Neumann vs Leontief: two models, two approaches to the economy

The paper compares the basic assumptions and methodology of the Von Neumann model, developed for purely abstract theoretical purposes, and those of the Leontief model, designed originally for practical applications. Study of the similar mathematical structures of the Von Neumann model and the closed...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Közgazdasági szemle 2014-11, Vol.61 (11), p.1245-1278
1. Verfasser: Zalai, Erno
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1278
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1245
container_title Közgazdasági szemle
container_volume 61
creator Zalai, Erno
description The paper compares the basic assumptions and methodology of the Von Neumann model, developed for purely abstract theoretical purposes, and those of the Leontief model, designed originally for practical applications. Study of the similar mathematical structures of the Von Neumann model and the closed, stationary Leontief model, with a unit length of production period, often leads to the false conclusion that the latter is just a simplified version of the former. It is argued that the economic assumptions of the two models are quite different, which makes such an assertion unfounded. Technical choice and joint production are indispensable features of the Von Neumann model, and the assumption of unitary length of production period excludes the possibility of taking service flows explicitly into account. All these features are completely alien to the Leontief model, however. It is shown that the two models are in fact special cases of a more general stock-flow stationary model, reduced to forms containing only flow variables. Reprinted by permission of Akadémiai Kiadó
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1652366581</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1652366581</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_16523665813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVyr0KwjAUQOEMCtafd7ijg4W0aUNxcBHFQZzcS4i3tJLkVm-q-PaK-AJO5wzfSCRS5iotVKEnYsp8lVKrTFaJ2Jxw8CYEeDAckULssFlDfBJ4uqDj1fdN39_J2BYZIkFsEdBSIP-ai3FjHOPi15lY7nfn7SH9-NuAHGvfsUXnTEAauM50mSutyypTf9A3jKk7gg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1652366581</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Neumann vs Leontief: two models, two approaches to the economy</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Zalai, Erno</creator><creatorcontrib>Zalai, Erno</creatorcontrib><description>The paper compares the basic assumptions and methodology of the Von Neumann model, developed for purely abstract theoretical purposes, and those of the Leontief model, designed originally for practical applications. Study of the similar mathematical structures of the Von Neumann model and the closed, stationary Leontief model, with a unit length of production period, often leads to the false conclusion that the latter is just a simplified version of the former. It is argued that the economic assumptions of the two models are quite different, which makes such an assertion unfounded. Technical choice and joint production are indispensable features of the Von Neumann model, and the assumption of unitary length of production period excludes the possibility of taking service flows explicitly into account. All these features are completely alien to the Leontief model, however. It is shown that the two models are in fact special cases of a more general stock-flow stationary model, reduced to forms containing only flow variables. Reprinted by permission of Akadémiai Kiadó</description><identifier>ISSN: 0023-4346</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Design ; Economic analysis ; Methodology ; Production ; Stocks ; Unitary state</subject><ispartof>Közgazdasági szemle, 2014-11, Vol.61 (11), p.1245-1278</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zalai, Erno</creatorcontrib><title>Neumann vs Leontief: two models, two approaches to the economy</title><title>Közgazdasági szemle</title><description>The paper compares the basic assumptions and methodology of the Von Neumann model, developed for purely abstract theoretical purposes, and those of the Leontief model, designed originally for practical applications. Study of the similar mathematical structures of the Von Neumann model and the closed, stationary Leontief model, with a unit length of production period, often leads to the false conclusion that the latter is just a simplified version of the former. It is argued that the economic assumptions of the two models are quite different, which makes such an assertion unfounded. Technical choice and joint production are indispensable features of the Von Neumann model, and the assumption of unitary length of production period excludes the possibility of taking service flows explicitly into account. All these features are completely alien to the Leontief model, however. It is shown that the two models are in fact special cases of a more general stock-flow stationary model, reduced to forms containing only flow variables. Reprinted by permission of Akadémiai Kiadó</description><subject>Design</subject><subject>Economic analysis</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Production</subject><subject>Stocks</subject><subject>Unitary state</subject><issn>0023-4346</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVyr0KwjAUQOEMCtafd7ijg4W0aUNxcBHFQZzcS4i3tJLkVm-q-PaK-AJO5wzfSCRS5iotVKEnYsp8lVKrTFaJ2Jxw8CYEeDAckULssFlDfBJ4uqDj1fdN39_J2BYZIkFsEdBSIP-ai3FjHOPi15lY7nfn7SH9-NuAHGvfsUXnTEAauM50mSutyypTf9A3jKk7gg</recordid><startdate>20141101</startdate><enddate>20141101</enddate><creator>Zalai, Erno</creator><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141101</creationdate><title>Neumann vs Leontief: two models, two approaches to the economy</title><author>Zalai, Erno</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_16523665813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Design</topic><topic>Economic analysis</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Production</topic><topic>Stocks</topic><topic>Unitary state</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zalai, Erno</creatorcontrib><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Közgazdasági szemle</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zalai, Erno</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Neumann vs Leontief: two models, two approaches to the economy</atitle><jtitle>Közgazdasági szemle</jtitle><date>2014-11-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1245</spage><epage>1278</epage><pages>1245-1278</pages><issn>0023-4346</issn><abstract>The paper compares the basic assumptions and methodology of the Von Neumann model, developed for purely abstract theoretical purposes, and those of the Leontief model, designed originally for practical applications. Study of the similar mathematical structures of the Von Neumann model and the closed, stationary Leontief model, with a unit length of production period, often leads to the false conclusion that the latter is just a simplified version of the former. It is argued that the economic assumptions of the two models are quite different, which makes such an assertion unfounded. Technical choice and joint production are indispensable features of the Von Neumann model, and the assumption of unitary length of production period excludes the possibility of taking service flows explicitly into account. All these features are completely alien to the Leontief model, however. It is shown that the two models are in fact special cases of a more general stock-flow stationary model, reduced to forms containing only flow variables. Reprinted by permission of Akadémiai Kiadó</abstract></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0023-4346
ispartof Közgazdasági szemle, 2014-11, Vol.61 (11), p.1245-1278
issn 0023-4346
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1652366581
source Business Source Complete
subjects Design
Economic analysis
Methodology
Production
Stocks
Unitary state
title Neumann vs Leontief: two models, two approaches to the economy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T13%3A09%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Neumann%20vs%20Leontief:%20two%20models,%20two%20approaches%20to%20the%20economy&rft.jtitle=K%C3%B6zgazdas%C3%A1gi%20szemle&rft.au=Zalai,%20Erno&rft.date=2014-11-01&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1245&rft.epage=1278&rft.pages=1245-1278&rft.issn=0023-4346&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1652366581%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1652366581&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true