Evaluation of remote maintenance schemes by plasma equilibrium analysis in Tokamak DEMO reactor

•The remote maintenance schemes in DEMO reactor were evaluated by the plasma equilibrium analysis.•Horizontal sector transport maintenance scheme requires the largest total PF coil current.•The difference of total PF coil current for MHD equilibrium in between the large segmented divertor maintenanc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Fusion engineering and design 2014-11, Vol.89 (11), p.2588-2593
Hauptverfasser: Utoh, Hiroyasu, Tobita, Kenji, Asakura, Nobuyuki, Sakamoto, Yoshiteru
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2593
container_issue 11
container_start_page 2588
container_title Fusion engineering and design
container_volume 89
creator Utoh, Hiroyasu
Tobita, Kenji
Asakura, Nobuyuki
Sakamoto, Yoshiteru
description •The remote maintenance schemes in DEMO reactor were evaluated by the plasma equilibrium analysis.•Horizontal sector transport maintenance scheme requires the largest total PF coil current.•The difference of total PF coil current for MHD equilibrium in between the large segmented divertor maintenance and the segmentalized divertor maintenance was about 10%. The remote maintenance schemes in a DEMO reactor are categorized by insertion direction, blanket segmentation, and divertor maintenance scheme, and are quantitatively evaluated by analysing the plasma equilibrium. The positions of the poloidal field (PF) coil are limited by the size of the toroidal field (TF) coil and the maintenance port layout of each remote maintenance scheme. Because the PF coils are located near the larger TF coil and far from the plasma surface, the horizontal sector transport maintenance scheme requires the largest part of total PF coil current, 25% larger than that required for separated sector transport using vertical maintenance ports with segmented divertor maintenance (SDM). In the unsegmented divertor maintenance (UDM) scheme, the total magnetic stored energy in the PF coils at plasma equilibrium is about 30% larger than that stored in the SDM scheme, but the time required for removal and installation of all the divertor cassettes in the UDM scheme is roughly a third of that required in the SDM scheme because the number of divertor cassettes in the UDM scheme is a third of that in the SDM scheme. From the viewpoint of simple maintenance operations, the merit of the UDM scheme has more merit than the SDM scheme.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2014.06.020
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1651431525</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0920379614004505</els_id><sourcerecordid>1651431525</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-f5432e0b2e2e97fd165a1fbd809ddf7861a6096acb24e9f47add55d9ea4c28e23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EEuXxDXjJJsF2EidZolIeUlE3ZW1N7DG4TeLWTpD696QqYos00t3ce6Q5hNxxlnLG5cMmtWPE_tNgTAXjecpkygQ7IzNelVlS8lqekxmrBUuyspaX5CrGDWO8nG5G1OIb2hEG53vqLQ3Y-QFpB64fsIdeI436CzuMtDnQXQuxA4r70bWuCW7sKPTQHqKL1PV07bfQwZY-Ld5XEwn04MMNubDQRrz9zWvy8bxYz1-T5erlbf64THRe5UNiizwTyBqBAuvSGi4L4LYxFauNsWUlOUhWS9CNyLG2eQnGFIWpEXItKhTZNbk_cXfB70eMg-pc1Ni20KMfo5qAPM94IYqpWp6qOvgYA1q1C66DcFCcqaNStVF_StVRqWJSTUqn5eNpidMn3w6DitrhJMm4gHpQxrt_GT9lg4Xd</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1651431525</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of remote maintenance schemes by plasma equilibrium analysis in Tokamak DEMO reactor</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Utoh, Hiroyasu ; Tobita, Kenji ; Asakura, Nobuyuki ; Sakamoto, Yoshiteru</creator><creatorcontrib>Utoh, Hiroyasu ; Tobita, Kenji ; Asakura, Nobuyuki ; Sakamoto, Yoshiteru</creatorcontrib><description>•The remote maintenance schemes in DEMO reactor were evaluated by the plasma equilibrium analysis.•Horizontal sector transport maintenance scheme requires the largest total PF coil current.•The difference of total PF coil current for MHD equilibrium in between the large segmented divertor maintenance and the segmentalized divertor maintenance was about 10%. The remote maintenance schemes in a DEMO reactor are categorized by insertion direction, blanket segmentation, and divertor maintenance scheme, and are quantitatively evaluated by analysing the plasma equilibrium. The positions of the poloidal field (PF) coil are limited by the size of the toroidal field (TF) coil and the maintenance port layout of each remote maintenance scheme. Because the PF coils are located near the larger TF coil and far from the plasma surface, the horizontal sector transport maintenance scheme requires the largest part of total PF coil current, 25% larger than that required for separated sector transport using vertical maintenance ports with segmented divertor maintenance (SDM). In the unsegmented divertor maintenance (UDM) scheme, the total magnetic stored energy in the PF coils at plasma equilibrium is about 30% larger than that stored in the SDM scheme, but the time required for removal and installation of all the divertor cassettes in the UDM scheme is roughly a third of that required in the SDM scheme because the number of divertor cassettes in the UDM scheme is a third of that in the SDM scheme. From the viewpoint of simple maintenance operations, the merit of the UDM scheme has more merit than the SDM scheme.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0920-3796</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7196</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2014.06.020</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Cassettes ; Coiling ; DEMO ; Divertor maintenance ; Maintenance ; Plasma equilibrium ; Poloidal field coil ; Ports ; Reactors ; Remote maintenance ; Tokamak devices ; Transport</subject><ispartof>Fusion engineering and design, 2014-11, Vol.89 (11), p.2588-2593</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-f5432e0b2e2e97fd165a1fbd809ddf7861a6096acb24e9f47add55d9ea4c28e23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-f5432e0b2e2e97fd165a1fbd809ddf7861a6096acb24e9f47add55d9ea4c28e23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2014.06.020$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Utoh, Hiroyasu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tobita, Kenji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asakura, Nobuyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakamoto, Yoshiteru</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of remote maintenance schemes by plasma equilibrium analysis in Tokamak DEMO reactor</title><title>Fusion engineering and design</title><description>•The remote maintenance schemes in DEMO reactor were evaluated by the plasma equilibrium analysis.•Horizontal sector transport maintenance scheme requires the largest total PF coil current.•The difference of total PF coil current for MHD equilibrium in between the large segmented divertor maintenance and the segmentalized divertor maintenance was about 10%. The remote maintenance schemes in a DEMO reactor are categorized by insertion direction, blanket segmentation, and divertor maintenance scheme, and are quantitatively evaluated by analysing the plasma equilibrium. The positions of the poloidal field (PF) coil are limited by the size of the toroidal field (TF) coil and the maintenance port layout of each remote maintenance scheme. Because the PF coils are located near the larger TF coil and far from the plasma surface, the horizontal sector transport maintenance scheme requires the largest part of total PF coil current, 25% larger than that required for separated sector transport using vertical maintenance ports with segmented divertor maintenance (SDM). In the unsegmented divertor maintenance (UDM) scheme, the total magnetic stored energy in the PF coils at plasma equilibrium is about 30% larger than that stored in the SDM scheme, but the time required for removal and installation of all the divertor cassettes in the UDM scheme is roughly a third of that required in the SDM scheme because the number of divertor cassettes in the UDM scheme is a third of that in the SDM scheme. From the viewpoint of simple maintenance operations, the merit of the UDM scheme has more merit than the SDM scheme.</description><subject>Cassettes</subject><subject>Coiling</subject><subject>DEMO</subject><subject>Divertor maintenance</subject><subject>Maintenance</subject><subject>Plasma equilibrium</subject><subject>Poloidal field coil</subject><subject>Ports</subject><subject>Reactors</subject><subject>Remote maintenance</subject><subject>Tokamak devices</subject><subject>Transport</subject><issn>0920-3796</issn><issn>1873-7196</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EEuXxDXjJJsF2EidZolIeUlE3ZW1N7DG4TeLWTpD696QqYos00t3ce6Q5hNxxlnLG5cMmtWPE_tNgTAXjecpkygQ7IzNelVlS8lqekxmrBUuyspaX5CrGDWO8nG5G1OIb2hEG53vqLQ3Y-QFpB64fsIdeI436CzuMtDnQXQuxA4r70bWuCW7sKPTQHqKL1PV07bfQwZY-Ld5XEwn04MMNubDQRrz9zWvy8bxYz1-T5erlbf64THRe5UNiizwTyBqBAuvSGi4L4LYxFauNsWUlOUhWS9CNyLG2eQnGFIWpEXItKhTZNbk_cXfB70eMg-pc1Ni20KMfo5qAPM94IYqpWp6qOvgYA1q1C66DcFCcqaNStVF_StVRqWJSTUqn5eNpidMn3w6DitrhJMm4gHpQxrt_GT9lg4Xd</recordid><startdate>20141101</startdate><enddate>20141101</enddate><creator>Utoh, Hiroyasu</creator><creator>Tobita, Kenji</creator><creator>Asakura, Nobuyuki</creator><creator>Sakamoto, Yoshiteru</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141101</creationdate><title>Evaluation of remote maintenance schemes by plasma equilibrium analysis in Tokamak DEMO reactor</title><author>Utoh, Hiroyasu ; Tobita, Kenji ; Asakura, Nobuyuki ; Sakamoto, Yoshiteru</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-f5432e0b2e2e97fd165a1fbd809ddf7861a6096acb24e9f47add55d9ea4c28e23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Cassettes</topic><topic>Coiling</topic><topic>DEMO</topic><topic>Divertor maintenance</topic><topic>Maintenance</topic><topic>Plasma equilibrium</topic><topic>Poloidal field coil</topic><topic>Ports</topic><topic>Reactors</topic><topic>Remote maintenance</topic><topic>Tokamak devices</topic><topic>Transport</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Utoh, Hiroyasu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tobita, Kenji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asakura, Nobuyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakamoto, Yoshiteru</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Fusion engineering and design</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Utoh, Hiroyasu</au><au>Tobita, Kenji</au><au>Asakura, Nobuyuki</au><au>Sakamoto, Yoshiteru</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of remote maintenance schemes by plasma equilibrium analysis in Tokamak DEMO reactor</atitle><jtitle>Fusion engineering and design</jtitle><date>2014-11-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>89</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2588</spage><epage>2593</epage><pages>2588-2593</pages><issn>0920-3796</issn><eissn>1873-7196</eissn><abstract>•The remote maintenance schemes in DEMO reactor were evaluated by the plasma equilibrium analysis.•Horizontal sector transport maintenance scheme requires the largest total PF coil current.•The difference of total PF coil current for MHD equilibrium in between the large segmented divertor maintenance and the segmentalized divertor maintenance was about 10%. The remote maintenance schemes in a DEMO reactor are categorized by insertion direction, blanket segmentation, and divertor maintenance scheme, and are quantitatively evaluated by analysing the plasma equilibrium. The positions of the poloidal field (PF) coil are limited by the size of the toroidal field (TF) coil and the maintenance port layout of each remote maintenance scheme. Because the PF coils are located near the larger TF coil and far from the plasma surface, the horizontal sector transport maintenance scheme requires the largest part of total PF coil current, 25% larger than that required for separated sector transport using vertical maintenance ports with segmented divertor maintenance (SDM). In the unsegmented divertor maintenance (UDM) scheme, the total magnetic stored energy in the PF coils at plasma equilibrium is about 30% larger than that stored in the SDM scheme, but the time required for removal and installation of all the divertor cassettes in the UDM scheme is roughly a third of that required in the SDM scheme because the number of divertor cassettes in the UDM scheme is a third of that in the SDM scheme. From the viewpoint of simple maintenance operations, the merit of the UDM scheme has more merit than the SDM scheme.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.fusengdes.2014.06.020</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0920-3796
ispartof Fusion engineering and design, 2014-11, Vol.89 (11), p.2588-2593
issn 0920-3796
1873-7196
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1651431525
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Cassettes
Coiling
DEMO
Divertor maintenance
Maintenance
Plasma equilibrium
Poloidal field coil
Ports
Reactors
Remote maintenance
Tokamak devices
Transport
title Evaluation of remote maintenance schemes by plasma equilibrium analysis in Tokamak DEMO reactor
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T08%3A56%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20remote%20maintenance%20schemes%20by%20plasma%20equilibrium%20analysis%20in%20Tokamak%20DEMO%20reactor&rft.jtitle=Fusion%20engineering%20and%20design&rft.au=Utoh,%20Hiroyasu&rft.date=2014-11-01&rft.volume=89&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2588&rft.epage=2593&rft.pages=2588-2593&rft.issn=0920-3796&rft.eissn=1873-7196&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2014.06.020&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1651431525%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1651431525&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0920379614004505&rfr_iscdi=true