Getting immersed in teacher and student perspectives? Facilitating analytical competence using video cases in teacher education

The ability to analyze and understand classroom situations through the eyes of not only teachers but also students can be seen as a crucial aspect of teachers' professional competence. Even though video case-based learning is considered to have great potential for the promotion of analytical co...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Instructional science 2014-01, Vol.42 (1), p.91-114
Hauptverfasser: Goeze, Annika, Zottmann, Jan M., Vogel, Freydis, Fischer, Frank, Schrader, Josef
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 114
container_issue 1
container_start_page 91
container_title Instructional science
container_volume 42
creator Goeze, Annika
Zottmann, Jan M.
Vogel, Freydis
Fischer, Frank
Schrader, Josef
description The ability to analyze and understand classroom situations through the eyes of not only teachers but also students can be seen as a crucial aspect of teachers' professional competence. Even though video case-based learning is considered to have great potential for the promotion of analytical competence of teachers (i.e., becoming immersed in student and teacher perspectives as well as applying conceptual knowledge to better understand classroom situations), only a few studies have investigated the effects of corresponding instructional support. This empirical field study examines the effects on analytical competence of two types of instructional support— hyperlinks to multiple perspectives and hyperlinks to conceptual knowledge— by using a 2 × 2 factorial design in a computersupported video case-based learning environment inspired by cognitive flexibility theory and participatory design. The study examines collaborative learning processes to discover what specific kind of instruction may help to counteract some of the known deficits of casebased learning and teacher thinking, such as limited perspective-taking. From a participatory design point of view, training novices to become immersed in teacher and student perspectives can be considered as an alternative for direct involvement of teachers and students in the design process. The study was realized as a four-day university course for pre-service teachers (N = 100). ANCOVAs of learning processes (small-group discussions) and outcomes (written case analyses) provide evidence that both types of instructional support (i.e., hyperlinks to multiple perspectives and conceptual knowledge) are beneficial. In particular, hyperlinks to multiple perspectives affected small-group case discussions and written post-tests as they led to increased immersion (i.e., perspective- taking). Hyperlinks to conceptual knowledge furthered the application of this knowledge, especially in the written post-tests. Implications for teacher education, participatory design, and further research are discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11251-013-9304-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1651865589</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1039483</ericid><jstor_id>43575216</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>43575216</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-d6c2a8568fd1a99d62de7bb0d8962699ffc0f4e0fd23cfe18de9d4e49c6acdde3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1rFjEUhYMo-Nr2B7gQAm7cTM3N10xWIqWtlUI3dj2kyZ2al5nMmGQKXfWvm9eRUty4yuJ5zrmEQ8h7YKfAWPs5A3AFDQPRGMFkI16RHahWNGAUf012jHHWSN62b8m7nPeMMZAd25GnSywlxHsapglTRk9DpAWt-4mJ2uhpLqvHWOhS6YKuhAfMX-iFdWEMxf6J2mjHxxKcHambpwULRod0zQf2EDzO1NmM-WUz-tXV8ByPyZvBjhlP_r5H5Pbi_MfZt-b65vLq7Ot146TQpfHacdsp3Q0erDFec4_t3R3zndFcGzMMjg0S2eC5cANC59F4idI4bZ33KI7Ip613SfOvFXPpp5AdjqONOK-5B62g00p1pqof_1H385rqH6slDefQAVPVgs1yac454dAvKUw2PfbA-sMk_TZJXyfpD5P0omY-bBlMwT3759-BCSO7A-cbz5XFe0wvLv-_dJ_LnJ5bpVCt4qDFb8inpLQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1492218105</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Getting immersed in teacher and student perspectives? Facilitating analytical competence using video cases in teacher education</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Goeze, Annika ; Zottmann, Jan M. ; Vogel, Freydis ; Fischer, Frank ; Schrader, Josef</creator><creatorcontrib>Goeze, Annika ; Zottmann, Jan M. ; Vogel, Freydis ; Fischer, Frank ; Schrader, Josef</creatorcontrib><description>The ability to analyze and understand classroom situations through the eyes of not only teachers but also students can be seen as a crucial aspect of teachers' professional competence. Even though video case-based learning is considered to have great potential for the promotion of analytical competence of teachers (i.e., becoming immersed in student and teacher perspectives as well as applying conceptual knowledge to better understand classroom situations), only a few studies have investigated the effects of corresponding instructional support. This empirical field study examines the effects on analytical competence of two types of instructional support— hyperlinks to multiple perspectives and hyperlinks to conceptual knowledge— by using a 2 × 2 factorial design in a computersupported video case-based learning environment inspired by cognitive flexibility theory and participatory design. The study examines collaborative learning processes to discover what specific kind of instruction may help to counteract some of the known deficits of casebased learning and teacher thinking, such as limited perspective-taking. From a participatory design point of view, training novices to become immersed in teacher and student perspectives can be considered as an alternative for direct involvement of teachers and students in the design process. The study was realized as a four-day university course for pre-service teachers (N = 100). ANCOVAs of learning processes (small-group discussions) and outcomes (written case analyses) provide evidence that both types of instructional support (i.e., hyperlinks to multiple perspectives and conceptual knowledge) are beneficial. In particular, hyperlinks to multiple perspectives affected small-group case discussions and written post-tests as they led to increased immersion (i.e., perspective- taking). Hyperlinks to conceptual knowledge furthered the application of this knowledge, especially in the written post-tests. Implications for teacher education, participatory design, and further research are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-4277</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1952</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11251-013-9304-3</identifier><identifier>CODEN: INLSBJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Art teachers ; CAI ; Case Studies ; Collaborative learning ; Computer assisted instruction ; Computer Uses in Education ; Cooperative Learning ; Education ; Educational Environment ; Educational Psychology ; Educational Researchers ; Educational technology ; Higher Education ; Hyperlinks ; Hypermedia ; Learning ; Learning and Instruction ; Learning Processes ; Learning Theories ; Lifelong Learning ; Outcomes of education ; Pedagogic Psychology ; Posttests ; Preservice Teachers ; Pretests Posttests ; Statistical Analysis ; Student Attitudes ; Teacher Attitudes ; Teacher Competencies ; Teacher Education ; Teacher Educators ; Teachers ; Thinking Skills ; Video Technology</subject><ispartof>Instructional science, 2014-01, Vol.42 (1), p.91-114</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media 2014</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-d6c2a8568fd1a99d62de7bb0d8962699ffc0f4e0fd23cfe18de9d4e49c6acdde3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-d6c2a8568fd1a99d62de7bb0d8962699ffc0f4e0fd23cfe18de9d4e49c6acdde3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/43575216$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/43575216$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1039483$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Goeze, Annika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zottmann, Jan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vogel, Freydis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schrader, Josef</creatorcontrib><title>Getting immersed in teacher and student perspectives? Facilitating analytical competence using video cases in teacher education</title><title>Instructional science</title><addtitle>Instr Sci</addtitle><description>The ability to analyze and understand classroom situations through the eyes of not only teachers but also students can be seen as a crucial aspect of teachers' professional competence. Even though video case-based learning is considered to have great potential for the promotion of analytical competence of teachers (i.e., becoming immersed in student and teacher perspectives as well as applying conceptual knowledge to better understand classroom situations), only a few studies have investigated the effects of corresponding instructional support. This empirical field study examines the effects on analytical competence of two types of instructional support— hyperlinks to multiple perspectives and hyperlinks to conceptual knowledge— by using a 2 × 2 factorial design in a computersupported video case-based learning environment inspired by cognitive flexibility theory and participatory design. The study examines collaborative learning processes to discover what specific kind of instruction may help to counteract some of the known deficits of casebased learning and teacher thinking, such as limited perspective-taking. From a participatory design point of view, training novices to become immersed in teacher and student perspectives can be considered as an alternative for direct involvement of teachers and students in the design process. The study was realized as a four-day university course for pre-service teachers (N = 100). ANCOVAs of learning processes (small-group discussions) and outcomes (written case analyses) provide evidence that both types of instructional support (i.e., hyperlinks to multiple perspectives and conceptual knowledge) are beneficial. In particular, hyperlinks to multiple perspectives affected small-group case discussions and written post-tests as they led to increased immersion (i.e., perspective- taking). Hyperlinks to conceptual knowledge furthered the application of this knowledge, especially in the written post-tests. Implications for teacher education, participatory design, and further research are discussed.</description><subject>Art teachers</subject><subject>CAI</subject><subject>Case Studies</subject><subject>Collaborative learning</subject><subject>Computer assisted instruction</subject><subject>Computer Uses in Education</subject><subject>Cooperative Learning</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Environment</subject><subject>Educational Psychology</subject><subject>Educational Researchers</subject><subject>Educational technology</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Hyperlinks</subject><subject>Hypermedia</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning and Instruction</subject><subject>Learning Processes</subject><subject>Learning Theories</subject><subject>Lifelong Learning</subject><subject>Outcomes of education</subject><subject>Pedagogic Psychology</subject><subject>Posttests</subject><subject>Preservice Teachers</subject><subject>Pretests Posttests</subject><subject>Statistical Analysis</subject><subject>Student Attitudes</subject><subject>Teacher Attitudes</subject><subject>Teacher Competencies</subject><subject>Teacher Education</subject><subject>Teacher Educators</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Thinking Skills</subject><subject>Video Technology</subject><issn>0020-4277</issn><issn>1573-1952</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1rFjEUhYMo-Nr2B7gQAm7cTM3N10xWIqWtlUI3dj2kyZ2al5nMmGQKXfWvm9eRUty4yuJ5zrmEQ8h7YKfAWPs5A3AFDQPRGMFkI16RHahWNGAUf012jHHWSN62b8m7nPeMMZAd25GnSywlxHsapglTRk9DpAWt-4mJ2uhpLqvHWOhS6YKuhAfMX-iFdWEMxf6J2mjHxxKcHambpwULRod0zQf2EDzO1NmM-WUz-tXV8ByPyZvBjhlP_r5H5Pbi_MfZt-b65vLq7Ot146TQpfHacdsp3Q0erDFec4_t3R3zndFcGzMMjg0S2eC5cANC59F4idI4bZ33KI7Ip613SfOvFXPpp5AdjqONOK-5B62g00p1pqof_1H385rqH6slDefQAVPVgs1yac454dAvKUw2PfbA-sMk_TZJXyfpD5P0omY-bBlMwT3759-BCSO7A-cbz5XFe0wvLv-_dJ_LnJ5bpVCt4qDFb8inpLQ</recordid><startdate>20140101</startdate><enddate>20140101</enddate><creator>Goeze, Annika</creator><creator>Zottmann, Jan M.</creator><creator>Vogel, Freydis</creator><creator>Fischer, Frank</creator><creator>Schrader, Josef</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140101</creationdate><title>Getting immersed in teacher and student perspectives? Facilitating analytical competence using video cases in teacher education</title><author>Goeze, Annika ; Zottmann, Jan M. ; Vogel, Freydis ; Fischer, Frank ; Schrader, Josef</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-d6c2a8568fd1a99d62de7bb0d8962699ffc0f4e0fd23cfe18de9d4e49c6acdde3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Art teachers</topic><topic>CAI</topic><topic>Case Studies</topic><topic>Collaborative learning</topic><topic>Computer assisted instruction</topic><topic>Computer Uses in Education</topic><topic>Cooperative Learning</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Environment</topic><topic>Educational Psychology</topic><topic>Educational Researchers</topic><topic>Educational technology</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Hyperlinks</topic><topic>Hypermedia</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning and Instruction</topic><topic>Learning Processes</topic><topic>Learning Theories</topic><topic>Lifelong Learning</topic><topic>Outcomes of education</topic><topic>Pedagogic Psychology</topic><topic>Posttests</topic><topic>Preservice Teachers</topic><topic>Pretests Posttests</topic><topic>Statistical Analysis</topic><topic>Student Attitudes</topic><topic>Teacher Attitudes</topic><topic>Teacher Competencies</topic><topic>Teacher Education</topic><topic>Teacher Educators</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Thinking Skills</topic><topic>Video Technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goeze, Annika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zottmann, Jan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vogel, Freydis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schrader, Josef</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Instructional science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goeze, Annika</au><au>Zottmann, Jan M.</au><au>Vogel, Freydis</au><au>Fischer, Frank</au><au>Schrader, Josef</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1039483</ericid><atitle>Getting immersed in teacher and student perspectives? Facilitating analytical competence using video cases in teacher education</atitle><jtitle>Instructional science</jtitle><stitle>Instr Sci</stitle><date>2014-01-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>91</spage><epage>114</epage><pages>91-114</pages><issn>0020-4277</issn><eissn>1573-1952</eissn><coden>INLSBJ</coden><abstract>The ability to analyze and understand classroom situations through the eyes of not only teachers but also students can be seen as a crucial aspect of teachers' professional competence. Even though video case-based learning is considered to have great potential for the promotion of analytical competence of teachers (i.e., becoming immersed in student and teacher perspectives as well as applying conceptual knowledge to better understand classroom situations), only a few studies have investigated the effects of corresponding instructional support. This empirical field study examines the effects on analytical competence of two types of instructional support— hyperlinks to multiple perspectives and hyperlinks to conceptual knowledge— by using a 2 × 2 factorial design in a computersupported video case-based learning environment inspired by cognitive flexibility theory and participatory design. The study examines collaborative learning processes to discover what specific kind of instruction may help to counteract some of the known deficits of casebased learning and teacher thinking, such as limited perspective-taking. From a participatory design point of view, training novices to become immersed in teacher and student perspectives can be considered as an alternative for direct involvement of teachers and students in the design process. The study was realized as a four-day university course for pre-service teachers (N = 100). ANCOVAs of learning processes (small-group discussions) and outcomes (written case analyses) provide evidence that both types of instructional support (i.e., hyperlinks to multiple perspectives and conceptual knowledge) are beneficial. In particular, hyperlinks to multiple perspectives affected small-group case discussions and written post-tests as they led to increased immersion (i.e., perspective- taking). Hyperlinks to conceptual knowledge furthered the application of this knowledge, especially in the written post-tests. Implications for teacher education, participatory design, and further research are discussed.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s11251-013-9304-3</doi><tpages>24</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0020-4277
ispartof Instructional science, 2014-01, Vol.42 (1), p.91-114
issn 0020-4277
1573-1952
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1651865589
source SpringerLink Journals; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EBSCOhost Education Source
subjects Art teachers
CAI
Case Studies
Collaborative learning
Computer assisted instruction
Computer Uses in Education
Cooperative Learning
Education
Educational Environment
Educational Psychology
Educational Researchers
Educational technology
Higher Education
Hyperlinks
Hypermedia
Learning
Learning and Instruction
Learning Processes
Learning Theories
Lifelong Learning
Outcomes of education
Pedagogic Psychology
Posttests
Preservice Teachers
Pretests Posttests
Statistical Analysis
Student Attitudes
Teacher Attitudes
Teacher Competencies
Teacher Education
Teacher Educators
Teachers
Thinking Skills
Video Technology
title Getting immersed in teacher and student perspectives? Facilitating analytical competence using video cases in teacher education
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T11%3A31%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Getting%20immersed%20in%20teacher%20and%20student%20perspectives?%20Facilitating%20analytical%20competence%20using%20video%20cases%20in%20teacher%20education&rft.jtitle=Instructional%20science&rft.au=Goeze,%20Annika&rft.date=2014-01-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=91&rft.epage=114&rft.pages=91-114&rft.issn=0020-4277&rft.eissn=1573-1952&rft.coden=INLSBJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11251-013-9304-3&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E43575216%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1492218105&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1039483&rft_jstor_id=43575216&rfr_iscdi=true