The peaked response of transpiration rate to vapour pressure deficit in field conditions can be explained by the temperature optimum of photosynthesis

•Transpiration rate frequently decreases at high vapour pressure deficit.•In field conditions, vapour pressure deficit is strongly correlated with temperature.•Stomatal conductance depends on photosynthesis.•The decrease in photosynthesis at high temperature can lead to a decrease in transpiration a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Agricultural and forest meteorology 2014-06, Vol.189-190, p.2-10
Hauptverfasser: Duursma, Remko A., Barton, Craig V.M., Lin, Yan-Shih, Medlyn, Belinda E., Eamus, Derek, Tissue, David T., Ellsworth, David S., McMurtrie, Ross E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 10
container_issue
container_start_page 2
container_title Agricultural and forest meteorology
container_volume 189-190
creator Duursma, Remko A.
Barton, Craig V.M.
Lin, Yan-Shih
Medlyn, Belinda E.
Eamus, Derek
Tissue, David T.
Ellsworth, David S.
McMurtrie, Ross E.
description •Transpiration rate frequently decreases at high vapour pressure deficit.•In field conditions, vapour pressure deficit is strongly correlated with temperature.•Stomatal conductance depends on photosynthesis.•The decrease in photosynthesis at high temperature can lead to a decrease in transpiration at high vapour pressure deficit.•We test this hypothesis on whole-tree fluxes, and in response to elevated [CO2]. Leaf transpiration rate (E) frequently shows a peaked response to increasing vapour pressure deficit (D). The mechanisms for the decrease in E at high D, known as the ‘apparent feed-forward response’, are strongly debated but explanations to date have exclusively focused on hydraulic processes. However, stomata also respond to signals related to photosynthesis. We investigated whether the apparent feed-forward response of E to D in the field can be explained by the response of photosynthesis to temperature (T), which normally co-varies with D in field conditions. As photosynthesis decreases with increasing T past its optimum, it may drive a decrease in stomatal conductance (gs) that is additional to the response of gs to increasing D alone. If this additional decrease is sufficiently steep and coupling between A and gs occurs, it could cause an overall decrease in E with increasing D. We tested this mechanism using a gas exchange model applied to leaf-scale and whole-tree CO2 and H2O fluxes measured on Eucalyptus saligna growing in whole-tree chambers. A peaked response of E to D was observed at both leaf and whole-tree scales. We found that this peaked response was matched by a gas exchange model only when T effects on photosynthesis were incorporated. We conclude that field-based studies of the relationship between E and D need to consider signals related to changing photosynthetic rates in addition to purely hydraulic mechanisms.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.12.007
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1651407990</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0168192313003183</els_id><sourcerecordid>1635031390</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-976fd0c1dcb5518b8fed696a4746d2b9ae6cc973ccb77c15a70c27d6ece516893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1u1TAQhS0EEpfCM-ANEpsE2_lxsqwqKEiVuilryxlPqC-JbWyn4r4Iz4vDrbqlq9l85xxpPkLec1ZzxvtPx1r_iLOPK-ZaMN7UXNSMyRfkwAfZVEK07CU5FHKo-Cia1-RNSkfGuJByPJA_d_dIA-qfaGjEFLxLSP1Mc9QuBRt1tt7RcpBmTx908FukoZBpi0gNzhZsptbR2eJiKHhn7B5JFLSjE1L8HRZtXamfTjSXsYxrwFK4533Idt3WfTDc--zTyRUk2fSWvJr1kvDd470g3798vrv6Wt3cXn-7urypoO1ZrkbZz4YBNzB1HR-mYUbTj71uZdsbMY0ae4BRNgCTlMA7LRkIaXoE7MpDxuaCfDz3huh_bZiyWm0CXBbt0G9J8b7jLZPjyJ6BNh1rePMPlWcUok8p4qxCtKuOJ8WZ2qWpo3qSpnZpigtVpJXkh8cRnUAvc7EANj3FxdAIUbDCXZ45LM95sBhVAosO0NiIkJXx9r9bfwE97LXd</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1635031390</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The peaked response of transpiration rate to vapour pressure deficit in field conditions can be explained by the temperature optimum of photosynthesis</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Duursma, Remko A. ; Barton, Craig V.M. ; Lin, Yan-Shih ; Medlyn, Belinda E. ; Eamus, Derek ; Tissue, David T. ; Ellsworth, David S. ; McMurtrie, Ross E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Duursma, Remko A. ; Barton, Craig V.M. ; Lin, Yan-Shih ; Medlyn, Belinda E. ; Eamus, Derek ; Tissue, David T. ; Ellsworth, David S. ; McMurtrie, Ross E.</creatorcontrib><description>•Transpiration rate frequently decreases at high vapour pressure deficit.•In field conditions, vapour pressure deficit is strongly correlated with temperature.•Stomatal conductance depends on photosynthesis.•The decrease in photosynthesis at high temperature can lead to a decrease in transpiration at high vapour pressure deficit.•We test this hypothesis on whole-tree fluxes, and in response to elevated [CO2]. Leaf transpiration rate (E) frequently shows a peaked response to increasing vapour pressure deficit (D). The mechanisms for the decrease in E at high D, known as the ‘apparent feed-forward response’, are strongly debated but explanations to date have exclusively focused on hydraulic processes. However, stomata also respond to signals related to photosynthesis. We investigated whether the apparent feed-forward response of E to D in the field can be explained by the response of photosynthesis to temperature (T), which normally co-varies with D in field conditions. As photosynthesis decreases with increasing T past its optimum, it may drive a decrease in stomatal conductance (gs) that is additional to the response of gs to increasing D alone. If this additional decrease is sufficiently steep and coupling between A and gs occurs, it could cause an overall decrease in E with increasing D. We tested this mechanism using a gas exchange model applied to leaf-scale and whole-tree CO2 and H2O fluxes measured on Eucalyptus saligna growing in whole-tree chambers. A peaked response of E to D was observed at both leaf and whole-tree scales. We found that this peaked response was matched by a gas exchange model only when T effects on photosynthesis were incorporated. We conclude that field-based studies of the relationship between E and D need to consider signals related to changing photosynthetic rates in addition to purely hydraulic mechanisms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0168-1923</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2240</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.12.007</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AFMEEB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Biological and medical sciences ; Computational fluid dynamics ; Elevated CO2 ; Eucalyptus ; Fluid flow ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Gas exchange ; General agronomy. Plant production ; Optimization ; Photosynthesis ; Plant water use ; Stomatal control ; Temperature response ; Transpiration ; Vapor pressure</subject><ispartof>Agricultural and forest meteorology, 2014-06, Vol.189-190, p.2-10</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-976fd0c1dcb5518b8fed696a4746d2b9ae6cc973ccb77c15a70c27d6ece516893</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-976fd0c1dcb5518b8fed696a4746d2b9ae6cc973ccb77c15a70c27d6ece516893</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3177-5186</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168192313003183$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28322073$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Duursma, Remko A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barton, Craig V.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Yan-Shih</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Medlyn, Belinda E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eamus, Derek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tissue, David T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellsworth, David S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McMurtrie, Ross E.</creatorcontrib><title>The peaked response of transpiration rate to vapour pressure deficit in field conditions can be explained by the temperature optimum of photosynthesis</title><title>Agricultural and forest meteorology</title><description>•Transpiration rate frequently decreases at high vapour pressure deficit.•In field conditions, vapour pressure deficit is strongly correlated with temperature.•Stomatal conductance depends on photosynthesis.•The decrease in photosynthesis at high temperature can lead to a decrease in transpiration at high vapour pressure deficit.•We test this hypothesis on whole-tree fluxes, and in response to elevated [CO2]. Leaf transpiration rate (E) frequently shows a peaked response to increasing vapour pressure deficit (D). The mechanisms for the decrease in E at high D, known as the ‘apparent feed-forward response’, are strongly debated but explanations to date have exclusively focused on hydraulic processes. However, stomata also respond to signals related to photosynthesis. We investigated whether the apparent feed-forward response of E to D in the field can be explained by the response of photosynthesis to temperature (T), which normally co-varies with D in field conditions. As photosynthesis decreases with increasing T past its optimum, it may drive a decrease in stomatal conductance (gs) that is additional to the response of gs to increasing D alone. If this additional decrease is sufficiently steep and coupling between A and gs occurs, it could cause an overall decrease in E with increasing D. We tested this mechanism using a gas exchange model applied to leaf-scale and whole-tree CO2 and H2O fluxes measured on Eucalyptus saligna growing in whole-tree chambers. A peaked response of E to D was observed at both leaf and whole-tree scales. We found that this peaked response was matched by a gas exchange model only when T effects on photosynthesis were incorporated. We conclude that field-based studies of the relationship between E and D need to consider signals related to changing photosynthetic rates in addition to purely hydraulic mechanisms.</description><subject>Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Computational fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Elevated CO2</subject><subject>Eucalyptus</subject><subject>Fluid flow</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Gas exchange</subject><subject>General agronomy. Plant production</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Photosynthesis</subject><subject>Plant water use</subject><subject>Stomatal control</subject><subject>Temperature response</subject><subject>Transpiration</subject><subject>Vapor pressure</subject><issn>0168-1923</issn><issn>1873-2240</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkc1u1TAQhS0EEpfCM-ANEpsE2_lxsqwqKEiVuilryxlPqC-JbWyn4r4Iz4vDrbqlq9l85xxpPkLec1ZzxvtPx1r_iLOPK-ZaMN7UXNSMyRfkwAfZVEK07CU5FHKo-Cia1-RNSkfGuJByPJA_d_dIA-qfaGjEFLxLSP1Mc9QuBRt1tt7RcpBmTx908FukoZBpi0gNzhZsptbR2eJiKHhn7B5JFLSjE1L8HRZtXamfTjSXsYxrwFK4533Idt3WfTDc--zTyRUk2fSWvJr1kvDd470g3798vrv6Wt3cXn-7urypoO1ZrkbZz4YBNzB1HR-mYUbTj71uZdsbMY0ae4BRNgCTlMA7LRkIaXoE7MpDxuaCfDz3huh_bZiyWm0CXBbt0G9J8b7jLZPjyJ6BNh1rePMPlWcUok8p4qxCtKuOJ8WZ2qWpo3qSpnZpigtVpJXkh8cRnUAvc7EANj3FxdAIUbDCXZ45LM95sBhVAosO0NiIkJXx9r9bfwE97LXd</recordid><startdate>20140601</startdate><enddate>20140601</enddate><creator>Duursma, Remko A.</creator><creator>Barton, Craig V.M.</creator><creator>Lin, Yan-Shih</creator><creator>Medlyn, Belinda E.</creator><creator>Eamus, Derek</creator><creator>Tissue, David T.</creator><creator>Ellsworth, David S.</creator><creator>McMurtrie, Ross E.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3177-5186</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20140601</creationdate><title>The peaked response of transpiration rate to vapour pressure deficit in field conditions can be explained by the temperature optimum of photosynthesis</title><author>Duursma, Remko A. ; Barton, Craig V.M. ; Lin, Yan-Shih ; Medlyn, Belinda E. ; Eamus, Derek ; Tissue, David T. ; Ellsworth, David S. ; McMurtrie, Ross E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-976fd0c1dcb5518b8fed696a4746d2b9ae6cc973ccb77c15a70c27d6ece516893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Computational fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Elevated CO2</topic><topic>Eucalyptus</topic><topic>Fluid flow</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Gas exchange</topic><topic>General agronomy. Plant production</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Photosynthesis</topic><topic>Plant water use</topic><topic>Stomatal control</topic><topic>Temperature response</topic><topic>Transpiration</topic><topic>Vapor pressure</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Duursma, Remko A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barton, Craig V.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Yan-Shih</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Medlyn, Belinda E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eamus, Derek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tissue, David T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellsworth, David S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McMurtrie, Ross E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Agricultural and forest meteorology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Duursma, Remko A.</au><au>Barton, Craig V.M.</au><au>Lin, Yan-Shih</au><au>Medlyn, Belinda E.</au><au>Eamus, Derek</au><au>Tissue, David T.</au><au>Ellsworth, David S.</au><au>McMurtrie, Ross E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The peaked response of transpiration rate to vapour pressure deficit in field conditions can be explained by the temperature optimum of photosynthesis</atitle><jtitle>Agricultural and forest meteorology</jtitle><date>2014-06-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>189-190</volume><spage>2</spage><epage>10</epage><pages>2-10</pages><issn>0168-1923</issn><eissn>1873-2240</eissn><coden>AFMEEB</coden><abstract>•Transpiration rate frequently decreases at high vapour pressure deficit.•In field conditions, vapour pressure deficit is strongly correlated with temperature.•Stomatal conductance depends on photosynthesis.•The decrease in photosynthesis at high temperature can lead to a decrease in transpiration at high vapour pressure deficit.•We test this hypothesis on whole-tree fluxes, and in response to elevated [CO2]. Leaf transpiration rate (E) frequently shows a peaked response to increasing vapour pressure deficit (D). The mechanisms for the decrease in E at high D, known as the ‘apparent feed-forward response’, are strongly debated but explanations to date have exclusively focused on hydraulic processes. However, stomata also respond to signals related to photosynthesis. We investigated whether the apparent feed-forward response of E to D in the field can be explained by the response of photosynthesis to temperature (T), which normally co-varies with D in field conditions. As photosynthesis decreases with increasing T past its optimum, it may drive a decrease in stomatal conductance (gs) that is additional to the response of gs to increasing D alone. If this additional decrease is sufficiently steep and coupling between A and gs occurs, it could cause an overall decrease in E with increasing D. We tested this mechanism using a gas exchange model applied to leaf-scale and whole-tree CO2 and H2O fluxes measured on Eucalyptus saligna growing in whole-tree chambers. A peaked response of E to D was observed at both leaf and whole-tree scales. We found that this peaked response was matched by a gas exchange model only when T effects on photosynthesis were incorporated. We conclude that field-based studies of the relationship between E and D need to consider signals related to changing photosynthetic rates in addition to purely hydraulic mechanisms.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.12.007</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3177-5186</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0168-1923
ispartof Agricultural and forest meteorology, 2014-06, Vol.189-190, p.2-10
issn 0168-1923
1873-2240
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1651407990
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage
Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions
Biological and medical sciences
Computational fluid dynamics
Elevated CO2
Eucalyptus
Fluid flow
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Gas exchange
General agronomy. Plant production
Optimization
Photosynthesis
Plant water use
Stomatal control
Temperature response
Transpiration
Vapor pressure
title The peaked response of transpiration rate to vapour pressure deficit in field conditions can be explained by the temperature optimum of photosynthesis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T21%3A46%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20peaked%20response%20of%20transpiration%20rate%20to%20vapour%20pressure%20deficit%20in%20field%20conditions%20can%20be%20explained%20by%20the%20temperature%20optimum%20of%20photosynthesis&rft.jtitle=Agricultural%20and%20forest%20meteorology&rft.au=Duursma,%20Remko%20A.&rft.date=2014-06-01&rft.volume=189-190&rft.spage=2&rft.epage=10&rft.pages=2-10&rft.issn=0168-1923&rft.eissn=1873-2240&rft.coden=AFMEEB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.12.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1635031390%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1635031390&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0168192313003183&rfr_iscdi=true