Treatment of winery wastewater by electrocoagulation process
Winery wastewater treatment by electrocoagulation (EC) process using aluminum (Al) and iron (Fe) electrodes was investigated. The effects of operational parameters such as initial pH, current density and electrolysis time were investigated separately. Chemical oxygen demand (COD), turbidity and colo...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Desalination and water treatment 2013-08, Vol.51 (28-30), p.5421-5429 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 5429 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 28-30 |
| container_start_page | 5421 |
| container_title | Desalination and water treatment |
| container_volume | 51 |
| creator | Kara, Serdar Gürbulak, Ercan Eyvaz, Murat Yüksel, Ebubekir |
| description | Winery wastewater treatment by electrocoagulation (EC) process using aluminum (Al) and iron (Fe) electrodes was investigated. The effects of operational parameters such as initial pH, current density and electrolysis time were investigated separately. Chemical oxygen demand (COD), turbidity and color were used to measure the treatment efficiency. Electrode consumptions were calculated per m3 of wastewater. Amount of sludge produced by EC was also reported per m3 of wastewater. The optimum operating conditions were defined due to the initial pH, applied current density and operating time for Fe and Al electrodes. Maximum removal efficiencies were found at pH 7 for Fe electrode and pH 5.2 for Al electrode with current density of 300 A/m2 for both electrodes and with an operating time of 90 min and 120 min for Fe and Al electrodes, respectively. The removal efficiencies were found as 46.6% (COD), 80.3% (color) and 92.3% (turbidity) for Fe electrode while they were 48.5% for COD, 97.2% for color and 98.6% for turbidity when Al electrodes were used. Finally, the results were compared with various food and beverage industry wastewaters treated by EC process reported in the literature. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1080/19443994.2013.770223 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1651437520</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1944398624189990</els_id><sourcerecordid>1651437520</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-caa1fb978420f9922b1b9e895ad22e586e003479f297f0384de5ad521c9923e03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1LAzEQhoMoWGr_gYe9CF625nOzARGk-AWCl3oO2exEItvdmqSW_ntTtoonMZdkJs_MCw9C5wTPCa7xFVGcM6X4nGLC5lJiStkRmuzbJVN1dfzrfYpmMb7jfASXgtMJul4GMGkFfSoGV2x9D2FXbE1MsDUJQtHsCujApjDYwbxtOpP80BfrXEKMZ-jEmS7C7HBP0ev93XLxWD6_PDwtbp9LyzFNpTWGuEbJmlPslKK0IY2CWgnTUgqirgBjxqVyVEmHWc1byF-CEpthBphN0eW4N-d-bCAmvfLRQteZHoZN1KQShDMp6D_Q7IqSGnOWUT6iNgwxBnB6HfzKhJ0mWO_V6m-1eq9Wj2rz2MUhwURrOhdMb338maWyqphgNHM3IwfZzKeHoKP10FtofchCdTv4v4O-AF_zitY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1439218043</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Treatment of winery wastewater by electrocoagulation process</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Kara, Serdar ; Gürbulak, Ercan ; Eyvaz, Murat ; Yüksel, Ebubekir</creator><creatorcontrib>Kara, Serdar ; Gürbulak, Ercan ; Eyvaz, Murat ; Yüksel, Ebubekir</creatorcontrib><description>Winery wastewater treatment by electrocoagulation (EC) process using aluminum (Al) and iron (Fe) electrodes was investigated. The effects of operational parameters such as initial pH, current density and electrolysis time were investigated separately. Chemical oxygen demand (COD), turbidity and color were used to measure the treatment efficiency. Electrode consumptions were calculated per m3 of wastewater. Amount of sludge produced by EC was also reported per m3 of wastewater. The optimum operating conditions were defined due to the initial pH, applied current density and operating time for Fe and Al electrodes. Maximum removal efficiencies were found at pH 7 for Fe electrode and pH 5.2 for Al electrode with current density of 300 A/m2 for both electrodes and with an operating time of 90 min and 120 min for Fe and Al electrodes, respectively. The removal efficiencies were found as 46.6% (COD), 80.3% (color) and 92.3% (turbidity) for Fe electrode while they were 48.5% for COD, 97.2% for color and 98.6% for turbidity when Al electrodes were used. Finally, the results were compared with various food and beverage industry wastewaters treated by EC process reported in the literature.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1944-3986</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1944-3994</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-3986</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/19443994.2013.770223</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>L'Aquila: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aluminum ; Aluminum electrodes ; Applied sciences ; Biological and medical sciences ; COD removal ; Color removal ; Crack opening displacement ; Current density ; Electrocoagulation ; Electrodes ; Exact sciences and technology ; Food industries ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Industrial wastewaters ; Iron ; Iron electrodes ; Pollution ; Pollution and sludges ; Turbidity ; Turbidity removal ; Waste water ; Wastewaters ; Water treatment and pollution ; Winery wastewater</subject><ispartof>Desalination and water treatment, 2013-08, Vol.51 (28-30), p.5421-5429</ispartof><rights>2013 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-caa1fb978420f9922b1b9e895ad22e586e003479f297f0384de5ad521c9923e03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-caa1fb978420f9922b1b9e895ad22e586e003479f297f0384de5ad521c9923e03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=27663532$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kara, Serdar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gürbulak, Ercan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eyvaz, Murat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yüksel, Ebubekir</creatorcontrib><title>Treatment of winery wastewater by electrocoagulation process</title><title>Desalination and water treatment</title><description>Winery wastewater treatment by electrocoagulation (EC) process using aluminum (Al) and iron (Fe) electrodes was investigated. The effects of operational parameters such as initial pH, current density and electrolysis time were investigated separately. Chemical oxygen demand (COD), turbidity and color were used to measure the treatment efficiency. Electrode consumptions were calculated per m3 of wastewater. Amount of sludge produced by EC was also reported per m3 of wastewater. The optimum operating conditions were defined due to the initial pH, applied current density and operating time for Fe and Al electrodes. Maximum removal efficiencies were found at pH 7 for Fe electrode and pH 5.2 for Al electrode with current density of 300 A/m2 for both electrodes and with an operating time of 90 min and 120 min for Fe and Al electrodes, respectively. The removal efficiencies were found as 46.6% (COD), 80.3% (color) and 92.3% (turbidity) for Fe electrode while they were 48.5% for COD, 97.2% for color and 98.6% for turbidity when Al electrodes were used. Finally, the results were compared with various food and beverage industry wastewaters treated by EC process reported in the literature.</description><subject>Aluminum</subject><subject>Aluminum electrodes</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>COD removal</subject><subject>Color removal</subject><subject>Crack opening displacement</subject><subject>Current density</subject><subject>Electrocoagulation</subject><subject>Electrodes</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Food industries</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Industrial wastewaters</subject><subject>Iron</subject><subject>Iron electrodes</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Pollution and sludges</subject><subject>Turbidity</subject><subject>Turbidity removal</subject><subject>Waste water</subject><subject>Wastewaters</subject><subject>Water treatment and pollution</subject><subject>Winery wastewater</subject><issn>1944-3986</issn><issn>1944-3994</issn><issn>1944-3986</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE1LAzEQhoMoWGr_gYe9CF625nOzARGk-AWCl3oO2exEItvdmqSW_ntTtoonMZdkJs_MCw9C5wTPCa7xFVGcM6X4nGLC5lJiStkRmuzbJVN1dfzrfYpmMb7jfASXgtMJul4GMGkFfSoGV2x9D2FXbE1MsDUJQtHsCujApjDYwbxtOpP80BfrXEKMZ-jEmS7C7HBP0ev93XLxWD6_PDwtbp9LyzFNpTWGuEbJmlPslKK0IY2CWgnTUgqirgBjxqVyVEmHWc1byF-CEpthBphN0eW4N-d-bCAmvfLRQteZHoZN1KQShDMp6D_Q7IqSGnOWUT6iNgwxBnB6HfzKhJ0mWO_V6m-1eq9Wj2rz2MUhwURrOhdMb338maWyqphgNHM3IwfZzKeHoKP10FtofchCdTv4v4O-AF_zitY</recordid><startdate>20130801</startdate><enddate>20130801</enddate><creator>Kara, Serdar</creator><creator>Gürbulak, Ercan</creator><creator>Eyvaz, Murat</creator><creator>Yüksel, Ebubekir</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Desalination Publications</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130801</creationdate><title>Treatment of winery wastewater by electrocoagulation process</title><author>Kara, Serdar ; Gürbulak, Ercan ; Eyvaz, Murat ; Yüksel, Ebubekir</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-caa1fb978420f9922b1b9e895ad22e586e003479f297f0384de5ad521c9923e03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Aluminum</topic><topic>Aluminum electrodes</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>COD removal</topic><topic>Color removal</topic><topic>Crack opening displacement</topic><topic>Current density</topic><topic>Electrocoagulation</topic><topic>Electrodes</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Food industries</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Industrial wastewaters</topic><topic>Iron</topic><topic>Iron electrodes</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Pollution and sludges</topic><topic>Turbidity</topic><topic>Turbidity removal</topic><topic>Waste water</topic><topic>Wastewaters</topic><topic>Water treatment and pollution</topic><topic>Winery wastewater</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kara, Serdar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gürbulak, Ercan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eyvaz, Murat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yüksel, Ebubekir</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Desalination and water treatment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kara, Serdar</au><au>Gürbulak, Ercan</au><au>Eyvaz, Murat</au><au>Yüksel, Ebubekir</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Treatment of winery wastewater by electrocoagulation process</atitle><jtitle>Desalination and water treatment</jtitle><date>2013-08-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>28-30</issue><spage>5421</spage><epage>5429</epage><pages>5421-5429</pages><issn>1944-3986</issn><issn>1944-3994</issn><eissn>1944-3986</eissn><abstract>Winery wastewater treatment by electrocoagulation (EC) process using aluminum (Al) and iron (Fe) electrodes was investigated. The effects of operational parameters such as initial pH, current density and electrolysis time were investigated separately. Chemical oxygen demand (COD), turbidity and color were used to measure the treatment efficiency. Electrode consumptions were calculated per m3 of wastewater. Amount of sludge produced by EC was also reported per m3 of wastewater. The optimum operating conditions were defined due to the initial pH, applied current density and operating time for Fe and Al electrodes. Maximum removal efficiencies were found at pH 7 for Fe electrode and pH 5.2 for Al electrode with current density of 300 A/m2 for both electrodes and with an operating time of 90 min and 120 min for Fe and Al electrodes, respectively. The removal efficiencies were found as 46.6% (COD), 80.3% (color) and 92.3% (turbidity) for Fe electrode while they were 48.5% for COD, 97.2% for color and 98.6% for turbidity when Al electrodes were used. Finally, the results were compared with various food and beverage industry wastewaters treated by EC process reported in the literature.</abstract><cop>L'Aquila</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1080/19443994.2013.770223</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1944-3986 |
| ispartof | Desalination and water treatment, 2013-08, Vol.51 (28-30), p.5421-5429 |
| issn | 1944-3986 1944-3994 1944-3986 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1651437520 |
| source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Aluminum Aluminum electrodes Applied sciences Biological and medical sciences COD removal Color removal Crack opening displacement Current density Electrocoagulation Electrodes Exact sciences and technology Food industries Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General aspects Industrial wastewaters Iron Iron electrodes Pollution Pollution and sludges Turbidity Turbidity removal Waste water Wastewaters Water treatment and pollution Winery wastewater |
| title | Treatment of winery wastewater by electrocoagulation process |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T09%3A58%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Treatment%20of%20winery%20wastewater%20by%20electrocoagulation%20process&rft.jtitle=Desalination%20and%20water%20treatment&rft.au=Kara,%20Serdar&rft.date=2013-08-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=28-30&rft.spage=5421&rft.epage=5429&rft.pages=5421-5429&rft.issn=1944-3986&rft.eissn=1944-3986&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/19443994.2013.770223&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1651437520%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1439218043&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1944398624189990&rfr_iscdi=true |