Effect of disabling bacteroid proline catabolism on the response of soybeans to repeated drought stress

The aim of this study is to evaluate the contribution of bacteroid proline catabolism as an adaptation to drought stress in soybean plants. To accomplish this, soybeans (Glycine max L. Merr.) were inoculated with either a parental strain of Bradyrhizobium japonicum which was able to catabolize proli...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of experimental botany 1997-06, Vol.48 (6), p.1299-1307
Hauptverfasser: Straub, Peter F., Shearer, Georgia, Reynolds, Paul H.S., Sawyer, Stanley A., Kohl, Daniel H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1307
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1299
container_title Journal of experimental botany
container_volume 48
creator Straub, Peter F.
Shearer, Georgia
Reynolds, Paul H.S.
Sawyer, Stanley A.
Kohl, Daniel H.
description The aim of this study is to evaluate the contribution of bacteroid proline catabolism as an adaptation to drought stress in soybean plants. To accomplish this, soybeans (Glycine max L. Merr.) were inoculated with either a parental strain of Bradyrhizobium japonicum which was able to catabolize proline, or a mutant strain unable to catabolize proline. A large strain-dependent difference in nodule number and size was observed. In order to separate inoculant-dependent effects on nodulation from effects on bacteroid proline catabolism, plants inoculated with each strain were only compared to other plants inoculated with the same strain, thus removing the observed inoculant-dependent differences in nodulation as a bar to interpretation of the results. This experimental design allowed a comparison of the drought penalty on yield for plants with parental bacteroids and for plants with mutant bacteroids. The two results were then compared to each other in order to evaluate the impact of the ability of bacteroids to catabolize proline on the response to drought stress. When water stress was mild, soybean plants inoculated with bacteria unable to catabolize proline suffered twice the percentage decrease in seed yield as did plants inoculated with bacteria able to catabolize proline. However, when stress was severe there was no significant effect of the ability of bacteroids to catabolize proline on drought imposed decrease in seed yield. These results suggest that increasing the oxidative flux of proline in bacteroids might provide an agronomically significant yield advantage when stress is modest, but that severe drought stress would probably overwhelm this yield benefit.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/jxb/48.6.1299
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16519537</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>23695814</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>23695814</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-f9988d94cfbe2b17050af56b8a7ef75d0724218d4b1e673542c9ffe1dad914633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkMtPGzEQxi3USqTQY4-VfKh62-Dnen2sEJCqVFyKhLhYfoZNN-vU40jw39dREJxmNPObx_ch9IWSJSWaX2ye3YUYlv2SMq1P0IKKnnRMcPoBLQhhrCNaqlP0CWBDCJFEygVaX6UUfcU54TCCddM4r7GzvsaSx4B3JbdKxN5W61oKW5xnXJ8iLhF2eYZ4mIT84qKdAdfc6rtoaww4lLxfP1UMtaFwjj4mO0H8_BrP0P311Z_LVXd7d_Pz8sdt57mUtUtaD0PQwicXmaOqfWmT7N1gVUxKBqKYYHQIwtHYKy4F87oJoMEG3eRyfoa-H_e2z__tI1SzHcHHabJzzHswtJdUS64a2B1BXzJAicnsyri15cVQYg52mmanEYPpzcHOxn97XWzB2ykVO_sR3oaY6tlAD_e_HrEN1Fze27zXcqDi_ewINT6_9W35a5oeJc3q4dH8Fr_4g1Qrc83_A8eIj7o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16519537</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of disabling bacteroid proline catabolism on the response of soybeans to repeated drought stress</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Straub, Peter F. ; Shearer, Georgia ; Reynolds, Paul H.S. ; Sawyer, Stanley A. ; Kohl, Daniel H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Straub, Peter F. ; Shearer, Georgia ; Reynolds, Paul H.S. ; Sawyer, Stanley A. ; Kohl, Daniel H.</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study is to evaluate the contribution of bacteroid proline catabolism as an adaptation to drought stress in soybean plants. To accomplish this, soybeans (Glycine max L. Merr.) were inoculated with either a parental strain of Bradyrhizobium japonicum which was able to catabolize proline, or a mutant strain unable to catabolize proline. A large strain-dependent difference in nodule number and size was observed. In order to separate inoculant-dependent effects on nodulation from effects on bacteroid proline catabolism, plants inoculated with each strain were only compared to other plants inoculated with the same strain, thus removing the observed inoculant-dependent differences in nodulation as a bar to interpretation of the results. This experimental design allowed a comparison of the drought penalty on yield for plants with parental bacteroids and for plants with mutant bacteroids. The two results were then compared to each other in order to evaluate the impact of the ability of bacteroids to catabolize proline on the response to drought stress. When water stress was mild, soybean plants inoculated with bacteria unable to catabolize proline suffered twice the percentage decrease in seed yield as did plants inoculated with bacteria able to catabolize proline. However, when stress was severe there was no significant effect of the ability of bacteroids to catabolize proline on drought imposed decrease in seed yield. These results suggest that increasing the oxidative flux of proline in bacteroids might provide an agronomically significant yield advantage when stress is modest, but that severe drought stress would probably overwhelm this yield benefit.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0957</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2431</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jxb/48.6.1299</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEBOA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Bacteroids ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bradyrhizobium japonicum ; Dehydration ; Drought ; drought stress ; Economic plant physiology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Glycine max ; Inoculum ; N2-fixation ; Nodulation ; Nodules ; Parasitism and symbiosis ; Plant physiology and development ; Planting ; Plants ; Plants and the Environment ; proline dehydrogenase ; Seed productivity ; Soybeans ; Symbiosis ; Symbiosis (nodules, symbiotic nitrogen fixation, mycorrhiza...)</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental botany, 1997-06, Vol.48 (6), p.1299-1307</ispartof><rights>Oxford University Press 1997</rights><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-f9988d94cfbe2b17050af56b8a7ef75d0724218d4b1e673542c9ffe1dad914633</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23695814$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/23695814$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,801,27907,27908,58000,58233</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2762813$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Straub, Peter F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shearer, Georgia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reynolds, Paul H.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sawyer, Stanley A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kohl, Daniel H.</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of disabling bacteroid proline catabolism on the response of soybeans to repeated drought stress</title><title>Journal of experimental botany</title><description>The aim of this study is to evaluate the contribution of bacteroid proline catabolism as an adaptation to drought stress in soybean plants. To accomplish this, soybeans (Glycine max L. Merr.) were inoculated with either a parental strain of Bradyrhizobium japonicum which was able to catabolize proline, or a mutant strain unable to catabolize proline. A large strain-dependent difference in nodule number and size was observed. In order to separate inoculant-dependent effects on nodulation from effects on bacteroid proline catabolism, plants inoculated with each strain were only compared to other plants inoculated with the same strain, thus removing the observed inoculant-dependent differences in nodulation as a bar to interpretation of the results. This experimental design allowed a comparison of the drought penalty on yield for plants with parental bacteroids and for plants with mutant bacteroids. The two results were then compared to each other in order to evaluate the impact of the ability of bacteroids to catabolize proline on the response to drought stress. When water stress was mild, soybean plants inoculated with bacteria unable to catabolize proline suffered twice the percentage decrease in seed yield as did plants inoculated with bacteria able to catabolize proline. However, when stress was severe there was no significant effect of the ability of bacteroids to catabolize proline on drought imposed decrease in seed yield. These results suggest that increasing the oxidative flux of proline in bacteroids might provide an agronomically significant yield advantage when stress is modest, but that severe drought stress would probably overwhelm this yield benefit.</description><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Bacteroids</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bradyrhizobium japonicum</subject><subject>Dehydration</subject><subject>Drought</subject><subject>drought stress</subject><subject>Economic plant physiology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Glycine max</subject><subject>Inoculum</subject><subject>N2-fixation</subject><subject>Nodulation</subject><subject>Nodules</subject><subject>Parasitism and symbiosis</subject><subject>Plant physiology and development</subject><subject>Planting</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Plants and the Environment</subject><subject>proline dehydrogenase</subject><subject>Seed productivity</subject><subject>Soybeans</subject><subject>Symbiosis</subject><subject>Symbiosis (nodules, symbiotic nitrogen fixation, mycorrhiza...)</subject><issn>0022-0957</issn><issn>1460-2431</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkMtPGzEQxi3USqTQY4-VfKh62-Dnen2sEJCqVFyKhLhYfoZNN-vU40jw39dREJxmNPObx_ch9IWSJSWaX2ye3YUYlv2SMq1P0IKKnnRMcPoBLQhhrCNaqlP0CWBDCJFEygVaX6UUfcU54TCCddM4r7GzvsaSx4B3JbdKxN5W61oKW5xnXJ8iLhF2eYZ4mIT84qKdAdfc6rtoaww4lLxfP1UMtaFwjj4mO0H8_BrP0P311Z_LVXd7d_Pz8sdt57mUtUtaD0PQwicXmaOqfWmT7N1gVUxKBqKYYHQIwtHYKy4F87oJoMEG3eRyfoa-H_e2z__tI1SzHcHHabJzzHswtJdUS64a2B1BXzJAicnsyri15cVQYg52mmanEYPpzcHOxn97XWzB2ykVO_sR3oaY6tlAD_e_HrEN1Fze27zXcqDi_ewINT6_9W35a5oeJc3q4dH8Fr_4g1Qrc83_A8eIj7o</recordid><startdate>19970601</startdate><enddate>19970601</enddate><creator>Straub, Peter F.</creator><creator>Shearer, Georgia</creator><creator>Reynolds, Paul H.S.</creator><creator>Sawyer, Stanley A.</creator><creator>Kohl, Daniel H.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970601</creationdate><title>Effect of disabling bacteroid proline catabolism on the response of soybeans to repeated drought stress</title><author>Straub, Peter F. ; Shearer, Georgia ; Reynolds, Paul H.S. ; Sawyer, Stanley A. ; Kohl, Daniel H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-f9988d94cfbe2b17050af56b8a7ef75d0724218d4b1e673542c9ffe1dad914633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Bacteroids</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bradyrhizobium japonicum</topic><topic>Dehydration</topic><topic>Drought</topic><topic>drought stress</topic><topic>Economic plant physiology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Glycine max</topic><topic>Inoculum</topic><topic>N2-fixation</topic><topic>Nodulation</topic><topic>Nodules</topic><topic>Parasitism and symbiosis</topic><topic>Plant physiology and development</topic><topic>Planting</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Plants and the Environment</topic><topic>proline dehydrogenase</topic><topic>Seed productivity</topic><topic>Soybeans</topic><topic>Symbiosis</topic><topic>Symbiosis (nodules, symbiotic nitrogen fixation, mycorrhiza...)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Straub, Peter F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shearer, Georgia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reynolds, Paul H.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sawyer, Stanley A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kohl, Daniel H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental botany</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Straub, Peter F.</au><au>Shearer, Georgia</au><au>Reynolds, Paul H.S.</au><au>Sawyer, Stanley A.</au><au>Kohl, Daniel H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of disabling bacteroid proline catabolism on the response of soybeans to repeated drought stress</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental botany</jtitle><date>1997-06-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1299</spage><epage>1307</epage><pages>1299-1307</pages><issn>0022-0957</issn><eissn>1460-2431</eissn><coden>JEBOA6</coden><abstract>The aim of this study is to evaluate the contribution of bacteroid proline catabolism as an adaptation to drought stress in soybean plants. To accomplish this, soybeans (Glycine max L. Merr.) were inoculated with either a parental strain of Bradyrhizobium japonicum which was able to catabolize proline, or a mutant strain unable to catabolize proline. A large strain-dependent difference in nodule number and size was observed. In order to separate inoculant-dependent effects on nodulation from effects on bacteroid proline catabolism, plants inoculated with each strain were only compared to other plants inoculated with the same strain, thus removing the observed inoculant-dependent differences in nodulation as a bar to interpretation of the results. This experimental design allowed a comparison of the drought penalty on yield for plants with parental bacteroids and for plants with mutant bacteroids. The two results were then compared to each other in order to evaluate the impact of the ability of bacteroids to catabolize proline on the response to drought stress. When water stress was mild, soybean plants inoculated with bacteria unable to catabolize proline suffered twice the percentage decrease in seed yield as did plants inoculated with bacteria able to catabolize proline. However, when stress was severe there was no significant effect of the ability of bacteroids to catabolize proline on drought imposed decrease in seed yield. These results suggest that increasing the oxidative flux of proline in bacteroids might provide an agronomically significant yield advantage when stress is modest, but that severe drought stress would probably overwhelm this yield benefit.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/jxb/48.6.1299</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0957
ispartof Journal of experimental botany, 1997-06, Vol.48 (6), p.1299-1307
issn 0022-0957
1460-2431
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16519537
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions
Bacteroids
Biological and medical sciences
Bradyrhizobium japonicum
Dehydration
Drought
drought stress
Economic plant physiology
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Glycine max
Inoculum
N2-fixation
Nodulation
Nodules
Parasitism and symbiosis
Plant physiology and development
Planting
Plants
Plants and the Environment
proline dehydrogenase
Seed productivity
Soybeans
Symbiosis
Symbiosis (nodules, symbiotic nitrogen fixation, mycorrhiza...)
title Effect of disabling bacteroid proline catabolism on the response of soybeans to repeated drought stress
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T03%3A44%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20disabling%20bacteroid%20proline%20catabolism%20on%20the%20response%20of%20soybeans%20to%20repeated%20drought%20stress&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20botany&rft.au=Straub,%20Peter%20F.&rft.date=1997-06-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1299&rft.epage=1307&rft.pages=1299-1307&rft.issn=0022-0957&rft.eissn=1460-2431&rft.coden=JEBOA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jxb/48.6.1299&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E23695814%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16519537&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=23695814&rfr_iscdi=true