Differences in Student Evaluations of Limited-Term Lecturers and Full-Time Faculty

This study compared student evaluations of teaching (SET) for limited-term lecturers (LTLs) and full-time faculty (FTF) using a Likert-scaled survey administered to students (N = 1,410) at the end of university courses. Data were analyzed using a general linear regression model to investigate the in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal on excellence in college teaching 2014, Vol.25 (2), p.5-24
Hauptverfasser: Cho, Jeong-Il, Otani, Koichiro, Kim, B. Joon
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 24
container_issue 2
container_start_page 5
container_title Journal on excellence in college teaching
container_volume 25
creator Cho, Jeong-Il
Otani, Koichiro
Kim, B. Joon
description This study compared student evaluations of teaching (SET) for limited-term lecturers (LTLs) and full-time faculty (FTF) using a Likert-scaled survey administered to students (N = 1,410) at the end of university courses. Data were analyzed using a general linear regression model to investigate the influence of multi-dimensional evaluation items on the overall rating item (Overall, I would rate the instructor of this course as outstanding) on the SET. Results showed that students provided higher ratings for LTLs than FTF, but they value different items when rating the overall evaluation of LTLs and FTF. Some survey items (for instance, those about instructor planning and enthusiasm) influence more on the rating of the overall item for LTLs than for FTF, whereas other, multi-dimensional items (for instance, those about assessment strategies and instructor's availability) influence more on the overall rating for FTF than for LTLs. Data and discussions of results identify the differences and suggest strategies for improving teaching effectiveness based on the ratings provided by students.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_eric_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1651854101</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1041384</ericid><sourcerecordid>1651854101</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e551-de68895a7f2dcdcac1a3accd0887cef2e47d83cd476ea2dd610ca2f44b63fd273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotzMtKxDAUgOEuFBxHH0HI0k0g1zazlHHqhYKg3Zd4cgKRtB1zEebtFcbVv_n4L5oNZ1pQZRi7aq5z_mJMaC53m-b9MXiPCRfATMJCPkp1uBRy-LGx2hLWJZPVkyHMoaCjI6aZDAilJkyZ2MWRvsZIxzAj6S3UWE43zaW3MePtf7fN2B_G_TMd3p5e9g8DRa05ddgas9O288KBAwvcSgvgmDEdoBeoOmckONW1aIVzLWdghVfqs5XeiU5um_vz9pjW74q5THPIgDHaBdeaJ95qbrTijP_RuzPFFGA6pjDbdJoOr5wpLo2Sv89uVuY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1651854101</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differences in Student Evaluations of Limited-Term Lecturers and Full-Time Faculty</title><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Cho, Jeong-Il ; Otani, Koichiro ; Kim, B. Joon</creator><creatorcontrib>Cho, Jeong-Il ; Otani, Koichiro ; Kim, B. Joon</creatorcontrib><description>This study compared student evaluations of teaching (SET) for limited-term lecturers (LTLs) and full-time faculty (FTF) using a Likert-scaled survey administered to students (N = 1,410) at the end of university courses. Data were analyzed using a general linear regression model to investigate the influence of multi-dimensional evaluation items on the overall rating item (Overall, I would rate the instructor of this course as outstanding) on the SET. Results showed that students provided higher ratings for LTLs than FTF, but they value different items when rating the overall evaluation of LTLs and FTF. Some survey items (for instance, those about instructor planning and enthusiasm) influence more on the rating of the overall item for LTLs than for FTF, whereas other, multi-dimensional items (for instance, those about assessment strategies and instructor's availability) influence more on the overall rating for FTF than for LTLs. Data and discussions of results identify the differences and suggest strategies for improving teaching effectiveness based on the ratings provided by students.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1052-4800</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Miami University</publisher><subject>College Faculty ; College Students ; Comparative Analysis ; Measures (Individuals) ; Regression (Statistics) ; Student Evaluation of Teacher Performance ; Student Surveys ; Teacher Effectiveness ; United States (Midwest)</subject><ispartof>Journal on excellence in college teaching, 2014, Vol.25 (2), p.5-24</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1041384$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cho, Jeong-Il</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Otani, Koichiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, B. Joon</creatorcontrib><title>Differences in Student Evaluations of Limited-Term Lecturers and Full-Time Faculty</title><title>Journal on excellence in college teaching</title><description>This study compared student evaluations of teaching (SET) for limited-term lecturers (LTLs) and full-time faculty (FTF) using a Likert-scaled survey administered to students (N = 1,410) at the end of university courses. Data were analyzed using a general linear regression model to investigate the influence of multi-dimensional evaluation items on the overall rating item (Overall, I would rate the instructor of this course as outstanding) on the SET. Results showed that students provided higher ratings for LTLs than FTF, but they value different items when rating the overall evaluation of LTLs and FTF. Some survey items (for instance, those about instructor planning and enthusiasm) influence more on the rating of the overall item for LTLs than for FTF, whereas other, multi-dimensional items (for instance, those about assessment strategies and instructor's availability) influence more on the overall rating for FTF than for LTLs. Data and discussions of results identify the differences and suggest strategies for improving teaching effectiveness based on the ratings provided by students.</description><subject>College Faculty</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Measures (Individuals)</subject><subject>Regression (Statistics)</subject><subject>Student Evaluation of Teacher Performance</subject><subject>Student Surveys</subject><subject>Teacher Effectiveness</subject><subject>United States (Midwest)</subject><issn>1052-4800</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotzMtKxDAUgOEuFBxHH0HI0k0g1zazlHHqhYKg3Zd4cgKRtB1zEebtFcbVv_n4L5oNZ1pQZRi7aq5z_mJMaC53m-b9MXiPCRfATMJCPkp1uBRy-LGx2hLWJZPVkyHMoaCjI6aZDAilJkyZ2MWRvsZIxzAj6S3UWE43zaW3MePtf7fN2B_G_TMd3p5e9g8DRa05ddgas9O288KBAwvcSgvgmDEdoBeoOmckONW1aIVzLWdghVfqs5XeiU5um_vz9pjW74q5THPIgDHaBdeaJ95qbrTijP_RuzPFFGA6pjDbdJoOr5wpLo2Sv89uVuY</recordid><startdate>2014</startdate><enddate>2014</enddate><creator>Cho, Jeong-Il</creator><creator>Otani, Koichiro</creator><creator>Kim, B. Joon</creator><general>Miami University</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2014</creationdate><title>Differences in Student Evaluations of Limited-Term Lecturers and Full-Time Faculty</title><author>Cho, Jeong-Il ; Otani, Koichiro ; Kim, B. Joon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e551-de68895a7f2dcdcac1a3accd0887cef2e47d83cd476ea2dd610ca2f44b63fd273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>College Faculty</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Measures (Individuals)</topic><topic>Regression (Statistics)</topic><topic>Student Evaluation of Teacher Performance</topic><topic>Student Surveys</topic><topic>Teacher Effectiveness</topic><topic>United States (Midwest)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cho, Jeong-Il</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Otani, Koichiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, B. Joon</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><jtitle>Journal on excellence in college teaching</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cho, Jeong-Il</au><au>Otani, Koichiro</au><au>Kim, B. Joon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1041384</ericid><atitle>Differences in Student Evaluations of Limited-Term Lecturers and Full-Time Faculty</atitle><jtitle>Journal on excellence in college teaching</jtitle><date>2014</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>5</spage><epage>24</epage><pages>5-24</pages><issn>1052-4800</issn><abstract>This study compared student evaluations of teaching (SET) for limited-term lecturers (LTLs) and full-time faculty (FTF) using a Likert-scaled survey administered to students (N = 1,410) at the end of university courses. Data were analyzed using a general linear regression model to investigate the influence of multi-dimensional evaluation items on the overall rating item (Overall, I would rate the instructor of this course as outstanding) on the SET. Results showed that students provided higher ratings for LTLs than FTF, but they value different items when rating the overall evaluation of LTLs and FTF. Some survey items (for instance, those about instructor planning and enthusiasm) influence more on the rating of the overall item for LTLs than for FTF, whereas other, multi-dimensional items (for instance, those about assessment strategies and instructor's availability) influence more on the overall rating for FTF than for LTLs. Data and discussions of results identify the differences and suggest strategies for improving teaching effectiveness based on the ratings provided by students.</abstract><pub>Miami University</pub><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1052-4800
ispartof Journal on excellence in college teaching, 2014, Vol.25 (2), p.5-24
issn 1052-4800
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1651854101
source EBSCOhost Education Source; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects College Faculty
College Students
Comparative Analysis
Measures (Individuals)
Regression (Statistics)
Student Evaluation of Teacher Performance
Student Surveys
Teacher Effectiveness
United States (Midwest)
title Differences in Student Evaluations of Limited-Term Lecturers and Full-Time Faculty
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T03%3A13%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_eric_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differences%20in%20Student%20Evaluations%20of%20Limited-Term%20Lecturers%20and%20Full-Time%20Faculty&rft.jtitle=Journal%20on%20excellence%20in%20college%20teaching&rft.au=Cho,%20Jeong-Il&rft.date=2014&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=5&rft.epage=24&rft.pages=5-24&rft.issn=1052-4800&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_eric_%3E1651854101%3C/proquest_eric_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1651854101&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1041384&rfr_iscdi=true