper compares the basic assumptions and methodology of the Von Neumann model, developed for purely abstract theoretical purposes, and those of the Leontief model, designed originally for practical applications. Study of the similar mathematical structures of the Von Neumann model and the closed...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Közgazdasági szemle 2014-11, Vol.61 (11), p.1245-1278 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1278 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 1245 |
container_title | Közgazdasági szemle |
container_volume | 61 |
creator | Zalai, Erno |
description | The paper compares the basic assumptions and methodology of the Von Neumann model, developed for purely abstract theoretical purposes, and those of the Leontief model, designed originally for practical applications. Study of the similar mathematical structures of the Von Neumann model and the closed, stationary Leontief model, with a unit length of production period, often leads to the false conclusion that the latter is just a simplified version of the former. It is argued that the economic assumptions of the two models are quite different, which makes such an assertion unfounded. Technical choice and joint production are indispensable features of the Von Neumann model, and the assumption of unitary length of production period excludes the possibility of taking service flows explicitly into account. All these features are completely alien to the Leontief model, however. It is shown that the two models are in fact special cases of a more general stock-flow stationary model, reduced to forms containing only flow variables. Reprinted by permission of Akadémiai Kiadó |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1652366581</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1652366581</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_16523665813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVyr0KwjAUQOEMCtafd7ijg4W0aUNxcBHFQZzcS4i3tJLkVm-q-PaK-AJO5wzfSCRS5iotVKEnYsp8lVKrTFaJ2Jxw8CYEeDAckULssFlDfBJ4uqDj1fdN39_J2BYZIkFsEdBSIP-ai3FjHOPi15lY7nfn7SH9-NuAHGvfsUXnTEAauM50mSutyypTf9A3jKk7gg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1652366581</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Neumann vs Leontief: two models, two approaches to the economy</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Zalai, Erno</creator><creatorcontrib>Zalai, Erno</creatorcontrib><description>The paper compares the basic assumptions and methodology of the Von Neumann model, developed for purely abstract theoretical purposes, and those of the Leontief model, designed originally for practical applications. Study of the similar mathematical structures of the Von Neumann model and the closed, stationary Leontief model, with a unit length of production period, often leads to the false conclusion that the latter is just a simplified version of the former. It is argued that the economic assumptions of the two models are quite different, which makes such an assertion unfounded. Technical choice and joint production are indispensable features of the Von Neumann model, and the assumption of unitary length of production period excludes the possibility of taking service flows explicitly into account. All these features are completely alien to the Leontief model, however. It is shown that the two models are in fact special cases of a more general stock-flow stationary model, reduced to forms containing only flow variables. Reprinted by permission of Akadémiai Kiadó</description><identifier>ISSN: 0023-4346</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Design ; Economic analysis ; Methodology ; Production ; Stocks ; Unitary state</subject><ispartof>Közgazdasági szemle, 2014-11, Vol.61 (11), p.1245-1278</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zalai, Erno</creatorcontrib><title>Neumann vs Leontief: two models, two approaches to the economy</title><title>Közgazdasági szemle</title><description>The paper compares the basic assumptions and methodology of the Von Neumann model, developed for purely abstract theoretical purposes, and those of the Leontief model, designed originally for practical applications. Study of the similar mathematical structures of the Von Neumann model and the closed, stationary Leontief model, with a unit length of production period, often leads to the false conclusion that the latter is just a simplified version of the former. It is argued that the economic assumptions of the two models are quite different, which makes such an assertion unfounded. Technical choice and joint production are indispensable features of the Von Neumann model, and the assumption of unitary length of production period excludes the possibility of taking service flows explicitly into account. All these features are completely alien to the Leontief model, however. It is shown that the two models are in fact special cases of a more general stock-flow stationary model, reduced to forms containing only flow variables. Reprinted by permission of Akadémiai Kiadó</description><subject>Design</subject><subject>Economic analysis</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Production</subject><subject>Stocks</subject><subject>Unitary state</subject><issn>0023-4346</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVyr0KwjAUQOEMCtafd7ijg4W0aUNxcBHFQZzcS4i3tJLkVm-q-PaK-AJO5wzfSCRS5iotVKEnYsp8lVKrTFaJ2Jxw8CYEeDAckULssFlDfBJ4uqDj1fdN39_J2BYZIkFsEdBSIP-ai3FjHOPi15lY7nfn7SH9-NuAHGvfsUXnTEAauM50mSutyypTf9A3jKk7gg</recordid><startdate>20141101</startdate><enddate>20141101</enddate><creator>Zalai, Erno</creator><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141101</creationdate><title>Neumann vs Leontief: two models, two approaches to the economy</title><author>Zalai, Erno</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_16523665813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Design</topic><topic>Economic analysis</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Production</topic><topic>Stocks</topic><topic>Unitary state</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zalai, Erno</creatorcontrib><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Közgazdasági szemle</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zalai, Erno</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Neumann vs Leontief: two models, two approaches to the economy</atitle><jtitle>Közgazdasági szemle</jtitle><date>2014-11-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1245</spage><epage>1278</epage><pages>1245-1278</pages><issn>0023-4346</issn><abstract>The paper compares the basic assumptions and methodology of the Von Neumann model, developed for purely abstract theoretical purposes, and those of the Leontief model, designed originally for practical applications. Study of the similar mathematical structures of the Von Neumann model and the closed, stationary Leontief model, with a unit length of production period, often leads to the false conclusion that the latter is just a simplified version of the former. It is argued that the economic assumptions of the two models are quite different, which makes such an assertion unfounded. Technical choice and joint production are indispensable features of the Von Neumann model, and the assumption of unitary length of production period excludes the possibility of taking service flows explicitly into account. All these features are completely alien to the Leontief model, however. It is shown that the two models are in fact special cases of a more general stock-flow stationary model, reduced to forms containing only flow variables. Reprinted by permission of Akadémiai Kiadó</abstract></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0023-4346 |
ispartof | Közgazdasági szemle, 2014-11, Vol.61 (11), p.1245-1278 |
issn | 0023-4346 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1652366581 |
source | Business Source Complete |
subjects | Design Economic analysis Methodology Production Stocks Unitary state |
title | Neumann vs Leontief: two models, two approaches to the economy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T13%3A09%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Neumann%20vs%20Leontief:%20two%20models,%20two%20approaches%20to%20the%20economy&rft.jtitle=K%C3%B6zgazdas%C3%A1gi%20szemle&rft.au=Zalai,%20Erno&rft.date=2014-11-01&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1245&rft.epage=1278&rft.pages=1245-1278&rft.issn=0023-4346&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1652366581%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1652366581&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |