Modeling and validation of the iodine-sulfur hydrogen production process

The iodine‐sulfur thermochemical water‐splitting cycle (I‐S process) is one of the highly efficient, CO2‐free, massive hydrogen production methods. We simulated the I‐S process through commercial software programs Aspen Plus and OLI database with the aid of self‐developed models to analyze the overa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:AIChE journal 2014-02, Vol.60 (2), p.546-558
Hauptverfasser: Guo, Hanfei, Zhang, Ping, Chen, Songzhe, Wang, Laijun, Xu, Jingming
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 558
container_issue 2
container_start_page 546
container_title AIChE journal
container_volume 60
creator Guo, Hanfei
Zhang, Ping
Chen, Songzhe
Wang, Laijun
Xu, Jingming
description The iodine‐sulfur thermochemical water‐splitting cycle (I‐S process) is one of the highly efficient, CO2‐free, massive hydrogen production methods. We simulated the I‐S process through commercial software programs Aspen Plus and OLI database with the aid of self‐developed models to analyze the overall running status of the process and to decrease the investment and time consumption of experiments. A two‐phase separator model operating at 353 K and an electro‐electrodialysis (EED) cell model working at 338 K were built on the basis of experimental data. The entire flow sheet of the I‐S process was modeled based on the two self‐developed models. The simulation models were validated through the experimental results obtained from the closed cycle I‐S facility (IS‐10) in our laboratory. By employing the simulation program, sensitivity analyses of the important parameters in the process were carried out, including the ratio of the distillate to the feed rate of the H2SO4 distillation column, reflux ratio of the H2SO4 column, H2SO4 conversion ratio, HI molality in the EED cathode outlet stream, and HI mole fraction in the liquid and vapor distillates of the HI distillation column. The key parameters significantly affecting the input duty were determined; that is, the ratio of the distillate to the feed rate of the H2SO4 distillation column and the HI molality in the EED cathode outlet stream. The optimal values of the analyzed parameters were also discussed. The simulation program we developed is a useful tool that can evaluate and optimize the I‐S process. © 2013 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J 60: 546–558, 2014
doi_str_mv 10.1002/aic.14285
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1651447637</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3184845901</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5045-a8769976f613fcf8b2c624d2f3cbb2123f2f253168a61f1e66f19b6b85c50c443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0E9PHCEYBnDStEm32oPfYJJe9DDKy9_haDatmqyaGk29EYaBXew4KOxU99vL7rYemhhPvJDfA-FBaA_wIWBMjkywh8BIwz-gCXAma64w_4gmGGOoywF8Rl9yvis7IhsyQafnsXN9GOaVGbrqj-lDZ5YhDlX01XLhqhC7MLg6j70fU7VYdSnO3VA9pNiNdgPLaF3Ou-iTN312X_-uO-jmx_fr6Wk9uzw5mx7Passx47VppFBKCi-AeuubllhBWEc8tW1LgFBPPOEURGMEeHBCeFCtaBte8pYxuoP2t_eWdx9Hl5f6PmTr-t4MLo5Zg-DAmBRUvk85YVQ1Etb023_0Lo5pKB_RwEpRREmiijrYKptizsl5_ZDCvUkrDViv69elfr2pv9ijrX0KvVu9DfXx2fRfot4mQl6659eESb-1kFRy_eviRN-qq6laDz_pC4lGk_Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1478229729</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Modeling and validation of the iodine-sulfur hydrogen production process</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Guo, Hanfei ; Zhang, Ping ; Chen, Songzhe ; Wang, Laijun ; Xu, Jingming</creator><creatorcontrib>Guo, Hanfei ; Zhang, Ping ; Chen, Songzhe ; Wang, Laijun ; Xu, Jingming</creatorcontrib><description>The iodine‐sulfur thermochemical water‐splitting cycle (I‐S process) is one of the highly efficient, CO2‐free, massive hydrogen production methods. We simulated the I‐S process through commercial software programs Aspen Plus and OLI database with the aid of self‐developed models to analyze the overall running status of the process and to decrease the investment and time consumption of experiments. A two‐phase separator model operating at 353 K and an electro‐electrodialysis (EED) cell model working at 338 K were built on the basis of experimental data. The entire flow sheet of the I‐S process was modeled based on the two self‐developed models. The simulation models were validated through the experimental results obtained from the closed cycle I‐S facility (IS‐10) in our laboratory. By employing the simulation program, sensitivity analyses of the important parameters in the process were carried out, including the ratio of the distillate to the feed rate of the H2SO4 distillation column, reflux ratio of the H2SO4 column, H2SO4 conversion ratio, HI molality in the EED cathode outlet stream, and HI mole fraction in the liquid and vapor distillates of the HI distillation column. The key parameters significantly affecting the input duty were determined; that is, the ratio of the distillate to the feed rate of the H2SO4 distillation column and the HI molality in the EED cathode outlet stream. The optimal values of the analyzed parameters were also discussed. The simulation program we developed is a useful tool that can evaluate and optimize the I‐S process. © 2013 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J 60: 546–558, 2014</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-1541</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1547-5905</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/aic.14285</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AICEAC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Cathodes ; Chemical engineering ; Columns (process) ; Computer simulation ; Concentration (composition) ; Distillation ; Distillation apparatus ; electro-electrodialysis ; Hydrogen ; Hydrogen production ; iodine-sulfur process ; Mathematical models ; Outlets ; Production methods ; simulation ; Sulfuric acid ; two-phase separator</subject><ispartof>AIChE journal, 2014-02, Vol.60 (2), p.546-558</ispartof><rights>2013 American Institute of Chemical Engineers</rights><rights>Copyright American Institute of Chemical Engineers Feb 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5045-a8769976f613fcf8b2c624d2f3cbb2123f2f253168a61f1e66f19b6b85c50c443</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5045-a8769976f613fcf8b2c624d2f3cbb2123f2f253168a61f1e66f19b6b85c50c443</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Faic.14285$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Faic.14285$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27929,27930,45579,45580</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guo, Hanfei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Songzhe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Laijun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Jingming</creatorcontrib><title>Modeling and validation of the iodine-sulfur hydrogen production process</title><title>AIChE journal</title><addtitle>AIChE J</addtitle><description>The iodine‐sulfur thermochemical water‐splitting cycle (I‐S process) is one of the highly efficient, CO2‐free, massive hydrogen production methods. We simulated the I‐S process through commercial software programs Aspen Plus and OLI database with the aid of self‐developed models to analyze the overall running status of the process and to decrease the investment and time consumption of experiments. A two‐phase separator model operating at 353 K and an electro‐electrodialysis (EED) cell model working at 338 K were built on the basis of experimental data. The entire flow sheet of the I‐S process was modeled based on the two self‐developed models. The simulation models were validated through the experimental results obtained from the closed cycle I‐S facility (IS‐10) in our laboratory. By employing the simulation program, sensitivity analyses of the important parameters in the process were carried out, including the ratio of the distillate to the feed rate of the H2SO4 distillation column, reflux ratio of the H2SO4 column, H2SO4 conversion ratio, HI molality in the EED cathode outlet stream, and HI mole fraction in the liquid and vapor distillates of the HI distillation column. The key parameters significantly affecting the input duty were determined; that is, the ratio of the distillate to the feed rate of the H2SO4 distillation column and the HI molality in the EED cathode outlet stream. The optimal values of the analyzed parameters were also discussed. The simulation program we developed is a useful tool that can evaluate and optimize the I‐S process. © 2013 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J 60: 546–558, 2014</description><subject>Cathodes</subject><subject>Chemical engineering</subject><subject>Columns (process)</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Concentration (composition)</subject><subject>Distillation</subject><subject>Distillation apparatus</subject><subject>electro-electrodialysis</subject><subject>Hydrogen</subject><subject>Hydrogen production</subject><subject>iodine-sulfur process</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Outlets</subject><subject>Production methods</subject><subject>simulation</subject><subject>Sulfuric acid</subject><subject>two-phase separator</subject><issn>0001-1541</issn><issn>1547-5905</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0E9PHCEYBnDStEm32oPfYJJe9DDKy9_haDatmqyaGk29EYaBXew4KOxU99vL7rYemhhPvJDfA-FBaA_wIWBMjkywh8BIwz-gCXAma64w_4gmGGOoywF8Rl9yvis7IhsyQafnsXN9GOaVGbrqj-lDZ5YhDlX01XLhqhC7MLg6j70fU7VYdSnO3VA9pNiNdgPLaF3Ou-iTN312X_-uO-jmx_fr6Wk9uzw5mx7Passx47VppFBKCi-AeuubllhBWEc8tW1LgFBPPOEURGMEeHBCeFCtaBte8pYxuoP2t_eWdx9Hl5f6PmTr-t4MLo5Zg-DAmBRUvk85YVQ1Etb023_0Lo5pKB_RwEpRREmiijrYKptizsl5_ZDCvUkrDViv69elfr2pv9ijrX0KvVu9DfXx2fRfot4mQl6659eESb-1kFRy_eviRN-qq6laDz_pC4lGk_Q</recordid><startdate>201402</startdate><enddate>201402</enddate><creator>Guo, Hanfei</creator><creator>Zhang, Ping</creator><creator>Chen, Songzhe</creator><creator>Wang, Laijun</creator><creator>Xu, Jingming</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>American Institute of Chemical Engineers</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201402</creationdate><title>Modeling and validation of the iodine-sulfur hydrogen production process</title><author>Guo, Hanfei ; Zhang, Ping ; Chen, Songzhe ; Wang, Laijun ; Xu, Jingming</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5045-a8769976f613fcf8b2c624d2f3cbb2123f2f253168a61f1e66f19b6b85c50c443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Cathodes</topic><topic>Chemical engineering</topic><topic>Columns (process)</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Concentration (composition)</topic><topic>Distillation</topic><topic>Distillation apparatus</topic><topic>electro-electrodialysis</topic><topic>Hydrogen</topic><topic>Hydrogen production</topic><topic>iodine-sulfur process</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Outlets</topic><topic>Production methods</topic><topic>simulation</topic><topic>Sulfuric acid</topic><topic>two-phase separator</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guo, Hanfei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Songzhe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Laijun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Jingming</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>AIChE journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guo, Hanfei</au><au>Zhang, Ping</au><au>Chen, Songzhe</au><au>Wang, Laijun</au><au>Xu, Jingming</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Modeling and validation of the iodine-sulfur hydrogen production process</atitle><jtitle>AIChE journal</jtitle><addtitle>AIChE J</addtitle><date>2014-02</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>546</spage><epage>558</epage><pages>546-558</pages><issn>0001-1541</issn><eissn>1547-5905</eissn><coden>AICEAC</coden><abstract>The iodine‐sulfur thermochemical water‐splitting cycle (I‐S process) is one of the highly efficient, CO2‐free, massive hydrogen production methods. We simulated the I‐S process through commercial software programs Aspen Plus and OLI database with the aid of self‐developed models to analyze the overall running status of the process and to decrease the investment and time consumption of experiments. A two‐phase separator model operating at 353 K and an electro‐electrodialysis (EED) cell model working at 338 K were built on the basis of experimental data. The entire flow sheet of the I‐S process was modeled based on the two self‐developed models. The simulation models were validated through the experimental results obtained from the closed cycle I‐S facility (IS‐10) in our laboratory. By employing the simulation program, sensitivity analyses of the important parameters in the process were carried out, including the ratio of the distillate to the feed rate of the H2SO4 distillation column, reflux ratio of the H2SO4 column, H2SO4 conversion ratio, HI molality in the EED cathode outlet stream, and HI mole fraction in the liquid and vapor distillates of the HI distillation column. The key parameters significantly affecting the input duty were determined; that is, the ratio of the distillate to the feed rate of the H2SO4 distillation column and the HI molality in the EED cathode outlet stream. The optimal values of the analyzed parameters were also discussed. The simulation program we developed is a useful tool that can evaluate and optimize the I‐S process. © 2013 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J 60: 546–558, 2014</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/aic.14285</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-1541
ispartof AIChE journal, 2014-02, Vol.60 (2), p.546-558
issn 0001-1541
1547-5905
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1651447637
source Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Cathodes
Chemical engineering
Columns (process)
Computer simulation
Concentration (composition)
Distillation
Distillation apparatus
electro-electrodialysis
Hydrogen
Hydrogen production
iodine-sulfur process
Mathematical models
Outlets
Production methods
simulation
Sulfuric acid
two-phase separator
title Modeling and validation of the iodine-sulfur hydrogen production process
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T21%3A55%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Modeling%20and%20validation%20of%20the%20iodine-sulfur%20hydrogen%20production%20process&rft.jtitle=AIChE%20journal&rft.au=Guo,%20Hanfei&rft.date=2014-02&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=546&rft.epage=558&rft.pages=546-558&rft.issn=0001-1541&rft.eissn=1547-5905&rft.coden=AICEAC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/aic.14285&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3184845901%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1478229729&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true